Slashdot Mirror


Stealth Inflation

prostoalex writes "The New York Times on the Web explores the topic of incorrect bills and numerous surcharges with names like 'assessment', 'handling', 'restocking', etc. David Pogue quotes Business Week magazine, where it says that such small charges $100 million annually for hotels, $2 billion for banks and $11 billion for credit-card companies. Users of landline phones, cell phones, checking accounts and credit cards are starting to suspect that such huge revenue might imply the mistakes are made on purpose. Is it just another conspiracy theory, or are we becoming victims to the stealth inflation?"

42 of 796 comments (clear)

  1. Sad state of affairs... by garcia · · Score: 4, Interesting

    How about physicians? I had a couple appointments with my family doctor to regulate my blood pressure... At one of the earlier appointments she took an EKG. Being 24 and never having one before I wanted it explained to me. She spent 2 or 3 minutes (and I am being loose here with the timeframe, it was only as long as it took me to put on my jacket and hat) explaining the peaks and what she thought they meant.

    Out the door I went into the world to get a new prescription filled and pay my co-pay...

    A few weeks pass and the bill from the doctor's office comes showing what the insurance company paid, etc, and that I owed $5. No biggy, pretty typical. I did see that she charged my insurance company $103 for an "EKG Consultation Fee". Call me insane but there is absolutely no way she had the right to charge $103 for a 2 minute deal.

    I went in the next time and not so calmly explained to her that she will not do that again without a) telling me what she is going to later charge, b) lying about what she was really doing, and c) being a cheat.

    We wonder why insurance costs so much... It's because of hidden fees and bullshit that the medical industry decides to make a quick buck on.

    That doctor made as much in 2 minutes as I do in 6 hours at work... She will NOT fleece me again like that... To those of you that say, "who cares, your insurance covered it." I say that my insurance co-pays just went up and they probably won't stop there. I am not going to stand idly by and watch this shit go down and you shouldn't either.

    How about my bank? TCF here in Minnesota. I *pay* for their advanced online banking service (it's just like any other free service I have had before but it shows all the transactions immediately unlike their free version which just shows a balance). I started noticing that I was being charged for using out of network ATMs when I wasn't using them. I had four $6 charges in a six week period. I had to call them each time and get them removed. It wasn't an issue to get it removed it was the unsettling feeling that other people out there that don't have the advanced online banking are getting ripped off, a lot.

    Sad state of affairs these days...

    Just my worthless .02,

    1. Re:Sad state of affairs... by Frymaster · · Score: 5, Funny
      fight fire with fire.

      if you think you're getting shafted by a company with "mystery" fees, just cook up an invoice for "services rendered: $11.52" and ship it off to their accounts payable department.

      most of the people in accts. payable have a policy that any invoice that's less than a certain amount (twenty bucks or whatever) will just get paid. it's a great way to recoup your costs.

    2. Re:Sad state of affairs... by gbjbaanb · · Score: 5, Insightful

      no, makes a lot of sense. For those places where you pay indirectly (ie through insurance), you must remember that you still pay. The insurance companies are never going to lose money by paying out outrageous fees without fleecing their customers in turn.

      Trouble is, everyone thinks that its free as they don't have to pay any of it, and so the fees are increased and increased, and the premiums go up and up.

      The other thing to watch out for is compensation paytments for everything. (you should have sued your doctor for .. something, a lawyer could give you a list :), and that would be ok, as her insurance would pay for it......

      its those that cause inflation, not a 0.02 here and there.

    3. Re:Sad state of affairs... by sdmartin101 · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Wouldn't that be mail fraud?

    4. Re:Sad state of affairs... by realdpk · · Score: 4, Informative

      Or he could perhaps consider a credit union, where you're the shareholder as well as the customer. I use Boeing Employee's Credit Union and while I've had a couple of problems (due to their not changing my address properly in their system, making the already-faulty AVS more problematic) I'm very happy with them. I don't get nickle-and-dimed to death.

