Slashdot Mirror

← Back to Stories (view on slashdot.org)

Forbes Examines SCO Subpoenas

Posted by ryuzaki0 on from the what-does-it-all-mean dept.

z4ce writes "It seems that Daniel Lyons of Forbes just wrote yet another article on the IBM vs. SCO law suit. Now, Daniel seems to seeing SCO for the liars they are. One of the choice quotes include, "What's the point of hassling people who make chips and set-top boxes? Don't ask SCO's top execs. They don't know anything about this stuff, remember?""

1 of 416 comments (clear)

  1. Getting old... by meta-monkey · · Score: 0, Redundant

    Okay, when the whole SCO thing started...what...this past June or so, I thought it was pretty funny. I mean, just who are they kidding? Do they actually expect anybody to pay them...anything? I still wonder if anyone actually has. They CLAIM people have, but won't say whom.

    I digress.

    The point is...it's getting old. Everyone with half a brain has been screaming that not only does the Emperor have no clothes, but that he never did, never will, and likely has no clue what clothes are for months now. When will SCO finally implode, and in one spectacularly unnoteworthy press release cease to exist?

    Earth to SCO: seriously, enough already.

    --
    We don't have a state-run media we have a media-run state.