Slashdot Mirror


Native KOffice for Mac OS X

bsharitt writes "A preliminary version of KOffice has been built natively on Mac OS X. It looks like a lot of the hard part is over, and now a lot of cleaning up and bug fixes stand between Mac OS X and a free full featured office suite." There's also a story on the dot.

18 of 335 comments (clear)

  1. Re:Before everyone say WHY BOTHER? by Zero_K · · Score: -1, Troll

    Why Bother? No seriously, I mean OpenOffice is already ported to MAC OS X, and I think this just a waste of developer time, I mean yes there should be choice and all that, but not to the point that there are several redundant programs, of which none of them work very well. (Not specific to Koffice btw)

  2. Free not important? by Robotdog · · Score: -1, Troll

    Given the price of a Mac, is *free* that big of a deal? Open source I understand, but it doesn't seem that anyone who can afford a Mac can't afford an office suite.

    1. Re:Free not important? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Troll

      We all know OS X is great for the simpleton. Leave Linux for the intelligent, friend.

    2. Re:Free not important? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Troll

      Its one thing to be a troll, but something more to be a stupid troll.

    3. Re:Free not important? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Troll

      I personally intend to give what I can (I'm poor after all) to help support the KOffice team.

      Maybe, if you hadn't bought a Mac you wouldn't be so poor ;)

    4. Re:Free not important? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Troll

      ugh.. I can't stand why the argument that a native language for a nation fabricated out of nowhere in the last century is some kind of news-worthy event. The same program probably doesn't support a zillion other native languages. Why continue to make noise over these few thousand users?

  3. Screenshots by James+A.+C.+Joyce · · Score: -1, Troll

    I managed to get some nice pretty Aqua screenshots of KDE and KOffice on Mac OS X. http://212.229.115.84/tripod/images/kofficemac/.

    --

    Slashdot: when news breaks, we give you the pieces.
  4. THAT'S NO TURD, THAT'S MY GREASED UP YODA DOLL! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Troll
  5. FACE IT APPLE IS GHEY by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Troll

    Eat cock mac fagotry

  6. DUPE! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Troll
    this story was posted here last week.


    3 fucking dupes on the front page today, guess that "give a shit about my job" resolution didn't last long.

  7. Re:OpenOffice.org by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Troll

    When I judge on a pruely objective basis, regarding the abilities of various office products (not I am looking at the product only) then MS Office wins every time, every application.

  8. Re:MOD DOWN - PARENT IS A "TADDLE" TROLL by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Troll

    Thanks for the wonderful idea.

  9. Re:OpenOffice.org by ctxspy · · Score: 0, Troll

    HAHAHAHAH It's you!!! :)

  10. Darl McBride by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Troll

    Is that you?

  11. Re:I'm ignorant... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Troll

    It may be imperfect,
    Understatement of the year.

    but it's a far cry better than MSOffice in many ways and defecient in only unimportant features.
    Bwahahahahahahahahahaha! Funniest thing I have ever read on /. Ever. Seriously. OO Writer is a complete piece of garbage. Buggy, quirky, image formatting is impossible, and even simple imports from Word that have even the SMALLEST formatting beyond text documents are usually completely trashed. Even starting from native documents it's difficult AT BEST to use. Not to mention its graph-less cousin, Calc. Hah.

    OO is garbage. It has been since the SO days when it was one single piece of garbage, now it's a bunch of slightly faster (though still considerably slower than Office) pieces of shit. No different in MDK, RH, or SuSE either. Slow. Crappy. Very consistent across platforms.

    It definately comes out ahead in the cost-benefit calculation.
    Finally, something you said that makes sense. Divide by zero results in.... ?

    Of course, you must not make any money. My time is worth something, so OO loses. Big time. Thanks for an enormous laugh.

    OO better than MS Office in any way other than price for people who don't make any money. Only on /.!

  12. Fuck Apple in the mouth by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Troll

    How is it a company with 3% market share can get 80% of the fucking press? I'm so fucking sick of hearing about Apple. Fuck Apple. Fuck Apple hard. I hope they go out of business in 2004.

  13. Re:OpenOffice.org by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Troll

    MS Office is clearly superior. It does well what the pretenders (OO/KO) try to do, and does a whole lot more. Would you differ from this opinion?

  14. Re:Nice effort, but . . . by babbage · · Score: -1, Troll
    Apple gave a very public lesson on the proper way to port OSS when they did Safari.

    But then, their "port" of KHTML/Konqueror kind of dropped the "O" from "OSS", and a lot of people would argue that that wasn't the proper way to do it. They were acting in their own self-interest, of course, and they helped make the KHTML engine better than it had been, but the interface they built around the engine is entirely non-open. Lessons can be drawn by reverse engineering their work (DMCA aside), but the work they put into Safari cannot be reused by others.

    So, a proprietary skin on an open core. Kind of like OSX itself for that matter. And just as Safari is a lesson to FOSS browser developers, OSX is one to system developers; contrariwise, just as, three or four years on, OSX hasn't yet motivated people to finally finish perfecting the standard *nix/X11 desktop, it could be a while before Safari's lessons make any impact...