Slashdot Mirror


Superfast Optically-Based DSP Announced

dawgnut writes "An Israeli venture-funded startup has announced a digital signal processor chip that uses optical connections rather than silicon transistors. The result is a very fast chip with massive throughput for calculating fast fourier transforms that wastes very small amounts of power as heat. Interesting applications (or frightening ones depending on where you come down on the security vs. privacy thing) for remote sensors, biometrics and homeland security stuff." The prototype being showcased is rather large, but Lenslet is hoping to have it shrunk down to a chip within five years. Update: 10/31 00:22 GMT by CN : Whoops, we ran this yesterday. Mea culpa.

140 comments

  1. Beowulf by Coyote67 · · Score: 1, Funny

    Ahh screw it. I can't afford to imagine it.

  2. DUUUUUUPE by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    1. Re:DUUUUUUPE by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Mea Culpa"?

      You'a shtupa.

    2. Re:DUUUUUUPE by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Check the timestamps.

    3. Re:DUUUUUUPE by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      YOU SUCK, CN!

  3. OFN by Phosphor3k · · Score: 1

    Super Fast Dupe too. http://slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=03/10/29/143420 3&mode=thread&tid=137

    1. Re:OFN by 1000StonedMonkeys · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Now I'm not a subscriber, so I don't know if this functionality already exists, but it seems like it would be handy if when subscribers saw articles early they could mark them as duplicates for the editors to check.

    2. Re:OFN by Phosphor3k · · Score: 1

      Pretty fucking good idea. Except that every story would get marked by trolls if there were no restrictions.

      Maybe base it on Karma. Or give out moderation points for stories. Dupe -1, Old News -1(ex: article dated 18 months ago.)

    3. Re:OFN by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Maybe if they did dupe processing with this digital signal processor we'd get somewhere.

    4. Re:OFN by hatrisc · · Score: 1

      if it's a dupe, it's a dupe. you can't have moderators who are idiots saying, "well, it's almost not a dupe" and then mod up to 1 "interesting", or 1 "funny", or 5 "it's not really a dupe".

      --
      I write code.
    5. Re:OFN by descentr · · Score: 1

      There is this capability. Subscribers can see most stories before anyone else, and an e-mail link is provided so that subscribers can alert an on-duty editor to the problem. I e-mailed about this post and one other one in the past, but I guess "on-duty" doesn't always mean that since it's never helped.

    6. Re:OFN by jerde · · Score: 2, Insightful

      The other possibility might be for /. editors to... well, actually READ slashdot.

      Nah.

      - Peter

      --
      INsigNIFICANT
    7. Re:OFN by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Except that every story would get marked by trolls if there were no restrictions.

      Correct me if I'm wrong, but aren't subscribers required to log in? Make the option unavailable to those logins that abuse it, and don't immediately remove the article on the say so of one person. Have something like a 5-user threshold before the dup is removed - at least that way we get shot of five subscribed trolls at once, if it comes down to it.

    8. Re:OFN by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Editors? Edit? Read? Work?

      I think you forget yourself. The editors signed up for this gig so they wouldn't HAVE to do any work.

      The word 'editor' was hijacked for some mental masturbation.

    9. Re:OFN by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So subscribers pay for the priviledge of being editors? Where is their incentive?

    10. Re:OFN by stevenp · · Score: 1

      >> The other possibility might be for /. editors to... well, actually READ slashdot.

      Thats too much for them, they are actually ... only humans

    11. Re:OFN by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They don't HAVE to be editors. But the people who ARE editors sure as hell aren't doing their job.

      The incentive is a cleaner slashdot - the community helping to make itself work properly, despite incompetent people in control (hey, just like real life!)

  4. Make it smaller within the next few years by Atmchicago · · Score: 3, Funny

    An old soviet joke was as follows: And yet another achievement by soviet science - they have perfected the world's largest microchip!

    --

    You can lead a horse to water, but you can't make it dissolve.

    1. Re:Make it smaller within the next few years by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In soviet russia, Microchip perfects YOU!

    2. Re:Make it smaller within the next few years by bobdotorg · · Score: 3, Funny

      and I believe it's called Itanium.

      --
      __ Someday, but not this morning, I'll finally learn to use the preview button.
    3. Re:Make it smaller within the next few years by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Trick or Treat, Negro Style

      Negro corpses washed ashore
      "That one looks like a dirty whore"

      Drowned cadavers dark and black
      "That one must be full of crack"

      Dead Negro eyes blank and hazy
      "This one here sure was lazy"

      Bloated sambos full of bile
      "Trick or Treat, Negro Style"


  5. you got duped by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    yeah, a EP on a Fsking dupe.

