Slashdot Mirror


China, Russia, U.S. To Build 100MBps Network

prostoalex writes "Gloriad (Global Ring Network for Advanced Applications Development), a scientific data network, will unite academic institutions in China, Russia and the United States with a 100 MBps link. National Center for Supercomputing Applications received a $2.8 mln grant from NSF, and both Russia and China will match this amount to contribute to network build-up. Later this year, as the Associated Press article notes, a new plan will be launched to move the international network to 10 GBps capacity."

3 of 213 comments (clear)

  1. Politically odd? (sorry, OT) by fiendo · · Score: 5, Insightful

    So let's see, we've got a 100MBps fat pipe direct from the heartland of the U.S. to the largest communist nation in the world, but I still can't get a direct flight from Miami to a communist country 90 miles off our shore???

    --
    I went to the city because I wished to live without deliberation.
  2. DWDM & OTDM by Ex-MislTech · · Score: 5, Informative

    With some of the newer Telecom technologies they could hit
    speads of 40 Giga-bits per second if they wanted, most
    likely faster as my knowledge is somewhat dated, ie. 2001 .

    I know Nortel was working on sending 160 Tera-bits down a
    single strand of fiber, and I have seen working gear that
    pushes 40 Giga-bits 2 years ago .

    Here is a article from 1999 that said they hit 1.6 Tera :

    http://www.findarticles.com/cf_dls/m0CGC/19_25/5 46 73084/p1/article.jhtml

    There is now 10 Giga-bit Ethernet ...

    www.10gea.org

    The Telecom links always outpace the current Ethernet high end
    by usually a sizeable amount .

    Peace,
    Ex-MislTech

    --
    google "32 trillion offshore needs IRS attention"
  3. Re:Bit 'B' or little 'b'? by AKnightCowboy · · Score: 5, Informative
    Capital B is not necessarily a standard for "Bytes".. people just like to pretend it is.

    Of course capital B is a standard for Bytes. People are just ignorant to the fact. It doesn't make it any less true.