Slashdot Mirror


Memory Hole Un-Redacts Redacted DOJ Memo

DrDNA writes "After a Freedom of Information Act request, the US Justice Department released a study on workplace diversity. However, nearly half of the memo was blacked-out. In what was apparently an incredible goof, it was posted in a PDF format called Image+Text. The folks at The Memory Hole simply removed the image, revealing the redacted text. The redacted text was highly critical of the DOJ's diversity efforts, as the New York Times reports." Folks, if you're going to be sneaky, at least do enough research to make sure you're really being sneaky.

18 of 453 comments (clear)

  1. This happened once before... by BJZQ8 · · Score: 4, Interesting

    There was an occasion where this happened before...I believe it was in blacking out some sources on a PDF document...so some enterprising chap removed the blackouts...and voila, there were the "classified" sources. Obviously nobody in government learns from their mistakes.

    1. Re:This happened once before... by airConditionedGypsy · · Score: 4, Informative
      This does seem to be a common goof. Bruce S. had some commentary in his newsletter a couple of months ago.

      --
      I bootleg Fizzy Lifting Drinks.
    2. Re:This happened once before... by epiphani · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Arent the people who do this pretty much putting a big white and red target on themselves? I was under the impression, with things like the PATRIOT act, as well as the DMCA, that this type of thing would get you detained without a lawyer.

      Granted, I'm not american, but judging how the country has been going, I'm surprised the people uncensoring these reports arent vanishing without a trace.

      --
      .
    3. Re:This happened once before... by EvilTwinSkippy · · Score: 5, Insightful
      You see, this document was supposed to be released to the public anyway. The redaction was dirty pool, and none of the information was a national secret. It was simply embarrasing to those in power.

      Truth be told the fact it was redacted in the first place is far more disturbing than the actual content that was removed. Especially since its release was the subject of a Freedom of Information Act case.

      --
      "Learning is not compulsory... neither is survival."
      --Dr.W.Edwards Deming
    4. Re:This happened once before... by mickwd · · Score: 4, Funny

      Why, if only the US government could have someone come to the US and give a talk on the limitations of some of Adobe's security mechanisms.

      Surely if someone was to do something like that, they would welcome him with open arms, and thank him for his useful expose ? After all, he would be doing them a service, wouldn't he ?

  2. Sneakiness by cperciva · · Score: 5, Funny

    Folks, if you're going to be sneaky, at least do enough research to make sure you're really being sneaky.

    Yes, but how do we know this wasn't intentional? Maybe the employee in charge of the redacting wanted that part of the memo to get out, so he deliberately redacted improperly.

    Or maybe that's just what he wants us to think...

    1. Re:Sneakiness by wirelessbuzzers · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Yes, but how do we know this wasn't intentional? Maybe the employee in charge of the redacting wanted that part of the memo to get out, so he deliberately redacted improperly.

      This would be a brilliant idea to spread false information. Instead of just publishing false information, write false information into a PDF and cover it with black rectangles. Not only do you have all the conspiracy theorists believiing whatever BS you wrote, you also have have a defense should anyone find out: it was blacked out, you weren't supposed to read it.

      --
      I hereby place the above post in the public domain.
  3. your tax dollars at work by dauvis · · Score: 5, Insightful

    If I had information that I didn't want the public to see I would have at least made sure that the information was not accessible by someone who is using a hex editor. I made a PDA program for myself that stored passwords I had for various websites (when you have a different one for each site, it sometimes gets a little hard to keep track of them in your head). However, before I actually started using it, I looked at the binary image of the record or the PDA that was being created. Well, it turned out that the mechanism for "securely" storing the information was just making it inaccessible through the API. In the end, I had to write my own storage mechanism using a standard encryption technique. The moral of this story is, just because you can't get to it doesn't mean it's not there for someone to find.

    Of course the people/person at The Memory Hole will be labeled as a hacker/pirate/terrorist by the justice department.

  4. What they remove by big_debacle · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I think it is most interesting to see what the government has decided shouldn't be revealed to the public. Classified sources? Nope. National Security threat? Nope. Poor HR? Yes. Discrimination within the government? Yes.

    Not to incite flames, but this speaks volumes about the Bush administration.