  6. double post? by Althazzar · · Score: 0, Redundant

    This post was made yesterday already:
    http://slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=03/10 /29/143420 3&mode=thread&tid=137

    1. Re:double post? by Althazzar · · Score: 0

      redundant? true
      was it possible not to be redundant? yeah perhaps, if i had written this even faster.... there were like 20 `double post' or `dupe' replies in a few secs....

  7. Obvious joke... by Realistic_Dragon · · Score: 0, Redundant

    If only they would develop an optical superfast chip to detect dupes...

    --
    Beep beep.
    1. Re:Obvious joke... by AVee · · Score: 1

      That whould be a good idea, your the 4th person to tell it's a duplicate...

  8. Dupe (again) by KarmaPolice · · Score: 0, Redundant

    Yep, it's a dupe: http://slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=03/10/29/143420 3&mode=thread&tid=137

  9. Flashlight Fun by Thargok · · Score: 3, Funny

    I can see the LAN parties now... "Will you stop it with the flashlight?!!!! Why did I buy that window kit?"

  10. Posted Yesterday by raider_red · · Score: 0, Redundant

    Haven't I seen this story before?

    --
    It's good to use your head, but not as a battering ram.
  11. I have to admit by NightWulf · · Score: 2, Insightful

    For such a small nation, with access to a hell of a lot less funding than american conglomerates. These Israeli companies sure do make some intresting inventions. From supercomputers, to genetic engineering, etc. etc.

    1. Re:I have to admit by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Interesting invention, but all they're banging on about is the military applications of it.

      I suppose that with the unquestioning support of the US they can get away with being so overtly belligerent.

      I wonder if they ever wonder WHY they're not particularly popular with their neighbors?

    2. Re:I have to admit by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      It's not so difficult. It's called lobbying. Simple example: the Canadian government gives a $10 million line of credit, no questions asked, to any company investing onto israeli homeland.

    3. Re:I have to admit by rindeee · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Perhaps they develope military technologies BECAUSE they aren't popular and perhaps they aren't popular BECAUSE they're the only democracy in the middle-east AND they've been at odds with the Arabs for the past several thousand years.

    4. Re:I have to admit by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      ...AND Perhaps they GET A HELLUVA LOT of funding from the United States.

    5. Re:I have to admit by The+Lynxpro · · Score: 1

      "Perhaps they develope military technologies BECAUSE they aren't popular and perhaps they aren't popular BECAUSE they're the only democracy in the middle-east AND they've been at odds with the Arabs for the past several thousand years."

      Yeah, I'm sure a few Afrikaaners said the same thing about South Africa in the 1980s too... Wait, did I just type that??? :)

      --
      "Right now, somewhere in this world, Scott Baio is plowing a woman he doesn't love," - Peter Griffin, *Family Guy*
    6. Re:I have to admit by Jafafa+Hots · · Score: 1

      I just noticed this myself. I was tested for sleep apnea a couple weeks ago, and instead of being monitored in a sleep center, or wearing some elaborate set of electrodes, I got to sleep in my own bed using a device that attaches to two fingers and velcros to a fabric wrapped around your forearm.

      This device uses a completely newly discovered form of biometic sensing, only known about for a couple years, and an israeli company put this thing out and got FDA approval in Feb. 2002. From medical discovery to actual product almost overnight.

      It has a flash memory card that they remove at the doctor's office, plug into their PC, and it generates nifty reports.

      I found myself wishing I could pull the card myself and take a look at the data. I'd like to see a hacker do something with one of these!

      --
      This space available.
    7. Re:I have to admit by Concerned+Onlooker · · Score: 1

      You might be surprised at just how much access to funding they do have. Check this out. Think of this technology as a a sort of return on American taxpayer dollars. That we'll have to pay for. :-)

      --
      http://www.rootstrikers.org/
    8. Re:I have to admit by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      well if one actually has a good understanding of 'sleep' as a sleep technician would, they'd be able to recognize what's going on from examining the data. Otherwise it wouldn't be of much use to the layperson.

    9. Re:I have to admit by Jafafa+Hots · · Score: 1

      actually, I got to look at the reports it generated, and they were pretty easy to interpret. Especially if you had net access to do more research.