    5. Re:Sad state of affairs... by niko9 · · Score: 4, Funny

      What if you registered for a buisness license and called it, I don't know, RBE Consultants. (Randon Billing Error) This way you could bill for your time spent fixing their error. You could also start the converstation with the rep as " Hi, this call maybe monitored or recorded for quality assurance...." and you could save the call to mp3 on your computer witha Radio Shack 2.99 phone suction cup microphone.

      Then just send them a bill as a consultant, something like $11.52.

      Sounds like a good little side buisness to me.

      --

    6. Re:Sad state of affairs... by BWJones · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Call me insane but there is absolutely no way she had the right to charge $103 for a 2 minute deal.

      You have to consider a couple of things here. The "two minute deal" was the time she spent with you. I suspect more time was spent actually "reading" the results of the EKG. Also, you need to realize that many times insurance companies will only reimburse physicians a portion of the total bill and its stuff like this that prevents many (including me) from wanting to practice medicine. I do research instead. Lemme give you an example: For instance, when my mother had her medical practice, there were certain procedures that ended up costing her money. An example is the cost to her of delivering babies. We sat down to run the numbers and found out that based upon her insurance rates, and the reimbursement from the insurance companies, each child she delivered was costing her $250. Furthermore, because physicians can be sued for delivery issues until a child reaches 21 years of age, she still has to maintain an insurance trailer until the last child she delivered reaches 21. Unbelieveable.

      It is not the medical system that is out of control, it is the insurance companies and the managed care systems that foisted a con on the American public by saying managed care can do medicine for less. Instead of lowering costs, managed care has created an entirely new middle level of management that simply soaks up more money than ever before. Do a little experiment here. Go to your local HMO and look in the parking lot. The Porsches and BMWs you see do not belong to the physicians as much as they do the management staff of the hospital.

      --
      Visit Jonesblog and say hello.
    7. Re:Sad state of affairs... by Ralph+Wiggam · · Score: 5, Informative

      Yes, the parent poster made a typo. It should be "Fight fire with a federal crime".

      Don't get yourself in trouble trying to "get back at the Man." I hate the Man as much as anyone, but there are smart ways and dumb ways to fight.

      -B

    8. Re:Sad state of affairs... by Just+Some+Guy · · Score: 4, Insightful
      Welcome to the new millenium. You realize, of course, that your doctor probably had no say in the amount that she billed you, either because your HMO/PPO/insurer has a set rate for each specific service or because the management company she works for sets all prices with or without her approval. You also realize that her malpractice insurer probably requires her to perform that test because one 25-year-old in Pensiltucky, AL didn't have one once, died that weekend from a heart attack while rocked on crystal meth, and left behind parents that filed a lawsuit against the doctor for $BIGNUM. Finally, I know you're considering that the EKG machine that you or I could probably build for $100 plus some Free software actually cost her or her employeer about $60,000 by the time the manufacturer recoups their FDA-testing outlay, and that like it or not, that machine's got to be paid for somehow.

      OK, yeah, of course I'm being sarcastic. It's amazingly easy to underestimate exactly how much it costs to provide medical services. You're considering the apparent work that went into your 5-minute consultation. She's considering:

      • Her salary
      • Her rent
      • Her electricity
      • Her heating/AC
      • Her transcriptionist
      • Her malpractice insurance
      • Her receptionist
      • Her phone system
      • Her disposable supplies
      • Her equipment investment
      • Her student loans
      • About 200 other "little" things that have to be included into the right-hand side of the equation.

      Sure, some doctors ( NOT ALL! ) make a pretty good living, but you'd be surprised to see how slim their profit margins probably are.

      --
      Dewey, what part of this looks like authorities should be involved?
    9. Re:Sad state of affairs... by Davak · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I did see that she charged my insurance company $103 for an "EKG Consultation Fee". Call me insane but there is absolutely no way she had the right to charge $103 for a 2 minute deal.


      Let me defend my profession a bit. $103 dollars for an evaluation of an EKG is very, very cheap. An EKG is an easy way to rule multiple life-threating illnesses. Compare an EKG to an CT scan, for example. and it probably saves many, many more lives per dollar than many other studies.

