Slashdot Mirror


Lego to Stop Producing Mindstorms

nick58b writes "Lego, in response to the worst financial loss in its history, has announced they will stop making the electronics and movie tie-in products. This would include Mindstorms, one of the greatest educational toys ever produced." It saddens me greatly to see the toy that was such a mainstay of my childhood to be in such dire financial straits. If I were a more qualified sociologist, I'd think it may have inspired by the way that our children play today versus how they played twenty years ago.

29 of 615 comments (clear)

  1. Get back to ordinary bricks! by jolyonr · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Too many of the new lego products have so few generic bricks and too many specialist bricks that can't easily be used for other things, eg, you can build a lego buggy into, um, a slightly different buggy, but not a lot else.

    Get back to providing big bags of ordinary bricks, and encourage creativity!

    Jolyon

    --


    Please read my Canon EOS tech blog at http://www.everyothershot.com
  2. Re:What happened? by Oculus+Habent · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Price.

    Also, how many parent think, "Little Jimmy should have a programmable set of Lego!"

    TC Logo and Dacta were also great toys (one of my teachers wrote some of the documentation), but there just wasn't a big market.

    --
    That what was all this school was for... to teach us how to solve our own problems. -- janeowit
  3. Such a shame :-( by tuxette · · Score: 3, Insightful
    This is horrible. I was hoping to buy my nephew lots of Mindstorms stuff when he got older. Maybe I have to buy them now and keep them around?

    I'm not sure the price of these toys is the problem. Toys in general aren't exactly cheap these days. Neither are video games, and video games seem to be what is the most appealing to children these days. So what we might need to look into is why expensive video games are more interesting than expensive toys where children have to actually think to use them. Or did I just answer my own question?

    --
    People say I'm crazy, I got diamonds on the soles of my shoes...
  4. Too Specialized by Oculus+Habent · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I've kept my eye on Lego, even though I haven't purchased much for years. My greatest disappointment is the "special" pieces that are now so common. All the special pieces detract from your ability to make new and interesting things with multiple sets.

    It's time to go back to castles and space ships and cities.

    --
    That what was all this school was for... to teach us how to solve our own problems. -- janeowit
  5. specialization by frizz · · Score: 5, Insightful

    The problem with Lego sets in recent years has been the fact that they are very specialized. You used to be able to buy sets that allowed for lots of imagination, such as "pirate", "city", and "space" legos. Now, all I see is "Star Wars: Episode I" or other such sets that don't inspire the imagination in the slightest.

  6. Re:Mindstorm no more! by DAldredge · · Score: 4, Insightful

    No.

    Geeks can think and imagine. You are turning you 2 year old into a person that has to have flashly lights to be entertained.

  7. No by imsabbel · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Sorry, but for 100$ you get a a64 3000+. You know, 1024KiB high speed cache, 6.4GB/s HT io, ect.
    Those little microcontrollers cost you 5$ at most if you buy a few 1000.

    --
    HI O WISE PRINCE. WHT TOOK U SO DAM LONG?
  8. No wonder by Apreche · · Score: 5, Insightful

    It's no wonder that lego is losing money. They seem to be putting a heck of a lot of their resources into stuff like Bionicle. Have you seen those things? There are like 10 pieces, they are not standard brick, and you can only make one thing out of them.

    Bring back castle lego at a reasonable price and we'll talk. I would love to get my hands on that original black knight's castle. The big black square one. Now all they make is bionicle, harry potter, and some star wars. It's not the same as it was.

    It used to be a toy of building. Now it's just a toy you build.

    --
    The GeekNights podcast is going strong. Listen!
    1. Re:No wonder by agedman · · Score: 3, Insightful

      My daughter plays with the bionicles, and she doesn't feel as limited as people seem to believe they are.

      The Bionicle pieces can be mixed to create different monster-like-critters (She's even created a six-legged beastie). They have a variety of gears and rubberbands that can be used with other pieces to articulate those things. And, of course, there are opportunities to mix different realms (Bionicle & K'nix or marble runs or even MindStorms).

      Kids aren't limited by the intended packaging of this things, nor even by the adult asthetics of not mixing different universes. Give them some building blocks, a little imagination and no TV and they'll have a good time!

      Oh, yes, I'm disappointed too to see that MindStorms will be discontinued. We've enjoyed it, even though I haven't got it to work under Linux at this point. But then MindStorms has always been kind of the odd child in the Lego house. I don't know that the Lego execs ever really knew what to do with (even if there was a world-wide community ready to tell them).