      --
      This space available.
    10. Re:I have to admit by Arker · · Score: 3, Informative

      Perhaps they develope military technologies BECAUSE they aren't popular and perhaps they aren't popular BECAUSE they're the only democracy in the middle-east AND they've been at odds with the Arabs for the past several thousand years.

      If by "they" you mean Jews, you're wrong. It was Europe where they were at odds for thousands of years, the Muslim world was a relative safe haven for Jews until very recently.

      If by "they" you mean the Israeli government, it's existed for decades, not thousands of years.

      And, of course, the fact that "they" are unpopular with the Arab world at the moment couldn't have anything to do with the occupation, land grabbing, apartheid system, and open aspirations of ethnic cleansing of the Israeli government, which pretends to speak for Jews as a whole even though many disagree wholeheartedly with its policies. That would be far too obvious.

      --
      =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
      Friends don't let friends enable ecmascript.
    11. Re:I have to admit by tho+1234 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Give me a break about being unpopular "because they are the only democracy in the middle east". I can't understand how people buy BS like that or "the terrorists attacked us because they are jealous of us". Its really incredible how many people believe rhetoric like this, despite there being no rational justification for it, or any evidence to support it. Take it for what it is, mindless rhetoric to stop people from questioning, trying to understand a very complex geopolitical conflict, or thinking for themselves. - Have you ever thought about the fact that Israel is also the only nuclear power in the middle east, has by far the most advanced military in the region, and frequently uses its military power to humiliate its neighbours? Or how about the millions of people living in poverty stricken refugee camps because of Israel's illegal occupation of territory? Certainly the thousands of civilian deaths they have caused has nothing to do with it...No, none of that has anything to do with the problem, its all because the freedom-hatin' Arabs can't stand democracy.... right... 2- The Jews have not been at odds with Arabs for thousands of years. (though that is probably true about Jews and the Europeans) They were conquered in the first century AD, and weren't there for most of the next 2000 years. Until about 1800 there were any Jews in the middle east, and the few that were there coexisted with the Arabs peacefully. Soon the Zionist movement started and many more immigrated to the area, and they also got along well. It wasn't until the founding of Israel after world war 2 (due to the European's guilt over the Holocaust), carving up land that previously belonged to others, followed by wars against virtually every one of its neighbours and the displacement of millions of refugees, that the current conflict with the Arab countries started. I'm not taking sides in this dispute, but get your facts right and try thinking for yourself instead of simplifying everything down to one line justifications.

    12. Re:I have to admit by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Try some formatting, for fuck's sake!

    13. Re:I have to admit by phozz+bare · · Score: 1
      What does US foreign military aid have anything to do with this? Lenslet is a privately held company and has nothing to do with US funds.

      But since the subject was raised.. Ahh, WRMEA. A website dedicated to "balanced and accurate information concerning U.S. relations with Middle Eastern states". Funny how their home page has a live counter (!) of dollars given to Israel, but no corresponding counter showing how many dollars are given to Egypt, Jordan, or whatever. And they do get a lot of money. They also don't mention that about 3/4 of the money Israel gets can only be spent in the US - which means the money goes right back to where it came from, creating jobs for Americans. Here is a link that presents the Israeli side of things. Actually I think that whole site is a worthwhile read, if you're curious to hear the Israeli side of the conflict.

    14. Re:I have to admit by Froug · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Israeli companies also make a lot of fraudulent claims.
      If all claims were to be believed, then the Israelis have had optical and quantum computers for half a decade, can break any encryption, have unbreakable encryption, and an AI in junior high.

      I have no doubt that some Israeli companies do develop interesting innovations, but not every sensational technology press release that finds its way on to Slashdot is entirely honest.

    15. Re:I have to admit by Concerned+Onlooker · · Score: 1
      It wasn't really meant to be a jab at Israel. I'm quite aware of the Israeli side of things. The majority of US foreign aid goes to two countries, Israel and--surprise--Saudi Arabia. The rest pales. By the way, that's US foreign aid, not US foreign military aid.

      I wonder about that bit concerning 3/4 of the money gets spent in the US. Not being an economist it's hard for me to see why the money needs to go outside the country first at all....

      --
      http://www.rootstrikers.org/
    16. Re:I have to admit by Giggle+Stick · · Score: 1

      Jafafa Hots' Sig: When I can trade karma for a blowjob, then I'll give a shit...

      So uh... How much karma you got?

