Slashdot Mirror


Dutch Invention Uses Electric Engines For Wheels

Makarand writes "A Dutch invention is promising to make vehicles atleast 50% more efficient and also bring down the soot and carbon dioxide emissions. This is made possible by replacing the conventional wheels by 'in-wheel' electric engines which are normal electric engines turned inside out. No transmission is necessary as the in-wheel engines are powered by battery-packs installed on the vehicle. A diesel-powered generator which replaces the original engine on the vehicle charges the battery-pack continuously. The Dutch company E-Traction has built a bus using this technology that will undergo testing for the next six months."

13 of 380 comments (clear)

  1. Will it stand the test of time? by earthforce_1 · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Interesting idea, but the real test will be with long term cost of operation. The cost of diesel fuel may be insignificant if this thing spends significantly more time in the garage, or costs more to build.

    Not that I want to be a naysayer. I hope it pans out, but don't be too surprised if it quietly goes away never to be heard from again lot a lot of other great ideas. (I remember a british high speed train that leaned into curves, that was quietly taken out of service after much initial fanfare)

    --
    My rights don't need management.
    1. Re:Will it stand the test of time? by nick_davison · · Score: 4, Funny

      Will it stand the test of time? Of course not...

      "...bring down the soot and carbon dioxide emissions."

      Sounds like vapourware to me.

    2. Re:Will it stand the test of time? by sjames · · Score: 4, Informative

      Interesting idea, but the real test will be with long term cost of operation.

      While any new tech carries risks, this one has a lot going for it.

      Diesel-electric is well proven as a technology. All diesel train engines use it. The difference is in the batteries. No battery pack could contribute much to storing the kinetic energy of a train. However, they do brake electrically. The big grid on the top of the engine is a simple resistance heater to dump the energy from the motors operating as generators.

      Electric motors are simple things. The only moving part is a bering, a well understood part. Because of that, industrial motors tend to run for a very long time with minimal maintainance. These motors are not THAT different than other motors, so will likely have the same desirable characteristic.

      Transmissions and differentials DO have a lot of moving parts subject to wear and tear. The generator/motor combo replaces all of that.

      Engines running at constant RPM and load experiance less wear then on that runs at variable speeds and loads. The engine is smaller as well, so cheaper.

      Because of th nature of the system, it doesn't need the latest and greatest cutting edge batteries. I don't know what they're using, but it probably isn't finniky expensive LiIon polymer.

      A later generation could easily switch to composite flywheel once that's better proven and manufacturing costs come down. Because of the system design, it would likely be a drop-in replacement.

      Even without the fuel savings and quiet operation, the new design might be worthwhile due to savings in maintainance and improved reliability.

  2. Oh puLEASe by chessie · · Score: 4, Informative

    this is news how? the idea was built and proven over 100 years ago. ferdinand porsche, who was an ENGINE man, did this in like 1900 and won lots of races with his hybrid car. this feat alone put his name on the map beginging his career.
    see this this page

    1. Re:Oh puLEASe by kfg · · Score: 4, Informative

      You could put it that way, yes. The issue is inertia. The function of the suspesion system is to move as freely as possible so that the wheels follow the uneven contours of the road leaving the chassis stable and keeping the tires in full contact with the surface for optimum traction.

      As the weight of the wheel goes up so does its inertia. It starts to resist movement more and more. This is a Bad Thing. When you hit the right bump at the right speed the wheel hops off the ground rather than moving the suspension up with the irregularity, upsetting the entire car and losing traction at that corner. The sprung to unsprung mass ratio becomes important because with heavy wheels and a light chassis the mass of the wheel reacts more strongly on the mass of the chassis. The suspension can't move with the bump but the chassis does. A loaded bus chassis is much more massive compared to the wheels than a loaded car is.

      The people in the car experience this as ride harshness.

      Active suspension systems are ones that use sensors and mechanical actuators to move the suspension ( as opposed to springs). They can "anticipate" the movement needed and partially compensate for the added mass, but only partially.

      I can'na change the laws of physics.

      A heavier wheel rim also takes more energy to accelerate, more so than the same mass on the chassis does, and increases gyroscopic effects.

