Slashdot Mirror
Debian 3.0r2 Released
FrankoBoy writes "As announced on DistroWatch, Debian 3.0r2 has been released this weekend, with some security issues fixed... and Rock 'n Diamonds dropped because of license problems. Here's the official announcement. This release had been slowed by an attack on Debian boxes discussed Friday."
Google cache of packages.debian.org
'Go for the eyes, Boo, go for the eyes, aaarrrrrrrr!' -- Minsc
The hack attack from last week (as cited in the write-up) could have grave effects on Linux servers worldwide if you don't check the MD5 sumations against your downloaded packages.
Reply or e-mail; don't vaguely moderate. Ex-O'Reilly/MIT employee, now a full-time Google employee.
Good choice ;-)
The stable distri of debian has one problem: Many programs made a lot of progress in the last month and the distro doesn't reflect that so far. So you will need to add some more (unoffical) sources to your apt configuration. Check the manual for details.
One important page for finding the right source for a recent Mozilla, OpenOffice or X11 is:
http://www.apt-get.org/
Have fun! *eg*
http://www.wiggy.net/debian/
Thank you for your support.
Is this truly the only Earth I can live on?
was caused by this... This release had been slowed by an attack on Debian boxes discussed Friday.
just some info for those playing at home.
Manipulate the moderator system! Mod someone as "overrated" today.
From the Debian 3.0r2 Changelog:
"Rocks-N-Diamonds contains sound, graphics and level data which
violate section 2.3 of the Debian policy manual. Some of the
game content originates with commercial sources that have not
provided explicit permission for their reuse."
BTW, aspell was also removed due to license reasons.
We should be able to take that one down as well.
Help fight continental drift.
Use Woody for a server. I haven't used it as a desktop, but it might be bit too old for you. If it isn't, it will be stable. Use the testing/unstable installation CD if you want an easier install, and then upgrade to the latest everything afterwards. If you use KDE, Google as the dependencies for kmultimedia are buggered at the moment. I use unstable on my desktop, and it's pretty good. The only complaints was X took more to setup than Mandrake (it doesn't like the fact that I have two video cards), KDE install took a while to figure out due to the broken deps, and there's a really annoying bug that puts some garbage in the default X window manager file instead of /usr/bin/kdm (or whatever it is). Generally though, it's good and up to date.
First of all, Debian has the most out of date software packages of any major mainstream distros. Even in the unstable version, is KDE 2.2 and Gnome 2.0, with Xfree86 4.1 (A version that really sucks).
/lib/modules, as you are going to need it.
.ko? modconf does all that nasty module stuff
$ konqueror --version
Qt: 3.1.1
KDE: 3.1.3
Konqueror: 3.1.3
$ xdpyinfo |grep "XFree86 version"
XFree86 version: 4.2.1.1
Secondly, its a pain in the goatse to set up, first of all, you are forced to use Kernel 2.2, which is horribly hacked with "backports" to get any use on any modern machine (Read, made after 1999). Good luck memorizing all the *.ko files in
WTF's a
$ uname -r
2.4.20
Configuring XFree86 is hell! If you don't have a Thick X11 orilley book, and a list of your horizontal sync values from your monitor's intruction manual (if you even have one), BOOM! There goes your monitor.
You must have a *really* old monitor if it can't cope with an out of range signal. I admit its been A few years, but xf86config or xf86setup or something was fine when I set up my X.
Even then, good luck getting anything over 640x480@16 colours.
screen #0:
dimensions: 1024x768 pixels (260x195 millimeters)
resolution: 100x100 dots per inch
depths (7): 16, 1, 4, 8, 15, 24, 32
Other distros give you comprehensive PRINTED MANUALS, PHONE SUPPPORT and/or freindly forums where repling RTFM gets you banned!
Yes, pay for the manuals and phone support if you want. For online stuff, I used to go to linuxnewbie.org
Debian has ZERO support for any decent hardware, including USB mice, scanners, Sound cards, heck even Serial devices struggle.