    17. Re:I have to admit by Jafafa+Hots · · Score: 1

      I have tons of excellent karma!
      How much you chargin'? ;)

      --
      This space available.
    18. Re:I have to admit by mericet · · Score: 1
      Safe haven? good thing that you said relatively, we weren't massacred there constantly as we were in 'enlightened' Europe, but that's it. And very recently is a blatant lie, the Damascus Blood Libel occurred in 1840, 163 years ago.

      Yes, Jews only fled the Arab world after the formation of the state of Israel in 1948, because of widespread and unbearable persecution, but that is also very much because of the fact that the option (the state of Israel) didn't exist before that (many Jews couldn't even free Nazi Germany, because no country would accept them).

      Arab terrorism against Jews started long before the state of Israel formed in 1948, the Hebron massacre occurred in 1929, any kind of occupation couldn't start before the six-day war in 1967, but the PLO was formed in 1964, with the expressed aim of total obliteration of Israel.

      The rest of your comment does not even justify a response.

  12. Heare is a similur aricaictial by SirJaxalot · · Score: 0
  13. Dupe. by univgeek · · Score: 0, Redundant
    Dupe from two days ago!!

    Can you remove this already?

    --
    All bow to his Noodliness!! His Noodle Appendage has touched me!
  14. I recognized this.. by Ancil · · Score: 0, Redundant

    It's a dupe.

  15. Astrology is NOT a science. Astronomy is. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Looks like YOU need to go back to elementary school.

  16. Yes my friends by Bendebecker · · Score: 0, Redundant

    This is a repeat of this thread.

    --
    There's a growing sense that even if The Future comes,
    most of us won't be able to afford it.
    -- Lemmy
  17. ...but how does it work... by homerjs42 · · Score: 1
    So according to the article, this DSP is really really fast because it uses lasers. To do what? To calculate? To transmit data from place to place? I'm curious as to how they can do computations using the lasers (which is what seems to be implied by the article)
    so there.

    --dw

    first on-topic post ;-)

    1. Re:...but how does it work... by WheatWilton · · Score: 0

      Same way freakin' sharks with freakin' lasers on their heads do.

    2. Re:...but how does it work... by npistentis · · Score: 0

      nice

      --
      Gentlemen, you can't fight in here! This is the War Room!
    3. Re:...but how does it work... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      DSP
      Digital Signal Processor
      google is your friend

    4. Re:...but how does it work... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      One way it might work is by using interfereance between laser beams. You could build a simple logic gate by combining two beams. A one could be represented by a beam that is 90 degrees of phase ahead of some refrence beam and a 0 could be represented by a beam 90 degrees behind some reference. If you combine the beams and the values they represent are different, you will get a destructive interferance. If they are the same, you will get constructive interferance. And since the wavefronts are traveling at the speed of light, the result appears at the output pretty much instantly. If they have figured out how to make an and gate and and inverter then they can make any logic circuit. If they implement some kind of asycronous architecture then they will have a very fast chip limited probably by only the rate that they can encode electronic data to an optical form and back again.

  18. Interesting... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Not new - just yesterday there was another /. story regarding optical DSPs. Optical logic gates have been around for quite some time - at least a year, but it is nice to see that it is finally getting put into pratical use. Now, all we have to do is put more and more on a chip, until we have an optical supercomputer. Now an optical supercomputer would have serious privacy implacations - brute forcing would suddenly be much easier. However, what we need is computing at the **quantum** level. Instead of having atoms that have to be worked around in large quanities, a computer should be based at the quantum level, instead of using atoms. There was a story a few months back about how these would work.

  19. C'mon CowboyNeal... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You might search before you post:
    http://slashdot.org/search.pl?query=Lenslet


  20. Picture by Phosphor3k · · Score: 1

    There is a nice picture of it here.

    1. Re:Picture by rgoer · · Score: 2, Funny

      Ancient Chinese Proverb: "Yesterday's +5, Informative is today's -1, Redundant."

  21. hmm, sounds familar by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Isn't this already been posted before?

  22. SORRY, wrong link! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    That was actually a link to some manners site I had in my clipboard. Sorry. The correct link

    Much more relavant, don't you think?

  23. FYI by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Interstingly, optical processors aren't faster because light is faster than electricity. They are faster because they have much faster rise and fall times between digital on and digital off.

    1. Re:FYI by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Really, I thought it was the cross-polarized emission of tachyons in a Potrezebie field.

    2. Re:FYI by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Interstingly, optical processors aren't faster because light is faster than electricity. They are faster because they have much faster rise and fall times between digital on and digital off.

