Slashdot Mirror
Pretty Women Scramble Men's Sense Of The Future
Adam_Trask writes "Psychologists in Canada have finally proved what women have long suspected - men really are irrational enough to risk entire kingdoms to catch sight of a beautiful face." The methodology is not air-tight, but how many scientists figure out a way to use Am I Hot or Not at work? See also "Women Live Longer Because Men Are Dumb."
Firstly: "Psychologists in Canada" + "The methodology is not air-tight" = verifiably-true???!?!?!
"But we hypothesise that viewing pictures of pretty women was mildly arousing"
Duh! Thats what the internet was invented for...
"If there's the prospect of getting a very [strike]attractive[/strike] rich partner it may pay a man to take more risks than if an average partner was available."
Thats better...
"If you are less attractive, with few potential partners, then it pays to take risks"
I.e, go for the cute ones! Nice...thats where I am going wrong...lol
Is it a boat?
oh ya, i forgot about that...*click click typetty type*
/* oops I accidentally made a comment, sorry */
I'm going to do some blatant karma whoring here so my status will fsdfjdfflll.... Wow! Lookit you! What's your name cutie? What am I reading? Slashsomething - it doesn't matter. You have gorgeous eyes.
US Democracy:The best person for the job (among These pre-selected choices...)
Isn't this just millions of years of evolution at play? The only reason we are all here today is because our ancestors were successful in finding a mate and passing on their genetic information... and we simply are the product of that evolutionary background.
The fact that both males and females were tested, and only males showed this behaviour tends to confirm this. For reproduction, females must spend far, far more resources than males do (as my old ecology prof used to say, 'sperm are cheap'). They can therefore afford to be more selective when it comes to mates. Males, on the other hand, aren't assured of passing down their genes, thus the evolution of such behaviour.
I don't know if scientists have a name for this most delicious of male irrationalities, but I like to call it the Jerry Springer Phenomenon.
I guess Darl McBride must be living surrounded by top models then...!
Daniel
Carpe Diem
I'd risk it all for boobies! Like the Bloodhound Gang sez... "Hurray for boobies!"
In other news today, the Earth has been reported to be round!
What are those? Whats this pretty? Is it like a simple command line or like a Gui..
My wife is a sales associate at a small electronic retail store full of insanely high-priced gadgets. The people she works with are average looking while she is quite stunning. Her sales are more than three times the next highest sales associate. I once witnessed her sell two high end IPaqs and a Tablet PC to the same guy who didn't even know what he was going to do with them.
Until this article I wasn't sure if it was her beauty, or some Jedi mind trick. Now I know.
I would have found it much more interesting
if the study had included the impact of exposure
to statistically attractive males and females
to both male and female subjects.
Clearly the interest of advertisers lies in
gaining a favorable irrational reaction.
But I notice that advertising geared toward
women generally includes images of attractive
females, not of attractive males. Thus I
think the negative results obtained by
exposing females subjects to statistically
attractive males is unsurprising.
I found the reasoning of the sociobiologist
interviewed in New Scientist to be facile.
If this study had been done 50 years ago,
they would have interviewed a psychoanalyst
and obtained a similarly affected "expert"
deep analysis.
-I like my women like I like my tea: green-
if they'd get the same results if they tested gay men (with the appropriate pictures). Or if they showed pictures of attractive men to straight men.
It would be interesting to see if this breaks down on gender lines or sexual preference lines.
You're just as likely to see the female go after the other woman at the same time she defends her love for the man that just cheated on her.
Someone needs to set up a complimentary experiment that tests a woman's decison-making process after being exposed to "bad boys" that will obviously use and abuse them, and yet are regularly preferred and pursued rather than the less dangerous guys who, despite having the capcity and desire to respect women and treat them as partners rather than toys, are dismissed as undesirable.
...men would look at pictures of attractive vs. less-attractive women. And females would be shown the education level and income-earning potential of the males.
I seem to recall this woman, Helen of Troy?
The news item title sounds like a description of the "plot complication" in "Back to the Future III" where Doc Brown meets the schoolteacher.
Don't blame Durga. I voted for Centauri.
Women have been exploiting this built-in feature in men for years!
Unfortunately there are no vendor patches available at the time beign. A temporary fix is not to have any contact with these 'women' (this should not be a problem for usual /. reader)!
NOTE: Even pr0n should be avoided while doing important decisions.
Knowing these facts helps preventing such exploitaition in the future.
I demand the Cone of Silence!
"Pretty Women Scramble Men's Sense Of The Future"
No where is this more apparent than comparing the work of Noastramus before, and after, he met the fetching Marie Rocque on a trip to Nice.
Previous to this, his qautraines were known for their poetic quality and predictive power.
After Cupid's arrow struck him, his writings were reduced to doggerell of no predictive ability, such as "Purple space alien destroy Russia in 1983", "Small Bears of Shicageau Win World Series 2001", "Cylons Led by Picard Destroy Babylon 4 in 2525", and "Matrix III Better than Matrix I".
Don't blame Durga. I voted for Centauri.
Way back when, there were several GNOME releases named after the Bonobo, rather like kernel 2.6-test releases are being named after the Turkey.
Presumably anyone who looked into the Bonobo a little bit learned about sperm competition, from the most extreme example amoung primates, if not the animal kingdom.
The living have better things to do than to continue hating the dead.
