Slashdot Mirror


Fight Woodworking Piracy: Add EULA Restrictions

An anonymous reader writes "Ed Foster's Gripelog discusses EULA restriction on a new woodworking tool. A small woodworking tool manufacturer, Stots Corporation, includes a license agreement on its TemplateMaster jig tool. The tool is licensed, not sold, and customers cannot sell it or lend it to others. Nor can they sell or lend the jigs they make with it. "Shrinkwrap licenses are showing up everywhere," a reader recently wrote. "I just bought a jig for making dovetailing jigs -- this is woodworker talk if it's unfamiliar to you. The master jig contained a license that says I've licensed the master jig, not bought it. The license says I can't lend or sell the master, and furthermore I can't lend or sell the jigs I make with the master." The reader was referring to Stots Corporation of Harrods Creek, KY, and the user agreement for its TemplateMaster product. Sure enough, the Stots license says TemplateMaster may be used "in only one shop by the original purchaser only" and that "you may not allow individuals that did not purchase the original Product (to) use the Product or any templates produced using the Product..." A FAQ document on the Stots website explains that the license is necessary because "the purpose of the TemplateMaster is to clone itself. Therefore we are verifying your honesty that only you will use the tool and you will not be passing it around to others to use for free. It is exactly the same as the 'shrink wrap' agreement that comes with almost all computer software. Please help us fight 'tool piracy'."

26 of 662 comments (clear)

  1. Bah! by niko9 · · Score: 3, Funny

    Please help us fight 'tool piracy'.

    The only tool piracy crime being perpetraed is that the lawyers in that company are able to procreate without supervision.

    --

    1. Re:Bah! by lanswitch · · Score: 2, Funny

      But are you gonna be the supervisor? I'm not gonna watch that...

    2. Re:Bah! by ocelotbob · · Score: 3, Funny
      It's a small price to pay if it means fewer lawyers in this world. Of course, many of these lawyers need to say hello to my little friend...

      Of course, this is all MHO

      --

      Marxism is the opiate of dumbasses

    3. Re:Bah! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      Are any of those shots of whisky for the lawyer?

    4. Re:Bah! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      What are you? Some kind of comedian?

      Yeah, one, but it doesn't have any alcohol in it.

  2. Ladies and Gentlemen... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    ...Mastah Jig!

    Yo wazzup y'all! Mastah Jig in the house! Word!

  3. These seeds may not be planted by nuffle · · Score: 5, Funny

    The sesame seeds contained in this package are inteded for consumption by the purchaser only. You hereby agree not to plant these seeds. Help us prevent plant piracy!

  4. Rent a life! by capt.Hij · · Score: 5, Funny

    This is great! Pretty soon I can go through life without owning everything, and everything I use will essentially be rented. I will be relieved of the material need to own things. "Imagine a world with no posessions."

    Not only that, if I get caught breaking the drug laws, the feds can't take anything that I own since I won't own anything. Best of all, when I get tired of my wife and daughter I just have to stop paying the license fees.

    I'm free! Free! Free! This is better than living in New Hampshire!

    Wife and daughter... Oh cr4p. I don't own anything anyway. This is bogus...

    1. Re:Rent a life! by skinfitz · · Score: 4, Funny

      This is great! Pretty soon I can go through life without owning everything, and everything I use will essentially be rented. I will be relieved of the material need to own things. "Imagine a world with no posessions."

      Hey don't knock it - Buddhists have been doing this for centuries.

  5. EULA killing AI by t4b00 · · Score: 2, Funny

    Consider Artificial Intelligence might never happen because if this kind of thing, bots could be unable to "clone themselves" due to End User License Agreement.

    Poetry in motion

  6. Re:Don't you get protections with a licensed produ by AKnightCowboy · · Score: 3, Funny
    So if you break your jig, or it gets stolen, you can phone up and ask for a replacement.

    Why not just make a backup copy of it? If the whole point of it is to replicate itself then you can use it to make a backup of itself. Then if it breaks, just use the backup... or use the backup exclusively and store the original in a safe location. Or store your backup on Karpentryzaa (har har) for secure off-site backup.

  7. Re:And don't tear about that antique dresser now! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    Isn't it a violation of digital protection mechanisms when you hit your thumb with a hammer?

  8. I should license my own tool by webslacker · · Score: 4, Funny

    My tool has been used by way too many women far too long to make duplicates of me. In addition to charging women for the use of my instrument, I will require that they only use my hardware for personal use and not for creating pirated copies of myself.

    1. Re:I should license my own tool by AVee · · Score: 5, Funny

      Well, use a shrink-wrap license, if there aren't holes in the license it should work perfectly...