      While your statement may indeed be correct, that is not why this chip is faster. The reason is that they are doing analog signal processing using the physics of various optical elements to perform computationally intensive mathematics.

      Think of it this way: We can use large, expensive mathematical operations to simulate optical components, which means we can also do the reverse - using optical components to perform the expensive mathematical operations.

      I read about this about 2 years ago, and it was really quite fascinating to me. It turns out that with a simple lense, you can compute a fourier transform just by focussing the light (it doesn't focus down to an infinitesimally small point).

      I managed to find an article about this, hopefully it should be apparent why this chip doesn't run quake:
      Check it out here.

      They are certainly not the only people doing this. I've seen plenty of references of this being used in missile guidance systems (turns out a simple fourier transform trick can be used to track objects in a camera). Someone I met while working at the Jet Propulsion Lab was working on this Optical Signal Processors. They prove to be very big in the next 10 years.

  24. Memory is irrelevant for this kind of "processor" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

    This is NOT a Harvard architecture part - this isn't fetching instructions from RAM and executing them, like a regular DSP would.

    Think of this more like an FPGA - you have a device that is configured for a specific processing algorithm, and data is fed in at wire rate and processed at wire rate.

    An example of how a device like this might be used may be in order:
    I'm trying to find a radar pulse buried in the noise coming in from my receiver. I want to know the phase delay of the radar pulse - how long from when I sent it till I got it back.

    Now, I know what my radar pulse looks like as it goes out. I know that any reflection is going to consist of versions of that pulse shape, delayed and of varying strengths. So what I do is called a correlation - the easiest way to think of this is to imagine having 2 transparencies, one of my outgoing pulse, and one of the incoming signal. Now, I hold them up to the light, and slide the incoming signal across the reference pulse until things match up - that's the point of maximum correlation, and that give me the delay of the signal.

    A real correlation function is a bit more complicated as you have to allow for the signal level to be changed - if I am looking for a signal of N samples in a received data stream of M samples, I have to do M*N multiply and add operations to get my correlation. Now, for a radar signal I might be sampling at over a billion samples a second, and looking for a chirp of a 100 ns would give me over 100 billion MAC operations a second. There are ways to do that with conventional DSPs, but they are a galloping BITCH to do (you basically make a cluster of DSPs, and each DSP takes a part of the signal. Synchronising that is a bitch.)

    This device would work by having the shape of the outbound pulse represented in the structure of the device itself, and the MACs are done by taking the incoming data stream and projecting it on the structure - thus you do all your processing in parallel, and at wire speed. You get a pulse out when the incoming signal matched the signal you ar looking for.

    ps Dupe.

  25. Almost by tarquin_fim_bim · · Score: 1

    I was almost impressed by this, until I read up on the technology on their website. It will have a pretty limited use as it only has 8-bit precision vector/matrix MAC which is where the 8 teraflops come from. This will be fine and all for just video but it isn't much of a quantum leap for anything else (besides having an optical core). I mean it has power, but there are other chips out there that do more with greater precision numbers.

    Deja vu?

    1. Re:Almost by geekoid · · Score: 1

      yeah, but it's a start. I mean, chips wheren't always 32 bit.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    2. Re:Almost by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I was dissapointed too. I was hoping they could do someing cool like a N point FFT in O(1) operations. Either this technology or some kind of quantum dot arrangment hopefully will be able to perform an algorithm on some input vector and have the result travel to the output as fast as the event horizon. Then we will be able to celebrate.

    3. Re:Almost by cgb8176 · · Score: 1

      I mean it has power, but there are other chips out there that do more with greater precision numbers.

      You mean that there are other chips out there that do less with greater precision.

  26. Ha! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I patented this idea already, give me money!
    My patent states:

    Using light to do stuff and/or calculate stuff.

    It's all there in black and white.

    1. Re:Ha! by BuckaBooBob · · Score: 1

      I hate to point out Prior Art for your Patent.. But At nearly the exact same second light was "invented" it was put to use "doing stuff". Its inital use was to Light up all the darkness :)

      Also there are alot of prior art examples for using it to calculate stuff too :)

      --
      Who needs WiFi when we can have Packet Over Sheep! http://datacomm.org/PoS-InternetDraft.txt
  27. Re:Another Booring Techincal Story (Long Rant) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Long rants which outline the reasons why art majors are just as insightful as techs should be proofread before they are submitted. Just a thought. Even better, try spellcheck- some half-witted "scientist" thought the world might be better off if computers and dictionaries were able to coexist.

