Slashdot Mirror


Web Ad Trademark Law To Be Retested

scubacuda writes "News.com et al report that The Ninth Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals on Wednesday found Playboy Enterprises can pursue charges that Excite and Netscape Communications violated its trademark by selling banner advertisements triggered by the terms 'playboy' and 'playmate.' The decision reverses a district court ruling that dismissed the suit without a trial in 2000. Playboy 'clearly holds the marks in question, and defendants used the marks in commerce without (its) permission,' a split three-judge panel wrote in its majority decision." This is a shame, because the first judge to look at this case seems to have pretty much gotten it right: "Although the trademark terms and the English language words are undisputedly identical, which, presumably, leads plaintiff to believe that the use of the English words is akin to use of the trademarks, the holder of a trademark may not remove a word from the English language merely by acquiring trademark rights in it."

2 of 331 comments (clear)

  1. Re:Is /. always anarchic/libertarian? by pantycrickets · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    Bonus points for whoever knows the first trademark in the UK. Here's a hint - I could go for one right now.

    I prefer American beer myself.

  2. Re:Only "permission" to sue by BillFarber · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    How the fuck is the parent a TROLL?