Slashdot Mirror


Suggestions for Reliable Touch Screen Displays?

seigniory asks: "I'm looking to put about 20 touchscreen displays into operation as information kiosks in low-traffic areas (i.e. private waiting rooms, not malls). The application is written, but is mouse-driven, so a conversion to touch screen is necessary. At present, I'm imagining a 12-15" LDC with active-matrix, but will entertain other suggestions. Without much experience with the quality and durability of most touchscreen solutions, or the 'gotcha's' of converting an existing app to touchscreen, I'm at a loss as to where I should begin. I can't start the touchscreen w/o the actual screen, and I don't have a ton of money to play with yet, so I can't afford to waste money trying to find my ideal solution. Searches for 'LCD Touchscreen Display Reviews' has turned up not much more than ads. What experiences or advice can Slashdot offer?"

46 comments

  1. lead by shaitand · · Score: 1, Funny

    If you cover the touchscreen with a 6inch thick lead shield I hear it greatly increases reliability and durability.

    1. Re:lead by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      How about we shove a 6inch lead shield up your butt?

  2. Quality does matter! by jptechnical · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Speaking from experience working with both food service companies and small mailbox etc. type stores, you will suffer if you get the cheapest available.

    Biggest problem was inaccuracy or under sensitivity (the sense screen far enough off the display that viewing angle made it a pain to calibrate) and it just wearing out from use.

    In the case of the small post office place, they decided that the amount of typing made the touchscreen a bad option since it was difficult to say the least for typing.

    What kind of industry is this for? Is a mouse or trackball surface mounted out of the question? I know that the mouse/trackball is real short money.

    --

    Boredom's not a burden anyone should bear.
    1. Re:Quality does matter! by ottothecow · · Score: 1
      DigitalWW sells products aimed at people who want screens and such in their cars but they offer 12.1inch and smaller touch kits.

      I know lots of people think very highly of the 7inch (most common size in cars) and the rest should be of the same quality

      --
      Bottles.
  3. EarthLCD is the place... by Stigmata669 · · Score: 1

    to look. Sure you don't get 3rd party reviews, but the prices are pretty good and you can get all sorts of kiosk and OEM parts. Touch screen technologies are discussed and can be added to any display. uhhh link.

    --
    Yawn.
  4. Google search found by jptechnical · · Score: 3, Informative

    lots of companies that work with kiosk cabinets google for "kiosk cabinet".

    Not knowing what your software already looks like, this site asks some good questions for a touchscreen application.

    --

    Boredom's not a burden anyone should bear.
  5. Enclosure is important! by elemur · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I had two kiosks at an outdoor location and the enclosure is *key*! I understand that you are doing it internally, but the enclosure is typically tied to a touchscreen of some sort, and that often will limit your options. Or, atleast provide guidance.

    Our touchscreens required a special driver in windows and then simply behaved as a mouse. We had a real problem with text entry however.. we were using a special kiosk browser with pop-up screen, but people found it very difficult to use. A nice enclosure with an attached keyboard and trackball would have helped things dramatically.

  6. Don't go cheap - go for quality, or get headaches! by Midnight+Ryder · · Score: 5, Informative

    I'll start off by saying that I typically don't recommend overly expensive (because I'm a tightwad), but in this case I'll make an exception.

    Allen Bradley uses Elo Touch products for thier industrial control touch screen PC's. These things are wonderful IMHO - I didn't want to see the ones I had leave when the project was done, and they had to go be installed on site - I love mine as a nice 21" desktop montitor and touchscreen combo :-) These critters are a bit hefty price wise, but I haven't seen one fail yet in the field (and these are industrial areas - either gritty dirt or greasy type stuff). They are pretty nice displays, but a little more faded color wise than I'd like to normally use for a desktop application like Photoshop. Incredibly durable, lots of different styles, and they have excellent accuracy. I recommended 'em.

    What I DON'T recommend is going with the lowest priced one you find. It will fail. Seriously. Don't be afraid to take your time, and find out what has the longest time between failures -vs- ruggedness (they don't always go together) -vs- the features you need. Anything less than what you need for the application is going to REALLY hurt you later.