Well, my usb mouse (cordless, mouse # 2 so I can control xine from across the room, but not my main mouse) works fine, as does my USB mp3 player and sound card. My modem was fine too when I used one, but I don't have a scanner. Printer worked too, but I sold it when I emmigrated.
Apt-get has many flaws. First of all it uses a non standard package format (the rest of the world uses RPM, deprecate the DEB format!)
It's a superior format
Debian is falling to pieces, if it is to survive any market share
That's just it, Debian isn't a commercial distro, it'll go As long as people develop it. If it's not for you, fine. TBH If I had time I'd probably migrate my desktop away from Debian. My laptop's too slow to run a modern distro though. Use whatever floats your boat.
there are images of testing/unstable
http://www.debian.org/CD/http-ftp/
however you can always install a minimal stable system and immediately change your sources from stable to unstable and `apt-get dist-upgrade` and continue from there
Debian has never really limited you by its politics, there are plenty of non-free packages available (in the helpfully named "non-free" section).
If you read the article you would know that this was removed due to containing commercial material for which usage permission had not been granted. Ceasing to distribute the package is completely the right (and legally required) thing for them to do; it doesn't mean you aren't going to be able to use other non-free packages on your machine. In fact, with over 4,000 packages available, Debian is extremely well-supplied with software of all kinds.
"'I pass the test,' she said. 'I will diminish, and go into the West, and remain Galadriel.'"
- JRR Tolkien.
However, why do you need a new ISO image every week? Just download a standard ISO and tell it to retrieve packages from Debian's servers. You'll automatically get the newest packages whenver you install.
It's hard to be religious when certain people are never incinerated by bolts of lightning.
I would suggest following the instructions on the debian/kde wiki for installing 3.1.X on Sid -- you have to install one package manually and then the rest go like clockwork.
501 Not Implemented
No, apart from the new ISO's being built for people to test the new installer.
The intention with Debian is that you only install once, you get the updates via apt-get.
I guess this sucks if you've got poor connectivity, but it's possible to download the list of packages needing updates and then fetch those at work - which is what I used to do, carrying my parallel port Zip disk to and from the office to transfer the .debs ...
Bzzzt. Wrong. Argumentum ad populum. Try again.
Tell your friends about xenu.net
The other nice thing about Knoppix is that it is very easy to try out, and it also makes for a very painless Debian installer. I use it all the time to install Debian Unstable onto x86 desktop machines (see knoppix-installer in /usr/local/bin). I've been a Debian Developer for several years now, and I've pretty much switched over to using Knoppix for all my installation needs.
Not gonna happen.
Too many of the developers have been failing to address bugs in Sarge (testing) and instead have been waiting for or [packaging new upstream versions. This happens during every release cycle, and many developers just assume that this is common practice.
Eventually, Sid (unstable) will be frozen as well, so the maintainers are unable to upload new versions until the RC bugs in Sarge are fixed.
If the release manager would just accept that this is necessary in order to get a release out the door instead of assuming that reason will rule the day, the time between releases would likely be much more reasonable.
The problem seems to originate in the fact of most maintainers having only one machine at home with Sid installed. It is difficult to replicate (and thus fix) bugs in testing if you are keeping your machine up to date with unstable. Freezing Sid and testing at the same time seems to resolve this problem for most of the maintainers.
IANADPM, but I have been using Debian for 6+ years and observing this series of events occur semi annually Every year, policy and process changes are adjusted to mitigate the various difficulties involved in preparing for release, but the dist is growing at such a rate (I believe that Sarge will fill 10 CDs with packages) that new complications must be addressed every year.
I'm just amazed that they are able to achieve what they do, and that the quality of the release is so much higher than that of thier comercial competitors.
Read, L
Help test apt-secure.
Belief is the currency of delusion.
