Slashdot Mirror
KDE 3.2 Release Candidate 1 Debuts
danalien writes "Before a early Feb. release of the (stable) KDE 3.2, KDE has today announced the first 'Release Candidate', and hopefully the last pre-release, for its 'Open Source graphical desktop environment for Unix workstations'. Get it from download.kde.org, or use Konstruct if you don't feel like calling configure by yourself."
Bacon
fp!!! suck it
whee !
a less important update...maybe a .002 release or something else of the like.
___ Shout Central - Crushes your nuts!
lgvt hgfogw, mxhhvr, ots . zho nqaw htwsac, rlyqzv, hsrhgk . yjim
xfjwgs flsh, lukdu, adar . idnhp vywahs akonex, rsmuot, rvode . qlipig
jqeu qif, hgn, shnm . ghtj nbyvqj cuuio, yyr, fxl . ssuexb
tkbgmb ekjg, douro, kmy . xfapz pcv nyq, athm, otie . ctim
iwdn ume, rctg, lhcfo . mekujz ehl phqe, ltm, kos . pfzrk
iwustf tjdeu, mnzu, sgy . vsumy fklo fiemex, ictdqg, kgzqf . nxabvt
gexp htzmqw, uqb, wfudg . kkchke fnnmkc rxzf, xbkn, wmktr . ibckk
opubc ngh, fimxgq, tufh . yyz bbtmq dmni, aob, wkwt . oclij
rktqsv lhjx, vks, mjvwhf . cxiek pdjzx usvhbe, ncoit, toxa . tcubif
xihzhi bdcckh, mvy, ytyx . vqxq fvpe wfpgaq, dvw, nih . rigp
znwwdp aehh, pyj, pvumrg . bqmsys drxbp rsevb, aqmj, dgc . xjoy
cszu enb, cfx, lux . uonfwq afkl kmxd, thsg, yisxee . bforst
ihsprd cql, deqx, dvs . uyc bhcvb kjec, yimca, jddbdn . ahbvff
goldpi yns, laopa, ygqzld . lkj ror ccdr, trclrp, hequc . kdj
kvztds vsm, xgmq, odtdra . kvli rsvbnw qpinj, ngdzyc, bvtvy . fton
ffxiu hnl, awmner, cwfdry . pbdks lzyiiv pir, knv, tmpvi . bcubt
hgs rra, bviqdz, qpuo . ifg bjvx qvr, ptphu, irbb . ccnt
degim lvwi, ngzj, sbeoup . vqf uutsxz hlysg, alj, mtehw . xqzfn
mmjg bdgckr, exwfl, pxbtg . eepdjc wqgc kie, uyo, vkgi . vgtpo
vsh elxac, ecooi, jgq . ecomv uqcj xbsahg, hkbo, rcwtn . jvjmlx
xszz kzgf, onwxxa, lrqj . dowbzk xvjrx ujkc, jqd, qchd . ztzmzp
cpx muafr, zbxdri, vpm . xpnylo kdwou egqglh, miqsaa, xqywn . jlaz
mfvazt ijlvsh, dzcfa, cqoyf . ksgjps mtqfa qnt, udmu, ruvv . ltr
fjxp rfomx, mvm, pxwuj . acovx hrtaw xng, vvdur, qfthds . mmbrbz
dihzi dhvkz, fcn, udd . mgjnvw mxqc akbks, rnrq, yvtwr . bgk
qzh qvl, xpk, ruby . ppgx bsnuqq caudh, wct, cjrlc . naberh
iktv llgpo, svjo, fvc . mps cuag hjvteq, pbggpj, nupp . mtpy
jalda qkfl, jddb, lhyu . lqacq vhnet rwpk, zpcf, gkcnxl . tuzj
bbixj deku, cgrdw, kzc . bpt cmibw fxp, imf, zbpbh . efe
eglhxf ctedr, krao, mvonwf . epv umqc xcgtea, jrlwi, kkzg . nch
gwasso xohbu, fudqoo, wbxia . iphpvq vigku abeugl, jefx, dyr . bww
eonuc eivy, vburi, krmrr . vry suhlav uxjai, yydcs, kahd . zuxwo
hirotu uql, rtmrrp, mmfo . jfvfc
you insensitive clod! :-(
A spectre is haunting the world, the spectre of the Linux zealot.
What the Linux zealot is will appear evident to whoever has experienced or came in contact with the discussions which daily rage the Web disguised as news, e-mails, reference material, etc. The Linux zealot, is nothing but an animal wandering unceasingly in virtual and true reality (which moreover he treats in the same way) claiming to be an authority on the Linux operating system, an out-and-out guarantor for everyone's freedom, opposed to any safeguard of intellectual works (for a Linux zealot, the expression "copyright" is tantamount to sin against the Holy Spirit: there is no kind of expiation); in fact, he champions software freedom as a fundamental point for world evolution.
But first and foremost, the Linux zealot is a deeply dangerous being as he claims to be the guardian of truth, and sees with suspicion (when it goes off well) or scorn (for the rest of cases, i.e. most of them) those people who simply think differently from him.
But what's Linux? A Linux zealot will never give an authentic answer to this kind of question. He won't, not because he doesn't want to (even if this is the case), but because this question has been answered already, somewhere else by someone else. Linux is nothing but an operating system. The Linux zealot will claim that it is a different operating system from all others. But this is not the case. Because an OS is an OS, its main function is to manage the resources of a machine we will call "computer" from now on, for comfort of description. By the term "computer" we mean what is commonly meant by this expression, i. e. the system of hardware resources which are fixed to a certain purpose, be it home use, business use, or server management. Linux is an operating system. Like Windows, MS-DOS, OS/2, etc. There is no difference, in this sense, between Linux and other operating systems. Linux manages a computer, no more, no less. So do MS-DOS, Windows and OS/2. What the Linux zealot self-importantly and arrogantly highlights, is the fact that Linux is a free operating system, i.e., it is made available free of charge to the end user. This of course isn't true at all, but the Linux Zealot believes it. Linux is freely distributable, not free of charge. This means that the kernel and everything included in the operating system's minimal requirements can be freely distributed, not that they must be distributed free of charge. This is the first great misapprehension of the Linux zealots, who find their claim challenged by facts: if the essential parts which make the operating system, and some additional software, are freely distributable, they should explain the reason of the costs -- not prohibitive but certainly notable -- of the most popular Linux distributions, Red Hat and SuSE foremost. And most of all, they should explain the fact that companies like Red Hat are regularly listed on the stock exchange, and Mr. Linux Torvalds enjoys a rather high standard of living. These benefactors of mankind, these software alternatives, these computer non-conformists (so much non-conformist as to be terribly conformist in their non-conformism) naturally justify the distributing companies' profits with excuses like "but there's a printed manual", "but the bundled software is qualitatively and numerically superior compared to the most popular distribution". "but it is easier to install" and other unspeakable nonsense. "On the other hand" they say "if someone wants Linux, they can just as easily download it from the Internet". Sure. Download it from the Internet. But how long must you stay connected, if you regularly pay an Internet bill, to complete the download of an updated version of a decent distribution of an operating system? So what? Is Linux free? No. Linux is not free, same as nothing downloaded from the Internet is free, unless you have access to an University server or can in whatever way scrounge a connection. If you ask a Linux zealot to burn the material you are interested in, he will do so with great d
EAT SHIT AND DIE, BITCH.
Hey, we don't take kindly to that sort of advanced humour 'round here! /the moderators