Is CocoaTech Violating the GPL?

elliotj asks: "In the latest version of their Finder-replacement product, PathFinder CocoaTech has included a terminal feature based on sourcecode from the GPL'd iTerm. They have made available the classes they developed from the iTerm sources, but not all the sourcecode for their product. Since iTerm is GPL (and not LGPL), shouldn't they have to make the ENTIRE codebase available? This is being debated on their forums. If this is true, what can we do to get CocoaTech to open up the rest of the code?"

Comments

With witty comebacks like that...

[ErnstKompressor]

you truly do show who is retarded...

I agree that the occasional Apple zealot is out of their mind, but those who decry all Mac users as zealots show themselves for the morons that they are. If you enjoy the internet -- namely browsing -- thank your stars for the existence of Apple/NEXT...If you value the existence of ubiquitous desktop publishing, thank Apple...I thank Linux, and more honestly UNIX, all the time for providing a strong and inexpensive platform for servers and networks.