  28. Appropriate name by Rosco+P.+Coltrane · · Score: 1

    [...] a digital signal processor chip that uses optical connections rather than silicon transistors. [...] The prototype being showcased is rather large, but Lenslet is hoping to have it shrunk down to a chip within five years.

    I'm sure they didn't choose Mr. Lenslet at random for the job of shrinking optical an processor ...

    --
    "A door is what a dog is perpetually on the wrong side of" - Ogden Nash
  29. Picture by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    There's a nice picture of the processor here

    And

    Also, a demo video here

  30. New optical chip! by xfs · · Score: 0, Redundant
  31. HURRAY! by leerpm · · Score: 0, Redundant

    April Fools Day has come 6 months early this year!

  32. Dupe.-Elvis has left the building. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "Can you remove this already?"

    Hold your horses.

    You'll be escorted out of the building shortly.

  33. nice one CowboyNeal by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    nice one CowboyNeal, look what you do even after everyone votes for you.

  34. Wow this chip is fast! by EmCeeHawking · · Score: 0, Redundant
  35. ANOTHER ONE??? by morelife · · Score: 0, Redundant

    why just yesterday... damn, innovation's kicking ASS this quarter!!

  36. Anyone else read that wrong? by mbourgon · · Score: 1

    I saw "super-fast optical BSD" and my mouth watered.

    --
    "Sometimes a woman is a kind of religion, she can save your soul & set you free from all your sins" - Bad Examples
  37. Lucky webmaster by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I hope they have 24/7 webmasters because boy, two slashdottings in 24hrs....pity this story wasn't linked to a small site, the effect would've been interesting...

  38. What changed?! by Daath · · Score: 3, Funny

    /.'er: Whoa. Deja vu.
    Trinity: What did you just say?
    /.'er: Nothing. Just had a little deja vu.
    Trinity: What happened? What did you see?
    /.'er: A post on slashdot about a CPU. Then another just like it.
    Trinity: How much like it? Was it the same post?
    /.'er: It might have been. I'm not sure. What is it?
    Trinity: A deja vu is usually a glitch in the Matrix. It happens when they change something.
    /.: Figures. Perl sucks.

    --
    Any technology distinguishable from magic, is insufficiently advanced.
    1. Re:What changed?! by Wehesheit · · Score: 0

      AHAHAHAHAHAH

      --
      This P.I.G. will walk on the water, This P.I.G. will walk on the sea, This P.I.G. will walk whereever he wants.
  39. seeing double by werdnapk · · Score: 1

    Wow, the light and mirrors in this chip can even produce duplicate slashdot postings!

  40. Fuck you moderators !!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Everyone knows that Taco, Neal, Timothy ,etc have "super moderation" powers and try to quash stuff they think is "unmutual". Fuck you , Taco !!!

    1. Re:Fuck you moderators !!!! by lurker412 · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      Hey, man, chill out. Real karma is not an integer and has nothing to do with Slashdot.

    2. Re:Fuck you moderators !!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      karma is portioned out by the cosmos. How do you know the cosmos doesn't moderate on /.?

    3. Re:Fuck you moderators !!!! by lurker412 · · Score: 1

      Well, karma might be more like a complex number than an integer. There's a real part and an imaginary one. Perhaps one of those parts is moderated on /. but I doubt that both of them are. As to which is moderated on /., Vishnu only knows...

  41. Cowboy Neal needs to RTFA... by HotNeedleOfInquiry · · Score: 1

    It's not a chip, it's a module the size of a palm pilot. It *might* be a chip in 5 years. Big difference.

    --
    "Eve of Destruction", it's not just for old hippies anymore...
    1. Re:Cowboy Neal needs to RTFA... by geekoid · · Score: 1

      I don't think size determines what's a chip, and what's not.

      so what if its the size of a palm? you stare in your computer all day?

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
  42. FUCK ALL OF YOU by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    REALLY

  43. FYI by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Interestingly, optical processors aren't faster because light is faster than electricity. They are faster because they have much faster rise and fall times between digital on and digital off.

  44. GOATSE LINK IN PARENT --- MOD DOWN!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    n/t

  45. Almost anything by phorm · · Score: 1

    Interesting applications (or frightening ones depending on where you come down on the security vs. privacy thing:

    You have to consider that almost anything can be abused, and in many cases the worst are the ones that we aren't prepared for. I'd say this is no more threatening than many other methods out there.

