Slashdot Mirror


New Bacterium Could Herald Bio-Batteries

Clever Pun writes "According to this BBC article, a newly discovered bacterium is able to convert 'uranium and other radionuclides dissolved in water to solid compounds that can be extracted.' It reduces (adds electrons to) positively charged metal ions, making them insoluble in water (making them easier to clean up), which creates small charges of electricity. It has been speculated that this bacterium could potentially be used in a sort of bio-battery. Matrix v0.1b, anyone?"

24 of 60 comments (clear)

  1. heard this on NPR by jaredmauch · · Score: 5, Informative

    This was covered on NPR this past Friday. You can probally find some archive of it if you're interested in hearing it.. try here. It sounded interesting but not quite viable yet based on what I heard.

  2. Sugar eating bacteria battery by G4from128k · · Score: 4, Interesting

    This sugar eating bacteria battery looks more promising. Runs on sugar and has an 80% conversion efficiency.

    --
    Two wrongs don't make a right, but three lefts do.
  3. Who cares... by Kobal · · Score: 3, Insightful

    about directly producing electricity when you could probably extract uranium straight from sea water with the help of these babies? Probably even cheaper than buying it from third world countries in the long run.

    1. Re:Who cares... by UnknowingFool · · Score: 3, Interesting

      There's a difference between a side benefit and a direct purpose. The bacteria's greatest potential is in the area of environmental clean up. The ability to extract uranium can help in many polluted and toxic areas. The fact that it can generate electricity is a bonus. Sure, it can be adapted for other purposes but that is not the main reason that it is being developed.

      --
      Well, there's spam egg sausage and spam, that's not got much spam in it.
    2. Re:Who cares... by Nucleon500 · · Score: 3, Interesting

      I can think of one other use for heavy-metal extracting bacteria - medicine. Could they be used to counteract lead and mercury poisoning?

  4. Evolution by ()vnorby() · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Not saying evolution didnt happen, but someone explain how an organism like this bacterium could evolve due to "survival of the fittest?"
    It seems quite impossible to understand how a bacterium could have mutations that allow it to "convert 'uranium and other radionuclides dissolved in water to solid compounds that can be extracted.' It reduces (adds electrons to) positively charged metal ions, making them insoluble in water (making them easier to clean up), which creates small charges of electricity."

    --
    -Vib, videogame freelancer for news0r.com, videogame.net, and vnorby.tk
    1. Re:Evolution by Kobal · · Score: 4, Informative

      Actually, there are quite a few species of bacteria who use this kind of cycle to get their energy. Not a bad thing to colonize layers where respiration won't help. And the ability to specifically reduce heavy metal ions probably comes, as the article implies, from mutations on cytochrome reductases genes.

    2. Re:Evolution by ()vnorby() · · Score: 2, Interesting

      If there are other species of bacteria that we know can do this, why is this one special? Couldn't we theoretically use any kind of bacteria that creates charges of electricity using this type of cycle in a bio-battery? There might be a bacteria that gets their energy from a more common metal ion.

      --
      -Vib, videogame freelancer for news0r.com, videogame.net, and vnorby.tk
    3. Re:Evolution by Smidge204 · · Score: 4, Informative

      There is nothing special about this particular bug, except that it was used to gain some insight on how these kinds of bacteria work their magic.

      The whole battery idea comes from how we now understand that the "c-type cytochromes" add electrons to the heavy metal ions to newtralize them, and create a small electrical current in the process.

      Yes, in theory I would imagine any bacteria that has similar mechanics could be used.

      This little fella jsut happened to get the spotlight because it was the first to be studied in depth.

      Ref. http://www.geobacter.org/ for some more info

      You might also want to read through the talk.origins archive, since I think you might not fully understand how evolution works. (Hint: "survival of the fittest" is a really poor way to describe it.)
      =Smidge=

    4. Re:Evolution by CXI · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Not saying evolution didnt happen, but someone explain how an organism like this bacterium could evolve due to "survival of the fittest?"

      It's pretty simple really. This type of bacterium is decended from a line which figured out how to live on a new type of food that others could not. That's evolution at work. The fact that it "convert[s] 'uranium and other radionuclides dissolved in water to solid compounds that can be extracted'" is a nice side effect for us, but that has nothing to do with evolution.

    5. Re:Evolution by splerdu · · Score: 2, Informative

      If something can be eaten, it will be. Survival of the fittest doesn't only mean competition with peers, it also means adapting to make use of resources.. If this bacteria evolved because of exposure to a redionuclide rich environment, then that's evolution at work for you.

    6. Re:Evolution by the_2nd_coming · · Score: 2, Funny

      well one day a bacterium came along and said "gee, I have no niche I wish there was some where I could specialize"

      then the bacterium noticed a glowing piece of rock that was not being touched by anything.

      "hmm" said the bacterium, "I could eat that thing"

      and so became the Uranium eating bacterium.

      --



      I am the Alpha and the Omega-3
  5. What I want to see by Hythlodaeus · · Score: 2, Insightful

    What I want to see is a machine that operates
    carbon + electricty -> food
    in less labor and land area per calorie than farming plants.

    No one would want to eat it now, especially not the organic farming fans (mmm... organic parasites, yum!), but don't forget we're multiplying exponentially still, and you can only pile on so much fertilizer.

    --
    For great justice.
    1. Re:What I want to see by iggymanz · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Hard to beat very low cost of 100+ bushels of corn per acre. actually, with the revised U.N. estimates of 9 billion people by 2300 a.d., it seems we may not have the "exponential" growth in population we once thought we had. Farming the land & oceans for 50% more people, we probably can do that, just need to be a little smarter about it. The main problem is that we aren't yet managing/farming the oceans yet, just plundering.

