Slashdot Mirror

← Back to Stories (view on slashdot.org)

SCO Fails to Produce Evidence

Posted by ryuzaki0 on from the gee-i-wonder-why dept.

BlueSteel writes "For those of you that need that daily SCO fix, Groklaw has the declaration of Ryan E. Tibbitts of SCO, stating why they haven't produced any evidence... and that they need recent AIX and Dynix/ptx code from IBM before they can comply."

4 of 651 comments (clear)

  1. old news... by muzza · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    This story was posted on Groklaw two days ago. This seems to be a bit of a trend with Slashdot lately, it is rapidly becoming irellevent as a "news" site, maybe the name should change to "News for Nerds. Stuff thats two days old.".



    --
    --Murray Barton
  2. dont kid yourself... by ainsoph · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    Hmmm, I wonder how the judge will see this.

    The judge will see this based on who produces the most cash to pay him off.

  3. Re:SCO says: by CAIMLAS · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    Legalese, motherfucker, can you speak it?

    --
    ~/ssh slashdot.org ssh: connect to host slashdot.org port 22: too many beers
  4. Re:So they've never had specific proof ! by Performer+Guy · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    The SCO situation has nothing to do with future Linux GPL theft cases. You can keep saying it. You can hold your breath until you turn blue. It won't change the facts. I've explained very clearly that TODAY you can't do this because that's the law. TOMORROW you won't be able to do this either because it'll still be the law. If SCO does get so peek at code it'll be because of contracts and proof, not a pipe dream, and reguardless Linux will NOT, I repeat for your slow mind, ABSOLUTELY NOT be able to go on fishing expeditions in code without proof. Not YESTERDAY, not TODAY and not TOMORROW.

    Got it? Is it sinking in yet?