The Voice of Groklaw
Random BedHead Ed writes "LinuxPlanet has an interesting interview with Pamela Jones, the paralegal and blogger who created Groklaw. Groklaw has become an indespensible site for geeks who need even more SCO updates than even /. provides - and if the site's inclusion in the footnotes of one of IBM's court documents is any indication, it's been handy for people involved in the case as well. No wonder the site won Best News Site in O'Reilly's OSDir.com Editor's Choice Awards for 2003. It shows how useful and influental a well-run collaborative website can be."
If I got agitated every time about this like you do then, well, I wouldn't posting this message. (Unless someone writes an astral interconnect module for Perl.)
Someone making ridiculous claims and wanting a huge heaps of money isn't actually news. Much more people do this for a living than you might guess.
Over 90 years and counting !
Groklaw is the best thing, so far, to come out of the case.
There is an ever increasing need for common ground between the legal and geek communities, and Groklaw appears to be it. Neither techs or lawyers understand each other's worlds, this goes a long way, to bridging the gap.
A hearty "atta boy" to Pam, and a nomination for whatever annual award there is on the web.
I don't buy it. The author of Grok Law is a paralegal, not a real laywer.
Which is her strength, she does research for a living. Many of the people who post on Groklaw are people who have worked on Linux for years. They know where the bodies are buried. If there was a smoking gun we would have seen it long ago. She runs a professional, well thought out site. She will be arround for a long time after Darl and Co. bite the dust.
Save a Life. Donate Blood. Please.
Having a graduate degree in a funky fusion of computer science and law, I know all to well about the challenges involved in getting the geeks, lawyers, and everyone else, involved or not involved, to understand one another. It is a challenge to write and explain things in a way with a goal of getting as many people as possible to understand what is written and where the fewest people feel like they are being patronized, belittled, hearing "old news," etc. From what I can see (maybe others think differently), Jones does a good job in meeting that challenge.
I hope to see other cases on Groklaw, in addition to all the SCO stuff, both from the US and the rest of the world. I'll be more than willing to contribute stuff. Just keep the site going!
People say I'm crazy, I got diamonds on the soles of my shoes...
If the legal department of IBM ever doubted Open Source and that model of cooperation, I expect Groklaw has convinced them of the success you can achieve by free discussion. If I were an IBM lawyer I would check Groklaw several times every day and keep notes. I really believe Pamela Jones has made a difference that will work in favor of Linux. Thanks, PJ!!
What is the sound of one hand clapping?
cat
She was in the passenger seat. I'm pretty sure that people in the passenger seat aren't considered to be "driving" the car. The car was at a complete stop when the incident occured.
Black and grey are both shades of white.
She was in the passenger seat. I'm pretty sure that people in the passenger seat aren't considered to be "driving" the car
That makes her case look even worse. She was so incompetant that she was able to endeavor to dump hot coffee into her lap when there was no other motion in the environment. I wonder if this lady ever heard of an amazing invention....cup holders!
Jones is a savvy user, and her ideas for what needs improvement would be valuable, provided we listen and react to input such as hers. The props are nice, but don't help identify what we need to improve as much as good, honest feedback does.
On the whole, though, a pretty good interview...
Items above a certain temperature are dangerous. We learn this as children, and conduct our lives accordingly. That a grown woman was foolish enough to put cup of coffe between her legs (knowing that it was hot both from years of experience, and from having purchased McDonald's coffee many times over the years), that she was then foolish enough to squeeze the cup tightly enough to cause it's contents to spill over her thighs and genitals says absolutely nothing about the relative safety of McDonald's coffe. It highlights only her unfortunate foolishness in choosing to handle the product in an unsafe manner.
The contest for ages has been to rescue liberty from the grasp of executive power. -- Daniel Webster