Slashdot Mirror


Panther Problem Roundup

An anonymous reader writes "SecureMac has posted an advisory on Mac OS X 10.3 Panther's screen lock. Apparently, to a limited degree, keys being pressed before the authentication window pops-up are sent to the currently logged-in user's environment. Note: Security Update 2003-10-28 version 1.0, which was released shortly after the advisory's release, does not fix this issue, but rather a hole in QuickTime for Java." Another anonymous reader writes "A problem with Panther has been found with external FireWire drives, that causes FireWire disk partitions in Panther above 137GB to be shown as corrupt after a reboot, in most cases being entirely unaccessible and unusable." And as a public service to all you mail rebels, I found out -- for me, anyway -- how to send email under Eudora without crashing.

28 of 149 comments (clear)

  1. Other Resources by daeley · · Score: 4, Informative

    As usual, MacInTouch is doing a great job of staying on top of the issues. Also, Mac OS X Hints has been flooded with loads of new Panther hints the past few days.

    --
    I watched C-beams glitter in the dark near the Tannhauser gate.
  2. Roll on X.3.1 by gsdali · · Score: 2, Informative

    I'm quite happy to let others uncover the bugs first. Although so far bugs and incompatibilities seem to be thin on the ground so far.

    1. Re:Roll on X.3.1 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      Better not wait too long, 10.2's already EOL.

      http://zdnet.com.com/2100-1104_2-5098688.html?tag= zdfd.newsfeed

      No more updates. Sorry bub, $129 annual fee, please.

  3. IBook + System Load + Battery Life by krisp · · Score: 2, Informative

    Since ive installed 10.3, ive noticed my system load hovers around 2.7 and my battery life seems far reduced. In 10.2 my load was always close to 0, and my battery lasted 5 hours atleast. Now I'm lucky to get 2.5 hours.

    No major changes other than the OS upgrade have been preformed.

    Anyone else notice their battery life drop?

    1. Re:IBook + System Load + Battery Life by tomcio.s · · Score: 2, Informative

      I found the opposite. My system seems to get better battery life with Panther..

      Strange.

    2. Re:IBook + System Load + Battery Life by Smitty825 · · Score: 4, Informative

      In the terminal, run "top -u" to see what process is taking up all the CPU time. If your processor is running at 100% for hours on end, then that's why you are getting less battery life! Panther slightly improved my battery life on my 15" AlBook.

      --

      Doh!
    3. Re:IBook + System Load + Battery Life by kageryu255 · · Score: 4, Informative

      I've seen increased battery life too. Try resetting your power manager? (cmd-option-p-r on some systems, others you have to push and hold a reset button.. check apple.com/support and search for "power manager" and your laptop type)

    4. Re:IBook + System Load + Battery Life by Biotech9 · · Score: 2, Informative

      I have the same spec as you, and I can pull 5 plus hours out of the bag with panther. Try doing battery exercises, fill it, drain it, and as it is ending reduce all power usage (turn all programs off and kill the lights. Reset the PV ram and fill it up. I'm very unlucky if i dont get at least 3.5 hours with panther.

  4. Screen goes black after install by godawful · · Score: 4, Informative

    Another problem affecting a group of users (myself included) involves Sawtooth G4's with upgraded video cards.. these shipped with ATI 128's (and 128 Pro's I think). But many users swapped those cards out for nVidia cards (GeForce 2 mx etc) as these cards could do Quartz Extreme and were relatively cheap.. unfortunately, after installing panther on these setups it wont boot anymore.

    The work are some work arounds but they all have draw backs. one fix is to remove all but 256 megs of ram from your computer.. things will return to normal then, but you'll be stuck with 256 megs of ram.. or you for some, you can copy over the old drivers from a previous version of os x, unfortunately you lose QE support then. or, the wisest, stick with 10.2 for the time being.. it remains to be seen if apple will take care of this problem.. i hope they do.

    i tried doing the 256 megs of ram thing for a couple days, but it was just too slow, so this morning i went back to 10.2

    --
    Live EVERY week... Like it's Shark Week
  5. 137GB is a common problem by devphil · · Score: 5, Informative


    I've learned more than I ever wanted to know about the "137GB barrier" after buying a driver larger than that and discovering the hard way that neither Linux 2.4.22, nor Win2K, nor my BIOS, were prepared to see anything larger than that number. It's definitely not a Mac-only problem.

