Slashdot Mirror


Real Announces Helix Grant Winners

elaineg writes "We're happy to announce the 2003 Helix Community Grant Program winners for development of open source projects on Helix. They are to UC Santa Barbara for providing robust multicast support in Helix, the Justin Karneges and Ulrich Staudinger at the Jabber Foundation for Jabber/Helix integration, Robert Kaye at MusicBrainz for integrated metadata cleanup in the Helix DNA Client, Jesse Schell at Carnegie Mellon University for integrating the Panda3D game and simulation engine with Helix, and the Xiph.org Foundation for further R&D and support of Ogg Vorbis and Ogg Theora codecs, including Helix DNA platform integration. More details can be found in the press release. Also, in vaguely related news, we've released Milestone 2 of the Helix Player for Linux." Helix styles itself as "the first open multi-format platform for digital media creation, delivery and playback", and has been created by Real Networks.

37 of 149 comments (clear)

  1. Its good to see by HappyCitizen · · Score: 5, Insightful

    That Org Vorbiss R&D is given an award. Its a good format IMO

    --
    http://www.beyourowneviloverlord.tk
    http://www.frozenchickenthrowing.tk
    http://www.killercamel.tk
    1. Re:Its good to see by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      And the winner is!!!!...

      Buffering...

  2. They should have more screenshots. by Chuck+Chunder · · Score: 5, Insightful

    If this one is anything to go by it looks like they may have created something better than the old players from hell.

    Simply a menu bar, a playback area and some control buttons. Lovely.

    --
    Boffoonery - downloadable Comedy Benefit for Bletchley Park
    1. Re:They should have more screenshots. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

      a menubar playback area and some control buttons, simplicity is a positive. what else is necessary, its a media player. not an organizer etc.

    2. Re:They should have more screenshots. by rgammon_real · · Score: 4, Informative

      The UI is written in glade, and the helix engine is wrapped in a GtkWidget-based GObject.

      This makes it easy to create your own UI or even custom player

      UI feedback is welcome on the users mailing list, users@player.helixcommunity.org, which you can subscribe to on https://player.helixcommunity.org.

      --
      Check out Helix Player
  3. Re:Wow... by Rosco+P.+Coltrane · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Aaww well yes, they do suck, but I also remember a time when they were the only maker of serious software to play video on Linux, and I was really grateful to be able to play realaudio and realvideo files on my then badly supported pet OS.

    I guess it's like a moped : when you're a kid, you feel the biggest guy in town on your little buzzing machine, then you get your driver's license and your first car, and your hate the thing for taking up so much space in the garage and stinking the place up with that awful gasoline stench. But remember you once liked it though ...

    --
    "A door is what a dog is perpetually on the wrong side of" - Ogden Nash
  4. Re:Helix Player milestone 2 by DA-MAN · · Score: 4, Informative

    Here is the direct link for the download!

    http://forms.helixcommunity.org/helixdnaclient/

    Here is a quick tutorial on making an rpm of it.
    http://fedoranews.org/tchung/helixplayer/

    And since there is no Windows version of the HelixPlayer, here is the link to the RealOne Player:

    http://www.realone.com/R/RC.012004realhome_1_1_2_1 _1_2.ecomm...R/forms.real.com/real/realone/realone .html?beta_bypass=true&bbits=true&type=dlrhap_bb&& pp=home&src=012004realhome_1_1_2_1_1_2

    --
    Can I get an eye poke?
    Dog House Forum
  5. Call me a skeptic, but Real... by Myself · · Score: 4, Insightful

    ...must have something up their sleeve. Everything Real has ever done has been user-hostile, with the express aim of taking control of your computer away from you.

    Without some absurdly good justification (a new board of directors with Mother Theresa as chairperson?), I can't believe that Real would do anything "open" without an ulterior motive.

    1. Re:Call me a skeptic, but Real... by joe_bruin · · Score: 3, Interesting

      okay, here it is:
      real is getting their ass handed to them in the formats market. divx/xvid/mpeg4 format files are everywhere. quicktime sorenson is thriving in its own nitch. realvideo formats are nowhere except for low end streaming, and that market is drying up.
      in the music field, mp3 is the king, but wma and itunes m4a/m4p are catching up. ogg is out there for the geeks. meanwhile, real's audio and drm formats are decaying. their portable strategy is even worse (having sat in on some meetings with them, in a nutshell it is "[insert platform] is not currently supported").
      their players are spyware-ridden, buggy (buffering...), and annoying (being a pioneer in the player "skinning disease" that every media player seems to suffer from now). smart users avoid them like the plague, and stupid users, well, they have windows media player already installed.

      the only reason to have the real player installed on your machine right now is if there is some real content that you need to see. real's motive here is to make their streaming servers the choice of the geeks. microsoft is edging them out of the streaming server, but the problem is, you need to run windows to serve windows media format streams, and they are not (officially) supported on linux/unix clients. by giving the source (for what, really, a streaming server and client? big deal), they get cross platform compatibility, good pr, some free porting efforts, and a last foothold in their dying market. now, when your boss comes to you and says "we need a streaming video server", will you say "let's put up a winxp machine and stream asf", or will you say "real helix server on one of our linux boxes"?

      the fact is, they still suck. but at least now you don't have to rely on their shitty software as much as previously, at least making them a viable option. that's what their up to. whether it succeeds is yet to be determined.

