Slashdot Mirror


Download Anaconda for Debian

hsoom writes "Debian Planet is reporting that unofficial sarge-based ISOs using the Anaconda installer can be downloaded from here. The features developed so far include '...changed the code that installs software to use APT instead of RPM, removed Red Hat-specific configuration hooks, and written a new tool called picax that builds Anaconda-based installation CDs from a Debian repository'. However there are features that are not yet working and it is not recommended for use in a production environment."

12 of 208 comments (clear)

  1. rightious karma whoring by CAIMLAS · · Score: 5, Informative

    Here's the link to building anaconda-based debian ISO images.

    Finally a quick, easy way to remaster debian to hand out to friends.

    --
    ~/ssh slashdot.org ssh: connect to host slashdot.org port 22: too many beers
  2. Not to excited by killmuji · · Score: 4, Informative

    Before getting too enthusiatic about this, please do remember to read the errata before downloading the iso images. Lots of work still needs to be done, but this is a step in the right direction.

  3. Re:Single Package / Dep manager by byolinux · · Score: 4, Informative
    I agree entirely.

    Knoppix is pretty simple to install onto the Hard Disk too:-
    1. Boot Knoppix
    2. Alt-F2 (maybe Ctrl+Alt-F2)
    3. Type knx-hdinstall
    Knoppix for older Macintosh computers would seem like the next logical step - ones that can't run OS X, or run OS X poorly... good time for it, especially as Apple just had to pay out for misrepresenting OS X as functional on older hardware.
  4. Re:Single Package / Dep manager by sirReal.83. · · Score: 5, Informative
    You forgot a step.

    4. Reinstall entire OS just to remove Knoppix-specific packages

    Don't get me wrong, I love Knoppix, but for use as an installer it's far from perfect. The last Debian install I did, I used Mepis, which takes the hardware detection from Knoppix and makes it pure Debian, plus a couple of Mepis system admin tools (USB key /home syncing, APT-source config, spamassassin blacklist/whitelist... list goes on) and the install is super easy. It's all done graphically, after booting the CD.

  5. Re:Does Anaconda support text by zerblat · · Score: 4, Informative
    Anaconda won't be Debian's default installer -- the next version of Debian will use the new Debian Installer, which supports multiple UIs and all the Debian platforms.

    Anaconda has been ported to Debian by Progeny, mainly because Progeny supports both Red Hat and Debian and they want to use the same installer for both distros.

    Oh, and yes, Anaconda can be run in text mode, but it doesn't currently work in the Progeny port.

    --
    Please alter my pants as fashion dictates.
  6. Re:This is good news. by tacocat · · Score: 3, Informative

    Debian is working on a new installation process for their sarge release. This new debian-installer is greatly improved over the previous methods. I have been playing with it as a net-install and found it to work extremely well.

    Installation time, not counting file downloads which don't require my intervention anyways, is on the order of 20 minutes or less

    I don't know that Anaconda can bring much of anything to the installation process. When installing debian-installer I found I was asked fewer questions and have a faster set up then I did with SuSE 8.2.

    One very important point to make abundantly clear about the debian-installer is that it is not responsible for the configuration of your X-Window environment. This is something that may confuse newbies who are not used to the concept of a non-GUI operating system. All the distro's offer it (non-GUI), but many are assuming a GUI interface is preferred.

    Keeping this in mind, the debian-installer does what it is intended to do very well. And it's cross platform too!

    Personally, I don't think it's a generally good thing to have more distribution models tied into to only one installation engine. There are advantages with this, but there are always disadvantages to a homogeneous environment.

  7. Re:Are you an IT specialist or a user? by BoysDontCry · · Score: 4, Informative

    Well. Keep in mind that the Woody installer is several years old now.

    The new installer should have good hardware detection. It's in beta right now.

    Debian Installer
  8. Re:Anaconda??? Is it too much to ask... by tacocat · · Score: 4, Informative

    Just a suggestion, but the next time you can't identify the hardware, flip to another console window (Alt+Ctrl+F2) and type "lspci -vv" and you will have all the information about hardware detection you could want.

    And the best part is, you don't have to remove the cover!

  9. Glossary by nsushkin · · Score: 5, Informative
    It took me a while to figure out the meaning of this article. It needs a quick glossary.
    • sarge - The code name for the next major Debian release after woody is "sarge". It is likely that this release will be numbered "3.1".
    • Anaconda - the Red Hat Linux installation program.
  10. Re:Single Package / Dep manager by frozenray · · Score: 5, Informative

    > 3. Type knx-hdinstall

    As far as I know, knx-hdinstall is deprecated with current Knoppix versions (starting June this year as far as I remember); the preferred method to perform a hard disk installation is now knoppix-installer. Gives you the choice to do a Knoppix installation or a Debian installation, too.

    --
    "There are already a million monkeys on a million typewriters, and Usenet is NOTHING like Shakespeare." - Blair Houghton
  11. Re:Single Package / Dep manager by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Informative
    no, a package manager that builds everything from source, even when you're using common-as-dirt x86 IDE-PCI hardware, is simply inane.

    while you're waiting for mozilla to build, I've installed mozilla.

    and openoffice, gnome, KDE, a pile of audio editing utilities, and the latest security updates. that would take you somewhere around 3 days, even with your 'optimized' kernel and build chain, wouldn't it?

    and then your oc'ed CPU burns up somewhere around the time mozilla finishes building, and you visit the benchmarks to prove that gentoo presents no performance benefits over debian and mandrake.

    I mean, gimme a break here. Gentoo is slow especially for compiling stuff!

    Test 3 : Kernel Compile

    The same 2.4.21 source was copied to all machines and compiled using the same options. However, it should be noted that the Debian system used gcc 3.3.1 whilst the Mandrake and Gentoo installations used gcc 3.3.2 .

    Results:

    Debian
    7m 28s

    Mandrake
    7m 49s

    Gentoo
    9m 40s

  12. Re:This is good news. by derF024 · · Score: 3, Informative
    Updating the kernel is *Important*. That is one thing that up2date (Redhat) did well and as near as I can tell apt-get -upgrade doesn't.
    • kernel-image-2.4-386 - Linux kernel image for version 2.4 on 386.
    • kernel-image-2.4-586tsc - Linux kernel image for version 2.4 on Pentium-Classic.
    • kernel-image-2.4-686 - Linux kernel image for version 2.4 on PPro/Celeron/PII/PIII/PIV.
    • kernel-image-2.4-686-smp - Linux kernel image for version 2.4 on PPro/Celeron/PII/PIII/PIV SMP.
    • kernel-image-2.4-k6 - Linux kernel image for version 2.4 on AMD K6/K6-II/K6-III.
    • kernel-image-2.4-k7 - Linux kernel image for version 2.4 on AMD K7.
    • kernel-image-2.4-k7-smp - Linux kernel image for version 2.4 on AMD K7 SMP.

    apt-get install the kernel image for your arch and it will stay up to date with the rest of your system automatically. Unfortunately, it doesn't do this out of the box.