    Basically, the standard LBA addressing mode uses 28 bits to hold an address/offset, which means you can only see 137 gigs. There are 48-bit LBA devices out there, nearly all of them PCI controller card, but support for those is either spotty or widespread, depending on which shill you talk to. I eventually got mine working under both OSes.

    Usually, however, lack of support means that the device shows up as only being 137GB, not that the partitions are corrupted. Ick.

    --
    You cannot apply a technological solution to a sociological problem. (Edwards' Law)
    1. Re:137GB is a common problem by pudge · · Score: 2, Informative

      I got a new 160GB FW drive today, hooked it up to newly upgraded Panther PowerBook. It sees 152.61 GB capacity and free (which is what 160GB where K=1000 instead of 1024 works out to, approximately). Now, feeling brave, I try my previous 160GB FW drive (both are Maxtor), and ... 152.65GB capacity, 11.2GB free. So ... works for me!(tm)

    2. Re:137GB is a common problem by Oniros · · Score: 3, Informative

      The problem is not with any size barrier.

      Some people had the problem with 80 GB firewire drives. At the present it is not known what is causing the problem with some firewire drives. No distinct pattern as emerged as far as drive size, manifacturer, firewire chipset, etc. goes. It seems Apple is investigating the issue as some people who were affected by the problem were contacted by Apple.
      For more information on this issue, check MacFixIt:
      http://www.macfixit.com/article.php?sto ry=20031029 03070357

    3. Re:137GB is a common problem by hype7 · · Score: 2, Informative

      Apple is trying to get a handle on this problem - if you have a FW hard drive and have experience the bug, post it over here
      http://discussions.info.apple.com/webx?13@@.599b4a 59/84

      There's a good thread over here with a lot of angry people in it :) If you have a F/W hard drive, if it's at all important - I would recommend keeping it away from Panther during installation, start up or shut down, or log in. If it's really important stuff, I'd either not install Panther or keep the hard drive unplugged altogether until a fix is forthcoming.

      -- james

  6. Re:uControl doesn't work by kageryu255 · · Score: 4, Informative

    Check versiontracker.com, uControl was updated a day or two ago.

  7. 95% of my problems went away with... by DebianDog · · Score: 4, Informative
    a good cache cleaning and a rebind. My biggest issue is no more Sorenson 3. I have put up a page on the Unofficial iMovie FAQ to help people out without having to buy Cocktail or something.

    A few tips there too ;-)
    --
    Daniel C. Slagle
    Keeper of the "Unofficial" iMovie FAQ
    Tell Apple how you feel about iMovie

  8. Re:Wow am I glad I didnt update yet by mrgeometry · · Score: 2, Informative

    Panther works just dandy on my laptop, not that I'm a power user or anything.

    BUT, I just noticed one of my iPod cables is fraying! (The cable with the "wired remote" is fraying just above the plaug that goes into the iPod.) WTF!!!

    As far as utilities and programs not working---well, (1) that's not much of a surprise, there, now is it? and (2) there are many, many, many, many more of them now than there were when 10.1 morphed into Jaguar. So I'd suspect that the vast majority of things that don't work are not things for Apple to worry about, and they'll just get fixed when the developers get around to it; and maybe some things *are* because of Apple bugs, but not most.

    For example, someone said uControl doesn't work. Well, gosh. I sincerely hope it gets fixed soon, but is it Apple's "fault" that they changed and updated all the APIs and stuff?

    Anyway, there are enough *real* bugs to go around... programs that stopped working is just a distraction.

    Plus my ipod cable. Grrrrrr. Let's see if this Scotch tape can hold it together?...

    zach

  9. D'oh. by kageryu255 · · Score: 2, Informative

    Said update didn't include panther compatibility.

    1. Re:D'oh. by polyhue · · Score: 2, Informative

      If you check out the dev's site he said he's gonna get working on it, hasn't set up 10.3 yet. I believe some have theorized it's due to upping gcc from 3.1 to 3.3. Or something along those lines...

      It's a showstopper for me as well, but all the other problems arising are also now a showstopper. I think I'm waiting for 10.3.1.