XFree86 is certainly not the most recent. However, X Strike Force is working on 4.3.0 and you can get it out of experimental. Add
to your sources.list and you can select the newer version manually inside aptitude (which I highly recommend for package management anyway, if you're not using it.)
when sid finally becomes stable
suddenly start [...] new packages, things get messy
Neither of these statements are accurate reflections of reality. 'sid' is synonymous with 'unstable', and, even were that not the case, it would just upgrade the packages that there were dependencies for when the dist switched over
We've secretly replaced Slashdot with new Folgers Crystals - let's see if it notices.
Actually, tell it you're installing 'sid'. Otherwise...
Actually, I believe that unsable has always been, and always will be, called Sid [go watch ToyStory again if you can't work out why!] so this won't make any difference.
When Sarge becomes 'stable', replacing Woody, Sid will not become 'testing' - it will be copied to 'testing' and given a new name.
I use Sid (unstable) on my laptop, but on my new desktop PC I haven't bothered to upgrade from Woody, other than KDE 3.1, OpenOffice.org, Privoxy, and a few home-compiled apps. Actually, I find it refreshing to have a rock-solid and stable system. On my Sid laptop, I get all kinds of weird problems. Not often, but occasionally... Like when the printer stops working, or the USB mouse doesn't work anymore, or when X is no longer 3D accelerated. These are the kinds of issues you have to deal with once in a while when running Debian unstable. Not a big deal, but if I could choose again, I would have chosen Woody (with a few selected upgrades) on the laptop as well.
Another option is installing Debian via Knoppix. I found the partitioning a bit annoying as the installer at the time I did it wanted to just throw everything into a single partition, but otherwise it was amazingly easy to install and dist-upgrade to Debian Unstable.
Everything will be taken away from you.
Debian's release cycle is a little slow, so by the end things seem a little out of date. But when the new stable comes out, upgrading will be a snap (if the past is any indication). Install once, and then easy upgrades from then on.
--Lawrence Lessig for Congress!
7.0.
www.backports.org is also a good resource for finding cutting-edge packages backported to the stable release.
LRC, the best-read libertarian site on the web
That's what the Bug-Report resulting in this removal said (according to the Woody ChangeLog). I don't have any other information about this, sorry. Note that GNU aspell is still in unstable, so perhaps it was about a specific version being non-free in the past, which happened to be included in woody.
Michael
umm... use unstable, the name is more of a disclaimer then anything else. I'm using it right now and have for a least a year or so. Never had a stability issue. Either I'm just that damn good, or Debian is, and I know its not me.
Way to go Debian, keep up the good work!
Actually, it ships with a number of different 2.4 kernels also. If you do nothing but keep hitting the enter key, you will get the most conservative install possible (with a 2.2 kernel). If you read a paragraph or two of documentation or the install help screen, it will tell you how to select a kenel. Also, the different CDs in the set are all bootable, and use different kenels to start the install if you want to do it that way. If all else fails, and you install a 2.2 kernel, type apt-get install kernel-image-# and you should be ready to go.
What's wrong with this one?
May I suggest Knoppix. Its pretty much unstable with some 'testing' bits in it.
You can drop it in yer cd rom and know in a blink if you will have any sort of hardware compatability issues. then use the kpx-hdinstall command to drop it on yer hard drive. Also remember to specify english. Finally find a good deb source for Gnome 2.4 and put that gnomish goodness on yer desk.
Knoppix is nice.
Excuse the Unicode crap in my posts. That's an apostrophe, and slashdot is busted.
What about this?