  9. I agree: too much cutomization by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    The real problem Lego is facing right now (let's hope they realize it) is they produce too much custom pieces. Every set has at least 5 - 10 custom bricks and therefore:
    1) costs much to produce
    2) contains less ordinary pieces to reduce the costs
    3) Since it contains less pieces and the ones it contains are custom, there's very little play value to justify the cost.

    I would suggest Lego to:
    1)reduce custom pieces. Kids are suppose to have fantasy you know... I remember I put two triangles together and pretend it was a star destroyer...
    2)kill most of the cinema stuff. Starwars stuff is ok (meaning it's well done and designed). reduce cutom pieces and completely kill the other series ( If they can't make other movies with the same quality, then it's a no go.)
    3)Kill bionicles!!!! (what in the world are those things? are they LEGO at all? and they DO contain very few pieces and they're mostly custom!!!! They're model kits, not LEGO!)
    4) where are the old series? trains castles cities... there was really tons and tons of stuff!!! (and some amazing works to say the truth) where's all that stuff gone?

    Anyway, probably Lego is facing the usual toy VS digital dilemma where most of the kids don't want dull toys and prefer videgames... anyway, I really believe the company isn't facing the crisis for the good... A few steps in the same direction and Lego is gone.

  10. Play methods by Waffle+Iron · · Score: 4, Insightful
    If I were a more qualified sociologist, I'd think it may have inspired by the way that our children play today versus how they played twenty years ago.

    I don't know about 20 years ago, but 35 years ago I used to play with plain rectangular Lego blocks and generic wheels. I had to use my own mind and imagination to assemble these general-purpose blocks into the wide variety of things I wanted to build.

    From the look of today's Lego sets, children play today by using the custom single-purpose pieces to assemble a verbatim copy of the picture on the box.

  11. They Don't Care About Customers by snookerdoodle · · Score: 4, Insightful

    As the father of 7 and 8 year old boys, the elder of which has quite a collection of Bionicles, I've observed one little tidbit about Lego: if you lose or break a piece, it's gonna cost you an arm and a leg to replace it (No Bionicle Pun Intended ;).

    What does this have to do with their financial success? A lot, IMHO. It certainly has affected our brand loyalty. As Kewl as Bionicles are, we have tried to steer our boyz towards products made by more consumer friendly companies, such as K'nex.

    I know there's more to running a company, but this to me says they still Just Don't Get It.

    Mark

  12. Indicative of a trend? by tjcoyle · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Am I the only one who has noticed that Lego barely sells a kit (in stores) that require any effort or concentration to complete?

    When I was younger (here we go....), toy stores always had a great selection of the classic Technics kits. The large, complicated kits seemed to be the hottest items, because they were *challenging* and *interesting*.

    Today, most of the sets I see are low-piece count, over-simplifed, plug-the-head-into-the-pelvic-chassis Bionicle garbage, which seems only to make the statement that kids today aren't interested in anything unless it's presented as a completely non-cerebral AARRRGGGHHH-type of monster package.

    This really is a shame. I'll never stop appreciating the endless hours I spent creating machines of every type imaginable, and can't help but to think that my exposure to Lego helped to form a little bit of who I am today.

    I don't know what a childhood of building Bionicles might do to kid, expect possibly make them wish their parents were cool enough to buy them a toy that doesn't require assembly, like the kid next door.

    And that's a sad thing

  13. Vid Games by millahtime · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Could the less use of legos be due to video games???? I think so. Why use your imaginagtion when someone else can do it for you.

    1. Re:Vid Games by Peeet · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Unfortunatley, that seems to be the American way, why do x when someone/thing else can do it for you (x the variable, not the hallucinegen...). You can sub so many things these days for x:

      raising children
      definging your taste in music/movies
      forming opinions on news events
      Managing your Digital Rights
      building things
      repairing your own stuff (like electronics)
      imagining (like video games, see parent post)
      thinking (in general, welcome to the American way)

      Unfortunatley, the someone/thing else are the conglomerating corporate focus groups, looking for where the money is. The idea of legos, which someone buys once, and is used for so long afterwards, because they are so versitile, doesn't match with our one-time use throw-it-away culture. Legos may be a bit more expensive, but stretch that money over the amount of time that they can entertain a little kid and they become so much cheaper than video games. It's not that there isn't a market for Legos, it's just that it takes a lot more parenting toget legos to entertain your children than it takes to get video games to entertain. We may be witnessing a dying empire, but I for one, when I have kids, will give them Legos, even if I have to go antiquing to find them. (The Legos, not the kids...)
      -P

