Slashdot Mirror


Fox Considering a Return of "Family Guy"

wo1verin3 writes: "USA Today is reporting that all is not lost and due to exceptionally strong DVD sales Family Guy may return with as many as 35 new episodes! A DVD set of the show's first 28 episodes, released in April, has sold nearly 1 million copies, making it this year's top-selling TV show and the No. 4 television title ever, according to Video Store magazine."

33 of 694 comments (clear)

  1. Woo Hoo! by dolo666 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I love the Family Guy! Does that make me sick?
    I feel like I just heard they brought Futurama back.
    Oh now I feel sad now...

  2. Pick a day, any day... by ericspinder · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I love that show, I saw every epoisode on Fox that I could catch, and I watch ever one that I can on adult swim. As I remember it fox keep moving the show from night to night. Sometimes showing it sometimes not, it really didn't make a log of sense. It was one of those shows that you couldn't depend it being on. I am glad that Fox is reconsidering.

    --
    The grass is only greener, if you don't take care of your own lawn.
    1. Re:Pick a day, any day... by Doomstalk · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Fox loves to do this. Especially with shows they air around the same time as The Simpsons, which is by far their most popular show. They like to use those slots to show off whatever new series they feel like hawking that week, causing the musical slots effect you're talking about. That and football games that go into overtime generally mean the kiss of death for whatever show is unlucky enough to be there. The sad part is that they kill great shows to promote ones with far less lasting power.

  3. The question is by BizDiz · · Score: 5, Insightful

    what kind of "restrictions" are they gonna place on it?

    The show got cancelled more because of controversy than lack of ratings. It's good to see Fox selling out on this due to response (whoddathunkit? Fox?), but I hate for the Family Guy people to sell out too.

    In some ways it was good that it went out on top; Look at the Simpsons now; yech.

    1. Re:The question is by CrowScape · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Except South Park is cable, Family Guy is network. There is a massive difference. Cable channels can take far greater risks as they generally cater to niche audiences. So if Comedy Central alienates the "moral majority" with an episode about a gay dog, it doesn't hurt them much because the audience that was offended probably wasn't watching Comedy Central anyway.

      --
      common sense: noun
      What those who are ignorant of the subject matter think; usually wrong.
    2. Re:The question is by Belgand · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Well, beyond that they have different FCC limitations. For some insane reason it was ruled that the FCC can effectively censor broadcast television. Cable, however, falls outside of these bounds and thus is free to do pretty much whatever they want as far as I'm aware. I may be wrong, but there's nothing stopping a cable channel from showing hardcore fetish porn aside from sponsor and viewer complaints (guess which they care about more).

    3. Re:The question is by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Contrary to popular belief, Family Guy was not cancelled because of controversy. If that had been the case they would have simply said "you can't do that" and there were relatively few times this happened. MacFarlane wouldn't consider doing the show if they wouldn't give him freedom to be edgy.

      As someone else mentioned, it was bad scheduling on the part of Fox that killed the show. It was shuffled to nearly every day of the week throughout its life and sometimes would be shown at a different time without warning, so viewers started disappearing.

      I fell in love with this show from the first episode, but I only saw it occasionally because I never knew if it would be on or not. I usually ended up having to check the TV listings just to find out when it would be each week.

  4. There is a Santy Claus by Alric · · Score: 2, Insightful

    As a proud owner of both volumes, I can say, "FINALLY!" In my opinion, Family Guy is one of the smartest, most subtle shows ever on Television.

    Maybe the audience over the commercial sponsors for once. That would be awesome.

    1. Re:There is a Santy Claus by smart.id · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I agree with you that Family Guy is one of the smartest shows on television, but it is in no way subtle. Do you call the Kool-Aid Guy busting through a wall and yelling "OH YEAH!" subtle?

      --
      blog & fiction: jd87
    2. Re:There is a Santy Claus by mekkab · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Do you call the Kool-Aid Guy busting through a wall and yelling "OH YEAH!" subtle?


      Yes.

      --
      In the future, I would want to not be isolated from my friends in the Space Station.
  5. Re:Better Than The Simpsons? by miketang16 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    You've obviously never watched it then... Family Guy is levels upon levels above King of the Hill, and in my opinion actually better than the Simpsons too. It mixes an awesome blend of 'stupid' humor with underlying intelligent themes.

    --
    -------
    "In times of universal deceit, telling the truth becomes a revolutionary act."
    -- George Orwell
  6. Re:Better Than The Simpsons? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    It's funnier. Far, far funnier than King of the Hill, and averaging funnier than recent seasons of the Simpsons.

  7. FOX = morons by glassesmonkey · · Score: 5, Insightful
    How annoying, first they cancel the show despite the LARGEST viewer response of any cancelled program. Then they leave it cancelled just long enough so it will suck by the time they put it back on the air. And then they claim it was a "late-bloomer". Fact is they realized they fsck'd up when they looked at the DVD sales and some exec wanted an explaination.

