Slashdot Mirror


NatSci 802.11x WiFi Tracker Zeroes In On Users

securitas writes "Techweb reports that IT admins can now track and physically locate 802.11x WLAN users within a few feet using the new Wi-Fi Tracker hardware from National Scientific, based on its DarkStar wireless product. NSC's site says it will also produce tracking-only 'tag or badge' formats so admins are not limited to tracking active WLAN users and equipment. The company is now shipping development kits to its first customers and a technical specs PDF is available. The product incorporates Ekahau triangulation software. This is reminiscent of an earlier Slashdot story about office surveillance using 802.11b triangulation to track and determine the location of wireless network users."

85 comments

  1. Trollkore is dying!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Troll

    SHIT ON ME! It's official - Slashdot has fucking confirmed: Trollkore is dying

    Yet another cunting bombshell hit the community of Trollkore asswipes when Slashdot recently confirmed that Trollkore accounts for less than a fraction of one single puny fucking percent of all trolls. Coming hot on the heels of the latest Slashdot survey which plainly states that Trollkore has lost more fucking fp's to the GNAA, this news serves to reinforce what we've known all along. Trollkore is ingesting itself backwards, disappearing up its very own shitter, as fittingly exemplified by beeing fucking owned in this recent Slashdot story.

    You don't need to be a cock-sucking Kreskin to predict Trollkore's future. The hand writing is on the wall: Trollkore faces a bleak future. In fact there won't be any fucking future at all for Trollkore because that sorded, shit-filled, mutated testicle of a troll group is dying. Things are looking very bad for Trollkore. As many of us are already aware, Trollkore continues to lose first posts. Red ink splashes across the accounting documents like a series of exploding bloodfarts. Trollkore munches the most ass of them all, having lost 93% of its core trollers. The sudden and unpleasant departures of long time Trollkore cuntwipes Jordan Hubbard and Mike Smith only serve to underscore the point more clearly. There can no longer be any doubt: Trollkore is dying and its rotting corpse smells worse than a maggot, vomit, shit and piss cocktail.

    Due to the troubles of those arseholes at Slashdot, abysmal trolls and so on, Trollkore showed themselves to be a bunch of retarded tossers, went out of business and were taken over by GNAA who troll another type of trolls. Now Trollkore is also a miserable failure, its corpse turned over to yet another charnel house... pathetic.

    All major surveys show that Trollkore has steadily fucking declined in first posts. Trollkore is where it belongs, at death's door and its long term survival prospects are almost non-fucking-existant. If Trollkore is to survive at all it will be among moronic, dilettante shitheads. Trollkore continues to Chew Satan's Dick And Fuck The Baby Jesus Up The Pooper. Nothing short of a miracle could save it at this point in time. For all practical purposes, Trollkore is dead.

    Fact: Trollkore WILL FUCKING LOOSE THE UPCOMING FP-BATTLE!!.

    1. Re:Trollkore is dying!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Troll



      ______
      .-" "-.
      / \
      | | SUCK ON THIS TROLLKORE!
      |, .-. .-. ,| THE GNAA CUM IN UR MOUTH
      | )(__/ \__)( |
      |/ /\ \|
      (_ ^^ _)
      \__|IIIIII|__/
      / |mmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm
      ( |xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
      \ |wwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwww
      |-\IIIIII|-|
      \ /
      `--------`

    2. Re:Trollkore is dying!!! by Fecal+Troll+Matter · · Score: -1

      gnna is pretty lame but that was pretty funny.

      /me graces you with presence.

  2. Great news! by Bender_ · · Score: 4, Interesting

    This is really great news for all online gamers, because this allows games like features in this article further down the top page without losing all your money to your wireless provider.

    Just imagine all the geeky reallife RPGs you can build using this technique!

  3. Well, damn. by Tuxedo+Jack · · Score: 4, Funny

    There goes my plan to wardrive around my city next year and shamelessy exploit^H^H^H^H^H^Hassist the BitTorrent network.

    --

    Striking fear in the authors of godawful fanfiction, I am here, appearing in darkness, Tuxedo Jack!
    1. Re:Well, damn. by zmooc · · Score: 1

      Wasn't that what the wireless bridge on the RC-controlled tank was for?

      --
      0x or or snor perron?!
  4. Mookore also Challenges Trollkore. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Troll

    < The GNAA can fuck off! >
    \ ^__^
    \ (oo)\_______
    (__)\ )\/\
    ||----w |
    || ||

  5. perhaps named after... by jjeffries · · Score: 1

    this dark star?

