Pricing and Internet Architecture
Frisky070802 writes "The Politech list recently posted a pointer to a new paper (pdf) by UMN prof Andrew Odlyzko, which compares the telecom industry to the historical transportation industry (railroad, bridges, and such). One quote, from the conclusion, is particularly interesting: '... the networking industry [has] devoted inordinate efforts to technologies such as ATM and QoS, even though there was abundant evidence these were not going to succeed. One can go further and say that essentially all the major networking initiatives of the last decade, such as ATM, QoS, RSVP, multicasting, congestion pricing, active networks, and 3G, have turned out to be duds. Furthermore, they all failed not because the technical solutions that were developed were inadequate, but because they were not what users wanted.'"
CowboyNeal's diet anyone?
WWJD.... for a Klondike bar?
here
AAP = Adam Alexander Pumm
Pummer = Adam Alexander Pumm
DRAW YOUR OWN CONCLUSION
Why have I been hearing Microsoft Bob in comments, newgroup postings, etc etc lately? Something I don't know about, maybe a Microsoft Bob cult?
LOLOLOLOLOL OMG WTF!
MS poured resources into it as the "next big thing" in desktop OSs, but it failed miserably.
PLEASE somebody tell me what happened to anti-slash.org?!?!? I miss that site and its db tool!!!
ATMs all the time. Most efficient money withdrawl system EVER.
"You're nothing but a pack of fickle mushheads!"
Now what does this have to do with pricing ?
Yes.
Cause the users make it what they want??
The Rediculas cost of broadband (on average, about 30-40+ a month) is what keeps me with my current *shudder* Dial-up ISP.
Price Comparison: I pay $5 a month, about $60 a year for Access4Less
$40 a month comes to $480 a year, about 1/100 of a teacher's salary.
How about this, asswipe, save yourself some money and don't subscribe.
This one needs to be modded offtopic, too.
Unless the socialist bias here is real.