    2. Re:Call me a skeptic, but Real... by rgammon_real · · Score: 2, Informative

      I'd also add that the news page talks a lot about how helix is being used by our partners. Worth a read! https://www.helixcommunity.org/

      To name the top few, in order of appearance:

      --
      Check out Helix Player
    3. Re:Call me a skeptic, but Real... by kforeman · · Score: 5, Informative

      Guys, its really simple. Over 65% of our revenue now comes from consumer content services like RealOne SuperPass (content from CNN, ABCNEWS, Major League Baseball, etc) and Rhaposdy (streaming music service) This business model has allowed us to build great free(gratis) and open source (libre) software products, like the Helix Player. Kevin Foreman GM, Helix, RealNetworks

      --
      Kevin Foreman
  6. What the? by Chuck+Chunder · · Score: 5, Insightful

    You seem to be saying that getting Realmedia to adopt open formats is a bad thing?

    Sure, we'd all like all the codecs to be open but in the meantime proprietary+open is better than proprietary alone. Pre-existing proprietary codecs are never going to be opened. Whatever they or we want sorting out all the patents and licences to do so would be an unbelievable amount of effort. You can't just "undo" proprietary development like that.

    What we can do however is help Realmedia see the value of Open formats here and now. We can't change their history but we can try and guide their future.

    --
    Boffoonery - downloadable Comedy Benefit for Bletchley Park
    1. Re:What the? by ThogScully · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I wish I had mod points to mod you up. I know the general consensus here is that Real is a bad company, but personally, I like being able to listen/watch streams in Linux because my other option is essentially not to listen/watch streams.

      I'm glad someone's giving me an option and the fact that they're using open protocol standards also only emphasizes that some websites may now choose that format in the comfort of knowing there is a bigger installed base.
      -N

      --
      I've nothing to say here...
    2. Re:What the? by Chuck+Chunder · · Score: 3, Insightful
      I'd rather that they either go completely open and be embraced as a standard, or else stay completely proprietary so they can die out as quickly as possible and be replaced by open formats.
      And I'd rather travel to work in a flying car, get paid a million dollars for an hours work and drive home to my wives Sarah Michelle Geller and Jennifer Love Hewitt for a bit of nookie.

      Unfortunatly I live in the real world.

      • Real cannot feasibly open up their closed codecs.
      • They cannot simply dump their closed codecs in favour of open ones as they clearly must continue to support existing customers.
      • There is no indication that if Real were to die there would be any great migration to open formats. Instead there would be a migration to the only other format that has an existing installation base. Microsoft Media Player.
      Real providing access to open formats provides a migration path. It's incredibly hard to get people to switch from one thing to another without one of those.
      --
      Boffoonery - downloadable Comedy Benefit for Bletchley Park
    3. Re:What the? by phr1 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I don't see why they can't open the closed codecs. Other companies open formerly closed programs or formats all the time. Even Flash has been opened, fron what I understand (the format, not the Macromedia implementation).

    4. Re:What the? by waxed · · Score: 2, Informative

      Even if RealNetworks wanted to open up the codecs completely (not to say they don't), they couldn't; some chunks of code inside the codecs are not RealNetworks property. There are technologies utilized in the codecs that are owned, copyrighted and patented by third parties (Intel, Sony, etc.) and licensed and built upon by RealNetworks. RealNetworks almost certainly does not have their permission to release the code they don't actually own.

  7. Re:Helix Player milestone 2 by glassesmonkey · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I think the link to the windows Real One player should be a *hint* to everyone about what this company is about.. Note: the link is NOT http://realone.com/download/realoneplayer_free.exe but rather a game to trick the average person into going somewhere they did not want to go.

    Does anyone think all the recent PR on slashdot in favor of Real (including quotes about having changed their ways and favorable comments from Helix community) is that much different from the clicky trickery just to download the player? It's just more of the same "try our great new player".. You just wait for the other RealOne(TM) shoe to drop.

  8. Whither Ogg Theora? by Dr.Dubious+DDQ · · Score: 5, Informative

    I'm beginning to think Xiph may fade and disappear at this rate. The Theora mailing lists appear to be dead, there've been no 'Ogg Traffic' updates for a couple of months, and Theora's still at "Alpha 2" half-a-year after it was originally scheduled to be "finished"....

