Slashdot Mirror

← Back to Stories (view on slashdot.org)

The Best and Worst Movies of 2003?

Posted by Cliff on from the jackson-and-company-will-dominate-this-one dept.

rufey asks: "As 2003 comes to a close, I thought it would be interesting to ask Slashdot what they thought the best and worst movie of 2003 was, and why. At the beginning of the year there was excitement about parts 2 and 3 of The Matrix triology, X-Men 2, and of course, LOTR: Return of the King. In Slashdot's opinion, what did and didn't live up to the hype and expectations, and were there any surprises?"

3 of 1,093 comments (clear)

  1. Re:The Hulk by KReilly · · Score: 1, Troll

    Don't equate your short attention span with a movie actually being bad. I thought purley on the basis of the way it was shot and edited was worth the money at the theaters.. Not to mention the hulk hands were the coolest damn toy I ever played with..

  2. Re:Surprises by putamare · · Score: 1, Troll

    What movie that won an Oscar gives you the impression that movies that deserve Oscars actually win them?

  3. Re:A bad year except for.... by nagora · · Score: 1, Troll
    The Return Of The King - The entire trilogy is a masterpiece of modern cinema

    I'd hate to see what you think is a bad movie then. Jackson couldn't direct traffic in a ghosttown. These were bad, bad, bad movies. So much for your idea that a movie needs more than eye-candy.

    TWW

    --
    "Encyclopedia" is to "Wikipedia" what "Library" is to "Some people at a bus stop"