    Fox Television Entertainment Group chairman Sandy Grushow said a decision is expected soon and called the series a late-blooming phenomenon that may have aired before its time.
  8. Re:Better Than The Simpsons? by macshune · · Score: 4, Insightful

    It's also good because it's one of the only times in life when you get rewarded for watching shitloads of tv shows and commercials during the 70s, 80s & 90s (as in, you get the jokes:).

  9. The ANSWER is... by StandardCell · · Score: 4, Insightful

    (from the USA Today article) "...new episodes could end up going directly to Cartoon Network."

    That would solve the controversy problem since Cartoon Network is a cable channel.

    1. Re:The ANSWER is... by harlows_monkeys · · Score: 3, Insightful
      That would solve the controversy problem since Cartoon Network is a cable channel

      They are a cable channel that cuts the Professor on Futurama when he says "sweet zombie Jesus", at a time that is supposed to be only adults watching. I wouldn't look to them for controversial programming.

  10. Re:Better Than The Simpsons? by Cornelius+the+Great · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Family Guy actually utilizes the same basic premise behind the Simpsons, and borrows quite a bit from the show:
    - a show about a family with 3 kids
    - the father is a moron
    - the wife is usually the sane/careful one
    - setting is in a fictional American town, although in Family Guy, we at least know the state (Rhode Island)
    - the children are a boy, girl, and a baby
    - the father spends a lot of time at the bar

    There's a few others. The biggest differences in the two have to deal with the fact that the family pet (Brian, a walking, talking, alcoholic mutt) is personified, as well as the baby (Stewie, who has napoleonic tendencies) Needless to say, I've enjoyed both shows enough to consider myself a big fan of each.

    --
    Sigs are for losers
  11. Not Curiosity/Firefly DVD by ucsckevin · · Score: 5, Insightful

    relatively short network run may have helped DVD sales, Video Store's Judith McCourt says. "It really speaks to something that had a following, was cut off network TV, and people said, 'What did I miss?' "

    I don't think people are saying "hmm, I think I'll check out the family guy." Consumers of the DVD were fans of the show. It sounds like no one wants to admit that fox made a mistake when they cancelled it. Also I wonder if they make the same turn around when they see the strong Firefly DVD sales

    1. Re:Not Curiosity/Firefly DVD by Chanc_Gorkon · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Firefly sucked compared to what it replaced. Dark Angel was better. WAY better then Firefly. My wife even watched it and she's not the scifi freak I am. Oh how I miss seeing max kick some booty and look hot at the same time (Jessica Alba).

      --

      Gorkman

    2. Re:Not Curiosity/Firefly DVD by sfe_software · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I don't think people are saying "hmm, I think I'll check out the family guy." Consumers of the DVD were fans of the show.

      I also suspect (like with Futurama, though to a lesser extent here) that the type of people who would allow a Nielson box in their homes are not the type of people who watch Family Guy. I also suspect that this is why we see so many "millionaire" shows, and Judge this and Jerry that...

      It's a biased system in the first place, in that there is (I suspect) a rather narrow class of people that would participate in Nielson ratings (and answer Arbitron's unsolicited phone surveys, etc).

      That's my theory anyway...

      --
      NGWave - Fast Sound Editor for Windows
  12. well, that's great. by perrin5 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    That sets a precident.

    everybody, go buy the Firefly DVD set as soon as it's out.

    --
    hmmmm?
  13. Re:Why Family Guy? by nacturation · · Score: 1, Insightful

    OK, I get Harry Potter. I get The Simpsons. But why do geeks love Family Guy? Is it a Stewie thing?
    --
    One man's -1 Flamebait is another man's +5 Funny.


    Yes, I quoted your sig. But that's the exact reason. For most people (and likely Fox execs) The Family Guy is pure flamebait. Ever see that episode with the "Diamonds are forever" commercial? 'Nuff said! However, if you're not an overly sensitive person, most of the humor there is a veritable goldmine! Others have said it, but it's worth repeating that TFG has at least triple the wit of any other show packed into its 22 minutes, and I'm being conservative.

    --
    Want to improve your Karma? Instead of "Post Anonymously", try the "Post Humously" option.
  14. List of characters is not the difference by DunbarTheInept · · Score: 4, Insightful

    So they have similar characters. Big deal. The difference is in the style. Family Guy used the 'flashback' joke a LOT, as in: "Oh, they don't let Peter rent from the video store anymore because he kept recording over the tapes. {cut to scene of opening of 'citizen kane', which goes staticy for a second and then it's Peter on a couch, obviously being filmed with a home video camera, saying "It's a freakin sled, okay! Rosebud is a freakin' sled! There, now I just saved you from wasting two boring pointless hours of your life.", and then the movie continues.}

    The Simpsons generally tried to stick to the story, and use the plot for the humor, while Family Guy was usually funny *despite* the plot, because the humor was in fast, small snippets.

    --

    Don't label something "offtopic" unless you know the topic well enough to tell what's on topic.

  15. stewie sounds noble british by caveat · · Score: 2, Insightful

    South Africans have a distinctly different sound, even though they describe themselves as "sounding a bit British" - like canadians and americans. Stewie sounds rather well-bred, and acts the part; the ep with the girl who speaks Cockney is classic for this..."Ugh, she doesn't speak the language so much as murder it."