    2. Re:Vid Games by mark_lybarger · · Score: 3, Insightful

      i never really understand the insightful mod. what's in the parent post that contains a clear and deep perception? anyway, enough on the /. moderation system. back on topic.

      do you have kids with legos? have you been a kid with legos?

      the big duplo blocks that are aimed at preschool kids don't really incite much imagination in themselves. but that age group really can exercise their imagination with... well, i'm amazed at what little they can use to exercise their imagination.

      now on to the actual legos. these are aimed at kids mainly 5 and over possibly 6. yes, they come with instructions, and somehow the kids can put them together just like the picture on the box in what seems like record time. once. that's the only time that heap of plastic will ever resemble anything that is on the box or any piece of paper within the box. not because they get taken apart and just left alone never to be used again. not because 1/2 the pieces are gone (well, this isn't entirely true, those tiny pieces are hard to keep track of). it's because the pieces take some new shape at least every other day or so to become part of a star fleet, or a battle ship, or a race team, or just kewl peice of art that lasts 20 minutes.

  14. Re:Sadly.. by illusioned · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I think that society today is more interested in quick results then in long term effects. When a child is restless, parents seem to just want them to quiet down and look for the easiest ways out. When a parent is too busy with their own lives, the TV should not become a baby sitter. Why? There is no independent thought going on, the child is simply entertained. The child is not forced to think about what is happening in most cases because the answer is inevitably answered later on in the show, if there even is a question to ponder. Parents should never be too busy for their child, if that is the case, they shouldn't have had one at all. I am no sociologist, but one thing that makes me believe that sticking children in front of a TV does a-lot more bad then good is watching my father getting older. Last year all he did was watch TV, even educational things like the discovery channel. I noticed that gradually his mind became a little duller, you could tell by the way that he spoke. He couldn't take it anymore, he even noticed that he was slowing down. Now he works for my sister's school doing odd computer jobs, and he is back to a sort of "normal".

  15. Re:MindStorms by alienw · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Add that to the cost of making the plastic blocks themselves.

    Nope. Plastic blocks cannot cost much more than a few cents. It's simple injection molding, the same way they make CDs. Not much material in each block. The only reason lego charges such outrageous prices for them is because they can.

    I mean, a microcontroller with three inputs and outputs, 32 kB RAM, and some ROM (512 kiB IIRC) has to cost at least $100

    If you think that a microcontroller with 32kB RAM and 512 KB ROM costs >$100 you have never priced one. A microcontroller such as a PICmicro, an Atmel, a Zilog, and so on costs at most $10 for a "deluxe" version with about 30 I/O pins and Flash memory. What Lego is using is most likely a pre-programmed chip w/o Flash, which are about 1/3 of the price. A 512 KB FlashROM chip costs about $6. These are RETAIL prices, what you can get one single chip for. Lego probably gets them for a fraction of the price since they need quite a few of the things.

    I am willing to bet that most of the money from the cost of a Mindstorms kit goes towards marketing and product development. Not towards manufacturing. I'm sure the software inside (and outside) the mindstorms thing cost much more to develop than the hardware.

  16. Re:Mindstorms was awesome by JaredOfEuropa · · Score: 5, Insightful
    Though I've never played with them because I'm a grown up now
    Remember: we do not stop playing because we grow old. We grow old because we stop playing.
    --
    If construction was anything like programming, an incorrectly fitted lock would bring down the entire building...
  17. Re:NNNNNOOOOOOO!!!!!!! by RobotRunAmok · · Score: 5, Insightful

    When we found out we were having a boy

    Because girls aren't supposed to build robots? Don't tell that to my six year old Natasha, whose favorite playtime is spent building K'Nex Battlemechs and Bandai Gundams with her dad.

    1953 just called. They want their gender biases back.

    Sheesh.

  18. Re:Can't feel much sympathy for them. by jsteinfo · · Score: 3, Insightful

    So, I thought "just how expensive are these things these days"... I went over to Amazon and entered Lego in the search.

    Green Lego Base

    $7 for a 10 inch square plastic base??!?

    I shudder to think how much my parents paid for all the legos that I had when I was a kid. Then again, maybe they were not so expensive back then (70s).

  19. Re:What happened? by hh1000 · · Score: 3, Insightful

    No, just ridiculously high price.

