Slashdot Mirror
Reviving the Firewall Design Program?
rcha101 asks: "I'm not sure if many of you are aware but Robert L. Ziegler use to host (IMHO) the best online firewall configuration tool (formerly available here here, check out the link now for his sad synopsis) until recently when he decided to pull the plug on it. I have since been trying to contact him in an effort to get this tool back online and develop the IPFW2 side of it (correct some of the rules, add extra features to it etc) but have had no luck. Does anyone know how to contact him? Has anyone else been in a similar situation? What web tools do you use that could suddenly disappear overnight? Robert are you out there?"
I just discovered today that a fine site (http://www2.gol.com/users/tame/swing/examples/) with losts of custom swing components went 404.
I was able to retrieve some stuff using the wayback machine, but it is still a shame to see the site itself go.
Maybe the poster should try the wayback machine too.
If only I could come up with a good sig
.sig: file not found
Here's a brief synopsis:
I never made a dime from my obviously useful program, and therefore will not work on it any further because I need to feed myself and my family.
Because I'm so bitter about it, I'm completely closing up shop, and denying anyone any further benefit from my, until recently, free contribution to society.
As far as I'm concerned, you moochers can all go suck it, I'm through.
I don't blame him, he did a lot of work, it was obviously being used by many people who could have afforded hima few luxuries.
But on the other hand, if you don't want to give something away for free, then don't. If you do, then you can't complain about getting nothing in return later - that's simply shortsighted.
The linux router project guy is the epitome of the, "I didn't mean to get nothing back from something I gave away" pitiful rants.
-Adam
I don't know much about the project, but his attitude about his project and users is absolutley deplorable.
First off, he shouldn't think of his users as moochers. First off, he was offering it for free. You give something away, you shouldn't ever expect anything back. Second, I'm sure there were many people, like the poster of this article, who are grateful users, but just haven't voiced their opinion. Personally, I'd rather have one message in my inbox about 5 reasons why my software sucks than 100 messages about reasons why it rocks.
Things like feature requests are very common for an admin of a project. And many people out there are rude, or just not conciderate, and their requests may seem like demands to some people. As far as technical support of the software, setup a listserv and make it community support. I would expect any message I send to any project admin about technical support to be brushed off.
One more thing, if he made this an open source project and is now hording the source, that is just wrong. The open source community is just that, you give to them and they provide peer review. True it doesn't always end up that way, but maybe that's because you didn't manage to get the right users.
Anyway, I think he needs to pick up a copy of The Cathedrial and the Bazaar. That may shed a little light onto his problem.
Mewyn Dy'ner