Slashdot Mirror


The Beetle That Thought It Was A Precious Stone

circletimessquare writes "Queensland, Australia is well-known as one of the most important sources for opal in the world. Apparently Queensland has another untapped source of opal recently discovered in its backyard, except this source is not the providence of geology, but biology. A native weevil of Queensland grows opal on it's back shell! Implications for research into nanotechnology, biotechnology, and photonic computing are implied in the article. The journal Nature is publishing the more rigorous scientific write-up of the findings."

11 of 47 comments (clear)

  1. Biotech by Godeke · · Score: 5, Insightful

    To paraphrase The Graduate, "In one word - biotech. The future, my boy, is biotech." Almost everything that is promised by nanotech devices will be inspired by, copied from or created out of biotech research. "Classic nano-tech" (the use of bulky, expensive machines to affect the nano-world) doesn't scale. Great for looking at nano stuff, but not for making it.

    There are already rumblings that some of the computer components in the fairly near future will be created by organic chemical processes depositing layers at accuracies that classic nano-tech might have achieved, but at a *scale* that makes it useful. A recent "IEEE Computer Magazine" had an article on using viruses to create transistor junctions. Even if this *particular* road dead ends, it seems impossible that organic nanotech won't be the preferred approach to making all things tiny and intricate, especially once we fall below the scale that chip masks are useful.

    --
    Sig under construction since 1998.
    1. Re:Biotech by mhw25 · · Score: 4, Interesting
      Biotech is great if you want to churn out specialty drugs, hormones and stuff like that. But assembling "hardware" there will be a long way to go before it can catch even the most low end "Classic nano-tech".

      The bugs makes "nanoparticles" 250nm in size, i.e. 0.25 micron in size. In semiconductor 0.25micron is so old tech you can sell anything to China without anyone raising an eyebrow. The current highend semiconductor manufacturing is using 0.09 micron design rules, implying gate lengths of about 45nm and they are not going around shouting "Hey we are doing nanotech!"

      Biotech is great, but perhaps overhyped if people start associating it with anything. For the near future it will concentrate on and making heaps of money doing medical based and lifestyle enhancing (thing Viagra) products.

      Meanwhile semiconductor people will continue pushing the barrier and makes heaps of money doing so, without needing to spin itself with terms like nano- things. But to be fair they don't need to do too much convincing sceptical venture capitalists anymore.

      Perhaps organic chemists with their highly specific molecules may get to do some real results. But making proteins and complex molecules using cells is not nanotechnology. Looking at bugs who have 0.25micron particles on its back doesn't make the cut either.

      Read the articles again. The discoverer did not used "nanotechnology" nor hype it as such. But after getting a paper publish on Nature, perhaps he doesn't need the hype.

  2. That's nothing... by blamanj · · Score: 4, Funny

    ...in Montana we have diamond-backed rattlesnakes.

    1. Re:That's nothing... by NanoGator · · Score: 5, Funny

      "...in Montana we have diamond-backed rattlesnakes."

      I can't wait to find a tit mouse.

      --
      "Derp de derp."
  3. Nature Better Than Humans at Some Things by chia_monkey · · Score: 4, Insightful

    It kills me to see how people can be so surprised that nature is capable of producing such incredible things. When there is a new discovery of a naturally occuring disease cure in the Brazillian rain forest people go nuts. How about the fact spider's silk is stronger than kevlar? We've got plants that produce wonder cures. Animals that perform wondrous feats like this beetle that can make gems. And yet we humans still spend billions trying to "discover" new drugs or ways to manufacture crystals. We seriously need to look more at what nature has to offer and mimic that. It's more natural, it's been proven effective over thousands of years, and it will probably cost less.

    --

    "He uses statistics as a drunken man uses lampposts...for support rather than illumination." - Andrew Lang
  4. Butterflies are good at that, too by Jesrad · · Score: 4, Interesting

    This beetle imitates opals by stacking layers of hexagonally aligned nanospheres (250 nm in diameter) to reflect one wavelength (color). If I'm not mistaken that's a lot like those butterflies that have scales sized in the same range of hundreds of nanometers to appear blue without synthetizing any colored substance.

    --
    Maybe we deserve this world ?
  5. opal composition by morcheeba · · Score: 4, Informative

    Opals are actually just a mixture of tiny silica spheres and 3-10% water... "nanospeheres" are a defining characteristic of an opal; it's not a single crystal like many other types of gems. interesting reference

    1. Re:opal composition by RobertB-DC · · Score: 4, Interesting

      From the reference cited in the parent:
      Opal was formed millions of years ago, when silica and water, mixed together, flowed into cracks and spaces in the ground, then gradually hardened, solidified and became opal.

      Based on this article -- and on the fact that "96% of the worlds supply" (ref) comes from the isolated continent that just happens to be home to an opal-bearing bug -- I wonder if the theory of opal formation needs to be changed?

      After all, "silica and water" are a couple of the most abundant compounds on the planet. Wouldn't you expect somewhere besides Australia to have the right conditions for forming those silica nano-beads?

      My theory:
      Opal was formed millions of years ago, when dead Pachyrhynchus argus beetles and water, mixed together, flowed into cracks and spaces in the ground, then gradually hardened, solidified and became opal.

      --
      Stressed? Me? Of course not. Stress is what a rubber band feels before it breaks, silly.
  6. Structural Color: Butterflies to Jelly Fish by G4from128k · · Score: 4, Interesting

    There is an entire field of research on this approach to color and photonic manipulation in biology (I first heard of this around 1980). Structural colors refer to coloration created not by dyes or pigments, but by microstructural features of the physical surface. The best example of this is the morpho butterfly . Many iridescent creatures get their colors from structural colors. Some of the darkest blacks are also structural.

    The transparency of jelly-fish is also structural -- the surface of the jellyfish has nanoscopic fingers (much smaller than a wavelength of light) that create a smooth transition between the high-index-refraction of the jellyfish and the low index of refraction of the water. The result is the ultimate in anti-reflection coatings and a much more transparent jelly fish.

    --
    Two wrongs don't make a right, but three lefts do.
  7. Plus it is patentable by isn't+my+name · · Score: 4, Insightful

    No, the reason that people like to be able to manufacture en masse is because it is cheaper.

    You can patent a process for producing things, but you can't patent a plant--though, unfortunately, in some locales you can patent the plant's genome.

    A wonderdrug like penicillin, that comes from naturally occurring processes, is not patentable, so you can't make money on it. An antibiotic produced via chemical, bioengineered, or nanoprocesses is patentable.

    So, the only financial incentive for investigating new naturally occuring drugs in nature is simply to identify them, figure out their molecular structure and determine how to produce them because that you can patent and that you can make money on.

  8. Gold Bugs by Colymbosathon+ecplec · · Score: 5, Interesting
    I remember reading an article about bugs sweating gold: "Exactly what happened to cause Alaska's placer-building bugs to build up a gold molecule at a time isn't certain. Grossly oversimplified---and I certainly hope no chemist reads this---the metabolic products exuded by the bacteria interact with compounds in the environment virtually an electron at a time. So to speak, the bugs sweat solid gold. Others think the process may have had another purpose. British chemist Steven Mann speculates that the bacteria could be using "gold complexes...as terminal electron acceptors. If so, then this would be a novel form of energy transduction in anaerobic respiration"---that is, the gold buildup was an important part of the bacteria's life processes, not just a waste product like the crust of salt on an athlete's drying skin." Source

    Make Your Own Gold Mine