Experts Critique SERVE Internet Voting System
linuxwrangler writes "SFGate is reporting that a critique by four security experts claims that SERVE, a system being developed to allow US citizens overseas to vote via the Internet, is so vulnerable to attacks that it should be scrapped. The other six experts who examined the system declined to issue a report. Nevertheless, the Pentagon stands by the system and plans to use in in elections next month."
Given that the US can't seem to get in-person voting right (Goooo Diebold), I doubt they're really ready for remote voting.
HOW'S MY POSTING? CALL 1-800-POSTING
We'll be counting hanging TCP connections?
...100% of respondents (in this case, all qualified) say the system sucks, and the people in power say "Nah, go with it!"
The optimistic interpretation: The pentagon is full of idiots.
The pessimistic interpretation: The pentagon is full of corrupt people.
My interpretation: The pentagon is full of corrupt idiots.
2) Allow Voting
3) Announce result
Using this task order means that 2) is redundant and therefore has no impact on the result, therefore you do not need a secure system and can save money by purcasing a system off your friends
That's what my asshole's been doing all along.
Most Americans don't vote, so I think it's only fitting that the people who are most effected by American policy now have a chance to have their votes counted!
NarratorDan
"If you're not confused by quantum mechanics, you really don't understand it." - Niels Bohr
... not working right when 700,000 Privates with the last name of Chen vote for the Communist party candidate. Who needs a Manchurian Candidate when you can just elect Chairman Jia Qinglin himself? :-P
~UP
Eat the Path.
A-A-A-WHOOP!