    1. Re:What they remove by Jameth · · Score: 4, Interesting

      I agree, and have said such many times.

      However, I wish I knew about this kind of shit from the Clinton administration. Maybe this happened then, too. Maybe not. I honestly haven't a clue what happened then because the Republicans were so obsessed with his dick.

  5. Memory Hole Goes To Jail by thelizman · · Score: 4, Funny

    Memory Hole to be Charged With DMCA Violation

    Reuters 11-01-03

    Just one day after releasing an uncensored version of a Department of Justice report on racial diversity in the work place, operators of the web site "Memory Hole" have been charged with violating terms of the Digital Millenium Copyright Act. According to a complaint filed by the Department of Justice in the 6th Federal Circuit Court, Memory Hole illegally circumvented electronic controls used to protect confidential material.

    On October 31st, the Department of Justice responded to a request under the Freedom of Information Act and released the report. However, several sections of the report were blacked out. Memory Hole discovered that the file format (PDF) used an image laid over the censored text, and simply removed the images and published the memo.

    On Saturday morning, Agents of the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, and Firearms and the FBI raided the offices of Memory Hole, the home of the publisher, and their ISP and confiscated several computers. The web site has not yet been ordered to be taken down, but a request is pending with Judge Y. H. Barrett Thompson to have the site terminated monday morning.

    Last Updated: Saturday Nov 1 2003 @ 2:50:34 PM

    1. Re:Memory Hole Goes To Jail by Soko · · Score: 4, Insightful

      The parent post is neither troll nor funny. If I had mod points at present, it would get "+1 Insightful".

      In reality, though, I'd rather give it "+1 Scary".

      Soko

      --
      "Depression is merely anger without enthusiasm." - Anonymous
  6. Re:This happened thrice before... by VValdo · · Score: 5, Informative
    Yes, it happened a few times...

    ...with a Carnivore review team...

    ...with a justice department document...

    ...and a CIA document containing agent's names


    W

    --
    -------------------
    This is my SIG. There are many like it, but this one is mine.
  7. encryption techniques by giblfiz · · Score: 5, Funny

    I suppose this is better than just changing the font to wingdings, but then SCO probably has a patent on that

  8. DOJ Memo - encrypted by SCO and SunnComm by HighOrbit · · Score: 4, Funny

    So, in additon to hiring the same lawyer (Boise), I see the DOJ has hired SCO's encryption team of MIT mathmaticians to handle its super-secret documents. Next they will hire SunnComm to write a document locking program that uses the windows auto-play feature, change their font to Chinese script, and make it black on black background. Shhhh.. don't tell the Russians to hold down the shift-key.

    No wonder they can't catch Bin Laden.

  9. Re:Still waiting... but... by TheMidget · · Score: 4, Insightful
    On the whole measuring diversity is pointless.

    The idea of equal opportunity and equal rights should be that you just hire whoever is better for the job, and hit anyone making this not so with a big stick that has a nail in it.

    Actually, according to the memo, the issue here was not just about diversity, but active discrimation. They were not hiring whoever was better for the job, they were giving better chances to caucasians: certain career opportunities were only offered to caucasians, critical information was withheld from minorities. The playing field was severly skewed against minorities. Yes, in this memo lack of diversity is just a polically correct euphemism for outright racism!

    Aiming for exactly 50% one thing or another is no less sexist/racist than only hiring women or only hiring men (etc).

    It was not about aiming at exactly 50%, but rather about aiming at anything above 0% for the minority employees!

  10. absolutely appalling by treat · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Notice that the blacked out text is always negative, where positive text is left in. This makes the redacted official version a deliberate deception. The people responsible should be held accountable.

  11. Can we give the parent comment a score of 6? by bigpat · · Score: 5, Insightful

    "Truth be told the fact it was redacted in the first place is far more disturbing than the actual content that was removed."

    Government representatives are only supposed to keep stuff secret that would give a potential enemy vital information... blacking out anything that doesn't meet this criteria should be a hanging offense. If this report is true, then this is obviously corruption in its most base and basic form.

    Next thing you know we will be trillions of dollars in debt spending half our income on taxes with social security about to collapse and being told that everything will be okay. Oh wait a sec...