Slashdot Mirror


Dread Empire's Fall: The Praxis

CrankyFool writes "On advice of a foolish sci-fi bookstore clerk, I once purchased the entire Honor Harrington series in preparation for a long trip. The upcoming days would find me in a cold sweat reading these books, all the while muttering 'unclean ... unclean ...' and wishing I had something, anything, else to read. They were bad. They were very, very bad. To paraphrase Pratchett, they were so bad they went though the other side of bad and were simply not very good anymore. Look, there go some one-dimensional bad guys! Look, there goes the one-dimensional good guy (well, person)! Look, she's put in impossible tactical odds and yet somehow still manages to triumph! Look, she gets no respect back at home! Look, the next book rehashes the EXACT SAME PLOT. Needless to say, I do not like David Weber, nor do I like the Honor Harrington books. I am deeply distrustful of anyone who does." Read on to see what this has to do with Walter Jon Williams newest book, Dread Empire's Fall: the Praxis. Dread Empire's Fall: The Praxis author Walter Jon Williams pages 448 publisher HarperTorch rating 2 reviewer Roy Rapoport ISBN 038082020X summary Weber as imagined by Williams. Liked Harrington? You'll Like Martinez.

So it's a damn, damn shame that DEF:tP feels like it's written by Weber, because I really like Walter Jon Williams. I liked his cyberpunkish Hardwired and Voice of the Whirlwind. I liked his fantasy City on Fire and Metropolitan. I really liked his story of how a culture may select Gods to manage the most dangerous of technologies (Aristoi), and I thought his comedies (The Crown Jewels, Rock of Ages, and House of Shards) were, well, just damn funny.

I don't know what happened here, other than maybe Williams has Weber's arm up his ass -- that's the only explanation I can come up for this book.

The background, at least, is somewhat interesting: The Shaa, an alien race, have subjugated everyone around them for thousands of years to the point where nobody even thinks of the concept of rebellion -- everyone's been assimilated into the Shaa empire. This includes the Terrans (whose process of subjugation is the cause of the naming of the battleships Bombardment of Los Angeles, Bombardment of Delhi, Bombardment of Buenos Aires, and a few others) and the Naxid, who were the first race to be subjugated by the Shaa. The Naxid, by the way, are insectile (or insectoid, as the book prefers to call them). As everyone knows, insectile creatures are inherently evil. You'll be happy to know that one of the other races, the Torminels, is a race of nocturnals hunters, with "a plump and furry body." As is appropriate for teddy bears, the Torminels appear to be relatively harmless but when pushed are discovered to be ferocious and honorable fighters. Gotta love the Ewoks!

Anyway, back to the story: Everyone's living in harmony. Unfortunately, the Shaa, who are functionally immortal, have been slowly suiciding because, well, they're bored, and finally the last Shaa kills himself. Will the perfect order his race forced the universe into remain unchanged as he wished? Don't count on it.

Remember the Naxid? They're insectile (sorry, insectoid), and so do the only thing that an insectile (or insectoid) race is allowed in sci-fi books: They try to take over. All the other races band together to try to beat them. Apparently, Dread Empire's Fall will be the saga of that war. Thousands will fight, and millions will die. No one knows who will live and who will die. Anyone's life could be snuffed out at the next moment.

Well, as long as we define "anyone" to be "not Gareth Martinez or Caroline Sula." See, Gareth Martinez (who, by the way, is tall and considered handsome by some, very intelligent, and is cursed by a provincial accent and a lowly birth that means he just gets no respect) is one of our two protagonists. And Caroline Sula, described as "pale, nearly translucent skin, emerald-green eyes, white-gold hair worn collar-length ... Martinez threw the picture into 3D and rotated it, and Sula didn't have a single bad angle" is also very, very smart. Caroline, by the way, has a nasty little secret that you'll be very, very surprised to have revealed to you if you've been recently lobotomized and consequently not figured it out fairly early in the book.