  6. Web site by RML · · Score: 5, Informative

    Quite a lot of information about this bacteria (Geobacter sulfurreducens) can be found at the Geobacter project home page.

    --
    Human/Ranger/Zangband
  7. My Batteries Died... by Sunlighter · · Score: 5, Funny

    That phrase will have new meaning...

    --
    Sunlit World Scheme. Weird and different.
  8. NPR Link by lordDallan · · Score: 4, Informative

    The page linking to the NPR audio is here

  9. It didn't by gacp · · Score: 2, Informative


    Forget Neodarwinism: it's a myth, and dead wrong. Biological evolution does not happen that way. In short: autonomous systems cannot be instructed by the environment, so there can be no such thing as Natural Selection. The reason Neodarwinism (which is not the same as evolution!) is still the dominant paradigm are really very very close to the reason Micro$oft dominates the computer market. FUD included: I'm supposed to be a "cryptocreationist" because I demand this so-called "theory" to be put to the test [it never was, go check it].




    Evolutionary biology (the non-Micro$oft-like kind, that is) has long left Darwin behind, decades ago.
    Sorry this Science Inc. had you fooled.


    --
    ``L'imagination au povoir.''
  10. ProtoCulture? by Zarf · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I heard about this first on Science Friday on the December 12th show. When I heard them mention the bacteria making electricity I though of the "Proto-Culture" from Robotech. When I was a kid I used to think it was an electricity producing life-form that they found on the SDF-1 ... of course my memories are mostly of Robotech season three... "Genesis Climber Mospeada"

    It would be hilarious if science fact would follow this particular fiction and lead to...
    <Announcer Voice>
    "the awesome power of RoboTech!"
    </Announcer Voice>

    --
    [signature]
  11. Energy Yields too low by spin2cool · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I have my doubts that this sort of bio-battery will ever be useful on a widespread, large scale.

    Even anaerobic resiration by the most efficient organisms yields under 50% of the potential energy in their food. Secondary reactions like this typically occur at a much slower rate than life-sustaining reactions. What this means is that a fairly high amount of nutrients will have to be supplied, and that the resulting current generated will be relatively small compared to the potential energy sent in.

    I guess what I'm saying here is "don't expect a miracle bio-powered car from this."

    These bacteria will no doubt be useful in cleanup of contaminated sites, though. Perhaps soil could be placed into large decontamination devices, and the resulting electricity could be used for low-output pumps that drip nutrients into the chamber. Then you'd have a useful, self-powered detox device.

    1. Re:Energy Yields too low by spin2cool · · Score: 2, Insightful

      correction: Aerobic resiration by the most efficient organisms yields under 50% of the potential energy in their food.

      Anaerobic yields are typically much lower.

  12. By gosh... by splerdu · · Score: 2, Interesting

    environment it wasn't intended for

    If someone hooks you up with a life's supply of food in exchange for taking your crap what would you do?

    I'd say the bacteria would be happy being in a battery.. They get to feed and we get our volts. It's a win-win situation!

  13. Really not a battery by juushin · · Score: 2, Informative

    Organisms that reduce other metals have been known for a long time - for example mercury. There are already programs using these sorts of bioorganisms for detoxifying heavy metal-containing soil and water.

  14. Applications to Uranium 235 Enrichment by A55M0NKEY · · Score: 3, Insightful
    A while back there was an article about 2 geophysiscists ( sp ) who found iron isotope ratios were affected by being metabolized by bacteria.

    Their bacteria Shenwala alga, reduces the iron from Fe(III) to Fe(II) ( uses the iron as oxygen in it's metabolism ) . Other bacteria ( Desulfovibrio Ferrireducens ( sp ) ) have shown to reduce uranium from U(VI) to the less soluable U(IV) and have been used to clean up mine tailing drainage by making all the uranium insoluable.

    Since any chemical reaction that is not allowed to go to completion causes isotopic enrichment ( presumably the lighter isotope is the preferred reactant ) and metabolism by bacteria is really just a chemical reaction there is some enrichment there.

    Other bacteria which oxidize iron like Thiobacillus Ferrooxidans have been used to leach uranium out of ores by oxidizing it to a soluable state.

    Since any chemical reaction not completed results in some isotopic enrichment one might enrich U235 by, feeding the dissolved Uranium oxide produced by Thiobacillus Ferrooxidans from raw ore to the anaerobic Desulfovibrio ferrireducens where it would reprecipitate. Then feed the precipitated uranium oxide back to thiobacillus ferrooxidans to produce more uranium liquor to feed to desulfovibrio ferrireducens forming cascaded stages which would gradually enrich the U235 until it was useful for fuel rods etc.

    The question is: how much energy does this take, and how efficient is the enrichment? How much sugar/light/whatever-these-bugs-eat do you need to feed them per stage and is it more economical energy-wise than other uranium enrichment methods already in use?

    A home experimenter interested in developing this into a patentable process would be breaking the law by enriching uranium. After learning how to grow these beasties ( I'm sure they'd sell them to you since they are not dangerous ) you would have to measure the enrichment achieved bu sending a sample off to a mass spectometry lab. It would behove one to send the depleted uranium rather than the enriched uranium so as not to piss anyone off ( hope it wasn't the heavy isotope the bugs liked better! ). Then you could measure how much it costs you to feed the bacteria per kilo of metabolized uranium and compare it to the cost of existing enrichment methods by looking it up, and decide if you have something worth patenting. Profit.

    --

    Eat at Joe's.