    Einstein didn't predict the nuclear bomb, though it certainly made him regret his contributions

  46. Re:Memory is irrelevant for this kind of "processo by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    thank you for posting anonymously, honorable sah!

  47. Still. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The moderators are promoting a bizarre "groupthink" mentality. But you're right, real karma must be some kind of "imaginary number".

  48. Lensman? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    is that a reference to the EE Doc lensmen saga i was just reading? Wasn't the lens made up of "hundreds of millions" of cells that emitted a characteristic polychromatic light?

    was that it? huh was it??

    hee hee.
    j.

  49. Oh my goodidnnes. by YOU+ARE+SUCH+A+FAG! · · Score: 0

    Iitt sseeemmmsss faaaammmmmiiiiiilllllliiiiiaaaaarrrr somemmeehoooww.

    Maybe it's a trick of the light.

  50. -= SLASHDOT =- by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0



    Now -0- days with a duplicate posting.

  51. Am I wrong or by odiado · · Score: 1

    Dupes have reduced dramatically from 'those times'?

    Kudos to editors for bringing the dupe rate that low

    Now, Come on... pour me with karma :D

  52. Deliberate dupe submitters by Peter+Cooper · · Score: 1

    Are there people who deliberately submit old stories to Slashdot over and over again just to see if they can catch the moderators out? Just wondering.

  53. great.... by The+Lynxpro · · Score: 1



    Great, I can just see it now: somehow the PPC edition of this future chip will still be a few mhz slower than the licensed x86 counterpart... :0

    --
    "Right now, somewhere in this world, Scott Baio is plowing a woman he doesn't love," - Peter Griffin, *Family Guy*
  54. This just in . . . by OverlordQ · · Score: 1

    New Israeli processor operates at the speed of light. A Dual-Chip system expected to be a minimum requirement for Half-Life 3.

    --
    Your hair look like poop, Bob! - Wanker.
  55. Welcome to Slashdot! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Same shit....different day.

  56. Wow what a dumbass by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Do you think this story was initally shown with the "Oops, its a dupe, we're sorry" spiel?

    Jackass

  57. macro chip by wawadave · · Score: 0

    hello this new macro chip concept to catch on. like in soviet russia!

  58. Shamir twinkle computer by zymano · · Score: 0

    Seems to be the Israel connection to one man.

    RSA was named after Shamir.

    if you google - shamir twinkle , everything about these optical dsp's will become lucid to you from all these articles this week.

  59. congrats... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...if you know what "mea culpa" means.

  60. Test it with Seti@Home by DaMa9eD · · Score: 0

    http://setiathome.ssl.berkeley.edu/

    --
    Have you been DaMa9eD today?
  61. Processing at the speed of light by eples · · Score: 2, Insightful

    enabling it to compute at the speed of light, the company said.

    Ummmm, don't electrons travel that fast anyway?

    --
    I'm a 2000 man.
    1. Re:Processing at the speed of light by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The electrons do not travel at the speed of light. It's the electromagnetic field that travels at speeds close to the speed of light and that is what sets the electrons into motion.

    2. Re:Processing at the speed of light by psychofox · · Score: 1

      No.

      In short -
      1) An electrical signal can travel close to the speed of light (of the order of 60%)

      2) The electrons themselve can have a slow 'drift velocity'. Its like this. Imagine a tube full of marbles. When I push one in one end, a marble (almost instantly) pops out the other end. That is the electrical signal. Each individual marble moves only one 'space' along at a time.

      I'd welcome someone who could provide a more detailed description...

    3. Re:Processing at the speed of light by psychofox · · Score: 1
      In answer to my own question... here is a more deailed description:

      http://hyperphysics.phy-astr.gsu.edu/hbase/electri c/ohmmic.html

  62. Can't you UN-POST something? by simetra · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Really, how hard can that be. Or do you get paid per post?

    --

    "Would it kill you to put down the toilet seat?" -- Maya Angelou
  63. They also have the best torturers, assassins by jack_n_jill · · Score: 0
    Yep, Israel has it all. Their fighter pilots can really nail those women and children and not even get blood on their spiffy starched uniforms. Their assassins can slip in and get entire families and slip away without getting a smudge on their outfits.

    Their PR is the best in the world. They have convinced us that the Palestinians are responsible for their own oppression. We weep in agreement and send another mountain of money and arms their way. If only Slobodan Melosivich or Pol Pot had Israeli's PR we would he hailing them as heroic too.