      With insurance the way it is, the doctor probably billed for twice that much... but only took what the insurance was willing to pay.

      Included in that fee is the cost of the machine including upkeep, malpractice insurance, and the greater than 7 years of training that the doctor has received.

      "Did you need an EKG" is another question completely. If you are an older man/woman with hypertension, then an EKG is not a useless test... especially if you were having any symptoms. Some docs (like myself) might use a different blood pressure medication if there are related EKG changes.

      If you are 20 with hypertension, then it's harder to defend. Even then (thanks to the lawyers) anybody with pain above the belt will probably get an EKG because cardiac disease is so common.

      Looking at a normal EKG for 2 minutes is probably about 1 minute too long. However, it's normal... but it's not useless. If we knew the answer without the EKG, then it wouldn't be a very useful test, would it? If the EKG would have been abnormal, then the doctor would have had to spend more time on it.

      Anyway, rant off. Medicine as a lot of thing wrong with it. $100 EKG is not one of those things.

      Davak

    10. Re:Sad state of affairs... by PCM2 · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Similar situation: When I had my wisdom teeth taken out by an oral surgeon, I was given the option of having general anaesthetic (i.e. being put out completely). The surgeon was apparently required to brief me on the risks and dangers involved -- which meant he sat me down in front of an 8-minute video tape and left the room. I was ushered into all this as if it was part of the procedure -- I had no choice whatsoever.

      When the surgeon eventually returned into the room, I asked, "Look -- do I have to have general?" He looked at me like I was nuts: "Of course not!" More carefully, I asked, "Am I going to want general? Like -- is it going to hurt so bad I'll wish I was put out?" He replied, "Not at all. I doubt you'll feel a thing." I said, "OK, I'll pass."

      (Sure enough, it was no big deal -- some blood, some bone chips, but nothing that I'd really describe as "pain" -- though the surgeon did comment that I was "a very tolerant patient.")

      Anyway, when the bill eventually arrived, sure enough, there was (I believe) a $65 charge for "anaesthetic consultation fee." That's right, finding out the health risks of being put under anaesthesia was the most expensive video rental in the world.

      But there's more! When I got the summary from my insurance company, they denied the charge -- because apparently the law says you cannot have the consultation and the procedure on the same day! I guess I'm supposed to be able to go home and think it over. (Never mind that I declined to have it anyway.)

      Anyway, I later got another bill from the surgeon where he basically reversed the consultation charge. So my insurance company didn't pay it, and I didn't pay it either. The doctor just ate it.

      Now, before you say "everything worked out" here, think about how f'ed up the medical system is and how it has to deal with the insurance companies. In that case, the insurance company said "no, we won't pay this fee" and the doctor, looking at his options, just shrugged and said, "OK, I guess I won't get paid, then."

      And this kind of thing happens all the time -- and not just for questionable charges like this "video consultation fee." My mom worked for many years in the medical billing field (yes, there's an entire industry devoted to working out these billing problems for doctors) and she tells me that most doctors never see the full amount they bill for the procedures they conduct, if they have to bill an insurance company. Got that? Never. The power of the insurance companies is such that they -- despite being private corporations, not government regulators -- can essentially set the prices doctors are allowed to charge for procedures.

      I have another friend who works for a large national HMO and he tells me lots of stories, too. You may not realize it, but there are a lot of people out there who, say, have their legs put back together through reconstructive surgery -- they can walk again, that kind of thing -- and then they turn around and say their bills were unfair and they won't pay. They get a lawyer and they flat-out tell the provider that they won't pay a dime. Again, mark me now: They don't try to re-negotiate, they don't try to set up a payment plan, they don't try to talk the doctor into rolling back a few charges. They flat-out say that they will not pay the bill, and in some cases, because of the structure of the industry, the way that it is regulated etc., they will absolutely get away with it. (Their credit might get messed up, but that's a different story.)