    1. Re:perhaps named after... by foobsr · · Score: 1

      ... and if we perhaps add in some of this this and of course that that we with a little help of the Dr. Weevil might end in some appropriate means of defense against network intruders.

      CC.

      --
      TaijiQuan (Huang, 5 loosenings)
  6. How can they do that? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Funny

    You must have a really cheap 802.11 if it's leaking electro-magnetic waves.

    1. Re:How can they do that? by UnMutedChaos · · Score: 1

      Atleast their not leaking radation huh :P

      --
      ...
    2. Re:How can they do that? by Qzukk · · Score: 1

      Man, mine has been spinning around and spitting out pea soup. I wish it had been leaking radiation, there'd be nothing to clean up...

      --
      If I have been able to see further than others, it is because I bought a pair of binoculars.
    3. Re:How can they do that? by TedCheshireAcad · · Score: 2, Funny

      OMG u are so dumb. 802.11 wireless networking technology uses RADIO not ELECTRO-MAGNETIC waves!!!

      lololol

      :P

  7. What does it take? by AirLace · · Score: 1

    Does anyone with a little knowledge of 802.11b scanning know if ordinary wireless kit can be used to determine the signal strength to a given wireless node?

    Triangulation is easy once you have the raw signal data, and this seems a fun hack to do this on the cheap with Linux HostAP over the holidays.

    1. Re:What does it take? by Null_Packet · · Score: 5, Informative

      AFAIK, the signal strength metric from almost any card is different from any other, making it a highly arbitrary number from vendor to vendor. With that said, Kismet (www.kismetwireless.net) offers the ability to store signal strength and do some nifty triangulation with GPS.

      I am interested to see if the product in question can be used indoors for traingulation. Without a usable gps signal, you'd have to calibrate known locations and that seems out of the range of the Dark Star's ability.

      FWIW, I spoke at ToorCon in San Diego this last fall on the subject of using a directional antenna and a fluxgate (electronic) compass. We did some coding and quite a bit of hardware hacking, and we didn't get far because one sensor cost around $1400 in raw materials and hardware tests to get one built.

      Google for Cassandra or e-mail me if you're still interested.

    2. Re:What does it take? by LostCluster · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Why do the known points have to be relative to GPS? Calibration relative to known points on the office property is good enough... there's a lot of knowledge in knowing if a user is in the warehouse or the parking lot next to the warehouse.

    3. Re:What does it take? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      your making it too complicated. In the world wars they used simple directional antenna's and estimated the signal's strength. Using just the direction the signal came from recorded by two or three base points you can find the location, if they didn't have the time to accuratly find the direction they would use the estimated signal strength that each point recorded to estimate the location. Doing some thing like this for a office shouldn't be too hard. Why try and use only one directional antenna, and signal strength? The only reason modern triangulation uses signal strength is because they try and use one self contained unit for easy of use. when your triangle becomes small enough you to hold in your hand it needs more data than just the direction.

    4. Re:What does it take? by bbn · · Score: 1

      Signal strength alone is useless to triangulate. I did not go farther away just because I moved behind a wall.

      But you could use timing instead. You could probably do that with any wifi card that allows you to "snoop" the airwaves.

      The problem is of course how to get a timer that precise. The signal moves with a speed of about 3*10^8 m/s. To locate the sender within 3 meters, you need rougly a 10 ns timer. I don't think you could do that in software on an ordinary computer.

    5. Re:What does it take? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I run a 200 mWatt card, so I will appear closer than I really am :D or I could boost up the signal. Talk about easy to get around :D

    6. Re:What does it take? by Quantum-Sci · · Score: 1

      This is all you need, with a directional antenna.

      I gotta say, NatSci's stuff is gigantic. No need for devices that size. And what kid's going to want to carry a device called "Gotcha!"? Whatever.

      --
      Campaign finance reform is national security.
    7. Re:What does it take? by mrogers · · Score: 1
      You should be able to determine the transmitter's location with a single receiver, assuming that the transmitter can't teleport. But you have to do a lot of work in advance...

      First, divide the building up into zones. Where possible, the boundaries between zones should follow "natural" boundaries that are likely to attenuate radio signals, like walls and ceilings, but if you have to cover large open spaces then you might have to draw some fairly arbitrary boundaries.

      Put your receiver in the first zone and visit each of the other zones with your transmitter, recording the signal strength from each one. Then move the receiver to the second zone and repeat, and so on. Normalize the data - different hardware will produce different signals, so we're only interested in relative levels. For N zones, this gives you an NxN table of relative signal strengths between zones.