  20. The death of Lego? by kekoap · · Score: 5, Insightful

    The article confirms that Lego has been hurting badly. The writing has been on the wall for a while now though. Just look at Lego's product lines over the past 5-10 years. Added: Harry Potter, Star Wars, video games, Bionicle, Sports, Mindstorms. Lost: classic space, castle, pirates. Plus the saddest thing for me, a lack of focus on good Technic sets.

    Why so many problems? I think kids expect more from today's toys than just bricks. That's kind of a sad fact that says something about our culture I think. Second, since the expiration of Lego's stud-and-tube patent, there's been competition from Mega Bloks, which are inferior but cheaper. In today's world though, I think it makes sense that many parents choose cheaper rather than better. Another sad fact.

    In any event, while I'm unhappy about Mindstorms, I'm happy they're abandoning Harry Potter and the like. They have totally lost their identity by branching out, and I think they really do need to get back to their core business as they're doing now. I wonder though, is it too late already?

    There use to be a steady stream of great Technic sets worth getting, but recently good sets have slowed to a trickle, with just one catching my eye recently... 8455 Backhoe. Check it out, it might be one of your last few chances to grab a great Lego set.

  21. Re:Mindstorm no more! by wayward_son · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Exactly.

    In the heyday of Lego, (late 1980's-early 1990's IMHO) you had a few specialized parts and mostly rather generic parts. You could build many different things out of a kit, sometimes even coming up with things better that what the kit was intended for. For example, I was able to build a church for my Lego town out of leftover castle parts.

    Now it's all specialized crap. You can only build one thing that looks halfway decent. What's the fun in that?

  22. Re:What happened? by zaffir · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Also, there are no good, cool sets to buy anymore. It's all Bionicle or sets that are 90% "unique" pieces. Every time i go to the toy store i hope to find something along the lines of Space Police or Ice Station or any of the other good sets, and they just don't exist. Therefore, Lego doesn't get my money.

    --
    "Upon attaching the waterblock to my penis, I began to notice that I know nothing about computers." -- JRockway
  23. Re:What happened? by fenix+down · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Honestly, I don't see how that's a bad thing. I always thought the Star Wars sets were a bad idea, no matter how neat it is to have a little Lego Emperor. You get the kid a model kit if he wants a model Millenium Falcon. Lego's for building stuff without instructions. Sure, sell the sets, it keeps the kids busy for the rest of Christmas day, but at least pretend you can take it apart and turn it into something else. What's your kid supposed to do when he takes the thing apart the next day and all he has are irregular slanty bricks with Rebel Alliance logos printed on them and Millenium Falcon hull sections? You can't very well go and build castle turrets out of R2D2's head.

  24. Overpriced is unfortunately right. by LiberalApplication · · Score: 3, Insightful
    ...and that may be why the majority of Lego-set-purchasers I know (myself included) are over the age of 21 and purchasing them for themselves. With most of the sets that kids would actually be able to squeeze a decent amount of fun out of being over $40.00, and most of the affordable sets being so rinky-dink, a child given the choice would probably ask their parent for a comparably priced video game instead of a $50 Lego set.

    I had (and dearly loved) piles of Legos when I was little, but most of those came as hand-me-downs in buckets. Maybe we can convince the folks at Lego to stop spending as much effort in producing new, specialized blocks for new, specialized sets with fancy graphics on their boxes and start selling things in buckets.

    On another note, I bet that if someone were to set up a PayPal account to donate to the Lego corporation, that the mobs of Lego maniacs out there would be able to generate a significant amount of money for them.

    1. Re:Overpriced is unfortunately right. by mabhatter654 · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I'd agree, what's needed are more simle parts and less flashy stuff. You know how hard [and expensive] it is to get enough parts to build a decent sized castle nowdays! They need more buckets of 2x4 colored blocks...in more useful colors. That said, Lego needs to adapt it's piece size to make it more friendly to robot builders...The current technic pieces are too small and poorly joining for anything except matchbox sized toys. Building anything moving that exceeds 12" in any direction is extremely flaky.

    2. Re:Overpriced is unfortunately right. by rocca · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I think the reason for the high-price is actually hiding in your post. Lego is virtually indestructable. I have lego kits from 25 years ago that look to be in as good condition as they were the day I got them. Take any other toy, and it wears out, gets faded, clothes rip, wheels fall off, etc, and they end up going in the garbage or needing replacement. Lego never seems to get lost or thrown out, it is handed down and as a result the market for Lego dwindles each year. I think they realized this quite quickly when the $1 kits jumped to $5 the next year and it's been priced high ever since.