Debian World Domination Plan
An anonymous reader writes "Guillem Jover announced his plans to take over the non-Debian world and released a tool which converts in
runtime any distribution to Debian. It does not convert in the sense
of mapping all previous installed packages to the Debian counterparts,
but installs a base system or tarball and cleans traces from the
previous distribution."
Who says I use Gentoo?
/. crowd I write comments based on pure conjured brainfarts that come out of the wind. Why RTFA, why AHSFE and certainly why PSFTIYP?
Like the rest of the
Tom
Someday, I'll have a real sig.
OR -www.Retrobox.com- They have deals that are even sweeter.
Wow, you truly are an asshole.
It is interesting to note that Mr. Perens helped solidify the organizational structure of Debian over the course of years. For that I am grateful.
But there is something between him and KDE. After he left Debian, KDE was brought in and is now well supported and integrated within Debian. I very much like being able to run Qt and GTK applications seamlessly at the same time regardless of what the window manager is.
As titular head of this UserLinux thing, he comes out and declares that the desktop will be GNOME and only GNOME.
Yet, right there for everyone to see, is Debian with GNOME and KDE existing side by side without conflict.
I'm sure Mr. Perens has a good reason for his preference. I cannot imagine what it is.
Bob-
The Ludwig von Mises Institute. The reasoning individuals economics
I am pro-life and it really irks me that you first of all call me anti-choice and second say Im about controling the lives and choices of women. So from here on out Im going to put things into perspective(I did this to my women's studies professor when she made the same mistake) and refer to your movement as ANTI-LIFE. Now Ill take on your other mistake. The anti-life movement tries to make abortion about women's rights. I believe its more about the three persons involved and thats why I am pro-life. The three people are obviously the Mother, the Father, and the Child. ALl there have rights and responsibilities in this and choices in this situation. First the child has the right to live. Some may say that the child is just a featus and there fore is not a person. Studies have proven that babies are concious and have thought processes while still in the womb and that conciousness makes that featus a human being and there for has a right to live. Next lets examine the Father and Mother together. As another poster has already pointed out they descided to have sex(Im not going to examine the issue of rape because I see that as a seperate issue and my beliefs there very slightly in that I believe the rapist should be castrated and be made to pay reparations to the victim and Im not sure where I stand on abortion there). I am not some virginial hermit who has never had sex. Everytime I have sex with a woman I make a concious choice that I am willing to have the child with her and support her monitarily, phyisically, and emotionally through out the pregnancy and examine our options together as to if we want to get married or give the baby up for adoption or share custody in some way. That is the problem with most people and abortion. Abortion is simply a way out of a mistake that distroies a human life. Its not about choice. Both persons have already made the choice by having sex. BTW, I took womans studies because I am a big supporter of women's rights all over the world and I cant stand weak women and it sickens me to see women who let themselves be dominated. Fact of the matter is I saying that all pro-life advocates are against womens rights is just as bad as saying that all pro-choice advocates are against life. It is two sets of people seeing the same very grey issue from two differing view points. I dont personally think abortion needs to be outlawed. I think that sex education and the way sex is looked at in the US needs a reevaluation. Oh, and just for shits and giggles, my women's studies professor and I had a debate on the subject and in the end that was the conclusion we both came to. And just to bring it back on topic, Debian rules because its about many people of differing view points comming together to work on something they all agree is a good thing and finding common grounds and working out disagreements to the betterment of all. That is what made the US great at one time, but now its in decline because everyone is greedy and wants the biggest share of the pie.
"We Don't Need No Truthless Heros!" - Project 86
Schools I understand. But why churches? Most of them have more money than they'll ever admit to. And what are they going to use the computers for?? Emailing god?
The reason girls and Windows users don't understand UNIX is because all the documentation is in Man files.