Slashdot Mirror


Warcraft - From The Screen To The Board

Thanks to OgreCave for their article discussing the imminent arrival of the Warcraft-licensed board game, adapting Blizzard's classic RTS series for paper-gaming. They point to a new article on maker Fantasy Flight Games' site, where "...designer Kevin Wilson described his desire to have an endless variety of scenarios for the game, and how victory points and interchangable board pieces will make it possible." The game itself, shipping later this month, will have "13 board sections alone, helping bring the game's component count to over 400 pieces", but despite the large amount of units, an earlier article describes the design goal: "...to create a fun, relatively simple game that could be played in under 2 hours while still capturing enough of Warcraft's charm to have players yelling 'Zug zug!' and 'At your command, my Lord!'"

38 comments

  1. Warhammer? by array_one · · Score: 1

    If anything, this will just get more people interested in Warhammer.

    1. Re:Warhammer? by schild · · Score: 1

      Not likely. That's the sole purpose of it taking under 2 hours. I used to play Warhammer and let me just say that those games could feel like epic games of Risk in the days of yore. I for one would be glad to try out a Warcraft board game played like Warhammer as I have a good feeling it would be more fast paced and strategies could involve hundreds of pieces rather easily. That is to say, damn Blizzard is gonna make some cash money on this. Of course, getting me back to a warhammer like board game would be like tearing a fat kid from cake. It just ain't gonna happen. /Schild

      --
      schild
      editor, f13.net
    2. Re:Warhammer? by hibiki_r · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I really don't think so. This game seems to have nothing to do with a standard miniature game like warhammer. In fact, just the price difference makes the games completely different. A $30-$50 game is very different from spending a few hundred dollars per player, + the time investment of painting the miniatures, which appeals to some people, but is a no-no to many others.

      Warcraft does take a lot of artwork and race design from Warhammer, but the game mechanics have nothing to do with each other. Thus, a Warcraft boardgame will have very little to do with Warhammer. In fact, it doesn't even have miniatures!

  2. Sad by HunterZ · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    This is really sad. Because the Games category is not on the default list of viewable Slashdot article categories, noone but me reads these - well, myself and the two other persons who posted here that is. TPTB should either add Games to the default category list, or stop wasting effort posting Games articles. If noone is going to read these, then the time is better spent bringing us other kinds of news, IMHO.

    --
    Arguing about vi versus Emacs is like arguing whether it's better to make fire by rubbing sticks or banging rocks.
    1. Re:Sad by ZzzzSleep · · Score: 1
      Quoth HunterZ:
      If noone is going to read these, then the time is better spent bringing us other kinds of news, IMHO.

      Hey! Just because we lurkers don't post, doesn't mean that we're not interested in games news.
      /me turns lurk mode on again.
    2. Re:Sad by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I assume you mean on the left to choose "sections"? It's there in AC mode. Maybe accounts created before the category was added just don't see it.

    3. Re:Sad by DrEldarion · · Score: 1

      But then there'd be no room for such important headlines as "What Linus ate for breakfast this morning"!

      -- Dr. Eldarion --

    4. Re:Sad by Terminal+Saint · · Score: 1

      No one reads it? Bah. Hell, I've got games.slashdot.org as my homepage.

      --
      It's sad when choosing an installation directory on your own qualifies you as an "advanced user."
    5. Re:Sad by HunterZ · · Score: 1

      :D Thanks for chiming in everyone. I'm mystified that there are so few replies to every Games category article that I see, so I assume that they don't show up in the main list in the middle of the main slashdot.org page in AC mode (or maybe it's disabled in the default settings for registered users?). At any rate, something is amiss, but I'm glad to here that there are others out there (even if it cost me some karma to find them ;)

      --
      Arguing about vi versus Emacs is like arguing whether it's better to make fire by rubbing sticks or banging rocks.
    6. Re:Sad by simoniker · · Score: 1

      Sorry, noticed this late - yes, the Games subsection is only intended to be read by clickin the 'Games' section link on the left of the main page, so we get many fewer (but still significant amounts) of comments. Yay.

  3. Re:Mod me down, or something!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    clearly, you need a lot more attention than you are presently getting in your real life.

  4. Starcraft boardgame by JFMulder · · Score: 1

    I never was much of a Warcraft fan. This seem like a nice game though. I think I can put Starcraft on my wish list for a board game adaptation now. The Starcraft universe and story ir sooooo much richer than Warcraft. Maybe adapt the 3.5 edition rules and make an RPG out of it? I dunno how they'd pull it off, but hey, maybe it could happen, and be good!