      So my point is: Lest you read my initial story and say, "Yeah, doctors screwing the patients again," consider that the medical industry in the United States is maybe a different case than, say, sneaking an extra $2 charge onto your phone bill. Healthcare in this country has almost completely broken down. Personally, I place the majority of the blame on the insurance companies, though doctors are at fault as well. But the way the industry is set up now, both sides pretty much have to play these stupid little billing games just to keep the money flowing, and personally I'm hard-pressed to figure out how this is going to change without some serious regulatory hammer falling.

      --
      Breakfast served all day!
    11. Re:Sad state of affairs... by Lumpy · · Score: 5, Interesting

      no it is not.

      send them a bill.... Check writing fee : $9.95

      you are doing business with them, you have a business relationship with them and it's perfectly legal.

      I have done that for the past 2 years with the local Telephone company cince they atsrtedto charge $5.00 a month for making electronic payments.

      They refused to pay it for the first 3 months until I sent a letter that I was going to send them to collections. I got a telephone call from their finance department asking what was up and I told them it was a fee they are being charged for me to write them a check every month. They asked how could they avoid the fee and I said, accept my electronic payment without a surcharge.

      They keep paying it, and I even recently started sending a note on the bill "remove this check writing fee by accepting no-charge electronic payments!"

      works great, is 100% legal (if they want to stop getting billed they can stop the business relationship with me.) and my lawyer thought I was very innovative and also told me that I am within my right to do what I am doing.

      YMMV, but doing this is not automatically illegal as the misinformed here say.

      --
      Do not look at laser with remaining good eye.
    12. Re:Sad state of affairs... by pilgrim23 · · Score: 5, Insightful

      To quote and rebut:
      Her salary
      All Professions
      Her rent
      All Professions
      Her electricity
      All Professions
      Her heating/AC
      All Professions
      Her transcriptionist
      All Business related professions (Computer Consultant for example)
      Her malpractice insurance
      Liability, though not as high, but there
      Her receptionist
      All Professions
      Her phone system
      All Professions
      Her disposable supplies
      All Professions
      Her equipment investment
      All Professions
      Her student loans
      Most all professions
      So now,tell me now where a doctor is special and gets off charging three times the rate of any OTHER profession!
      ALL PROFESSIONS have these charges. As a computer tech you have outragiously expensive equipment, strange arcane knowledge, a bizzare incomprehensible language, and all the other trappings of any of the High Priests of our culture. So how come I can't charge Lawyer/Doctor rates? A con gents is still a con. Even when you drive a BMW to the con.

      --
      - Minutus cantorum, minutus balorum, minutus carborata descendum pantorum.
    13. Re:Sad state of affairs... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Interesting

      I recently did battle with Sprint over a billing error. I fought and fought with them for months. Eventually I convinced them that if their fraudulant billing were exposed to a larger audience, that more irritating bastards like me would be hounding their accounting department.

      I got a free years worth of phone service and long distance to keep my mouth shut and go away. It just ran out. I say give it a go, they're wrong and they know it.

    14. Re:Sad state of affairs... by stand · · Score: 4, Funny
      There were guys in my old neighborhood that mowed lawns, then later billed the customer, even though no one asked for their lawn to be mowed

      Isn't this is sort of like a more sophisticated, suburban form of those squeegie guys that clean your windshield? ;-)

      --
      Four fifths of all our troubles in this life would disappear if we would just sit down and keep still. -C. Coolidge
    15. Re:Sad state of affairs... by egburr · · Score: 4, Insightful
      Trespassing isn't illegal? What if someone didn't want their yard mowed? What if these guys mowed down some new plants that were still in a straggly weed-look-alike stage?

      What if one of the guys hurts himself while performing this unsolicited mowing? Why should my homeowner's liability insurance rates have to go up when I didn't even want the guy there in the first place?

      At the very least, they should ask first.

      --

      Edward Burr
      Having a smoking section in a restaurant is like having a peeing section in a swimming pool.
    16. Re:Sad state of affairs... by IWannaBeAnAC · · Score: 5, Funny
      I imagine they only started this project because they lived in a place where the neighbors were pleasant people.