      When you want to determine the location of a transmitter, first check whether the signal strength varies significantly over time. If it does, the source is probably moving. Stay in your current location (let's call it zone M) and make frequent measurements. By assuming that consecutive measurements come from the same zone or neighbouring zones (no teleporting), you can use the Mth row of your table to guess the source's location.

      If the transmitter's signal strength remains constant it is probably still, so move around the building and take measurements from several zones. Again, use the table to work out the most likely location of the transmitter. The snag here is that the transmitter might start moving after you start moving, so you have to take a series of measurements at each location. If the source appears to have started moving, stay still and use the first method.

    8. Re:What does it take? by LostCluster · · Score: 1

      The problem is, "teleporting" could be defined as turning off, moving, and turning on again... kinda hard to prohibit that.

    9. Re:What does it take? by mrogers · · Score: 1

      Sure, if a long enough pause occurred between two sets of measurements you'd have to analyze them separately.

  8. The New Dup! by ChrisTower · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    reminiscent of an earlier Slashdot

    It's the new way to describe dupes for the new year. Let's live it up folks.

  9. Well.. by Sir+Pallas · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Well, maybe my boss will be intrigued to discover that I am sitting on a couch using my laptop instead of sitting at a desk using my desktop; but I can think of interesting games that one can play with this kind of technology. I mean, if you hook this thing up to a wearable computer, first person shooters could be a lot more first person. Will companies be tracking the movement of wardrivers that normally track companies' bad security policies?

    1. Re:Well.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Will companies be tracking the movement of wardrivers that normally track companies' bad security policies?

      Probably. They may even attempt to set up a physical boundary within which everything is OK to operate, but if any machine is found connecting that is OUTSIDE that boundary, off the network it drops.

      Personally I find this invasive, and I'm not sure they should have the right to do it. But feh, it's they're network

    2. Re:Well.. by AmericanKleptocracy · · Score: 1, Insightful

      it's they're [sic] network

      Precisely. It's their network, so why shouldn't they have the right to do anything they want to with it as long as it's not in violation of any laws, in order to ensure security, efficiency and productivity of their business?

      If business were trying to track what their employees do after they leave work, I would agree, but when you're on the job, it's all fair game.

    3. Re:Well.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Will companies be tracking the movement of wardrivers that normally track companies' bad security policies?

      If I recall, it was said that you would be able to detect if someone was in the building or not, but I'd imagine that if you can position yourself so you are only talking to one AP that their method wouldn't be able to find you, but you'd still be able to use the network.

      ^^ I'm a SysAdmin for a Wireless ISP, but that doesn't mean I know what I'm talking about.

    4. Re:Well.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wait. you find it invasive that someone will use a method to stop you getting into their network unauthorised from outside?

      You're calling THEM invasive?

    5. Re:Well.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Precisely. It's their network, so why shouldn't they have the right to do anything they want to with it as long as it's not in violation of any laws, in order to ensure security, efficiency and productivity of their business?

      Overheard in the delivery room when another tyranny took its first breath.

  10. Heh... by Tuxedo+Jack · · Score: 5, Funny

    I wonder if we can put tinfoil hats on our 802.11 emitters?

    And yes, I know.

    --

    Striking fear in the authors of godawful fanfiction, I am here, appearing in darkness, Tuxedo Jack!
    1. Re:Heh... by AmericanKleptocracy · · Score: 0

      Your employer has a right to know if you're doing the job he is paying you for, and part of that job might be sitting where he wants you to sit. Suck it up.

  11. Guess what by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Troll

    Hey, if you don't like it then dont use it. You sniveling little snot nosed geeks think that you can have your cake and eat it too, dont you? Punks

  12. Active badge by yanboss · · Score: 3, Interesting

    A bit like:
    Office tracking as already in use.

  13. Spyware time by 77Punker · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Now I imagine the Gov't will start giving free Wi-Fi access just to have a little better big-brother type of hold on us here in the "land of liberty". *sigh*

    1. Re:Spyware time by AmericanKleptocracy · · Score: -1, Offtopic

      Was that a joke? If it weren't for the price, I wouldn't put it past the American Kleptocracy to do so. Don't think Americans wouldn't stand for it? Look at what they're allowing, even supporting now. If there were another terrorist attack on this nation, of greater severity than the ones two years ago, I think you'd see measures that would make the USA Patriot act look like the Bill of Rights. Remember when politicians were clamoring for national ID cards and even the letists were advocating torture? You all just wait until we're living under martial law. Then we'll see who is paranoid.