The way it works is a named distro such as sid, woody or sarge progresses through different stages of stability: from unstable->testing->stable. So right now sid is considered "unstable", sarge is in the "testing" stage before it becoms stable, and woody is considered "stable." Once sarge is considered stable, woody will be obsolete and sid will be bumped to testing and a new version will become unstable. The Debian maintainers have a _very_ high standard for stability. When you have a Debian stable release you can count on being able to install any package from the stable release without hitting a stability problem. All packages in stable are very thoroughly tested to be sure that there are no problems with them. That being said they tend to be somewhat out of date. I've been using Debian since 1998 and I've used unstable almost exclusively since then on my desktop, but have used stable on any servers/gateways I've built. I would say that "unstable" Debian tends to be more stable than RedHat releases, and more up to date (RedHat 9 did make vast improvements over RedHat 8 in the stability/non-brokeness area though). I suggest if you're installing it on a desktop machine that you should go with unstable(sid). From time to time some packages will have dependency fights with each other but those can be solved by putting those packages on "hold" for a few days and waiting for the dependency issues to work themeselves out, then upgrading as normal. Once you go Debian, you'll never go back to a distro without apt builtin.
As of now:
Unstable->sid (this is probably what you want for a desktop)
testing->sarge (use this if you need something slight more reliable than unstable)
stable->woody (use this on mission critcal systems and servers)
-Mr. Lizard
^I'm with stupid.^
Yes, in a way, Debian really does need to you know what you're doing, how a Linux system works, and what certain packages do. But if you're technically adept, I can tell you that a Debian system is nicer to maintain than Redhat or Mandrake. It's not just apt, it's the way the whole system is designed from a technical perspective. And of course, apt makes installing and maintaining great, and you know that apt is on every Debian system you may encounter. It's not an optional package.
By the way, if you want to make things easier, you just have to know the right package. discover will automatically probe and insert modules every time you boot up. webmin handles easy configurations for many system programs and settings.
Really, the main problem with debian is you have to _know_ that these packages exist, and then install them. Debian will not install these packages by default, because its basic install is just that
Nothing beats the time I visited a client to fix something that they had wrong with their unix server. I discovered it was a Debian machine, but one that didn't have the telnet command installed. A simple apt-get install telnet, and 20 seconds later (it was a modem internet connection
Step1: Go to apt-get.org and put xfree86 into the package search.
8 6/$(ARCH)/ ./' >> /etc/apt/sources.list
step2: ???
step3: profit
If you can't follow this to its logical conclusion, then:
echo 'deb http://people.debian.org/~mmagallo/packages/xfree
apt-get update
apt-get upgrade
These packages have worked just fine for me. enjoy!
-Mr. Lizard
^I'm with stupid.^
One correction: unstable is always called sid. When sarge is released, a new name will be chosen for testing.
Note to ACs: I usually delete AC replies without reading them. If you want to talk to me, log in.
Why not give Knoppix a try if you want an easy install. It is incredibly easy to install to HD as well, just boot up without X ( hit F2 for boot options, then type in knoppix 2), and type in knx-hdinstall. Answer a few questions and you will have a very up to date Debian based system.
Status update:
http://www.wiggy.net/debian/
Unless you like to do fresh installs to clear out the clutter you've created from time to time,
This isn't an issue with Debian. Want to clear out the clutter? Just use your favorite apt-get interface to remove all but a basic set of packages. Use cruft to find and remove anything else, then use apt-get to install the stuff you want again. This way you clear out the clutter, but don't lose your configuration.
In practice, I don't really even do the above unless my drive is getting full. Unlike other operating systems (cough Windows cough), Linux doesn't really 'degrade' over time. It may get cluttered, but it continues to work just fine.
to try new things and such
If you run unstable, you will always be trying new things. Just upgrade frequently (I upgrade daily, in general) and you'll always be running new stuff. Also, every time I update I get a new list of packages in my "New Packages" section, and I find it very interesting to take five minutes and scan through them, looking for anything intruiguing.
need a system you can setup on a new set of hardware in under an hour pretty much consistantly
Try Knoppix. It's Instant Debian unstable. Getting it running on a clean box takes nothing more than the time to boot. Getting it installed takes just a few minutes more.