      Since this clearly does not apply to you, I don't think you have anything to worry about.

    17. Re:Sad state of affairs... by Malc · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Indeed. A recent study in the New England Journal of Medicine indicates that administration costs in the US are over $1,000/capita, and in Canada $300/capita. This explains a large part of the 4% GDP difference between the US and Canada. The US insurance companies spend a huge amount of money on administrators whose job it is to deny insurance or investigate claims.

  2. My answer by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    Is it just another conspiracy theory, or are we becoming victims to the stealth inflation?

    Yes, in that order.

  3. Stealth Inflation by Pingular · · Score: 4, Funny

    Next week: Ninja Tax!

    --

    When anger rises, think of the consequences.
    Confucius (551 BC - 479 BC)
    1. Re:Stealth Inflation by Trigun · · Score: 5, Funny

      But I haven't any ninjas to tax!

    2. Re:Stealth Inflation by webtre · · Score: 4, Funny

      You do, you just can't see them :)

      --
      litigious bastards
      suck it sco!
  4. Inflation by musingmelpomene · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Inflation hasn't only gone up because of things like this, but because of the increasing dollar amount of taxes being subtracted from paychecks. Even if your paycheck is the same as 10 years ago, your take-home pay is very likely less. These surcharges are yet another way that make you think you're making the same amount - when really, you're making less and less, every day.

  5. Oh yes by ActionPlant · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Maybe I'm REALLY paranoid, but I figured it was intentional long ago, and have since merely accepted it. Since when does "handling" in the shipping and handling for a two pound item justify an extra $10 expense? Online, I've taken to shopping where I can get free shipping. It feels more honest, and I like making the statement that I appreciate it.

    Damon,

    --
    http://actionPlant.com
  6. Stealth tax by RealProgrammer · · Score: 4, Interesting

    It all started with adding the sales tax to an item's advertised price to make up the real cost to purchase it.

    That still annoys me.

    --
    sigs, as if you care.
  7. Human nature by Space+cowboy · · Score: 4, Insightful

    This shouldn't really be a surprise unless you still believe in the essential goodness of humankind (!)

    It's a simple-enough risk calculation - how much will I gain by people not noticing or not bothering for $xxx, how much will I lose by annoying customers. If that comes out positive, it's a good business (and only business) decision to do it. You'd need to re-analyse the figures periodically, and figure in public opinion when news breaks like this, but essentially it's money for nothing.

    So, why are we surprised ?

    Simon.

    --
    Physicists get Hadrons!
    1. Re:Human nature by MegaHamsterX · · Score: 5, Informative

      I'll give you an example of how this thinking is flawed.

      In 2000 ATT was my local cable service, I wanted pay channels and a remote control.

      They quoted me a price, which was no where close to what I actually paid.

      Normal Sales Tax, I calculate this into everything already, I expect it, roads, schools and such.

      Additional charge for the remote controls, the installer said they're extra, huh?

      County franchise tax, which has something to do with the fact their cable is strung through the county.

      City Franchise tax, same as above, but for the wire strewn through the city.

      Sales tax was calculated after these taxes, the bill was over $50.00 greater than the quoted rate. I argued with ATT to at least calculate the sales tax corretly, they essentially told me to F$%@ off.

      So I did, I canceled cable, went to circuit city, bought a directv system, installed it myself and later that day had crystal clear satellite with just sales tax added in.

      Then I canceled my long distance with ATT after a phone conversation cost me $1.00 a minute, they said I'm not on a plan, so I asked about one, they said I had to pay additional fees every month to be on one, I told them to F#$% off this time, canceled long distance service entirely on the landline, the cellphone has nationwide anyhow.

      After sometime I saw a deal with ATT cellular online, it looked better than everything else out at the time, and my current cingular contract was up. I signed up online, the phone was shipped quickly, no hassels, until several months later.....

