Amazon Launches Full Text Book Search
m00nun1t writes "Amazon have launched a new service that allows you to search the full text of books. This sounds like an incredibly useful function as well as technically impressive at this scale. I wonder if a patent is in the works." Or if a patent is already owned.
I can almost hear the screams of joy from the underground book pirates.
How easy can this service be abused, with automatic webbots doing the searching?
I can imagine there might be filters, time limits, and max searchs/day limits for something of this scale, no?
user@host$ diff
Even though he said he was 'blown away' by Amazon's new Search Inside the Book feature, Tim O'Reilly has decided not to participate in the program for now. 'If they end up being a Google for published content...we need to think better about what publishers get out of it,' he said.
There's books about everything:
."
Encyclopedia of New Media : An Essential Reference to Communication and Technology -- Steve Jones (Editor); Hardcover
Excerpt from page 0: ". . . post-ranking system used by members the of Web message board Slashdot.org, began as a result of community self- restraint in the face of unrelenting trolls (pointlessly hostile posters). In addition, some cyberspace forums now require . .
See more references to slashdot troll in this book.
It is really nice, I was using amazon right as they switched it one.
I was searching for books on Object Role Modeling(ORM), I had first done a search for ORM and did not find anything of interest. They then switched it on while I did a search of 'Object Role Modeling', this poped up a few books with the text where it was being used.
Why do I need to enter a credit card number?
We require credit card information for security purposes only. We will not charge your credit card account any fees for using the Search Inside the Book feature.
Uhuh. Security. Whose?
Yeah, I want to be financially secure too !
Some web sites have 100's of A4 pages, but google still returns in a jiffy. I'm pretty sure their book collection is well indexed, if they're offering this service. Probably with the google engine, too.
Daniel
Carpe Diem
Neat idea, but some excerpts come out all wrong:
See this for example...
Mass-OCR'ing has it's drawbacks..
Slashdot: stuff for news, nerds that matter, matter for news, stuff that nerd
Umm, maybe you missed the point. It allows me to find others who are stealing from *me*
When you pass off somone else's ideas as those of your own it's called plagiarism.
I'm not suing them for any monetary damages. Just a requirement that my own work be attributed to me.
The music itself is free, but quality recordings on MP3s are still being sold only as CDs, and are NOT available online for free. Thus, if I want to find quality classical music, I need to find a good recording, and that implies either piracy or buying a CD.
Whereas if I want H.G. Wells' The Time Machine, I am one click away from a quality MS Reader version of it.
Thus, your searches will tend to return more results from books that are fully indexed.
Now that I think about it - this is a major incentive for publishers to get their books indexed.
...are included in the search?
A check on "the clocks were striking thirteen" yields seventeen hits, including the Cliff's Notes to Nineteen Eighty-Four and a reference in the Oxford Dictionary of Modern Quotations...
but none to Orwell's Nineteen Eighty-Four itself.
We must conclude that the coverage is spotty.
"How to Do Nothing," kids activities, back in print!
Yes, but searching pages scanned/OCR'ed and highlighting the keywords has been a feature of Google search for a long time:
Google Catalogs (Beta)
It's very probable that they licensed the Catalog Search technology from Google.
---
Support Mozilla. Buy the CD.
Google has a prior art for this, and maybe they have the patent too:
Google Catalogs
---
Support Mozilla. Buy the CD.
If you can read 5 pages of text per search, couldn't you just continually search for a phrase on the 5th page, allowing you to read any book for free with a decent amount of effort?
GL