Note to ACs: I usually delete AC replies without reading them. If you want to talk to me, log in.
the thing is, that the best way to install it is through the netinstall and for that you only need a quite small iso to kick the installer going. you don't often need isos of it, for old installations update automatically very simply and it is _not_ preferable to update them from cd's. so for them it is preferable to have them created from the packages on the machine of the guy who wants those isos. also i imagine that a full iso package would weight quite a lot nowadays. this is fundamentally different from the "get the isos, that could come in a shrinkwrap package, and pop the cd's in to update to the next version" method of some other distributions.
and their mirrors for the packages are plenty and fast as hell as well(they seem to have quite formidable amount of support from the academic world with bandwith resources to donate). for me updating my debian box it takes more time to unpack than it takes to download, thanks to the mirror that is quite nearby on a fat pipe.
also a lot of people prefer to not run the 'stable' distribution as their desktops and so you would need many different sets of those isos that would be need to be updated periodically to reflect the changes in the distributions.
(however some might prefer to use knoppix or similar and do a hdinstall from there, if you just wanted a quite up to date system on a cd that works easily.)
all this said i'm pretty sure that there are some torrents somewhere for some iso pack, for that is the nature of the community big enough that everything will appear.
btw there's alternative (net)installation boot cd's as well should you wish for example xfs support & some things like that. and be sure to choose an apt-source that is fast since the chances are that you will find one pretty easily, and also spend the time to learn that where you can add additional sources(for additional software not in the official distributions http://www.apt-get.org is a pretty good place to look from).
world was created 5 seconds before this post as it is.
Another factor is packaging. Debian packages are built in a specific fashion, and in some cases when the upstream developer releases a new version that is binary and source incompatible with the old version, the package developer goes to great pains to make sure both packages can co-exist on the same system.
Then there's version stability. When a security hole is found in a Debian package, Debian doesn't just package up the latest version and ship that like some vendors do. Instead, the security fixes are backported to the previous version, and an update to the old version is released instead. Why would they do this? A new version with new features can have new bugs, or change the behaviour of certain things in various (sometimes subtle) ways. I've had an entire PHP-based website stop working because of a PHP upgrade. Something that was legal and worked fine in a previous version (storing objects in an array stored in the SESSION variable) completely ceased functioning in the new version.
I used up all my sick days, so I'm calling in dead.
the 'unstable' 'stable' and 'testing'
names are symlinks for one of the named
debian distributions.
woody is currently the stable version.
the stable version which will usually have
slightly older software, but because it's been
tested for a much longer time
it's better to use on business servers.
sarge is currently the testing version.
it should probably be for workstation/home use.
the packages are newer, but not as bug-free.
while it could be used in a production environment,
stable will always be a safer bet.
as the stable version, woody gets mainly
security updates. at some point, sarge
will become well testing enough that
woody will be retired (like 'potato' before it),
and sarge will become the current stable branch.
a new fork will be created at that point,
and become the new testing version.
'sid' will always be the unstable branch of
debian. you don't want to use 'unstable'.
it will almost always have the newest
software versions, but they will probably
break your system. if you see something you
like, download it singly, don't install
sarge to get it.
in short...
get sarge/testing to try out debian.
if there's problems, or you want older
more tested software, get woody/stable.
if all you want is problems,
for your own mind to solve,
get sid/unstable.
For several years I had run SuSE and Red Hat and had wanted to try Debian, but didn't have enough knowledge to get it installed.
Then, just over a year ago, I learned about Libranet and ordered a copy. Libranet is a distribution that is true to Debian, while providing a cutting edge desktop, slick install and a great administrative interface.
I have found Libranet to be exceptionally stable and you just can't beat Debian for its package management.
Those who trade freedom for security will lose both, and deserve neither" -- Ben Franklin
IIRC the problem was that there was a non free wordlist (the DEC one) included into the english dictionary, an that invalidated the full license.
In sid, the english dict comes from a different (fully free, and better) source, so there is no license problem in sid.
> SCO will be furious cause they forgot
:-)
> Linux Kernel - license problems
No license problems, they're still using the 2.2 kernel
-- running 3.0r1 at home