Slashdot Mirror


Star Trek Enterprise Tested to Mach 5

Sporkinum writes "University of Queensland Laser Diagnostics Dept has a page where they put the Enterprise through the gauntlet in a mach 5 wind tunnel. It did surprisingly well."

29 of 707 comments (clear)

  1. Good to know... by Squeebee · · Score: 5, Funny

    I was planning to use a scale model of the Enterprise as a hood ornament for my SR-71 Blackbird.

  2. Thank goodness the Enterprise is aerodynamic. by gpinzone · · Score: 5, Funny

    All that wind resistance in space could have meant certain doom for the crew!

  3. Simple... by nebaz · · Score: 5, Funny

    We all know that simply rerouting the EPS conduit to emit a low level anti-tachyon beam will nullify any damage space junk will create.

    --
    Rhymes that keep their secrets will unfold behind the clouds.There upon the rainbow is the answer to a neverending story
    1. Re:Simple... by hellfire · · Score: 4, Funny

      But not if the space junk is actually a highly evolved space-dwelling creature which was currently unknown before and cannot be detected with sensors. If that's the case, they'll need to uncouple the Heisenberg compensator.

      --

      "All great wisdom is contained in .signature files"

    2. Re:Simple... by MoxCamel · · Score: 4, Funny
      We all know that simply rerouting the EPS conduit to emit a low level anti-tachyon beam will nullify any damage space junk will create.

      Fool! You forgot to route it through the deflector array!

    3. Re:Simple... by gid13 · · Score: 5, Funny

      Officer: "Do you know how fast you were going?" Heisenberg: "No, but I know EXACTLY where I was"

    4. Re:Simple... by WNight · · Score: 4, Funny

      Well, it sounds stupid, but they only used charged neutrons! :)

  4. definitions? by flynt · · Score: 4, Funny

    How is ending up broken into a dozen pieces considered doing "suprisingly well"???

  5. Re:What does this matter if... by Doomrat · · Score: 5, Funny

    More to the point, there is no Starship Enterprise, freak.

  6. Page is over 3 years old by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    <!--This file created 3/29/00 9:54 AM by Claris Home Page version 3.0-->

    Nice to see some up-to-date stuff here on Slashdot.

    1. Re:Page is over 3 years old by Linker3000 · · Score: 5, Funny

      '00 could be 3000 - maybe the page hasn't been created yet and it's just appeared to us through a rift in the time-space continuum.

      Really!

      --
      AT&ROFLMAO
  7. Last picture by British · · Score: 4, Funny

    I really guess "She canna take it anymore!"

  8. Bah! by DrEldarion · · Score: 4, Funny

    I want to see them try this with the Borg cube.

  9. Its a trap! by chobee · · Score: 5, Funny

    This is like an uber-geek/nerd role call.

  10. Mach 5? pffft.... by PissingInTheWind · · Score: 4, Funny

    5 times the speed of sound is just about 0.0005% of the speed of light. That's not a conslusive test, it's like doing a car crash test at a speed of around 5 millimeters per hour.

    I hope they realize they still have a *lot* of work to do.

    --

    A message from the system administrator: 'I've upped my priority. Now up yours.'
    1. Re:Mach 5? pffft.... by broller · · Score: 4, Funny

      5 times the speed of sound is just about 0.0005% of the speed of light.

      Duh, it was a SCALE MODEL. The real one has survived a lot more than Mach 5. Sheesh!

      Oh, and how often do you think the real Enterprise travels at the speed of light in an atomosphere?

    2. Re:Mach 5? pffft.... by mchappee · · Score: 4, Funny

      >>it's like doing a car crash test at a speed of around 5 millimeters per hour.

      Which would result in about $2000.00 damage to any modern car. Dirty bastards...


      Matthew

      --
      /. finds me to be 20% Troll, 80% Funny
    3. Re:Mach 5? pffft.... by Fulcrum+of+Evil · · Score: 4, Funny

      Oh, and how often do you think the real Enterprise travels at the speed of light in an atomosphere?

      At most, once.

      --
      "We returned the General to El Salvador, or maybe Guatemala, it's difficult to tell from 10,000 feet"
  11. Re:Scotty by GMontag · · Score: 4, Funny

    Of course! Scotty is an Engineer and Kirk is just management, silly.

  12. Star Trek OS by Reverend528 · · Score: 5, Funny

    For a second I misread it and thought that the article would be about Star Trek OS, Enterprise Edition running on a Mach 5 Microkernel. Imagine my disappointment.

  13. This is pretty wild... by DarkSarin · · Score: 4, Funny

    I personally find this great. After all, I know that's exactly what I would do if I had a wind tunnel. I would also be testing the aerodynamic properties of the Millenium Falcon (which was designed for atmospheric travel), and numerous other fictitious "space ships". I would probably also test aluminum cans, coke bottles, penguins (after all I want to know how fast a penguin can go, having played too much tux racer), and numerous other objects.

    Of course, this is the exact reason no one wants to give me access to a wind tunnel! I'd probably break it.

    --
    "We don't know what we are doing, but we are doing it very carefully,..." Wherry, R.J. Personnel Psychology (1995)
  14. Re:Amazing by rjelks · · Score: 4, Funny

    You damn green-blooded vulcans are always trying to hold us humans back.

  15. Re:What does this matter if... by squiggleslash · · Score: 5, Funny
    "The star ship is only two inches tall! Hahaha, a very clever deception indeed!"

    I know it's an actual starship, it says so in the historical documents ;-)

    --
    You are not alone. This is not normal. None of this is normal.
  16. Re:What does this matter if... by Chaset · · Score: 5, Funny
    Don't get me wrong - I love fiction and escapism, I just think that the line between it and reality should be kept blurred.

    This looks like the opposite of what you're advocating. I think you meant the line should be kept clear.

    Now pardon me while I try to get this holodeck simulation to terminate.

    "Computer, End program!"

    "Computer!"

    "Computer!?"

    "End this simulation, NOW!"

    ..Crap, I'm still here.

    --
    -- "This world is a comedy to those who think, a tragedy to those who feel."
  17. Re:A nifty little visualization of a wind tunnel.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Funny

    In Mozilla, you need to download the newest CVS build. Then, apply the patch described in attachment #15 to bug #1378805. Then recompile with the APPLET_EXP_SUPPORT flag turned on. Run the moztest_applet_enable program to fix the resultant binary, and you're all set!

    Isn't open source grand?

  18. Re:Eh? by pmz · · Score: 4, Funny

    Warp 1 is stated to be c in both the TOS and TNG warp scales in the Star Trek TNG Technical Manual.

    Okay, of all of us who actually do own both manuals, who are proud of it and who are slightly ashamed of it? I was proud of it, but now I tend to keep them hidden...

  19. Re:What does this matter if... by Tattva · · Score: 4, Funny
    In space no one can hear you squeal with geekish delight...

    --
    personal attacks hurt, especially when deserved
  20. Well duh by jazman · · Score: 5, Funny

    Of course it blew up. They didn't have the deflector dish or the shields activated. Any idiot would know without them that it would blow up as soon as it started moving at any significant speed.

    I'd like to see them retest with shields and deflector - then let's see how well it performs!

  21. Re:Think before you post... by Lumpy · · Score: 4, Funny

    Get a life.

    Mister Shatner? is that you?

    --
    Do not look at laser with remaining good eye.