Anyway, The Praxis covers the death of the last Shaa (whose name is Anticipation of Victory, by the way. Normally referred to by everyone as Vic, I'm sure, unless his mother was very angry at which point I'm sure it was "Anticipation of Victory you clean your room RIGHT NOW!") and the beginning of the take-over attempt by the Naxid. You'll be delighted to know that Martinez figures out what they're up to, but nobody listens to him, so he only manages to save one ship. And then, against overwhelming odds, manages to escape. You'll be delighted to find out that our heroine, Caroline Sula, when put in her own precarious position (not to blow the plot, but it involves overwhelming odds against her and almost certain death) manages to do PHENOMENALLY well. Really, she becomes quite the hero. No, wait, why is everyone laughing?

Gareth and Caroline, by the way, hook up very briefly but due to Caroline's little secret not much comes of it and she runs away to ignore him for approximately 400 pages until, three pages before the ending of the book, she sends him a note that basically says "Wow, you and I are both the heroes of this saga and so are destined to be incredibly lucky. Wanna hook up?" No, I'm not really embellishing this much.

The aforementioned 400 pages pass by relatively quickly (how quickly? I bought the book approximately ten hours ago, and have spent much of the intervening time having dinner with my family, downloading p^Hdrivers from the net, and writing this minireview). They are filled with one-dimensional characterizations (see this good-for-nothing non-com? Don't worry about him -- he'll be good-for-nothing until the last drop. This tough but incredibly smart retired weapons chief? Good guy. You can trust him not to screw up. Ever. This aristocracy Captain who likes soccer more than having a functional warship? Go ahead and write him off) and questionable strategic thinking.

Williams does throw some interesting twists into the DEF universe. The Shaa empire is ruled by the laws of The Praxis, the major religion everyone's bought into. The Praxis forbids most of the more interesting uses of technology -- bioengineering is forbidden, as is AI. FTL weapons are non-existent and FTL travel is done only through wormholes. This means that when dealing with intrasolar warfare, the main weapons are missiles. However, because missiles can't be controlled by AI, and because communication can't be FTL, the further away the missiles are from you (and the closer to the enemy), the less able you are to control them. Hence, missiles are shepherded by pinnaces, small one-person ships. Typically, a pinnace controls a volley of missiles and flies with them toward the enemy. If the pinnace pilot is very lucky and very good, they even survive, though most people don't think of this much as the last conflict the Shaa empire had (before this upcoming rebellion) was 3400 hundred years ago and lasted six days. Aside from wormhole travel, all other tech is decidedly hard sci-fi -- lasers and missiles, and both explosive and propulsion power is provided by simple anti-matter. Acceleration couches are an important fixture on ships. In fact, acceleration plays a pretty important role in most of the battles (and Williams makes one of the races both supreme tacticians and incapable of anything more than 2G. OK, that's different).

Really, though, there's nothing there to redeem the one-dimensional characters, the simplistic prose, the improbable odds our heroes manage to slog through with great distinction, and the waste of your time. If you like Weber's Harrington series, you probably want to check it out. If you're the sort of Walter Jon Williams fan who simply has to read everything he writes, your decision will be clear. As to the rest of you ... stay away.

In case you're interested, Williams has a homepage.

You can purchase Dread Empire's Fall: The Praxis from bn.com. Slashdot welcomes readers' book reviews -- to see your own review here, read the book review guidelines, then visit the submission page.

21 of 313 comments (clear)

  1. What an interesting opening to a review by barc0001 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Spending the entire first paragraph bashing another book series than the subject of the review, and also anyone who does like said books. That's an *excellent* way to build credibility.

    1. Re:What an interesting opening to a review by viniosity · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Actually, I find things like this useful to an extent. For example, if I happened to like the book series he mentions in his chapter then perhaps I'll take his comments differently and buy Praxis. This is one of the reasons there are so many critics - people tend to agree with some and disagree with others. Having him tell you what he likes provides useful background to those who have read that series. So relax, ok?