      They apparently decided I didn't need the free bonus minutes, or the nights and weekends like I signed up with, I got a $490 cellphone bill, I lost the paperwork I signed up with, they did back credit for that month, but how many other months did they screw me on and how many people actually sit down with the calculator to tally all their minutes?

      ATT has forever lost my business, this includes comcast, no matter the marketing spin, no matter the offer, they will never again be someone I pay cash to.

      Oh and nearly everyone I know has kicked them to the curb as well.

  8. Is there a difference? by pvt_medic · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Now I doubt that the companies intentionally make the mistakes in order to extract more money from the customer...

    Now that being said, I think that the companies intentionally do make extra charges all around and hide them intricately in deals as they see there. It wasnt 800 minutes but 700 plus 100 minutes. Now no one in the world is going to ask about that. I know to ask about extra hidden charges, but no that.

    I think that the companies then through the complication of such systems easily profit from mistakes related to calculating the charges and fees. And they are not going to do anything to fix such errors.

    So the question remains by not doing anything is that the same as actually cheating the customer... This client says YES.

    --
    30% Troll, 50% Underrated, 10% Interesting
    Score:5, Troll
  9. must be an accident by dslbrian · · Score: 5, Funny

    ...starting to suspect that such huge revenue might imply the mistakes are made on purpose.

    I'm sure its all accidental .. and the fact that the charges are never in the consumers favor is a mere coincidence.

    Of course sales of 'random billing error' plugin modules are skyrocketing! ... again, coincidence

    1. Re:must be an accident by smack_attack · · Score: 4, Funny

      I've seen BofA's overdraft code...

      function overdraft()
      {
      srand((float)microtime()*1000000);
      $num=rand(0,20);
      $overdraft = $num*'29.50';
      include('rand.reasons');
      return rand_reason($num);
      }

  10. Just one more horror story by sameb · · Score: 4, Interesting

    It's sad that when people tell horror stories, others reply, "Yeah, that's about normal." We should not sit idly by while companies continue to 'mistakenly' swindle consumers out of money. I have personally spent countless hours fighting with RCN (a cable/phone/internet) company to refund $182.91 that they owe me. The full story is available at my RCN sucks page. I've had to resort to telling my credit card company to refuse payment, because RCN still refuses to return the money they owe me.

  11. "Restocking" fees, especially! by MsWillow · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I'd be inclined to agree, at least some of these ridiculous surcharges are deliberate. Recently, I purchased some DDR Ram, for which they tried to charge me extra to test it. When it arrived, I installed it, and my machine did nothing at all. I got the RMA, and sent it back for refund - they told me I'd get the "restocking" fee.

    Thankfully, I'd used VISA to buy it, and complained to my bank, which refunded it in toto. The company did, eventually, issue me a credit - not only did they take out their "restocking" fee, but charged me to test it when it got there, *and* then credited me based on the current price of the ram, not what I'd paid!

    Thank heaven for VISA. I did get *all* my money back (had to let the bank take the pitiful excuse for a refund that the company issued).

    So yes, these "hidden" charges are, in at least some cases, the way companies can increase their profit margins. Caveat emptor, indeed!

    --

    Lemon curry?
  12. Grocery Stores by Bowling+Moses · · Score: 4, Informative

    In California a year or three ago one of the major grocery store chains was slapped with a class action lawsuit and lost, IIRC. They were just ringing items up slightly wrong, like collard greens as the more expensive kale (happened to me. Twice. I don't shop at that chain anymore) or $.99 instead of $.79 for misc. food in a can, small stuff, stuff you probably don't notice 99% of the time. Spread it out across a year, they could screw customers out of maybe $100 each. Multiply that by however many people you've got buying groceries at your stores and that's a lot of "revenue."