    I'd played with the alphas and liked the video and sound quality. Seemed like a really promising format, so hopefully they won't let Theora languish and will use some of the grant money to get back to work on it, but I wouldn't hold my breath...

    1. Re:Whither Ogg Theora? by marshall_j · · Score: 2, Informative
      The milstones for the Helix player suggest that support for Theora will be included as at milestone 4 - june 2004.

      Quote:

      Media Types Supported:
      • All modern RV and RA codecs (RV10, RA10, RV9, RV8, RA8, RVG2, RV7)
      • MPEG4 enabled (codec not bundled)
      • MP3, H.263, G2 Audio, Ogg Vorbis, SDP
      • Full SMIL 2.0 Support
      • AIFF, wav, au, RealText, Flash, RealPix
      • Ogg Theora Support
    2. Re:Whither Ogg Theora? by evilviper · · Score: 2, Insightful
      and Theora's still at "Alpha 2" half-a-year after it was originally scheduled to be "finished"....

      Yes, development is going slow, unfortunately, but I'm sure it's not stopped. My main concern is not that it won't get finished (I'm sure it will) but that once it's finally done, it'll be so far behind the curve that nobody will want to use it.

      Theora isn't dead. There is Theora support in Xine, MPlayer, and I'm sure other media players.

      Personally, I wish they would have just released a Unix VP3.2 encoder/player, instead of wasting a lot of time on trivial improvements. Windows users can use the VP3.2 Quicktime plugin (along with a quicktime Vorbis Plugin) and create patent-free movies, but us Unix folks are left out in the cold.
      --
      Slashdot gets worse every day... Pipedot: News for nerds, without the corporate slant
    3. Re:Whither Ogg Theora? by vikman · · Score: 3, Informative

      Actually, Theora support in Helix Player is almost ready :) Look for it in a nightly build soon. The milestone schedule will change to show it when it gets in. Thanks to the support of our users and community, there are somethings that have gone faster than expected within the project.

      --
      --
  9. Re:What is this crap? by brain159 · · Score: 3, Informative

    Immediately underneath their blue cross-bar under their tab navigation stuff, at the right, are the magic words "Free RealOne Player".

    If you look closely in the Preferences dialog you can also disable the "check for new messages" junk which is also a major source of pissing-everyone-off.

  10. Mplayer is your friend by adrianbaugh · · Score: 4, Interesting

    It plays almost everything I need it to play. As of pre3 the exception seems to be realaudio streams (which play but seem to lose sync after a while). I'm sure that'll be sorted out before long though - props to the developers!

    --
    "'I pass the test,' she said. 'I will diminish, and go into the West, and remain Galadriel.'"
    - JRR Tolkien.
  11. Re:Let me be the first to say by Duncan+Howard · · Score: 2, Informative

    Ok, I understand what you were downloading. Splay and helixplay are "sample" applications. They are provided with the Helix DNA client source to provide developers with examples of how to work with client core. I thought your were talking about the GTK Linux player (http://player.helixcommunity.org), which has not been ported to Windows.

  12. /. conformism wins out over independent thought? by jensend · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Look- everybody knows Real's mass market players have been horrible for quite some time. However, whenever anybody mentions Helix on /., any rational discussion is drowned out by a horde of people who haven't looked into Helix at all but want to get in their "R3AL I5 T3H 5UX0RZ!" me-too comment. Helix looks like a really solid effort, and the linux player is rather nice. Hopefully management will let them release a Windows port of the helix player as they intend to do.

  13. Just say NO to Real; use these alternate tools by coltrane679 · · Score: 2, Troll

    Real is hideous spyware, bloatware and crapware; the most recent version is worse than ever:

    http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/articles/A2 41 90-2004Jan17.html

    Instead, use these tools if Real Media is all that is available:

    Player: http://sourceforge.net/project/showfiles.php?group _id=82303&package_id=84358

    Capture and convert to AVI: Use Real 7ime, more about it here:

    http://emoney.al.ru/capture-streaming-video-and- au dio/record-streaming-video-real-video.htm

    And if you want to see all the options for capturing streaming media:

    http://all-streaming-media.com/record-video-stre am /all-streaming-video-recording-software.htm

    FUCK REAL by any and all means possible.

  14. Gstreamer.. by Ploum · · Score: 2, Flamebait

    Well, I prefer spending my time to develop applications using gstreamer and feeding the gstreamer's bugzilla.

    I've seen some mail about helix on the gstreamer and on the matroska dev list.

    It's very interesting, because the only thing that helix folks can say is : "Helix is really better because we have the best codec ever made : RV9. And if you join Helix, you can build a player that play RV9 file. If you don't join Helix, your player will suxx because it will not be able to play proprietary encoded RV9 videos and RV9 is the best codec that everybody will be using."