    2. Re:What an interesting opening to a review by CodeWanker · · Score: 5, Insightful

      It certainly is. I thought there might be something wrong with me for thoroughly detesting Honor Harrington. The series has got its fanboys out in force in a lot of places. And David Weber is the kiss of death as a writer when he doesn't have David Drake along to smack him around. So now I have a good quick'n'dirty frame of reference for approaching the style of this book. Which is probably not to my taste. I love good trashy space opera, but to me that means Lt. Leary Commanding or Hammer's Slammers, not Honor Harrington. The nice thing about this issue is that you can check out both characters/series/universes for free at baen.com in their free library area. To me, sci-fi is a guilty pleasure, and I feel like I'm browsing porno when I'm in the sci-fi section... That is, embarassed that someone I know who doesn't share my bad taste will see me there. Why is that? Because so very much of sci-fi is excrable. For every pre-Stranger Heinlein or Keith Laumer or Iain M Banks book out there there are a hundred Honor Harringtons... And so how will people judge my taste when they see me with a paperback with a guy/girl in a spacesuit super-imposed over an airbrush painting of a space battle? The same way I'd judge someone coming out of the romance section with a lurid looking "Sweet Savage Something" clutched in her clammy paw.

      --


      "Wow. Now THAT'S a lot of angry Indians." - Lt. Col. George Armstrong Custer
    3. Re:What an interesting opening to a review by I+Be+Hatin' · · Score: 4, Insightful
      Having him tell you what he likes provides useful background to those who have read that series.

      While I agree that it's useful to have such reference points to compare to, the way the reference was done came across as more of a gratuitous attack than a comparison. He could've achieved the comparison effect with a couple sentences in the middle of the review. Instead, he starts the review with this attack which actually has nothing to do with the book in question.

      When I do reviews (of music, but the principle is the same), I always start out with a quick description of the work in question. This way, readers can quickly discern whether they might be interested in the book or not. But this reviewer starts with the attack, making the reader wade through it to even start to understand if they might like this book. It's poor style at least.

      --
      I know god exists. I read it on the internet, so it must be true.
    4. Re:What an interesting opening to a review by Chasuk · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I'm going to have to disagree with you here.

      I read reviews to help me winnow the wheat from the chaff. I read a lot of books, and I watch a lot of films, and I'd prefer that those experiences are pleasurable. If I know in advance, before getting deep into the review, that the reviewer thinks that Alan Dean Foster and Marion Zimmer Bradley are the best-fucking-authors-in-the-world, then I will also know that, if he likes the book he is reviewing, I'll probably hate it.

      I think Barry Norman and Roger Ebert are the two best film critics in the world. Why? Because they consistently recommend films that I enjoy. On the other hand, if Harry Knowles likes a film, I'll know that it sucks. Well, usually. He is such an unabashed fanboy that someties our opinions coincide.

      Anyway, the point is, knowing what a reviewer thinks about other, similar films and books is a help, not a hindrance, and boosts the reviewers usefulness and credibility, if you use that inforamtion wisely.

  2. Don't know about you... by Neil+Blender · · Score: 5, Insightful

    ...but I generally don't finish crappy books.

  3. Wow, what a piece of junk by Hal+The+Computer · · Score: 1, Insightful

    I wish I could mod this entire article as offtopic. I mean sheesh, the overview blurb has nothing to do with the actual book he is reviewing. Aren't editors supposed to cut out all the personal venting. I then proceeded to read the full review and discover that yep, the entire article is one big rant. Feel free to explain why you think this is an insightful article if you disagree.

    --

    int main(void){int x=01232;while(malloc(x));return x;}
    1. Re:Wow, what a piece of junk by Greedo · · Score: 4, Insightful

      How many book reviews have you read lately? Starting a review by setting up a point of comparison is pretty standard practice. Don't blame the author for /.'s way of posting the first paragraph as a overview.