  13. I've been waiting for a class action by unassimilatible · · Score: 5, Informative
    against these cell companies under unfair competition statutes. California's, which has been widely criticized, nontheless would be perfect for these chickn-$#!t hidden fees and deceptive practices.
    • CALIFORNIA CODES
      BUSINESS AND PROFESSIONS CODE
      SECTION 17200

      17200. As used in this chapter, unfair competition shall mean and
      include any unlawful, unfair or fraudulent business act or practice
      and unfair, deceptive, untrue or misleading advertising and any act
      prohibited by Chapter 1 (commencing with Section 17500) of Part 3 of
      Division 7 of the Business and Professions Code.
    The beauty (or horror, depending on your perspective) is the "unfair" part. What was not technically illegal in the past may now be sued for if it is "unfair."

    Next case, hidden bank and ATM fees...
    --
    Slashdot "libertarians": Small government for me, big government for those I disagree with. -1, I disagree with you
  14. You don't need a conspiracy theory by heironymouscoward · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Assume a background of random errors. Now in usual circumstances, clients are able to fix mistakes quickly: if someone overcharges in a shop, or if you get shoddy goods or service, it's easy to complain and get your money back. As more and more sales get done online, as credit card statements get longer and more complex, as suppliers get futher and further away, we will see the less disciplined suppliers making more profit.

    Example: the company I use for registering domain names made a mistake and charged for a domain name that was actually not available. Now, after some hours of trying to get service, I just let it fall. Hours' work to get $35 back is just not worthwhile. I'm not even annoyed with the company, it's my choice to let it slide.

    So, over time, there will be an inflation in the greyness of transactions, ironically quite the reverse of what you'd expect from a more and more automated system.

    Haha, this gives me a terrible idea. In decades from now, I guess we'll have shifted to a system whereby basic consumables are paid by taxes levied on our level of income. Much simpler and eventually the same result. Think RIAA taxes, but on the entire arena of consumer products.

    OK, sorry, ruined your evening.

    --
    Ceci n'est pas une signature
  15. Been going on for year with teleco's by Puff65535 · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Back in the 80's my mom used to record _all_ of her long distance calls and numbers on the calendar next to the phone (having only one phone, and little kids who didn't use it helped) and every few bills they'd try and screw us out of 50 cents to a dollar. After 2 years of calling up and screaming she started going into the main office and grumping in person, demanding the manager etc. After a couple of those and proof that we weren't home on days when calls were billed our bill mysteriously quit having problems and has been that way for the last 15 years.

  16. Number Portability Inflation (read profit) Scam by simi-lost · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I have to point out on my new Sprint bill, there is a $2.50 charge A MONTH for Number Portability, should I ever decide to change to another carrier. I know they had said it would be a reasonable fee, but that is outragous. Multiply that $2.50 per customer, per month, and that's one HELL of a profit. Sure would love to start a movement to blow that scam out of the water...

    --
    Mine means my own, but how can this be if I owe for it?
  17. Money rules by thelenm · · Score: 4, Interesting

    When it comes to money (specifically, other people getting their hands on yours), everything is done on purpose. Everything. People will do anything they need to do, and will fight harder for money than they will for their own lives. Haven't you figured that out by now?

    --
    Use Ctrl-C instead of ESC in Vim!
  18. Banks did this stuff all the time... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I used to work for an outsource bank data processor. We had a customer who required us to apply debits before credits because it generated more fees that way.

    Not all banks did this, and it wasn't standard practice (at the time -- don't know now). It was odd enough that it was the talk of our company for a couple of weeks.

  19. This sucks by hackstraw · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I've noticed this for years and its gotten entirely out of hand. I am now forced to ask people stupid questions like "How much does the $19.95 a day truck cost?" I was shocked to find out that at UHaul it actually cost 19.95 plus mileage.

    I refuse to get phone service because of this, cell or otherwise. It is insane that the priveledge of using over 100 year old technology to talk to people costs on order of 1/2 the amount to power my house for a month.

    I pay over $1,600 dollars a year in taxes for my house which is in a city. I always thought that city == trash pickup because of said taxes. Nope, they charge me 15 bucks a month on my water bill for trash, plus 4 dollars "maintence" on the sewer systems. I dunno what the sewer charge is for.

    The only way that this is going to stop is if people stop paying for it. I have asked hotels to take off the safe charge.