  14. TechWeb (business technology) by NtroP · · Score: 1

    12 posts and TechWeb (The Business Technology Network) is all but Slashdotted. And I actually did want to RTFA :-(

    --
    "terrorism" and "pedophilia" are the root passwords to the Constitution
  15. Am I the only one ... by petabyte · · Score: 3, Funny

    ... that just had a vision of Igon walking around with a PKE meter searching for "hotspots".

    Maybe I watched too many cartoons as a kid ...

  16. IANAEE by boobsea · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I'm not an Electrical Engineer, but would this system be able to tell where I am located if I'm using something like a yagi or parabolic dish from several miles away?

    What if I had a multi-antenna setup pointing my signal at different APs? To make the thing more confusing, what if I had attenuators or amplifiers on some of those antennas?

    1. Re:IANAEE by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This system is ment to be used indoors so the accuracy at one mile would be questionable. The direction your in and the distance would be enough to allow them to notice you as a intruder and deny you access. The multi-antenna's and amplifires would greaten the error rate if you pointed at the diffrent antenna, but I belive this is one unit with three reciving antenna with in the unit. The system isn't ment to be fool proof, just like GPS there are faults in the system, but those faults are known and measures can be taken. So to answer all your questions, Yes, but there would be an error rate that would grow as you added distance and more counter measures. The point of failure would depend on the acceptable error rate.

    2. Re:IANAEE by rcw-home · · Score: 4, Informative
      I'm not an Electrical Engineer, but would this system be able to tell where I am located if I'm using something like a yagi or parabolic dish from several miles away?

      A directional antenna is like a flashlight. It's pretty easy to find someone shining a flashlight at you. To answer your second question, it's no harder to find someone using multiple flashlights.

      Once you know the general direction, you can drive there, and once you get close enough, there will be more than enough signal from the antenna's sidelobes to finish the triangulation.

      For what it's worth, you only need triangulation to determine range. It's possible to determine the direction of a signal without pointing directional antennas around while looking at signal meters. By putting two dipoles a known distance away from each other and comparing the phase of the returned signal (like humans do with their ears) they can determine direction - with a third dipole, or by rotating the array, they can determine whether the signal is in front or behind them.

      For more information on this, google search for some combination of "foxhunt", "radio direction finding", "RDF", or "TDOA".

    3. Re:IANAEE by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      by the looks of the PDF, it's designed to be attached to an object or person, and then can let you track them via WiFi... the device its self does not "Sniff" out WiFi users and direct you to their locations.

    4. Re:IANAEE by LostCluster · · Score: 2, Informative

      Well, such a system, in theory, would have at at least be able to detect monkey business when it sees it...

      A yagi from miles away would hit one access point, and only one access point. However, this system requires that all authorized transmitters hit at least two if not three access points. It's going to be sure where this person is, but it can be sure where this person isn't... Remember, the first step in dealing with a hack is realizing you've been hacked. The hacker's traffic flags itself for attention this way.

      A multi-antenna setup might stand a chance of properly simulating a spot on the map by sending the right signal strengths to the right access points. However, that ruse would have one critcal weakness... a physical check of the spot being highlighted on the map would find no user there. Again, no accurate clue as to where the hacker is coming from, but a definite indication that there is a hacker. Any other combination would result in a combination of signal strengths that result in an inability to resolve to a point, but that again results in a sign of trouble.

      Yeah, this system could be fooled... but coloring outside the lines would at least draw attention to a problem.

    5. Re:IANAEE by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      IAAEE (and an Extra Class ham), and I think it all depends on what you have in mind. Yes, the single responding node would definitely highlight that someone is using a dish or a yagi, and yes, the radiation from the sidelobes is something to consider.

      If you're planning on sitting still and hacking into a wireless network from a single location, then yeah, you're apt to be caught. If you move around a lot and/or redirect the antenna(s) significantly and often, then I'm sure you can have all kinds of fun driving the trackers crazy.

      Of course, I think it would be more fun to do this on 433MHz and QRM all of those F@#$ing RFID tag sniffers to render those systems useless!

  17. Hahaha by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Looks like John Ashcroft got moderator points today

    1. Re:Hahaha by AmericanKleptocracy · · Score: 0

      You might not be too far off! I actually am joking about that one....