  9. Oh shit by garethwi · · Score: 3, Funny

    I just lent my son a hammer for his school woodworking project.

    If anyone asks for me, I'm in Mexico.

  10. Re:Patents, not shrinkwrap licenses by switched4OSX · · Score: 2, Funny

    Screw the 20 story window. Throw the lawyer out of a 2nd story window, repeatedly. No use letting him die quick.

  11. Re:Can't do it. by HAL9OOO · · Score: 2, Funny

    If this catches on I suggest you dump your E-Bay stock! I mean if you don't own it, how can you sell it?

  12. "Aah, my woodwork!" by Compact+Dick · · Score: 2, Funny

    Where's the "I'm not supposed to get jigs in it!" troll when you need him?

  13. Re:Forget Jigs... try Soy Sauce by kfg · · Score: 5, Funny

    I might point out that the technical term for a soybean seed is. . . "soybean."

    KFG

  14. Re:Can't do it. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    Obviously this has been a huge problem for jib makers for hundreds of years, which is why there are no more jig makers and this jig maker had to design their jib entirely from scratch with no prior knowledge of any other jig.

    Oh wait.

  15. Look at the silly monkey by BorgDrone · · Score: 5, Funny

    The only tool piracy crime being perpetraed is that the lawyers in that company are able to procreate without supervision.

    They aren't very smart either (or, alternatively, they are very smart).

    From the article:
    The master jig contained a license that says I've licensed the master jig, not bought it.
    (...)
    the Stots license says TemplateMaster may be used "in only one shop by the original purchaser only" and that "you may not allow individuals that did not purchase the original Product (to) use the Product (...)
    (emphasis mine)

    So you're not buying the product, and are not allowed to let anyone who didn't buy the product use it.
    Ladies and gentlemen of the supposed jury, that does not make sense.!

  16. Happy birthday to you... by yanestra · · Score: 4, Funny
    Copyrighted:
    Happy Birthday to You, the four-line ditty was written as a classroom greeting in 1893 by two Louisville teachers, Mildred J. Hill, an authority on Negro spirituals, and Dr. Patty Smith Hill, professor emeritus of education at Columbia University.
    The melody of the song Happy Birthday to You was composed by Mildred J. Hill, a schoolteacher born in Louisville, KY, on June 27, 1859. The song was first published in 1893, with the lyrics written by her sister, Patty Smith Hill, as "Good Morning To All."

    Happy Birthday to You was copyrighted in 1935 and renewed in 1963. The song was apparently written in 1893, but first copyrighted in 1935 after a lawsuit (reported in the New York Times of August 15, 1934, p.19 col. 6)

    In 1988, Birch Tree Group, Ltd. sold the rights of the song to Warner Communications (along with all other assets) for an estimated $25 million (considerably more than a song). (reported in Time, Jan 2, 1989 v133 n1 p88(1)

    In the 80s, the song Happy Birthday to You was believed to generate about $1 million in royalties annually. With Auld Lang Syne and For He's a Jolly Good Fellow, it is among the three most popular songs in the English language. (reported in Time, Jan 2, 1989 v133 n1 p88(1)

    Happy Birthday to You continues to bring in approximately 2 million dollars in licensing revenue each year, at least as of 1996 accounting, according to Warner Chappell and a Forbes magazine article. [Source]

    Don't you ever think, something's for free in the United States of America!
  17. What's next? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    A EULA restriction on a metal lathe because it can be used to make another lathe?

    A license agreement on a ruler?

  18. Logical end to this? Naw... by tacarat · · Score: 2, Funny

    "These condoms may only be used for hetersexual sex in the Classic Missionary position. We reserve the right to monitor and record any and all incidences of use for compliance. For more information on our privacy policy..."

    "These fertility drugs may only be used to produce intelligent children. Producing stupid children violates the terms of this agreement. This agreement can be terminated by either party without notice. Upon termination, all children and remaining medicinal doses must be immediately destroyed or returned to the manufacturer..."
    =====

    --
    "Common sense will be the death of us all"
  19. Re:Don't you get protections with a licensed produ by willtsmith · · Score: 4, Funny

    We need a service whereby illiterate people open all our software for us. In such a case, they cannot claim that we agreed to the license, nor could our agents as they cannot read ;-)

    --
    -------- -------- Support Wesley Clark for president!!!
  20. Re:EULA is not a contract by Dogtanian · · Score: 3, Funny

    one should not reasonably expect to make a living selling a product who's purpose is to replicate itself

    I was thinking about dabbling in the slave trade, but you've persuaded me otherwise...

    --
    "Slashdot - News and Chat Sites Deviant". (Click "homepage" link above for details).