    As for programming for one - if it's on Windows, no problem. It's just a one-button mouse. They also have Linux, Mac, etc. drivers - it's just sending ya' mouse coordinates and a mouse click. For most applications, it's ready to roll before you even see the touch screen, it's that simple.

    --

    Davis Ray Sickmon, Jr - looking for something to read? Check out my three free novels at MidnightRyder.org

  7. Enlarge and Limit by digitalvengeance · · Score: 5, Informative

    I recently wrote a traffic stop statistical program for a sheriff's office that used their laptop touchscreens as the primary mode of input. From that short 2-day project, I learned a few points that I'll pass on now.

    First, make everything larger than you need it to be. I've found that the size of buttons I need on a touchscreen is only about 1/3rd as large as some of my less adept users. (Of course, they are also using these in laptops in often-moving vehicles.)

    Secondly, try to severely limit the items on any given screen. I've found that users tend to be faster visual-scanners when they can just "tap" as they move their eyes, providing too many options on one screen can lead to more false-clicks.

    As far as drivers go - just process the input as a one button mouse.

    --
    How many roads must a man walk down? 42.
    1. Re:Enlarge and Limit by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      From my own experiences, everything said here is true. I've been working with this stuff for 8 years.

      When you are designing your interfaces, grab the person with the biggest fingers and have them test it. Of course, it helps if you suggest this tactfully. Good thing my boss at the time had a sense of humor.

      It's also a really good idea to avoid drag and drop. If the screen isn't perfectly smooth, your finger WILL skip and bounce enough to interrupt the drag.

      A touch screen IS a one-button mouse. Just TRY to right-click a touch screen. Also, increase the interval for a valid double click (tap) or avoid them entirely. Try to double click on your screen, and you'll see that your finger moves a lot more than it does on a mouse.

      Yeah, I probably need a login. I'll get around to it some time.

  8. Different types of touchscreens by NickDngr · · Score: 4, Informative

    There are many different types of touchscreen technology. The least expensive and the most common is a resistive touchscreen. These are also the least durable and give the most distortion. You can touch them with just about anything (including a golved hand) and they will work.

    If you want something a little more durable, go with a capacitive touchscreen. These will cost a bit more, but they will be MUCH more durable and will look much better. You have to use a bare finger on them, but for indoor use this is an acceptable tradeoff.

    There are other, less common, more expensive types that you are not likely to come across as well. Do your homework. I work in a casino - we have thousands of touchscreens. Gamblers are brutal, and all touchscreens are a PITA, but I think the capacitive type are your best bet.

    --
    Yoda of Borg am I! Assimilated shall you be! Futile resistance is, hmm?
    1. Re:Different types of touchscreens by crisco · · Score: 4, Interesting
      3M Dynapro demos their NFI touchscreens with spraypaint, stickers and stuff glued to the panel and it still works. NFI is a variant of capacitive technology and looks like it works well.

      Our product uses resistive from 3M and works well enough, although occasionally someone gouges the screen hard enough to start ripping the resistive layers of plastic out.

      --

      Bleh!

    2. Re:Different types of touchscreens by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      One thing to note with capacative touch screens, is that the resolution of the pointer is often much lower than resistive. Most touch-screen apps are based around large buttons, so it usually doesn't matter, but if you need to be able to control the pointer down to the nearest couple of pixels then you had better try before you buy.

    3. Re:Different types of touchscreens by Danny+Rathjens · · Score: 2, Informative

      There are no linux drivers for dynapro, unfortunately. We only support Microtouch and Elo.

    4. Re:Different types of touchscreens by DAldredge · · Score: 1

      Why not?

    5. Re:Different types of touchscreens by Danny+Rathjens · · Score: 1

      I'm not clear on what you are asking. But I should clarify that there is a driver for serial dynapros included with XFree86, but not for usb. And the serial one does not support calibration. There is one that supports calibration, but the author just gives out binaries and won't share the source code so it can't be used with recent versions of XFree86.
      And we haven't had the time or enough customer requests to write it ourselves like I did for the microtouch controller.

