Slashdot Mirror


Funny Things You've Seen on Resumes?

noackjr asks: "Everyone wants a great job, but writing a quality resume requires creativity and a fair bit of work (we won't go into actually having the proper skills, qualifications, or experiences -- let's not cloud the issue). Alternatively, sprucing up your resume with a few choice pieces of quasi-truth might set you apart from other 'qualified' candidates (the HR person will never figure it out, right?). A friend from college included knowledge of 'C, C+, and C++' on his resume. He had worked in C and C++ and just figured there had to be a C+ as well (too bad he didn't list C+-). He ended up getting a $50,000+/yr job with a major US tech firm using that resume. Anyone else come across funny/pathetic attempts to improve a resume?"

12 of 361 comments (clear)

  1. Programming languages by GuyMannDude · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I grow weary of seeing lots of young 20-something applicants fresh out of school who claim they have excellent coding skills and then proceed to list about ten different languages including HTML. First, HTML is not a programming language. Secondly, it takes years to learn how to program WELL in a complex language like C++. You may know the basic syntax for ten different languages, but that doesn't mean you're an expert programmer in all. And I'd argue that if you think listing tons of languages makes you look impressive, I would argue you're not much of a programmer at all (unless you've been working for decades).

    Another applicant wrote in his cover letter than his goal was to get a Nobel prize. We are a defense contractor. They don't give out Nobel prizes for "Most Novel New Method to Kill People". Besides, this guy had a GPA of less than 3.5. Better get cracking if you want that Nobel prize, pal.

    GMD

    1. Re:Programming languages by rot26 · · Score: 4, Insightful

      First, HTML is not a programming language

      No, but it's a meta-language, and they usually don't include a space to include the meta-languages you are proficient in. It's easier (arguably safer) to just throw "HTML" in with C, C++, etc, and take a chance on having a nit-picker down you for it, rather than take the chance of it being a keyword some HR drone is looking for and not finding.

      --



      To ensure perfect aim, shoot first and call whatever you hit the target
    2. Re:Programming languages by meta-monkey · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I know a few languages really, really well. I'd say C, C++, PHP, perl I know backwards and forwards. However, I'm also familiar with many, many more, like Java, Objective C, SQL, python, JavaScript, several assemly languages, etc. I list them all on my resume, but the best ones first. Now, do I know Java anywhere near as well as I know C++? No! But if I got hired for a job where I needed to do extensive Java programming, I'm pretty sure I could ramp up awfully fast. So why not list Java programming as one of my credentials? I agree with you on the HTML thing, though :)

      The Nobel Prize? Eh, if I ran the committee, you guys would have a chance. You make big guns, and the fact that we have those big guns makes our enemies too afraid to attack us, making the world a safer place. I hereby nominate you, GuyMannDude, for a Nobel Peace Prize! (or should that be "Nobel Piece Prize?")

      --
      We don't have a state-run media we have a media-run state.
    3. Re:Programming languages by Johnny+Mnemonic · · Score: 5, Insightful


      Free hint: they list all the languages that they have heard about, because recruiters search keywords on the web-based job boards. The goal of a resume is not to prove your skills--the goal of a resume is to get to talk to a recruiter. The interview (or three) is the place to demonstrate your skills.

      Anybody who keeps to a strictly modest resume simply hasn''t looked for work in the last three years--getting the recruiter to recognize that you're actually an ideal candidate for a position that they know nothing about is more than half the battle.

      --

      --
      $tar -xvf .sig.tar
    4. Re:Programming languages by Tom7 · · Score: 4, Insightful

      You may know the basic syntax for ten different languages, but that doesn't mean you're an expert programmer in all.

      On the other hand, if you have a good general education in programming with a lot of hacking experience in a few languages, then you sure won't find it very difficult to pick up C#, even if you only have passing familiarity with its syntax.

    5. Re:Programming languages by foonf · · Score: 5, Insightful

      They don't give out Nobel prizes for "Most Novel New Method to Kill People"

      You do know how Alfred Nobel made his fortune, right?

      --

      "(Man) tries to live his own life as if he were telling a story. But you have to choose: live or tell." --Sartre
    6. Re:Programming languages by Tumbleweed · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I hate to bring this up, but it takes years to be good at HTML, as well, and most of you absolutely SUCK at it even with that amount of experience. *sigh*

      If you program in C, you probably suck at HTML. (Yes, I know, the truth hurts, but so will the Troll or Flamebait mod this post will get, despite being Insightful *shrug*).

    7. Re:Programming languages by cperciva · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Secondly, it takes years to learn how to program WELL in a complex language like C++.

      No. It takes years to learn how to program well. Once you know how to program well, picking up a new language shouldn't take more than a few weeks, except in the most baroque cases (INTERCAL, BrainF***, etc).

  2. Well... by Violet+Null · · Score: 3, Insightful

    We all know that the HR people put the impossible into their resumes (5 years of Java back in '96, anyone)?

    And we also all know that HR does keyword searches on resumes, throwing out any that don't have the keyword.

    So why would't turnabout be fair play?

  3. Re:Time travel... by Gudlyf · · Score: 4, Insightful
    What's dumber than having that on your resume is having a job posting asking for that! Too many times I've seen it happen.

    Hmmm, then again maybe they're onto something in weeding out those who would lie on their resume to get the job.

    --
    Trolls lurk everywhere. Mod them down.
  4. Not as dumb as you think... by lynx_user_abroad · · Score: 3, Insightful
    The tactic of including something which obviously isn't right just to get attention is a well proven strategy.

    Here's one to watch for: watch for television advertisements where a product is pictured as reflected in a mirror, but the product name isn't mirror imaged. The eye will be drawn to the product name instinctively as the mind is saying "shouldn't that be backwards?"

    Some people consider a Resume to be a sales tool; an advertisement for themselves; and in keeping with our long-standing tradition of skirting the truth when advertising, consider it more important to get noticed than to be truthful.

    After all, the truthful ones who don't get noticed stand less of a chance at getting the job (or making the sale) than the untruthful ones which make it to the interview.

    --

    The thing about things we don't know is we often don't know we don't know them.

  5. Re:Nonexistant institutions by sartin · · Score: 3, Insightful

    It seems like that the "Robert George of Princeton Law School" mentioned in the New Jersey Ballot site (second "this") is probably Robert George, Professor of Jurisprudence at Princeton. It seems like an understandable error to mistakenly assume the Professor of Jurisprudence is at a Law School.