      And "review" is not synonymous with "loved it". The review called what he thought was a spade a spade, and did it in a fairly amusing-yet-informative manner.

      I'm not one for sci-fi, personally, but i imagine anyone who is, and who shares the crappy opinion of the Weber books, will appreciate this review-cum-warning.

      (p.s. and /. editors usually add personal venting ... you haven't been here long, have you?)

      --
      Tuus crepidae innexilis sunt.
  4. So basically, the reviewer's an ass by SerialHistorian · · Score: 5, Insightful

    The book, like this review, is a collection of cliches that aren't necessarily true?

    Sheesh.
    Oh, and the reason that the Honor Harrington story is told the way it is -- it's a retelling of Horatio Hornblower, which is written the same way. Not everything is sci-fi...

    --

    --
    Vote for your hopes, not for your fears - Vote Third Party

  5. Re:Harrington by Jhon · · Score: 4, Insightful

    For the same reason why people watch sitcoms -- empty entertainment. For many people, entertainment means not needing to "think".

  6. Donaldson rules by xirtam_work · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I absolutely loved the GAP series. Stephen Donaldson's writing is fanastic. Anyone reading this review should check out his books.

  7. Re:Harrington by Zak3056 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Why do people like the Harrington series?

    Because it's Horatio Hornblower in space.

    It isn't a coincidence that the main chacter serves in the "Royal Navy" and is fighting against an enemy that very strongly resembles France. Or that the title character's initials are HH.

    The Harrington series is NOT sci-fi. It's space opera. It has the same appeal that Star Wars does.

    --
    What part of "shall not be infringed" is so hard to understand?
  8. actually, it is! by mekkab · · Score: 4, Insightful

    It sets a comparison point.

    If you like Honor Harrington, you will most definitely ignore the reviewer, and you may even enjoy this book!

    THis is actually a genius reference point.

    --
    In the future, I would want to not be isolated from my friends in the Space Station.
    1. Re:actually, it is! by nutshell42 · · Score: 2, Insightful
      There's a difference between saying

      "this books are very similar to Weber's Honor Harrington series (which I hate ferociously btw. if you like them take everything I say about this book with a grain of salt)"

      and

      Needless to say, I do not like David Weber, nor do I like the Honor Harrington books. I am deeply distrustful of anyone who does.

      The first is polite, short and concise. The second would be short and concise if it wasn't just the last sentence of a long Weber bashing without a point.

      That said, yes, I like the Honor Harrington books but the reviewer is correct about various problems of the books even though he exaggerates of course. I didn't like his tone that's all. You can write something like that in a comment -in every M$-Apple flamewar there are vast numbers of comments that are worse- but is it really necessary to write it in a review?

      --
      Don't think of it as a flame---it's more like an argument that does 3d6 fire damage
  9. Re:Worst Author Ever Award by Gramie2 · · Score: 3, Insightful

    It's too bad you missed all the symbolism (much overt, far more oblique). The entire series is allegory; in fact, it's about the most theological set of books this side of C.S. Lewis.

    Given that, it's rather amusing that you are outraged at, and want to kill, a character who is clearly a Christ figure, for not living up to your expectations of what a saviour/hero should be. Kind of what happened to Him, too.

  10. Re:hits the nail on the head for me. by barc0001 · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Oh I don't know about that. I'll admit Weber's not my favorite author, but the first couple of books were fine. The Basilisk Station book in particular. It was the first book from the Baen free library I tried. But after the first couple, he seemed to develop Robert Jordan-itis, where what could easily be said in a hundred pages took three hundred instead. King is much the same way as well.
    I think the problem is these folks get popular, sell a bunch of books, and then their editors get scared to cut anything, so the books get longer and longer with less meat per page...

  11. Re:HH books: recommended by SuiteSisterMary · · Score: 2, Insightful

    HH is good light space opera. It starts out as Horatio Hornblower In Space (Or, as I call it now: Mistress and Commander: Far Side of the Galaxy); turns into Tom Clancy in Space about half way through the series.