    --

    Facts do not cease to exist because they are ignored. - Aldous Huxley
  16. Re:Bloody Hell by Corbin+Dallas · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Seth MacFarlane was responsible for over a dozen voices, including Stewie. He also, like, created it and stuff.

    Can I have my free cookie now?

    --
    Democracy is two wolves and a lamb voting on what to have for lunch. Liberty is a well-armed lamb contesting the vote.
  17. Mod parent up by Bobulusman · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Family Guy was ok, but I felt like I needed ADD just to keep up with how much they randomly changed topics.

    Now, Futurama, that was a show to savor. You had such a good mix of comedy and drama. You had story arcs, plot, character development, and most scifi inside-jokes than anyone could catch. Just look at "Jurassic Bark": Dolemite references and an ending that genuinely make me tear up, something that a television show has never make me do before.

    --
    Cogito ergo sum in Slashdot.
  18. Re:Better Than The Simpsons? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    no.

  19. Re:Better Than The Simpsons? by Lazlo+Nibble · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I agree with the other responders to this message: TFG is much, much wittier than The Simpsons. They're also less afraid to go for the cheap shot, and the musical bits just knock me on my ass. (Don't get me started on those flaccid "Evita" takeoffs on The Simpsons the other day -- yecccch!)

    Most significantly to me, Family Guy doesn't succumb to a sitcom-ish last-two-minutes-of-the-episode personal-redemption jones. The Simpsons seems to be constitutionally incapable of wrapping things up on a mean-spirited note. Nobody ever "learns a valuable lesson" on The Family Guy; it's kinda like Seinfeld or Curb Your Enthusiasm in that sense.

    It's obviously a matter of personal taste, but if you haven't seen The Family Guy you should at least give it a shot. When it first aired I dumped it after a couple of episodes because the whole "Stewie killing Lois" thing was way too overwrought for me, but after jumping back in for the Adult Swim airings I realized just how good a show it is. Arguably it's the most tightly-written network comedy in recent memory.

    (I would leave King of the Hill out of the discussion, because it's a completely different kind of show -- much more grounded and less reliant on pop-culture references and flights of whimsy and "wackiness" than TFG or Simpsons, or even your average network sitcom.)

  20. Re:Why Family Guy? by Durandal64 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    The one failing of the show, I think, is that sometimes they just can't let go of a joke. I remember the sequence when Peter go into a brawl with a giant chicken ... it went on for a good 3-5 minutes. That's entirely too long for a simple humorous interlude. There was also the letter that Stewie wrote Brian after he'd left for England to live on the set of that English show. It took over a minute to read the thing, and it just lost its humor after 15 seconds anyway. There are tons of other examples of what should be small interludes being dragged out to fill 30 seconds or more throughout the series, but the rest of the show is hilarious enough to make up for it. Whenever God makes an appearance, it's always funny.

    MEG: I wish God would just kill me now!
    [Camera goes to Heaven, with God pointing a sniper rifle at Meg's head. Then a phone rings.]
    GOD: Hello? ... Kaaaaaaaren!

  21. Re:Why Family Guy? by ditto999999999999999 · · Score: 3, Insightful

    My GOD!!! That chicken sketch was the most action packed cartoon scene I have ever seen. Right near the end when Peter says, "Chicken, gave me a bad coupon...", and it starts up again... Just thinking about that makes me laugh but I digress. I think that is one of Family Guys strengths. They keep going with stuff, and it really has an effect on me.

    Ditto

  22. DarkAngel OT by Scrameustache · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Firefly sucked compared to what it replaced. Dark Angel was better. WAY better then Firefly.

    Man, you gotta be drunk!

    You mean the post apocalyptic show where a giant EMP destroyed all electronics/civilisation and EVERYONE has a pager? Computers all over the place? That show?

    Where "old run down technology" is a brand new SUV with mud smudged on it?

    Where they had "original" characters like freakin' Vincent from that 80's Beauty and the Beast show? He looked exactly like him had the same damn personality and the same powers! (Yeah, the beast is really a big softy, REALLY original!)

    And don't forget, cat DNA means you can jump 20 feet in the air! It sure does!

    Oh, and the hot star goes in heat...real classy.

    What else...hey, her borrowed-womd mother looked exactly like her! Even though she had 0 relation to the baby she was carrying (not her egg)!

    Dark Angel was cheap crap. It was the movie Soldier made into a TV show, with a weaker storyline and a hot chick to compensate for the total lack of originality, effort, logic, or good sci-fi. It was a festival of cliches and borrowed ideas, badly executed.

    BUT, The star was hot. Really hot.

    --

    You can't take the sky from me...

  23. Re:Better Than The Simpsons? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    Family Guy... so good it got CANCELLED!

  24. Re:Better Than The Simpsons? by miketang16 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Brian is almost a knockoff of Homer Simpson.

    Uh, yea... if Homor went to Brown and was very intelligent. The only similarity is the alcoholism.

    --
    -------
    "In times of universal deceit, telling the truth becomes a revolutionary act."
    -- George Orwell