Novell's Certified Linux Engineer
AEnertia writes "Novell have been quick in moving ahead with their recent aquisition of SuSE. I was browsing their site when I found this page describing their new certification (CLE) under their certifications programs. Looks like they are positioning their well respected certification program for their newest asset."
You had me until you said vi. Maybe I'll find someone who teaches Emacs.
Yes we are lazy, that is why we use linux. you set it up once, and it works, it works till you take it down. none of the I'm bored so I think I will crash stuff.
i thought once I was found, but it was only a dream.
Hmm, I think "Im rubber, youre glue", or perhaps "I know you are, but what am I" would have been more the more appropriate fifth grade mentality response, but I suppose yours will work.
I do not need an abstraction layer protecting me from the horrors of the hardware/OS interface.
Hmmm, the Hardware Abstraction Layer doesnt do anything LIKE that... sounds like you are just swinging around jargon in an attempt to look like you know what you are talking about... The HAL was something MS used to make NT independent of the processor it was running on; at one time there were HALs for RISC and i386. They moved away from that direction for the most part, but there are still seperate uni- and multi- processor HALs. Also, there are now 64-bit versions of the HAL, for both Intel and AMD.
I wouldnt call that protecting me from the horrors of the hardware/OS interface (whatever thats supposed to mean).
I do not need a monopoly telling me what I can and can't do with the hardware I bought. I do not need forced upgrades, poor security, bloated code, and a GHz or better procesor to type a letter or browse the internet.
I use Windows, and I have none of those things. Just more anti-MS FUD, but I suppose we are in the right place for it...
Most of all, I don't need Clippy to help me do my work!
Hmmm, Ive never used Clippy myself. Honestly, I dont see why a little cartoon character face on a help file should generate such paranoia, but people are afraid of midgets and clowns, too.
Linus, Raymond, RMS, Cox and crew do not care if I upgrade my motherboard or get a new hard drive, so why do I have to get permission from Microsoft when I try it with XP?
Ive never had a problem with product activation, but thats probably because I always use the enterprise version. However, even people I know who use XP Home have never had an issue with activation. Score another one in the accute paranoia box.
Manipulate the moderator system! Mod someone as "overrated" today.
Its a poor craftsman who blames his tools.
Actually, it's a poor craftsman who chooses poor tools.
The skilled craftsman knows a good tool (Unix, Linux, Netware) when he sees it. It might be a little dirty, but that's from lots of use. It's well worn in. It's built to exacting specifications and it gets the job done, every time.
The naive craftsman will simply reach for the shiniest tool in the toolbox (Windows) and learn the hard way that he's chosen a tool that, although pretty, is poorly designed and built, and he's going to end up taking twice as long to get the job done, and he still won't be as happy with his finished work later.
If you're going to do an analogy, do it right.
Tired of FB/Google censorship? Visit UNCENSORED!