FCC Announces First Do-Not-Call Citation
An anonymous reader writes "The FCC will announce on Thursday December 18, its first enforcement action for violations of the new national Do-Not-Call list. The perp is a mortgage broker (big users of telemarketing, junk faxes, and spam) in California -- CPM Funding, Inc. No fines (yet) since the FCC can only impose fines on telemarketers after they have had one citation letter (which this is). If, perhaps, a common carrier was to violate however (can you say MCI, AT&T, etc) they can be fined up to $11,000 right off the bat.... no warnings. (The action against AT&T a couple of months ago was for other violations, not violating the new National DNC list.)"
Would the police be excluded from soliciting for fundraisers? If not, why not?
I have been pwned because my
This holiday season just keeps getting better and better - MS losing ("loosing" for those of you who learned to spell from /.) Office customers, SCO being told to put up or shut up, David Boies being up on possible ethics violations, Saddam Hussein in custody, RotK released, Athlon64 systems shipping, a spammer in Virginia being hit with felony spamming charges, now this.
Thank you Santa!
www.eFax.com are spammers
the FCC can only impose fines on telemarketers after they have had one citation letter
Does that mean that telemarketers can harass people for two weeks, receive a citation letter, change names, and repeat the process ad infinitum?
Tarsnap: Online backups for the truly paranoid
Somewhat relevant - a couple of months ago I got several SMS spams on my mobile advertising a premium rate phone service, which didn't list the call prices and looked dodgy anyway. I showed them to a friend who works in the mobile industry, who mentioned ICSTIS - they regulate premium rate services in the UK.
...banning them from operating a premium rate line for a year ...fining them 15000 ...and getting them to pay back the money they'd made on calls to the service.
I went to their website, read up on what they'd take action on, and filed a complaint.
A month later, they got back to me to say that they had...
1) stopped the service immediately as it looked like they were operating in breach of the code
2) held an inquiry, decided that they were in breach of the code in lots of ways and passed judgment....
3)
4)
5)
w00t! Heck I know 15k isn't a lot but the scum were shut down. Nice to see the system work.
-Baz
Some sleazoid called me during dinnertime last night, claiming to be from "CRM", "we're not selling anything, we're just doing a survey". When I asked him to remove me from the list, he told me that they don't use a list; they randomly generate phone numbers. I assume they use a wardialer to call down the random list, turning the call over to a "human" operator when a person is detected answering the call.
The "Do Not Call" law should be a simpler law that covers the actual problem. It should outlaw "unsolicited commercial transmission" in any medium. Opt-in would count as "solicitation". Otherwise, each new medium and hybrid will drown in these spams until Congress is forced to act. The agency administering the law should have comprehensive jurisdiction, if the FCC + FTC aren't sufficient. Transmissions from *official* political organizations (government), including the police department, in an official capacity, are allowed, for public safety and administration. Not to mention that they are legally controlled by the public, unlike corporations. I realize that until we get fat clowns like Karl Rove, with his Direct Marketing junkmail career, out of the Washington catbird seats, spam will be part of our lives. But articulating an alternative solution, that we can consistently demand, at least paves the way out.
--
make install -not war