Mac OS X Security Criticisms Countered
Paradox writes "In response to the recent PC Magazine story criticizing Mac OS X security, technologist/author Richard Forno has written a rebuttal criticizing the author and raising some good points about the fundamental differences between Windows and Mac OS X. Considering Lance Ulanoff's tone during his article, a rebuttal from the Mac OS X community was inevitable." Forno's conclusion: "Trustworthy computing must be more than a catchy marketing phrase. Ironically, despite a few hiccups along the way, it's becoming clear that Mac OS, not Windows, epitomizes Microsoft's new mantra of 'secure by design, default, and deployment'."
not much comparison when you start comparing your security to windows security.
Drill baby drill - on Mars
My windows all have locks on them. Do your apples?
My security is a big ax. Just try breaking into my computer, and I will HACK you.
30% Troll, 50% Underrated, 10% Interesting
Score:5, Troll
Saying that, I have to make the statement that I am an OS X user, and I love it. The simple fact that is asks for my username and password when I try to install applications is a wonder in itself.
So in the words, you download programs from the internet, execute them, and then type in your password when prompted... Can you say the word 'Trojan' ?
You are right, of course. But expecting Forno to avoid name-calling would mean expecting him to avoid feeding the Troll. This one was so cute, and looked so hungry... Maybe just a LITTLE food would be okay...
Crap. Slashdot picked it up. So much for keeping the Troll population down this Christmas season!
This at least had some bullets that backed up the statements.
The PC Mag article read as a 'neener neener neener I hate you' article vs. something with content.
As a rock-in-roll Physicist once said, No matter where you go, there you are.
The only OS I would trust to be completely secure is the one that runs on abacus.
Hey, reading this is slow going. Anyone got a link to the PowerPoint slideshow version for dummies?
"Accept that some days you are the pigeon, and some days you are the statue." - David Brent, Wernham Hogg
So in short,
Technologist is to technology what Waitress is to acting?
To: Richard Forno
From: Lance Ulanoff
Subject: Re: Mac Security
YHL YHBT HAND
With all due respect any "elite" user is pretty abhorrent to be around...
I'm sure we all know a:
Mac Zealot
Microsft Apologist
Pompus Unix Geek
But now you can be a Mac Zealot and a Pompus Unix Geek at the same time! Its great!
Wally -- "You're one of those condescending UNIX computer users!"
UNIX-guy-- "Here's a nickel, kid. Get yourself a better computer."
--Dilbert, c. 1994
Rule #1 -- Politics always trumps technology.
When it was time for something to go, the nice distructo matic guys came in, busted the monitors, all the hardware and ran magnates over everything just to make sure.
What, like, Andrew Carnegie and John D. Rockefeller had to jog on the broken computers? How does that help? Man, I just don't understand security these days.
Its brilliant! Windows safer by design will prove that everyone is at least as insecure as they are! Bammo! Acceptably secure operating system.
I smell a Monty Python skit in here somewhere!
Quack, quack.
Stay alert!
Trust no one!
Keep your laser handy!
Trust The Computer.
The Computer is your friend.
http://slacksite.com/images/humour/dilbert-unix.gi f