    I maybe wrong because my english is not perfect. I hope to be wrong... If not, please forget helix. it's disgusting...

  15. Re:What is this crap? by stefanlasiewski · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Until the realaudio and realvideo formats are opened, integrating those other formats is just helping Realmedia Corp. co-opt the open formats.

    Of you don't want groups to co-opt your open format, then don't release an open format.

    I thought the whole point of open formats to be used?

    --
    "Can of worms? The can is open... the worms are everywhere."
  16. Re:Helix Player milestone 2 by rgammon_real · · Score: 2, Informative

    DR5 (Developer Release 5) is a September 22, 2003 release of the client sample players, splay (no gui -- video window only), and helixplay (cross platform basic gui, uses motif on linux).

    It does not include the hxplay, the gtk-based linux player.

    You should register on helixcommunity.org, as that gives you access to the web support forums, mailing lists, and issue tracker.

    But, if you insist on using a build from the nightly builds download page, your best bet would be Table "Tarball for 01/15/04", row "linux-2.2-libc6-gcc32-i586" column "HelixPlayer"

    --
    Check out Helix Player
  17. Totally Lost by Compenguin · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I'm totally lost here, I've registered all agreed to two seperate licenses but I can't find the source to M2. A little help here.

    1. Re:Totally Lost by Compenguin · · Score: 2, Informative

      I got the binary installer, but what's confusing me is that the Release Notes say the source is availible but on the download page all I see are "hxplay-linux-2.2-libc6-gcc32-i586.bin" and "Test Plans." I'd love to get at the source because some minor things are driving me nuts.

    2. Re:Totally Lost by rgammon_real · · Score: 4, Informative

      The easiest way to get the source is here.

      You want the "01/21/04" table, "source" row, "HelixPlayer" column.

      You should be able to build this tarball by untarring it and typing make.

      It'd also be a good idea to subscribe to the dev@player.helixcommunity.org mailing list here

      You can also ask questions on irc.helixcommunity.org channel #player if you have feedback, or need a hand with the build system.

      Hope to see you on the mailing lists!

      --
      Check out Helix Player
  18. Re:What is this crap? by kforeman · · Score: 3, Informative

    We are building the industry's best Linux and open source media player. Yes, we haven't open source our RealAudio and RealVideo codecs because we can't. We don't own all of the IP inside of those codecs. However, the Helix Player with Ogg and SMIL support are 100% open source. Let me say that again. 100% open source. We are pleased to be working with the open source community to finally standardize on a legitimate media player that plays all formats, even those that are not open, like MP3, MPEG4, Flash, RealVideo 10, RealAudio 10, etc. Take Milestone 2 for a run at www.helixcommunity.org. Kevin Foreman GM Helix, RealNetworks

    --
    Kevin Foreman
  19. Umm... what about the Grant Program? by elaineg · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I manage the Helix Community Grant Program, and am really looking forward to working with the grant recipient choices. However, I am part of a larger team that's trying to effect change w/in Real... part of this effort is sharing the Slashdot community's thoughts with the exec team. Constructive comments are easier to convey than cranky responses about past perceptions. Help us out! We want to build products & release code that is for the greater good. With your support we can make this happen. Start here: what do you think about our Grant Recipient choices? Have you checked out the Helix Player project, or other projects in the Helix community?, Please advise...

  20. Real is NOT a software company by brrrrrr · · Score: 2, Informative

    Just a small comment, though most people know real from the realplayer and helixserver, Real is primarily a content-broker. Their players support their business to buy and sell content to the likes of BT and DT. To me it therefore seems that want to move (part) the SW business (the development of which is a cost-centre) to the outside world, thereby increasing their overall operating margins.

    I think this is a smart way to work (from a business point of view) but ethically questionable.

    --
    brrrrrr it's cold
  21. Re:/. conformism wins out over independent thought by jsebrech · · Score: 3, Insightful

    "So what?" Who needs Realmedia? There's a new, open-source player? So what? It might be useful for viewing the decaying Real content still out there on the net, but why should we promote the continued use of this crap?

    What cross-platform content format would you suggest then? WMV is not an option due to it being windows-only (there's a mac version, but it's been discontinued). Quicktime has no linux version (though you can get it to run through crossover, but performance in that case of horrible). All the other formats are either not available on all platforms, unsuitable for streaming, or too difficult to get running.

    Like it or not, in the real world, rm is the ONLY format that will easily play on all the major platforms.

    Maybe if ogg theora or ogg tarkin ever get off the ground that will change, but given how ogg vorbis is still a niche player, despite it being a clearly superior and completely open/free format that has been out for quite a while, this seems incredibly unlikely.