    6. Re:Different types of touchscreens by crisco · · Score: 1

      Funny enough, I'm evaluating your product right now. And getting the touchscreen working was one of the items on the todo list.

      --

      Bleh!

  9. A touch-screen is not a finger-mouse by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Porting mouse-based apps to touch screen can be a lot harder than people expect. I can't count the number of times I've had to remind touch UI design newbies that putting important information in a mouseover is a really bad idea. There are lots of more subtle gotchas as well. Most GUI widgets just aren't designed to be operated by a pointer as large as a finger. Dragging (for scrollbars, drag&drop, etc) doesn't work very well; the finger can stutter across the screen. Plus you have the user's hand obscuring parts of the display. Etc.

  10. Re:Don't go cheap - go for quality, or get headach by Chilles · · Score: 1

    I was just about to make this comment.
    My company uses 15" Elo touchs screens for all our industrial applications. The 15" models are great for office/light industrial use.

  11. Advantech panel Computers by sweede · · Score: 2, Informative

    I work at a printing plant (currently the number one company in the world w00t). We use advantech panel computers w/touch screen displays at the back of the press and soon in the color booth. They get abused with ink, oil, and various solvents and after a year still have NO "dead spots" on the screen where it doesnt work. Using your finger the mouse cursor does jump around a bit but i always use the back end of a pen or another plastic tool to move the mouse/icons around.

    http://www.advantech.com/ACG/

    --
    I follow the SDK and GDN principles.. Spelling Dont Kount, Grammer Dont Neither
    1. Re:Advantech panel Computers by The_Morgan · · Score: 2, Informative

      Advantech makes a few lines of touchscreen integrated computers. One of the things Ive seen is the TPC line of industrial grade computers isn't as robust as the PPC line (the one mentioned in the parent post).

      The touchscreens are the same but the intenal componets are not. I've had many TPCs with failed hard drives or bad motherboards.

      FWIW.

  12. Practical suggestion by wowbagger · · Score: 1

    No matter what technology you choose for the displays, I would suggest having a box of cleaning wipes near the screen - preferably the kind that have Clorox or some other strong antiseptic in them.

    1. Re:Practical suggestion by Oddly_Drac · · Score: 2, Insightful

      "No matter what technology you choose for the displays, I would suggest having a box of cleaning wipes near the screen - preferably the kind that have Clorox or some other strong antiseptic in them."

      While a very good point, it's not that good an idea, as this is exactly the over-use of antiseptics that has led to the evolution of resistent bacterial and viral strains. The downside is I don't have a suggestion apart from reviving the old saw of 'washing your hands' when you come into contact with public areas.

      --
      Oddly Draconis
      Too cynical to live, too stubborn to die.
    2. Re:Practical suggestion by bmac · · Score: 1

      I really don't know, but I'd guess that using harsh chemicals like those found in Clorox wipes would be bad for the monitor over long-term use.

      Just a guess, but most manufacturers recommend only *mild* soap and water for such things.

      But, certainly, having some damp cloth/wipes nearby would definitely help.

      Peace & Blessings,
      bmac
      For true peace and happiness : www.mihr.com
      MSG v. 4.0 :-)

  13. Re:Don't go cheap - go for quality, or get headach by bigmo · · Score: 1

    I'd also like to plug elo touchsystems. I used one of their systems quite a few years ago (a modified 21" mitsu monitor using their acoustic wave technology) for a project. I was in way over my head and they were very helpful. The product still works after some very serious abuse.

  14. Touch Controls by admorgan · · Score: 1

    We use touch screens for one of our applications. They are placed in access points of Nuclear Power Plants. One thing we found when testing this project is that durability is a lot more important than originally spec'ed. We use a company called Touch Controls for our screens. They have a problem in that it takes forever to get a quote, but their technology is hands down the best.

  15. Antiseptic, not antimicrobial by wowbagger · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Your point about the overuse of antimicrobials like triclosan is correct, but I am not talking about antimicrobials - I am talking about "Nuke'm till they glow, shoot them in the dark, and and let $DEITY sort them out" antiseptics, like sodium hypoclorite, hydrogen peroxide, Lysol, and the like.

