Slashdot Mirror
Xgrid Clustering Software and Demo
no_demons writes "Along with a selection of other goodies, Apple also unveiled their Xgrid clustering technology from their advanced computation group today. Xgrid can turn a number of networked Macs into a supercomputer, detects nodes automagically via Rendezvous, and can run in or out of a screensaver mode. You can download a technology demo (including a BLAST test app) here."
It'll be interesting to see if I can make this work with the stacks of old LC520s in my garage. I've been wanting to cluster them for a while. If Xgrid will work on those, Mac just saved me a ton of work. Not that I wasn't going to have fun with it....
Damon,
http://actionPlant.com
This makes me think: "Hmm... Seti@Home with an Aqua theme..."
Now every single story posted on slashdot for the next 6 months is going to have a comment of "Imagine an XGrid of these!" The old incarnation was slowly dying too...
What are we going to do tonight Brain?
And when I feel like it, I'll volunteer x% to non-commericial stuff like SETI@home."
Ladies and Gentlemen, please welcome the 21st century pimp.
"What do we get for 10 teraflops?"
"Anyting you want!"
"Anything?"
"Anyting!"
I like big butts and I cannot lie.
1 = super computer
1100 = supercomputer
See, with that many more computers you DO run out of space
*rim shot*
Thanks folks, we're here all week. Try the veal; it's delicious. And please, don't forget to tip your waitress.
I wonder if I could offload some of my compiles to TiVo...
:-)
Share and Enjoy!
Duh.
From my own inexhaustive observations, Apple gives consumer stuff "i" and geeky stuff "X", hence iPod, iApps, iMac, iLife etc against XServe, XCode, XGrid, etc.
To be frank I've always wondered about Apple's name syntaxes. When the Mac IIx and the SE/30 came out - improvements of the Mac II and the SE with then top-of-the-line 68030 processors - it seems they really should have gone with Mac II/30 or SEx. Mac II/30 sounds like a third grade joke about chinese dentists but the Macintosh SEx would have probably made them billions.
Actually, there was an old joke around Apple when I worked there about this exact subject.
Since the SE/30 was essentially a IIx without NuBus slots, the development team wanted to follow syntax and codename the machine the SE/x. This apparently was not cool with Scully or Jean-Louis.
Of course, no machine ever starts development with a final marketing name (at least not back then), so the story is most likely bull.
Why did I get moderator points on the same day as Macworld?
Try the veal.
Breakfast served all day!
but a grid of a hundred EMacs was a pretty good start to a mini-supercomputer I was told.
emacs created a super-computer? I thought emacs required a supercomputer... or was that xemacs...?
Thank you, I'll be here all week...
Me so speedy.
Me process you too much.
"And when they do, they end up with over analized and engineered products nobody want"
If anything is "Over analized" when it comes to Microsoft, it's their customers.
I just couldn't resist.
I HAVE CUBIC WISDOM THAT TRANSCENDS AND CONTRADICTS ONE DAY GODS
Now, with the Mac zealots insisting that it's OS TEN - not OS ECKS - how is XGrid pronounced? TEN Grid? Or does this not bolster my theory that calling it OS TEN is retarded?
Apple gives consumer stuff "i" and geeky stuff "X", hence iPod, iApps, iMac, iLife etc against XServe, XCode, XGrid, etc.
They couldn't have called it iGrid.. there is no I in team.
"Apple Corporation is proud to announce new version of XGrid technology, extended for use on iPod digital media player and Apple Pro Mouse."
:)
I wonder, what computational power will cluster of iPods have. Cluster of mice, anyone?
-- grmbl woz heer