    2. Re:Hahaha by 77Punker · · Score: 1

      My post was sort of half-a-joke, but yeah, they'd do it in a heartbeat. At least this place has meta-mods.

  18. WOULD SOMEONE SUBMIT AN INTERESTING STORY? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
  19. Am I the only one.... by AmericanKleptocracy · · Score: 0

    ...that has no clue what he's talking about?

    Maybe I ate too many paint chips and didn't watch enough cartoons as a kid....

    1. Re:Am I the only one.... by omega9 · · Score: 1

      Who ya gonna call...

      --
      I'm against picketing, but I don't know how to show it.
    2. Re:Am I the only one.... by a1ok · · Score: 1

      The reference is from Ghostbusters, where Dustin Hoffman (iirc) has a ghost-detector he uses to, err, detect ghosts :-)

    3. Re:Am I the only one.... by petabyte · · Score: 1

      Harold Ramis played Igon in 2 movies I believe. I don't know who did the cartoons. I was actually the staypuff marshmallow man. :)

    4. Re:Am I the only one.... by Gogo+Dodo · · Score: 1
      Dustin Hoffman? He wasn't even in the movie. It was Harold Ramis. The PKE meter were not glasses either. Ray Stantz, Dan Aykroyd, did wear a pair of goggles that looked like a NVG.

      IMDB

    5. Re:Am I the only one.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Dustin Hoffman wasn't even in the John Belushi version of the film.

  20. Here it is, in case of /.-ing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    National Scientific Corporation announced Tuesday that it's wrapped up work on its new WLAN hardware platform -- Wi-Fi Tracker -- which lets IT administrators pinpoint the position of wireless users and devices with accuracy within a few feet.
    Hardware developer kits are now available to select early adopting customers, the Scottsdale, Ariz.-based company said.

    First introduced in May, 2003, and touted at the Wi-Fi Planet Conference and Expo earlier in December, Wi-Fi Tracker is a spin-off from National Scientific's DarkStar wireless platform.

    When combined with Ekahau, Inc.'s Positioning Engine software, the tracker 'tags' wireless assets accessing a standard 802.11x network to accurately display their location.

  21. ah ha! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    as soon as I find a rabbit to strap my wifi transmitter to, the mean bad guy will start tracking *it* instead of me, and I can get away with the suitcase full of non-circulating currency.

  22. I'll be across the street at a local coffee bar! by csoto · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Whenever I have to write up presentations or work on code, I disappear to this place for hours at a time, but magically, work gets done (free wireless, and decent, if not super speedy, net connectivity). I think smart managers (I'm one of them) understand that sitting in a cubie 8 hours per day does not consitute "putting in a day's work." WiFi lets us be the most productive we can be, no matter where we are. Sometimes, that means leaving the office.

    --
    There exists no way of exchanging information without making judgments. --Bene Gesserit Axiom
  23. I'm confused.... by davburns · · Score: 2, Insightful
    I read the NatSci article (Yes, I know...) and it looks like this is just a wi-fi device that knows where it is, to be used to track things that its attached to.

    The techweb article seems to imply that something would locate any wi-fi device, which would be nice for tracking down wireless misbehavior.

    Did I miss something?

    1. Re:I'm confused.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The techweb article mentions a specific product, that knows where it is, and using that triangulates where those wireless hoodlums are. The Nat-sci article mentions they are working on tracking systems. They are more general in their description because they most likely offer both types of systems. GPS boxes for trucks, RF tags for a badge... etc.

  24. Ultrasound based positioning system by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This system is good for tracking equipment already using WLAN, but for an alternate approach, check out Sonitor, which uses ultrasound instead of radio and has a tag battery lifetime of one year instead of 24 hours.

  25. Not for wardrivers... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

    If you can imagine, that the company is enough security wise to deploy such solution to catch wardrivers, it probably employs other anti-hacking measures that among other things include strong authentication & encryption schemes (SSL tunneling, IPSEC, ...). Since traffic protected in such manner can be passively detected, one can imagine that wardrivers will simply proceed to the next mark, since they are merely trying yo exploit unsecured || weakly secured (WEP) networks.

    Using this to catch wardrivers is as useless as killing mosquitos with elephant gun. Eventualy you get the job done, but it would be much cheaper and much more effective to simply buy a mosquito net.

    You could use such solution in honeypot, but when caughtm the user could simply claim ignorance, as there are no "ether" signs preventing you from "accidentaly" connecting to AP is it is completely open to the world (left on default settings).