    Nothing short of an extremophile will survive those to engender resistance.

    1. Re:Antiseptic, not antimicrobial by Carnildo · · Score: 1

      Nothing short of an extremophile will survive those to engender resistance.

      Biofilms will also survive, but that's due to having an outer layer of bacteria killed by the antiseptic protecting the inner layer, not due to any inherent resistance.

      --
      "They redundantly repeated themselves over and over again incessantly without end ad infinitum" -- ibid.
  16. Different Technologies, and Companies by michael+noah · · Score: 3, Informative

    A couple of people have mentioned capacitive and resistive touch sceens. There is a better solution than both of these, a technology called Surface Acoustic Wave. It offers a longer life than capacitive, better accuracy than resistive, and IIRC. In fact, capacitive is in general better than resistive on all fronts, but SAW is not only longer lasting, it allows use without skin contact, i.e. by someone wearing gloves.

    The 2 big names in touch are 3M (microtouch), and Elo. The both provide about the same services, and you'd have to have a relationship with them to decide which was better, I think.

    There are new technologies on the horizon that will surpass SAW, but I've yet to get my hands on a demo unit.

    1. Re:Different Technologies, and Companies by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      All of the above is true. But...

      We used to have a bunch of these (Elo). The problem is that there is an air gap between the CRT glass and the touch screen face. Hard to get an exact fit, see. The problem is that this gap introduces some major parallax errors which makes these screens even less accurate than the other kinds. The amount of error changes depending on what angle you are looking at it.

      The last big hardware upgrade, we went replaced them all with capacitive screens.

    2. Re:Different Technologies, and Companies by Sxooter · · Score: 1

      Note that the 3m microtouch screens can be ordered bonded right onto the front of a CRT. I had a project a long time ago where I had to create / program a kiosk, and all through the project my computer had a touchscreen, and I got so damned used to using my finger for a mouse that when I got rid of that machine I kept touching the screen to do things. :-)

      --

      --- It is not the things we do which we regret the most, but the things which we don't do.
  17. Whats wrong with a mouse? by pagercam2 · · Score: 1

    Whats wrong with a mouse? Touch scrrens are often more trouble than they are worth and often confuse users who are expected to switch between keyboard and mouse. Your post doesn't describe the application so its hard to say what you're priorities are. Touch screens are often expensive, screens get dirty and touch screens loose calibration and stop working. A keyboard with some sort of pointing device or a menu with numbers/letters is often easier for users anyway. Or you could go the ATM route and have keys along the side of the screen with text arranged to relate the on-screen prompts. Details of your app would make it a lot easier to help you.

    1. Re:Whats wrong with a mouse? by Carnildo · · Score: 1

      Wireless mice will get stolen, wired mice will need frequent replacement.

      --
      "They redundantly repeated themselves over and over again incessantly without end ad infinitum" -- ibid.
  18. Touchscreen by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    Depending on the operating system you use, the touch supplier will provide you with the driver to interface your touchscreen. The best solution for you is a capacitive toughtouch solution which has impact resistance for vandalism and can be sealed for moister and water. SAW will not handle that,

  19. Controller... by herrvinny · · Score: 1

    Coincidently, I was looking at that website recently, to get a small LCD screen (the one here). Unfortunately, they don't sell a controller board or anything. How am I supposed to link it to a computer without an appropriate connector? Can anyone help?

    1. Re:Controller... by SirTwitchALot · · Score: 1

      Well, this LCD isn't designed to just "connect" to a computer. If you read the data sheet on the page (this thing) you'll see that the interface specs include one hsync line, one vsync line, and three lines for each color (RGB.) You just need to generate logic pulses according to the timing charts around page 9 or so. So how do you interface this LCD easily with a PC? You don't, you need to convert the VGA signal to something this display can understand, or even DVI if you're lucky enough to have a card that supports it.

