Slashdot Mirror


Folding@Home for OpenBSD

schnarff writes "Users of OpenBSD have been asking the Folding@Home team for a port of their distributed computing client since at least May of 2002; I've helped out by figuring out how to run F@H under Linux emulation (mirror of instructions). Note that this procedure should work for NetBSD as well with some minor modifications."

7 of 50 comments (clear)

  1. Re:Yawn, by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    I'm huge OpenBSD as anyone, works great on server and router, but for the desktop? Really? It's a great OS, but I say just use NetBSD or FreeBSD for your desktop.

    BSD Gear

  2. Re:Hmmmm by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Offtopic

    Please mod up parent as funny!

    It's the only BSD-is-dieing post to be reasonably clever and amusing evar.

  3. Troll-in-one by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Offtopic

    All the *BSD is dying posts are contained in this one post. If you have mod points, please mod this up so that everybody will know that *BSD is dying! No need to post your own, as it will only be redundant!

    Oh, and if I've missed any, please add your troll as a reply and I'll include it in the next Troll-in-one.

    _*_*_*_*_*_*_*_*_*_*_*_*_*_*_*_*_*_*_*_*_*_*_*_*_

    The *BSD Wailing Song

    What's left for me to see
    In my ship I sailed so far
    What can the answer be
    Don't know what the questions are.
    And after all I've done
    Still I cannot feel the sun
    Tell me save me
    In the end our lost souls must repent.
    I must know it is for certain
    Can it be the final curtain
    As long as the wind will blow
    I'll be searching high and low.
    Who knows what's really true
    They say the end is so near
    Why are we all so cruel
    We just fill ourselves with fear.
    And heaven and hell will turn
    All that we love shall burn
    Hear me trust me
    In the end our lost sould must repent.
    I must know it is for certain
    Can it be the final curtain
    As long as the wind will blow
    I'll be searching high and low
    Final curtain
    Final curtain


    _*_*_*_*_*_*_*_*_*_*_*_*_*_*_*_*_*_*_*_*_*_*_*_*_

    • flask of ripe urine
      pressed to bsd lips
      bsd drink up

    _*_*_*_*_*_*_*_*_*_*_*_*_*_*_*_*_*_*_*_*_*_*_*_*_

    I don't want to start a holy war here, but what is the deal with you BSD fanatics? I've been sitting here at my freelance gig in front of a BSD box (a PIII 800 w/512 Megs of RAM) for about 20 minutes now while it attempts to copy a 17 Meg file from one folder on the hard drive to another folder. 20 minutes. At home, on my Pentium Pro 200 running NT 4, which by all standards should be a lot slower than this BSD box, the same operation would take about 2 minutes. If that.

    In addition, during this file transfer, Netscape will not work. And everything else has ground to a halt. Even Emacs Lite is straining to keep up as I type this.

    I won't bore you with the laundry list of other problems that I've encountered while working on various BSD machines, but suffice it to say there have been many, not the least of which is I've never seen a BSD box that has run faster than its Windows counterpart, despite the BSD machines faster chip architecture. My 486/66 with 8 megs of ram runs faster than this 800 mhz machine at times. From a productivity standpoint, I don't get how people can claim that BSD is a "superior" machine.

    BSD addicts, flame me if you'd like, but I'd rather hear some intelligent reasons why anyone would choose to use a BSD over other faster, cheaper, more stable systems.


    _*_*_*_*_*_*_*_*_*_*_*_*_*_*_*_*_*_*_*_*_*_*_*_*_

    It is common knowledge that *BSD is dying. Almost everyone knows that ever hapless *BSD is mired in an irrecoverable and mortifying tangle of fatal trouble. It is perhaps anybody's guess as to which *BSD is the worst off of an admittedly suffering *BSD community. The numbers continue to decline for *BSD but FreeBSD may be hurting the most. Look at the numbers. The erosion of user base for FreeBSD continues in a head spinning downward spiral.

    OpenBSD leader Theo states that there are 7000 users of OpenBSD. How many users of BSD are there? Let's see. The number of OpenBSD versus NetBSD posts on Usenet is roughly in ratio of 5 to 1. Therefore there are about 7000/5 = 1400 NetBSD users. BSD/OS posts on Usenet are about half of the volume of NetBSD posts. Therefore there are about 700 users of BSD/OS. A recent article put FreeBSD at about 80 percent of the *BSD market. Therefore there are (7000+1400+700)*4 = 36400 FreeBSD users. This is consistent with the number of FreeBSD Usenet posts.

    Due to the troubles of Walnut Creek, abysmal sales and so on, FreeBSD went out of business and was taken over by BSDI who sell

  4. Re:Hmmmm by JShadow · · Score: -1, Offtopic


    ROFL... I'll have to agree, that's the most intelligent BSD slam I've ever read. :) I don't agree of course, but still, have to respect intelligence!

  5. Re:Lights out, pard. by beefdart · · Score: -1, Offtopic

    SCO isnt asking me to pay $600 a processor, and no freebsd developers seem to be getting sued...

    fugoff

  6. Re:Yawn, by grub · · Score: 0, Offtopic


    I run OpenBSD on my desktop at work and whatever servers I need to set up (other than smp machines which get FreeBSD) Off the top of my head here's nothing I can think of that I'm lacking.

    It may take a little digging around but usually you can get what you want. Certainly there isn't the hand-holding aspect of other OSs (unless you count "RTFM! RTFFAQ!" as hand-holding. :)

    Oh wait.. I just thought of one thing. off to misc@openbsd.org..

    --
    Trolling is a art,
  7. Re:Hmmmm by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Offtopic

    Yes, using a thesaurus is truly a sign of consummate percipience.