    Anonymous Cowards Unite

  26. Re:What does it take by pagz · · Score: 2, Informative

    I work in the mobile computing lab at Rutgers ( http://www.cs.rutgers.edu/dataman )

    one of the projects I work on is indeed localization based. We were working on Berkeley's Mica MOTES and have an algorithm APS which can as the above poster stated use a relative coordianate system. However in reference to the article ranging based on signal strength is worthless (based on my own research and experience). Strength fluctuates too much to give a good equation for trianglulation. On the mote hardware the signal strength is a type decreasing amplitude sin function. So yes signal strength goes down as range increases but not cleanly. With a given strength you could be 5 feet, 13 feet or 35 feet away from the base station. This is probably not going to work very well in office use as metal also really screws with wireless signals (Anyone at MobiCom2003 see my APS demo there and wonder why the hell the board was proped up on coffee mugs? a metal band running around the table was carrying the radio signal around the damn table)

    So in short I really doubt this will be a boon to wireless sys admins

  27. San Fransisco by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Redundant

    Hmmm, couldn't this be use to trace users doing illegal things on your WiFi network? I am thinking about the WiFi network in San Fransisco that was reporeted on Slashdot earlier.

  28. Photo logs by panxerox · · Score: 1

    combine this with photo/time databases and 802.11 enabled McDonalds would be able to give your photo to the RIAA, naa thats just the paranoia speaking...

    --
    "It's so convenient to have a system where everyone is a criminal" - A. Hitler
  29. Mod parent non-insightful by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting
    Typical. Just because you can doesn't mean you should, and says nothing about whether or not it's appropriate. And it certainly doesn't make it a right. There's a big difference between something not explicitly illegal, and a right

    It's funny how we Americans get so extreme about rights - it's not "I have a right, and so does he/she/it" - it's "I have this right, that right, and then some - all very unilateral. I live in the land of the free, halleluja!.

    But sure, the corp. network is the corp's network, the building is corp's building, and so on. That doesn't mean that a toilet-timer or toilet-cam is appropriate, even if weren't outright illegal. You want to put it into perspective? How about a supply-room closet-cam to ensure that neither too many Post-It's get snarfed, nor any hanky-panky after the x-mas party goes on. Well, I hear sexual harassment suits can be costly, best to make sure. And don't forget the company non-dating policy, analysing proximity/location information would be excellent there - hasn't Joe been spending a lot of time around Susan, eh? And sometimes circles a little before, he's obviously indecisive then, and we don't want those kind of managers.

    I think we're forgetting a very basic thing here. If you're worried about a device being used 'outside', then fine, worry about tracking the device - not the person. But the lowly card swipe/proximity-badge easily tells management what they need to know: Joe is at work, in the building, without knowing his lat/long. Joe's manager and surrouding staff will notice that Joe isn't there, even if Bob swipes Joe's badge for two days.

    If that doesn't cut it for management, then the company has some interesting issues of trust to sort out. Spending time collecting, checking/auditing and sorting out noise ("the system alerted because policy X was violated", but Bob actually had a fully legitimate 4-eyes-only conversation with his boss in the parking lot, a.k.a. let's take a walk, we need to figure this one out).

    And you guys actually cheered when the Berlin wall fell, didn't you? Yep, those KGB and Stasi people were horrible, what kind of government would keep tabs on the poor citizens like that.... we don't, of course, but the companies can, it's their airspace. Don't like it - take a hike.