    Back to the phone thing. I promptly canceled my last phone after the 12.95 a month phone cost me over $26 (yes thats double!). I told them that it was deceitful and false advertising and under no circumstances was I goint to pay that, and I have been without a phone for 6 months or so (my work does pay for a cell, so I'm not that hardcore). This phone thing really pissed me off because it was a switch of providers that I agreed to because it was going to save me $10 a month. Being that I was writing a check for over $26 before and after, I do not see how I was saving anything. These extra costs make price comparison imposible and I think that it should be illegal.

  20. a cautionary tale by theCat · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I am married and my wife raises the kids and manages the home. She also does the bills. We try to do as much electronic commerce as we can, and pay our bills online. Since she knows very well what our expenses ought to be, and has access to detailed statements online and time to go over them, she finds things constantly. Mostly it is just random stuff where you say "wtf?" and make a phone call to get your bill adjusted. But we had a real dust-up with [cell phone service starting with S] over our family cell phone plan, where they were charging us hundreds of dollars extra on our phone bill for months on end. Every month we knew we would have to call them to get $100-$400 worth of charges removed, 8 hour calls to places we never even heard of, totally off the wall. Finally they "fixed" it and we have not been troubled for over a year. If we had not annoyed them so furiously for most of a year before, would our billing ever have straightened itself out? Not on your life! But what in the world actually *changed* in their system to shield us from bogosity I could not tell you!

    I am dead certain that most (if not all) [cell phone service starting with S] customers are being overbilled on their mobile phone usage just as we were, and I suppose [cell phone service starting with S] spends a lot of time adjusting bills. There must be some really horrendous software blackhole in their billing system that gravitationally slings stray phone charges all over the database like so many loose asteriods.

    Why we sucked up so many nasty stray bits remains a mystery. Were they testing us because we were new with a one year lockin? Rather more a mystery is how it stopped. I can tell you *why* it stopped, and it was because of my wife. So they have control of some kind, which they exercise at need.

    What makes you reach for the tinfoil hat is the thought that maybe they don't "fix" the problem at the core because as a business matter it makes them money. Someone did the math and elected to a) invest less in expensive engineers doing process debugging, b) spend a little hiring low-paid phone jockies in Nevada to debate billing issues with irate customers, and 3) scrape off whatever is not adjusted as easy money.

    It is the lure of easy money, and avoidance of hard work, that creates this nonsense. Now that we have transferable mobile numbers let's see how long it takes service providers to clean up their act. And, let's see if honest billing impacts the bottom line.

    --
    =^..^= all your rodent are belong to us
  21. Car Rental by linuxwrangler · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Last month I visited a friend in North Carolina and rented a car. When we returned the car there were all sorts of fees with names like "Airport Surcharge Recovery Fee", "County Mandated Foo Fee", etc. The fees and taxes added up to roughly an additional 30%.

    I have mixed feelings on this. On one hand I like it when the government tax gouging is made obvious. On the other hand I want things to be standard from place to place.

    What lots of companies have been doing (hotels, car rental firms, and telcos are among the worst), is to make their prices look lower by "converting" a bunch of their overhead to "fees" that get tacked onto the bill (always phrased to sound like taxes but often including the overhead of handling the supposed manditory tax) .

    It's like buying a cup of coffee for $0.30 but going to the cash register and finding your receipt reading:
    Coffee: $0.30
    Property tax recovery fee: $0.10
    Business license recovery charge: $0.02
    Government mandated workers compensation surcharge: $0.25
    Health board inspection fee: $0.08
    Employee income tax recovery charge: $0.35
    Corporate tax surcharge: $0.20
    Sales tax: $0.05
    City waste disposal charge: $0.15

    That will be $1.50, sir.

    As an aside, in a country where one of the rallying cries was "No taxation without representation" our politicians try to subvert that wherever possible. The prime example is outrageous hotel room taxes. Soak the tourists, they won't be able to vote against me.

    --

    ~~~~~~~
    "You are not remembered for doing what is expected of you." - Atul Chitnis