      This is why the solid spoked wheel gave way to the tensioned wire spoked wheel, than the pressed steel wheel and ultimately the "mag" ( which is really only a mag if it's actually made of magnesium. The aluminum wheels you get in the dress up stores are actually often heavier than the cheaper steel wheels they are purchased to replace). The lighter the wheel the higher the ultimate performance of the vehicle in every catagory (this is why bicyclists are absolutely rabid about wheel weight).

      Is this system feasable for a car? Oh, absolutely. But you have to be careful to at least keep the motors as low weight and compact as possible. The GM Sunracer managed to contain them within something that looked very much like a standard bicycle hub, although rather heavier. Copper and magnets aren't light.

      KFG

  3. Old idea by swfranklin · · Score: 4, Insightful
    This is a new application of an old idea - diesel locomotive engines use this exact approach (well, their motors aren't "In" the wheel, but otherwise similar).

    Diesel locos use a Diesel powerplant to generate electricity, which is then used to run the electric motors powering the drive wheels. It's very effective and proven technology.

  4. Re:Just an improvement of standard hybrid technolo by sparkhead · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Why is this anything more than just a slightly more efficient way of doing a hybrid gas-electric system by putting the engine in the wheel.

    Well, I believe most hybrid cars today are parallel hybrids - the (gas/diesel) engine can power the drivetrain directly, and the car will use the engine or the electric motor or both depending on conditions and demand.

    This bus (and potential other hybrid cars today) is a series hybrid. The only thing powering the drivetrain is the electric motor. The engine either charges the batteries or powers the motor, but never directly powers the drivetrain.

  5. Re:Just an improvement of standard hybrid technolo by bennomatic · · Score: 4, Interesting
    You're right; it is just a natural progression. But they also took the next step (another "natural progression") from thinking about it, and actually built the darn thing, so I say kudos to them.

    I, for one, will welcome the results of the real-world tests of this thing. If it works as well as they claim, they could put those wheel-gines in all sorts of vehicles. And based on the size of them, I'd say they're going in large vehicles first. Can you imagine the Hummer ad campaign when the release a vehicle that is more fuel efficient than a Toyota Echo?

    --
    The CB App. What's your 20?
  6. Re:electric engines by Da+Fokka · · Score: 4, Informative

    To quote the Slashdot synopsis (not even TFA)
    A diesel-powered generator which replaces the original engine on the vehicle charges the battery-pack continuously.

    The electro motors are not used as an engine but just as a clever way of transmission. This system has been in diesl-electric trains for ages, since most diesel engines can operate quite efficiently if they always run at the same RPM.

  7. Re:If I know something about batteries... by bennomatic · · Score: 4, Funny
    I can just picture the phone calls:

    Customer: My batteries won't hold a charge.

    Appl^H^H^Huto Maker Support: Well, the batteries cost, like, $25,000. You may as well just get a new car.

    --
    The CB App. What's your 20?
  8. Re:A quiet bus in a busy city... by bennomatic · · Score: 4, Funny
    >bad because of its lack of noise, there's less warnings to the pedestrians

    So THAT'S why I keep getting run over by bicyclists! You know, I've been lobbying to make it a legal requirement for kids to start putting playing cards back in their spokes for just that reason!

    I can't smell bikes coming, either. Gosh darned quiet, clean-running vehicles!

    --
    The CB App. What's your 20?
  9. Re:If I know something about batteries... by Mr.+Slippery · · Score: 4, Informative
    Won't this create cleaner air AND dumps filled with highly toxic battery-waste?

    Lead-acid batteries are highly recyclable. (Though, like computers, because of poor regulation such batteries are often just dumped on third-world nations.)

    --
    Tom Swiss | the infamous tms | my blog
    You cannot wash away blood with blood
  10. Unsprung mass as proportion of vehicle mass by Porag_Spliffing · · Score: 4, Interesting

    All I can say is flat flat flat, not the tire the Netherlands ;-). Unsprung weight is not to important in a low performance vehicle running on good roads (Apeldoorn has well maintained roads, you should see the taxes here). In a bus the unsprung mass will still be rather a small proportion of the total mass even for rather massive wheel motors. The big bastard springs that carry all that bus will not have to much trouble holding the wheels on the road.

    Nadolig llawen,
    R.

    --
    Maybe you live in interesting times