  30. Trollkore is alive! by (TK7)Dessimat0r · · Score: -1

    -INSANE-PRIEST--INSANE-PRIEST--INSAN
    I___________,.-------.,____________I Slashdot
    N______,;~'_____________'~;,_______N fucking
    S____,;____LINUX FUCKING____;,_____S sucks
    A___;___SUCKS, YOU FUCKING____;____A
    N__,'____SLASHDOT RETARDS.____',___N Rob Malda
    E_,;___GET IT INTO YOUR HEAD___;,__E is a
    -_;_;______._____l_____.______;_;__- cocksucker
    P_l_;____________l____________;_l__P
    R_l__`/~"_____~"_._"~_____"~\'__l__R Slashdot
    I_l__~__,-~~~^~,_l_,~^~~~-,__~__l__I fucking
    E__l___l________}:{__ (O) _l___l___E sucks
    S__l___l_ (o) _/_l_\_______!___l___S
    T__.~__(__,.--"_.^._"--.,__)__~.___T Rob Malda
    -__l_____---;'_/_l_\_`;---_____l___- is a
    -___\__._______V.^.V___((oo))./____- cocksucker
    I__O_VI_\________________ll_IV___O_I
    N_____I_lT~\___!___!___/~ll_I______N Fucking
    S_____I_l`IIII_I_I_I_IIIIll_I__o___S lameness
    A_O___I__\,III_I_I_I_III,ll_I______A filters,
    N______\___`----------'__ll/____o__N will
    E____O___\___._______.___ll________E this
    -_________\..___^____../(_l___O____- ever
    P_________/_^___^___^_/__ll\_______P fucking
    R_O______/`'-l l_l l-';__ll_l___O__R WORK?!
    I_______;_`'=l l_l l='__/ll_l______I
    E_____O_l___\l l~l l__l/_ll_l______E Your mother
    S_______l\___\ l_l l__;__ll_l__O___S was good
    T__o____l_\___ll=l l==\__ll_l______T in bed, she
    -____o__l_/\_/\l_l l__l`-ll_/______- grunts like
    -_______'-l_`;'l_l l__l__ll_____O__- an ape.
    I_O_______l__l l_l l__l__ll________I
    N____O____l__l+l_l+l__l__ll___O____N Rob Malda
    S_________l__"""_"""__l__ll________S is a
    A__O______l____o_o____l__ll____O___A cocksucker
    N_________l,;,;,;,;,;,l__ll________N
    E_____O___`lIlIlIlIlIl`__ll________E
    -__________llIlIlIlIll___ll_____O__- By Dessimat0r
    P__________`"""""""""`___""________P (c)2003 Trollkore
    -INSANE-PRIEST--INSANE-PRIEST--INSAN

    The bishop, while living, was a follower of God.
    Now dead, his rotting fingers are able to raise
    an army of skeletons from the grave.

    Trollkore
    "I hate you, I hate your country, and I hate your face!"

    # Important Stuff: Please try to keep posts on topic. # Try to reply to other people's comments instead of starting new threads. # Read other people's messages before posting your own to avoid simply duplicating what has already been said. # Use a clear subject that describes what your message is about. # Offtopic, Inflammatory, Inappropriate, Illegal, or Offensive comments might be moderated. (You can read everything, even moderated posts, by adjusting your threshold on the User Preferences Page) # Important Stuff: Please try to keep posts on topic. # Try to reply to other people's comments instead of starting new threads. # Read other people's messages before posting your own to avoid simply duplicating what has already been said. # Use a clear subject that describes what your message is about. # Offtopic, Inflammatory, Inappropriate, Illegal, or Offensive comments might be moderated. (You can read everything, even moderated # Important Stuff: Please try to keep posts on topic. # Try to reply to other people's comments instead of starting new threads. # Read other people's messages before posting your own to avoid simply duplicating what has already been said. # Use a clear subject that describes what your message is about. # Offtopic, Inflammatory, Inappropriate, Illegal, or O

    1. Re:Trollkore is alive! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Troll

      I want to stick my pee pee in your poo poo hole.

  31. free wifi for customers that are INSIDE the store by emptybody · · Score: 1, Interesting

    This technology, coupled with MAC address filtering could easily allow a store to restrict the users of their free access point to users within the store.

    So much for bringing your own food from home and parking outside the coffee shop for free wireless.

    --
    comment directly in my journal
  32. Hygiene warning by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Offtopic

    Give me some kind of warning when I'm about to shake the hand of someone who vectored out of the restroom without hitting the sink.

  33. Dang! by utlemming · · Score: 2, Funny

    Something tells me that the testing center is going to get one of these things real fast --

    Testing Center Employee: "Excuse me sir, we have detected that you are using a Palm Pilot to access 'TestAnswers.com'"

    Me: "Ah crap!" (Beeline for the door.)

    --
    The views expressed are mine own and do not express the views of my employer.
  34. privacy policy by Doc+Ruby · · Score: 1

    All these infosystems are completing a really accurate model of the physical world in databases - a regular cyberspace, a la William Gibson. Tech is finding leaks in our assumptions of privacy, where we have always expected that our personal space was known only to us, not any browser. Tech protection of our personal space from being rendered as realtime info in cyberspace will go the way of copyprotection and the mysteries of subatomic space. Our only way to protect our privacy is through policy, executed in technology. As geeks, we can already see the rough Big Brother beast slouching towards Bethlehem. We must be among the first to reasonably demand laws and corporate policies that keep that beast from breathing down our necks. Flimsy as they are, privacy policies are all we've got. Let's make them universal now, before all our private info is just so much cat out of the bag.