More important to know ourselves and the manipulation we are subject to. Intersting that sex is used to sell beer very successfully, but not to sell geek toys (mobos, HDs, ...). Why?
I would have found it much more interesting
if there had been purty pictures to look at! Slobber Slobber Drool Drool Gah Gah
Sperm competition? Count me out. I don't want to be the one stuck with cleaning the walls when this one is over.
I wonder which newspaper that reporter will end up working for next?
God invented whiskey so the Irish would not rule the world.
Cause only faggots use flash.
according to this New Scientist article:
[snip]
Women, by contrast, made equally rational decisions whether they had been shown pictures of handsome men or those of average attractiveness.
[/snip]
Pretty Women Scramble Men's Sense Of The Future
To be more thorough, Pretty Women Scramble Men's Senses, period.
Table-ized A.I.
My wife, OTOH, can take upwards of two hours trying on different combinations of clothes, shoes and accessories just to determine what she doesn't want to wear. Rest assured, when she does decide, the effect will be stunning. But no less effective had she gone with any dozen of her other combinations.
Women instinctively know that men are more visual. Whether they admit to it or not, the whole "getting ready" ritual and the end result is to exploit (yes, I said "exploit") the fact that men are, well, very simple and predictable when it comes to certain things. We can't turn away from a pretty face, and if you show a little attention or interest, for the most part, we'll be eating out of your hands. If anyone caught the episode of South Park tonight (probabally the most well written one I've seen in years) you had it spelled out perfectly. Show a little skin, bat the eyes and give a little flirt, and most guys will throw their hearts (and wallets) on the line.
Xenon, where's my money? -Borno
An interesting followup might be to look at whether the student's major or area of studies had a relationship to his or her choice and the extent to which that choice was influenced by the treatment (exposure to attractive, as opposed to average, member of opposite sex).
I think that it's plausable that some relationship exits. For example, students of majors such as Actuarial Science, Economics, Statistics, Applied Mathematics, and the like would be more likely to know exactly how to make a rational choice in this case (i.e. maximize the net present value of their decision by discounting the future payment at a reasonable rate). This could easily influence their base odds of making the rational choice. An interesting question might be whether their ability to use their knowledge in the area would be affected by the treatment. If there is an effect, should workers be allowed to put on their cubicle walls pictures of members of opposite sex that are of only average attractiveness?
Of course, you wouldn't be able to demonstrate causality, since that would require randomly assigning students to majors.
Don't you think its possible that a few people on slashdot actually are socially normal enough to get married, and then a few of those are lucky enough to get a striking wife? I have just done the math, and there are exactly 37.8 lucky bastards.
not supporting Linux. They discount the future rewards available because of the current rewards they are receiving.
Because:
# man woman
No manual entry for woman
Pretty women scramble "the AVERAGE" men's sense of the future. The one that she will probably couple with is the one who is immume to her charms; the one who will be able to better redirect his money, not towards Ipaqs, tablet pc, etc; but something like starting his own company, investing in his education, etc... This is the type of man that she will marry.. the rest she is just using.... or the rest is letting her use them..
-Eleison
Obviously you've never been to one of our staff meetings.
That's our life, the big wheel of shit. - The Fat Man, Blue Tango Salvage
I think that your wife is able to sell more items because her attractiveness halo extends into consumer electronics information. So most guys think that she knows lots about gadgets even though she may know almost nothing abut them. Simply because she's hot.
Uggh life is unfair.
We had to destroy the sig to save the sig.
Originally, when they mentioned pretty, I thought this was what they were talking about.
However, just to be sure, I also asked Google about "women" and "pretty". The second resulting link was about urination, while the fifth link was about flatulence.
I have since come to the conclusion that the concept of being pretty is horrendously overrated, bordering on disgusting, and will eventually perish - pretty soon, hopefully.
Attack its weak point for massive damage!
...come again?
C|N>K
It is exactly 42. Should have talked to the mice beforehand.
I prefer the "u" in honour as it seems to be missing these days.
I think that's a really interesting point. Can somebody recommend a paper or source on the subject?
What do you mean my sig is repetitive? What do you mean my sig is repetitive? What do you mean....
For a second I thought this was the Paris Hilton study. Where Paris Hilton makes this desert storm night vision sex tape and then distributes it on the internet - just as her new show is coming out. So all the guys are like, "slut," but masturbate to the video every night and then subliminally cannot resist watching her show so the sponsors can add to her already enormous wealth. They stopped implanting orgasm inducing electrodes in male mice because they would just trigger it until they died. Men are dumb and I didn't really need this study to remind me of my failings - I'm living the dream baby!
well guys, what _can_ we do to patch this security hole? i mean obviously there are exploits running in the wild and all...the above poster's temporary fix is akin to 'hrm...we seem to have a bug in the kernel...so no one use linux for a few weeks.'
this is my idea
we find a female who we can trust and apply them as an interface with local reality.
it will work like this
world? -+- trusted woman -+- poor falliable guy.
because the woman involved has no vested interest in exploiting our lack of future (bonus if said woman is ugly or >300lbs so no lack of future occurs).
summarry: we need a cadre of women shells to protect us from the world, men, for my proposed man-patch.
women are not exploitable to this security hole by default, so no action is needed to protect them from it.
GENERATION 26: The first time you see this, copy it into your sig on any forum and add 1 to the generation.
fight eula vendor lock-in. support the eff. support the fsf
GENERATION 26: The first time you see this, copy it into your sig on any forum and add 1 to the generation.