  10. Japanese Input + Safari Cursor by Quobobo · · Score: 2, Informative

    I've noticed that on my 10.3 upgrade install, Japanese input is sort of flaky. I use the caps lock to switch between Japanese alphabets, and this feature often fails to work.

    Also, Safari seems to have issues sometimes when it runs into animation-heavy sites. The cursor stops updating its icon (like when you move it over a link, it doesn't change), and Safari itself has troubles going to the links you try to click on.

    One more thing (although this is just a pet peeve): when you navigate to any of the "special" folders like Pictures, Movies, Documents or whatever inside your Home folder in Column view, you can't scroll to the left anymore. This is especially annoying when you're in an Open/Save dialogue.

  11. Re:Mail.app and self-signed certs by ZerothAngel · · Score: 3, Informative
    Which keychain did you add the certificate too? I was disappointed when I added the cert to my personal keychain and was still warned by Mail. But after reading this more closely, it seems I missed an important step. You're supposed to add it to the X509Anchors keychain when prompted. After I did this, Mail stopped complaining about my server's certificate.

    But as you mentioned, the hard part is option dragging the certificate to your Desktop, because Mail tends to lock up. One way to get the certificate for your mail server is to use openssl. Specifically:
    openssl s_client -connect mail.server:993
    Somewhere in all that text, you should see a -----BEGIN CERTIFICATE----- and -----END CERTIFICATE-----. Just copy & paste everything between the two markers (including the markers) into a file with the .cer extension and then just follow steps 3 & 4 of Apple's article.

    Though I haven't had 100% success. On one of my Macs, I found that adding the cert to X509Anchors was not listed as an option. I manually added the keychain to Keychain Access (the file is in /System/Library/Keychains) and added the cert that way, but I found that it still wasn't being recognized. I haven't investigated any more, since it's only a minor annoyance at this point...
  12. Re:Mail.app and self-signed certs by nate_drake · · Score: 2, Informative
  13. Font Book issues by Phrogz · · Score: 2, Informative
    Messing with Font Book messes up Panther. Screwed up (and eventually fixed) two machines now.
    1. Set Font Book to Copy fonts when added (rather than moving) and that Disabling a set should disable all the fonts in it.
    2. Create a new set. Disable it. (Be annoyed the Font Book makes you confirm every freaking action the first time. "Are you sure you want to turn this on? Are you sure you want to turn this off? Are you sure you know what you're doing?")
    3. Drag Adobe Font Folio (600 fonts) into the set.
    4. Reboot. Notice that it takes 5+ minutes to get past the login screen, and Mail takes 100% CPU for 15 minutes and does nothing.
    5. Be annoyed to discover that despite previous setting, fonts added to a disabled set are enabled. Select all and disable them. (Wait a long time on a Dual GHz G4.)
    6. You should now be in the same state as you started, right? Wrong.
    7. Reboot. Notice that things still go somewhat slowly, but eventually open. Sometimes apps hang and take 100% CPU trying to launch. Sometimes you force quit them and they start right up on the next launch.
    8. Look in ~/Library/Fonts and discover 2,500 files.
    9. Attempt to delete the disabled fonts. (Manually, because you can't sort by enabled/disabled.) Be really annoyed at how long it takes to update things.
    10. Find out that halfway through the deletion process, Font Book hangs. Restart. Find your fonts in a higgeldy-piggeldy state.
    11. Install Panther on a new drive, boot into that, delete Font Book prefs and manually restore all fonts to their proper initial set.
    12. Vow never to touch Font Book again until it's patched.
  14. Firewire corruption issue specific to FW800 by cremes · · Score: 2, Informative

    I can confirm this bug exists in Panther. If a FW800 drive (usually an Oxford 922 controller) is plugged into a FW400 port, the drive will be irrecoverably corrupted upon reboot.

    Plugging the same FW800 drive directly into a FW800 port on the machine skirts the problem (though the damaged filesystem is still lost forever).

    Plugging FW400 into a FW400 port has no problems.

    In sum, this is specific to FW800 enclosures plugging into FW400 ports under Panther.

    cr

  15. Re:TCP Timestamp? by gerardrj · · Score: 4, Informative

    Well, it can tell you several things. Those things are not very useful in themselves, but they can aid you in determining the system configuration:

    1. Server or desktop/workstation. Desktop systems are rebooted quite regularly. Servers tend to stay up for weeks to months.