    1. Re:Starcraft boardgame by array_one · · Score: 1

      starcraft is just a glorified ripoff of warhammer 40,000. you can find it here: www.games-workshop.com In case you dont notice right away, tyranids == zerg, space marines == terrans, eldar == protoss.

    2. Re:Starcraft boardgame by JFMulder · · Score: 1

      I heard about the Warhammer brand before, but never knew what it was about. I'll check into it. Thanks.

    3. Re:Starcraft boardgame by Drey · · Score: 1

      There /was/ an adaptation of StarCraft for TSR's Alternity setting.

  5. Oh, cruel fate! by Decaffeinated+Jedi · · Score: 1

    What kind of world do we live in where a Warcraft boardgame is going to see the light of day and Warcraft Adventures was canceled half-way through its production?

    --
    DecafJedi
    my weblog: apropos of something
    1. Re:Oh, cruel fate! by UltimaL337Star · · Score: 0

      The same world where Enter the matrix was seemingly WILLINGLY released by the wachowskiz and Full Throttle 2 was canceled. But also the same world where we have the internet and a GIGANTIC selection of porn.

    2. Re:Oh, cruel fate! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      the othergame has not been cancelled but has prbably been put on hold as they put out a board game to get people to like warcraft more so their marketing will increase on world of worcraft.

  6. Diversification by etherlad · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Wow, an MMORPG coming out, a pen-and-paper RPG from the good people at White Wolf, and now a board game. Blizzard's really putting their brand in as many pots as they can. Wonder if it'll pay off?

    --
    Soylens viridis homines es
    1. Re:Diversification by rabbit994 · · Score: 1

      Oh, the computer side will probably pay off big. Blizzard always does well with it's games.
      Don't know about the RPG and board game. Doesn't matter, if it flops it doesn't hurt them anyways.

  7. Alternative to WC Boardgame... by Tech+Paradox · · Score: 1

    Alternatively, you could go get a boxed set of Warhammer and play the game that the entire Warcraft universe ripped off...

  8. wc by B33R+N1NJ4 · · Score: 1

    So instead of players shouting "LAG!" or "Disconnected?!?!" They're shouting misc stuff "Me so horned, he hurt you long time" I see this as just warhammer with different styles of units. For people wanting starcraft... Warhammer 40k.. A lot of dice, measurements, etc. It'd be fun though to see Huntress's just appear out of nowhere from my ancient of war. I'd buy it, if it came pre-painted.

    1. Re:wc by Incoherent07 · · Score: 1

      No, I'd be shouting...

      "Join the army, they said."
      "See the world, they said."
      "I'd rather be sailing."

      "Who wants to sing?"

      Bonus points to the first person to tell me the source of those two sets of quotes...

      --
      This is my sig. There are many others like it, but this one is mine.
    2. Re:wc by wcbarksdale · · Score: 1

      RTFA. It's not a miniatures game, it's a board game with little wooden pieces.

    3. Re:wc by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's what the orc ships say when you click too many times.... Good Times.

  9. And new characters! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    I understand one of the pieces is a DMCA-WIELDING JACKBOOTED THUG!

    ~~~

  10. Two things by misuba · · Score: 2, Insightful
    1) To others in the thread that claim that Warcraft and Starcraft rip off Warhammer Fantasy and 40K, respectively: this rings about as hollow as White Wolf's recent suit against the producers of Underworld. Both are actually ripping off a common source - in this case, Tolkien - and unless you can make a case for more specific infringement, that's the rightful end of it.

    2) If a Warcraft board game will make Warcraft fans flock to Warhammer, why didn't Starcraft make Warcraft players pick up, say, Master of Orion? That's an imprecise analogy at best, but the point is that gameplay matters. Fantasy Flight (publishers of the Warcraft boardgame) appear to be focused on making a game that has the same sense of fun and action as the source material (unlike the publishers of the recent Age of Mythology board game, who focused on the resource management aspect to the detriment of everything else). The ponderous, crufty Warhammer rules base can't achieve any kind of a "real time" fell without major hacking. (The fact that such hacking is so common is a credit to Warhammer and its players... but my point stands.)

    --

    If you don't pretend to be anyone, are you?

  11. Settlers of Catan by Brown+Eggs · · Score: 1

    Did anyone hear Victory Point, see the board, and immediately think of Settlers of Catan? A funny "coincidence"