    Good thing: He's not afraid to seriously fuck with his main characters. They get whomped, maimed, screwed over, generally what you'd expect in war, and in political circles.

    Bad thing: He's heavy handed with the historical parallels; when you name a character Rob S. Pierre, you're going a bit far. And that's just one example.

    Still, good for a light read.

    --
    Vintage computer games and RPG books available. Email me if you're interested.
  12. Re:Harrington by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    No, its bad Horatio Hornblower in space.

    The Hornblower series has a very well characterized hero who is heroic but not unbelievable. Honor Harrington on the other hand is perfect except for the same kind of flaws that you'd tell to an interviewer when asked what you're greatest weakness is.

    Secondly, the Hornblower series shows you Hornblower as a hero, while the Harrington series tells you how great she is. An editor should probably have cut out 75% of the Harrington series which would've left a halfway decent set of stories, but without huge chunks of the books being taken up by telling you how great Honor Harrington is.

  13. In defense of Honor Harrington by Animats · · Score: 5, Insightful
    By space opera standards, Honor Harrington is quite good. E.E. "Doc" Smith's "Lensman" series, the first space opera, has truly one-dimensional characters. Smith is remembered for the scale of his writings; others wrote about single trips to the Moon; Smith wrote about intergalactic empires. He single-handedly scaled up science fiction.

    Weber's characters have strengths and weaknesses. Honor isn't perfect. She has more character flaws than any hero from Star Trek or Star Wars. She's into revenge, and makes some mistakes because of it.

    Her real strength is tactics. That makes sense; she's in a navy that trains and selects for tactical skill. She doesn't get that skill by magic; she goes to the Academy and works her way up to command over many years.

    The Peep leaders are Weber's most complex characters. Some of them are boors, yet even Warden Tresca plays chess by mail. The Peep military commanders are in tough positions, caught between their political masters and military realities, and deal with them in different ways. Most just do their jobs. One or two go over to the Manty side. Some die for the People's Republic. Some try a coup. Rod Pierre (oh, please) has a tiger by the tail and can't let go; he's portrayed as ruthless but not evil.

    Weber is writing for people who know what Jellicoe did at Jutland. Battle charts wouldn't seem out of place in Weber's books. Fortunately, like Tom Clancy, he has the sense to avoid them.

    It's unusual to see tactical skill in SF. Usually, there's too much individual heroism and not enough planning. Historically, it's hard to find any example where individual heroism changed the outcome of a major war. But it happens all the time in fiction. David Drake gets this, and he's gradually been pulling SF around.

    Tactics in print SF are bad enough, but in movie SF, they're appalling. Nobody in the Star Wars universe has any decent tactical sense. On either side. Much like World War I. Dune. Starship Troopers. Battlefield Earth. The list of bad examples goes on.

  14. Honor Harrington is an oater set in space. by crovira · · Score: 3, Insightful

    It has never pretended verisimilitude, veracity or anything else.

    It's mindless entertainment.

    In this respect its like the ol' Horatio Hornblower pulp. Or the "Roman de Cap et d'Epee (like reading "The Three Musketeers" in the original French) that my dad used to read. I use hooked on the "Doc Savage" pap and the Poul Anderson "Polesotechnic league" books that I knocked off one a night.

    Or how about Jimmy Digriz a.k.a. "The Stainless Steel Rat."

    If its NOT your style, don't review it.

    You bought the whole series without reading one first? I must say that you're an idiot. I definitely don't want to trust any of your reviews.

    --
    MSBPodcast.com The opinions expressed here are my own. If you don't like 'em... Think up your own stuff.
  15. Re:hits the nail on the head for me. by Golias · · Score: 2, Insightful
    You know, if I'm on vacation with nothing to read but lousy novels, I stop reading and go outside.

    If being outside is not more interesting than crappy novels, you not only bought the wrong book series, you chose the wrong vacation spot.

    --

    Information wants to be anthropomorphized.