    2. From the uptime you may make some inferences about the OS on the machine. A machine with a year of uptime is likely a SUN, HP, IBM, etc "big iron" machine. Basially you know it's not windows so you can skip all those attacks.

    3. If a machine isn't rebooted often, there probably isn't a monitor attached to it so no-one is looking directly at it very often. Sure there may be load monitors and such, but unless you do something harsh the extra CPU load won't get noticed. Whereas a desktop system intrusion may be noticed by the user via slow downs or "hiccups" in GUI response.

    4. If an OS constantly uses the same timestamp for TCP packets, that's a dead giveaway as to the system/OS that's running.

    Much of this comes down to "security by obscurity", which while not a viable mechinism in it's own right, is quite valuable when combined with other techniques. You want your TCP stack to give away as little information to a potential attacker as possible. The less they know, the more they have to search and the more likely you will find them before they get in the system.

    --
    Article X: The powers not delegated... by the Constitution...are reserved...to the people
  16. Re:Lost Windows Share browser by good+soldier+svejk · · Score: 2, Informative

    I don't see how this ever worked for you. I was never able to get Jaguar to browse across subnets. And this Apple technote says, "SMB browsing is only supported on the local subnet."

    Are you authenticating against Active Directory or something?

    --
    It is cowardly, and a betrayal of whatever it means to be a Jew, to act as a white man

    -James Baldwin
  17. All I hear is whining... by jeeves99 · · Score: 4, Informative

    The ringing in my ears comes from three distinct camps.

    1. Those who are peeved that their super-specific, GUI or API-hacking freeware no longer works.

    2. Those who crammed their heads up their asses and used the "archive and install" or upgrade methods to put Panther on.

    3. Those elite few who have found a legitimate bug in panther.

    My answers are...

    1. "Umm, duh?" If the API I is no longer there, of course your freeware hack won't work. Its not apple's fault, so why blame them? We've gone through this on every major upgrade since system 6. If apple had to keep every API in each upgrade, macOSX would be as unstable as windows. Wait a week until your freeware developer updates the application to utilize the new API and then upgrade to panther. What's the problem?

    2. Apple's use of point release numbers (10.1, 10.2, 10.3) is quite misleading. All three really change a lot under the hood and as such upgrading is a really messy process. If you expect and demand a stable OS, then manually backup your data and do a clean install. This should be common practice. Sure, its convenient to upgrade, but if you are browsing slashdot, you should have enough computer savvy to do a proper clean install.

    3. Thank you for finding an error. I assume you've posted a bug report to apple? For the benefit of the rest of us, if you could post your system configuration, hardware, etc that'd be really useful for troubleshooting the problem. As always, the next point-point release (10.3.1) will solve a lot of the problems that people report.

    Shouting "apple blows b/c feature XYZ doesn't work!!" is not very helpful. You have to also include your hardware info, whether you upgraded or clean installed panther, and what third-party apps you have installed. Let's be productive people, not a bunch of whiners.

  18. Re:uControl doesn't work by mk2mk2 · · Score: 2, Informative

    Actually according to the author's home page he has gotten the .kext to load but only the "Real function keys" feature works as yet. I am eagerly waiting the new release; I keep hitting the enter key on my Pismo expecting it to be command. :)

  19. It's the QT for Java Update that causes this by LenE · · Score: 3, Informative

    The source of this problem is also the source of the first Panther security update; namely QuickTime for Java. Those unlucky enough to update QuickTime for Java in 10.2.8, prior to upgrading to Panther, found their Java 1.4.1 frameworks hosed.

    This is being called the "69 error", as the reported version is 1.4.1_69 rather than 1.4.1_99. The unintentional proximity of releasing this QT Java update and Panther's release, and the inability to change Panther's install scripts after being burned to CD is the cause of this problem.

    I can't verify that the security update fixes this problem, but my hunch is that it does. I fixed my machine before the security update was released, and I suspect that those who claim not to have the problem are already patched with the security update, or didn't install the QT Java update prior to installing Panther. The fact that many java programs still utilize Java 1.3, which was unaffected by this problem, probably masked the symptoms from many users, leading them to believe that they were unaffected also.

    -- Len