    --

    --
    make install -not war

  35. Re:What does it take by LostCluster · · Score: 1

    Traditional triangulation is done with vectors, under the theory that two lines can only intersect at one point, and if a third vector line crosses at the same point then a checksum agrees the result.

    So, while one access point saying "it could be 5, 13 or 35 feet away" is very little information, combining that with a second access point's information will draw another set of concentric circles, and there's going to be a limited number of intersect points. Add in a third set of circles and hope that the transmitter moves a little, and it's very possible to "lock on" to one coordinate and follow the nearest overlap point as it moves around.

  36. Military applications by Wag · · Score: 2, Interesting

    What does this mean for US warships that use Wi-Fi?

    1. Re:Military applications by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      Radio direction finding has been around since the 1930s. I'm sure they know about it.

    2. Re:Military applications by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Although it probably does present some rather large security concerns, it shouldn't really be that big of an issue.

      If someone can track us(said warships) then we can probably track those who are tracking us. Although we just don't go outright and TELL ... opposition where we are exactly, they generally have a bit of a clue. We're not the only government/military with reconnaissance.

      Give the Guvment a little bit more credit, we're not as retarded as we tell everyone.

    3. Re:Military applications by MonkeyCookie · · Score: 1

      This means that we can track the location of any US warship that is within a few hundred meters of us, as it's only a 802.11x signal. Of course any warship within a few hundred meters can usually be tracked using your eyes.

  37. Re:What does it take by pagz · · Score: 1

    Yes but looking at the article and the tech sheet it looks like an omnidirectional antenna which means that you can not to Angle of Arrival. So you can only rely on the signal strength of the transmitter. Getting the AoA of the received signal is a very nice bonus. Which they do not claim to be using (as far as I can find. Please tell me if I'm wrong because this is an interesting topic to me)

  38. Re:I'll be across the street at a local coffee bar by TedCheshireAcad · · Score: 1

    WiFi lets us be the most productive we can be, no matter where we are.

    ...but Slashdot does not.

  39. If these go mainstream... by parkanoid · · Score: 1

    Just imagine an angry sysadmin chasing down an unforunate warwalker with full intention of beating the crap out of him with a high-gain yagi antenna.

    Bicycle + iBook + Airport + Darkstar-equipped network = hours of fun :) Hell, might be even more fun to hide single-board systems around hotspots and trigger them randomly, driving the admin mad.

    (yes, I know it's only short-range as of now, and that anyone advanced enough to install one of these would probably have a network reasonably protected against warwalkers, but consider the possibilities!)

  40. Re:I'll be across the street at a local coffee bar by HPNpilot · · Score: 1

    It may sound scary, in terms of loss of freedom and micromanagement possibilities, but there are also benefits. Figuring out the best places to put antennas and the ability to track equipment inventory are some of the ways it can help us in our everyday jobs. The smart managers, as you point out, will tend to not micromanage their people into lower productivity.

  41. This is useless by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Because I leech out of hours and no admin is working overtime I can assure u.

    Them track me at 3 in the morning ? Dont make me laugh, I can always burst it.

    I could always jam it or I could set up decoys.

    1. Re:This is useless by nurb432 · · Score: 1

      Or they can just encrypt and tie access to authorized MAC addresses.. Making your venture sort of useless ....

      I doubt anyone that would spend that kind of $ to find you wouldnt just secure against you.

      --
      ---- Booth was a patriot ----
  42. Ekahau by bolind · · Score: 1

    Make sure to also check out finnish company Ekahau for 802.11* positioning.

  43. GO SCARLET KNIGHTS! by jpostel · · Score: 1

    Cool research. Good luck.

    --
    Ummm, Jon, aren't you supposed to be dead...? - Otter(3800)
  44. Re:What does it take by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    They are not, i belive the product only uses signal strength. I was commenting on the fact the home project was being too complicated. With a system built from the ground up, and ment for a small locations using signal strength becomes pratical. But if your going to try messing around with out a degree don't plan on getting anything very accurate 'hackd' from parts. From my experience using two cheap low quality directional antenna is plenty for me and a friend to drive straight to our model rockets, we just fan out about 25 yards, get a bering on it with the compass from the two locations. Punch the figures in the computer to find the distance, then hop in the truck and drive right up to where they lay. If we are off a little and the rocket isn't right there, we whip out the antenna and use the traditional method of just walking toward the source. We rarely have to pull one back out, but then again the rocket is over 3ft tall and painted safty orange.