    They should stick to oppression, they are better at it.

  64. Re:No by Lord+Bitman · · Score: 1

    they dont.
    Note that this still doesnt bring any meaning to "compute at the speed of light", which can't actually work out if you use it in a sentence no matter how many operations per second you can get

    --
    -- 'The' Lord and Master Bitman On High, Master Of All
  65. Dupes and solution by master_p · · Score: 1

    How difficult is it to write a script that searches last week's submissions and notifies the submitter about the subject ? say, 80% word similarity with previous subject should present a dialog to the submitter saying "look, this topic has been posted yesterday; press ok to submit something new on it; press cancel to cancel the submission".

    And then, slashdot reviewers will immediately see the dupe and reject it.

  66. Sounds like a fake by mcbunny29 · · Score: 0


    It's either too good to be true or it'll have limited applicability.

    "It's conceivable this technology could become mainstream inside chips in 10 years time," Tully said."

    10 years!?! By that time, silicon CPUs will be faster than these optical chips.

  67. DSP application by 3flp · · Score: 1

    Most often by far, the digital signal processors are used in mobile phones these days. They are used for the speech compression and channel coding.

    Would be nice to get more talk time...

    --

    "Argue with idiots, and you become an idiot." -- Paul Graham

  68. Just think how fast ... by Giggle+Stick · · Score: 1

    ... they'll be able to dupe articles once slashdot runs on one of these puppies!

  69. Electron travel=light speed by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Well, getting away from the concept of ordinary "signals" within the context of electronics applications...there are a variety of "atomic accelerators" that can get electrons to "near relativistic" speeds. It takes a lot of engery to do this since the mass of the electrons (or anything else) increase (a lot) as it approaches these kind of speeds. Not a whole lot of commercial use for this technology.

  70. nothing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    just ignore me.

  71. on the security vs. privacy thing by aimew · · Score: 1

    That was a terribly interesting parenthetical aside (or frightening ones depending on where you come down on the security vs. privacy thing), don't you think? I mean, where DO you draw that line?

    There is a rising clamor for the Patriot Act to be dismantled, for much the same reasoning, but should it be?

    Where does privacy end and security begin, and visa-versa? Is the threat from internal terrorists over? Are we secure in our homes, workplaces, and skyscrapers; or, does the threat continue?

    If we are not yet secure than what price will we pay for privacy now? It's nice for you and me to have privacy but should those who would plot to destroy our civilization have the privacy to make their plans?

    Our Constitution is a wonderful document, and should endure forever, but it is not a suicide pact, after all. During times of war certain liberties have always needed to be suspended (temporarily, as in 'sunset clause') for the greater need of preserving it.

    This "we all have to be free and at total liberty to do whatever we want," is an emotion that should have been put to rest when we were weaned from our mother's teat. We all have to live together; and, that means that we all can't do whatever we want, whenever we want.

    It's time to grow up and hope that our leaders can get this job done before the F**cking do-gooders screw it all up and we're all bowing to Mecca.

    So far they are.

    Remember that there are also built-in safe guards within our Constitution that secure our continued freedoms. Things like "term limits" will stop any Commander-in-Chief from becoming too powerful. Things like our Congress, that can and do make laws with sunset clauses built-in so that we get our liberties and freedoms back once the problem is settled.

    The Patriot Act has such a Sunset Clause, did you know that? It will just go away on it's own. It doesn't need your, or anybodies, help. Our (Republican) Congress did well by us there.

    All this decent does, when presented too early (like now), is to embolden our enemies and make the job harder and more dangerous for our troupes. This is a political tactic to draw out the war in order to make the current administration look bad so that some pin-head can win the next election and get more of our people killed. Please don't fall for that trap. You are being played.

    Some of our politicians, especially the liberals, don't care about who dies or who wins, as long as they get elected. That is their mission, the rest is just theater to them. Don't fall into that trap, and it is one. Remember, we were attacked and we are responding in a way to insure that we won't be again. That is how it should be.

    It's time to grow up. The world is bigger than your basement. Don't let them play on you this way.

    They live, while you sleep.

    We need to protect ourselves. The current administration is doing that. The term limits and sunset clauses will put everything back the way it was before 9/11, just without the threat of further attacks. Won't that be nice? Isn't that worth something? Think about it. It's a hard world out there and the boogey-man does want to kill you!

    Good night!

    --
    Keeper of the terrible karma ---