      --
      Go away, or I will replace you with a very small shell script.
  20. don't do what my gym did! by morcheeba · · Score: 2, Interesting

    My gym has a fancy touchscreen thingy to track your workouts. I suspect that they used a capactive touchscreen* because if you get a tiny drop of sweat on the screen, it stops working. I guess they didn't really test their kiosks in actual gyms. Maybe that was intentional so that people would wipe up after themselves.

    (* I don't know what the actual technology is, I just know these screens have this problem)

  21. Re:Don't go cheap - go for quality, or get headach by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    There are 2 ways to get touch screens. 1) You buy a complete, pre-assembled unit. 2) You buy a touch screen kit and add it to your own monitor.

    #1 is easier and safer, but more expensive. Also, these companies tend to use low-end, lowest bidder POS (and I don't mean Point-Of-Sale, either) monitors. They work, yes, but the screen adjustment controls typically can't get rid of all of the geometry problems.

    #2 has all the attendant risks involved in cracking open your monitor and sticking new bits inside. Hopefully, they fit. And then, if you survive that, discovering your fingerprints inside the screen after you've put it all back together again.

    We've also received factory made units with fingerprints inside, too. So there really isn't any advantage either way.

    Ok, so I'm only talking about non-industrial grade CRTs here, but considering some of the junk we've ended up with, I bet their choices for LCDs suck, too.

  22. Iiyama by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    im sure ill get modded down as an A.C., but if you see this, ive been using iiyama touchscreens for my HCI research; and though they dont get used as heavily as a screen would in a public kiosk, they probably see more use than they would in a private waiting room (probably 4-6 hrs a day of constant use, 5-6 days a week). theyre not dirt cheap, but they are reasonable, and the picture quality is great too. there is a bit of jumpiness when using your finger; but that happened on all the screens we tested, its a problem with filtering down a large oddly-shaped contact area (your finger) to a smaller point. a stylus (back of a pen, anything) takes care of it.

    i highly recommend at least checking them out.

  23. Not a mouse exactly... by Cyno01 · · Score: 1

    Most kiosk type things i've seen are a cabinet with a keyboard built in and a big fat trackball with 2 heavy duty old school style arcade buttons for clicks. Mice just aren't made for a kiosk setting.

    --
    "Sic Semper Tyrannosaurus Rex."
  24. looking out for #1 by Doc+Ruby · · Score: 1

    Clorox is bad for your hands.

    --

    --
    make install -not war

  25. begatting by Doc+Ruby · · Score: 1

    "Nothing short of an extremophile will survive those to engender resistance."

    And that, Virginia, is where little extremeophile species come from.

    --

    --
    make install -not war

  26. Re:Don't go cheap - go for quality, or get headach by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    we use the ELO touch screens in a manufacturing environment, have probably about 100 in service for about 2 years. They work really well, only bad ones I have seen in that time were ones I was first installing (returned to manufacturer)and it gets really hot where they are installed. I would also highly recommend these.

  27. Touchscreens by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Your best solution is a capacitive touchscreen. 3M Touchsystems (formerly Microtouch) offers good support under both Windows and Linux.

    How do I know? I spent the past several years at a major touchscreen video game company working on such things.

  28. Re:Don't go cheap - go for quality, or get headach by azurefog · · Score: 1

    Having supported Touch Screens on Cruise ships for 5 years (both employee and General Public) we used Elo TOuchscreens and found them to very reliable and they hold their calibration very well. e also used POS terminals by PAR that had the computer and the touchscreen integrated and they were good machines. The touchscreens were good quality, but the access to the cables and such was definately not for public consumption. I'd reccomend the Elo touchscreens overall because they are robust, easy to use (USB) and have a nice software interface for auto-calibration. --Jason

    --
    --azurefog --If you're not learning you're not fighting the man.
  29. Re:Don't go cheap - go for quality, or get headach by chrisatslashdot · · Score: 1

    Go with an industrial touch screen. We use Allen Bradley PanelViews in a wet, refrigerated, chlorinated washdown environment with minimal failure.

    --


    Simple people talk of people, better people talk of events, great people talk of ideas.