Slashdot Mirror


Microwave Steelmaking

Makarand writes "Researchers at the Michigan Technological University are working on a low-cost steelmaking process which uses microwaves to heat iron ore instead of conventional heating. Their steelmaking facility was made of magnetrons from six household microwaves wired together and an electric arc furnace. When fed iron oxide and coal, the microwave energy could reduce the iron ore to iron within minutes and the electric arc furnace smelted the iron and coal into steel. The steel industry is taking a closer look at this new process which could cut steel production costs by upto 50%."

67 comments

  1. Science can do anything! by Zemrec · · Score: 4, Funny

    First they find the cure for cancer is the common cold, and now they can put metal in a microwave!! Maybe next they'll find the cause of belly button lint.

    1. Re:Science can do anything! by PD · · Score: 2, Funny

      The cause of belly button lint is belly buttons. There's a 100% positive correlation.

    2. Re:Science can do anything! by foniksonik · · Score: 1

      Actually belly button lint is caused by the common cold, so you see it is in fact a strange ecosystem indeed.

      --
      A fool throws a stone into a well and a thousand sages can not remove it.
    3. Re:Science can do anything! by femto · · Score: 2, Informative

      The belly button lint one's been pretty well solved!

  2. Effect to consumers? by oroshana · · Score: 1, Interesting

    Does anyone think any of the savings will be passed down to consumers?

  3. Good news, if it works by ctr2sprt · · Score: 3, Insightful
    This is great news for US steelmakers. Like all other industries that rely on unskilled labor, steel manufacturers have been in a prolonged slump while business moves overseas. If this works out, we can implement it and become competitive again.

    You see, free trade can do good things for the average worker. Though to be fair "good things" in this case means fewer steelworkers will lose their jobs instead of all of them. Still, it's improvement, and who knows? If our costs really drop by 50%, demand very well could increase enough to justify keeping all the old workers around.

    (I didn't really have anything to say, but the only other posts with scores higher than zero were... Well, if you've been on Slashdot for more than five minutes, you know what they were like.)

    1. Re:Good news, if it works by dnahelix · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Or they can implement it in a 3rd-World country and MAKE EVEN MORE MONEY!

      --
      Slashdot Eds Link Anonymous Posts With Logged Posts
      They Are Vermin Feeding On Each Other's Feces.
      I Hate \.
    2. Re:Good news, if it works by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I don't think that the steel industry relies on unskilled labor. In fact, I think that in general a steel mill wouldn't tolerate "unskilled" people being in the building at all, because they have a tendency to get hurt or fuck things up. True, a lot workers may have not gone to college; but this ain't cotton pickin', folks. Those guys are pretty highly skilled.

    3. Re:Good news, if it works by bluGill · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Not nessicarly. Most third world countries don't have reliable power. If you have molten iron, and the power goes out, you have to empty everything fast, because once it solidifies it will crack the containers when you try to remove it. (as it cools it contracts, when you melt it, it expands. think frozen water)

      Remember too that energy is cheap in the US. I doupt any third world country really has a major advantage there. Perhaps Iceland, with all their geo-thermo, they have already locked up aluminium, but are they third world?

      There are a lot of issues. If you want a custom shape from your supplier it is much easier to get it from one in your town than a third world nation. If your factory is automatied enough, labor costs aren't significant anyway, (it is all skilled labor which you would have to import to the third world country) so what is the point in moving.

      Most of the "japanese" car manufactors have factorys in the US. You can have a profitable manufactoring company in the US, if you run it right.

    4. Re:Good news, if it works by Bob-o-Matic! · · Score: 1

      Just so you know, water expands when it freezes. Put a can of soda in the freezer to verify.

      As for molten iron, I'd bet that as it cools off and solidifies it will contract.

    5. Re:Good news, if it works by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      You are way off base. Big energy consuming operations ANYWHERE in the world supply their own power. Even Ford's assembly plants have their own on-site power plant. Also, if you knew what you were talking about, you would know that there are huge electricity consuming industries in many third world countries, such as refineries and in particular aluminum (bauxite) handling in Venezuela.

      The fact is, building a steel mill is a bigger endeavor than building a power plant. If you build a steel mill, you can build a power plant.

      The real advantage of this may be that it may enable smaller steel mills, not necessarily more efficient ones.

    6. Re:Good news, if it works by dnahelix · · Score: 1

      Thank You.

      --
      Slashdot Eds Link Anonymous Posts With Logged Posts
      They Are Vermin Feeding On Each Other's Feces.
      I Hate \.
    7. Re:Good news, if it works by bluGill · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Right, unfortunatly water is a strange thing, acting very different from most other materials. It hits the minimun density at about 4 degrees C. That is it contracts as it cools until it gets 4, then it starts expanding.

      Iron does in fact contract when it solidifies. As it contracts it pulls more and more iron (okay a very tiny amount more) in. When you heat something containing solid iron, that iron needs to go someplace. Heat from the bottom of a container, and the bottom will melt first, and expand, but there is solid iron above it, so something has to give. Often that is the container.

    8. Re:Good news, if it works by GigsVT · · Score: 1

      I think you mean maximum density, otherwise your sentence doesn't make sense.

      Thanks for the clarification about how something contracting could blow a container... it wasn't clear in your earlier message you were talking about closed containers as such.

      --
      I've had enough abrasive sigs. Kittens are cute and fuzzy.
    9. Re:Good news, if it works by JanneM · · Score: 1

      You do know that most competitors to US steelmakers are in other heavily industrialized countries, don't you? Nothing stopping Sweden, Japan and so on from implementing the same process.

      --
      Trust the Computer. The Computer is your friend.
    10. Re:Good news, if it works by identity0 · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Not nessesarily. Assembly plants and factories don't need much energy compared to smelting/ore refining operations, and I don't think on-site generation is practical for those purposes. I know the big aluminum plants in Oregon are fed off of the grid because they were shut down during the energy crisis in Cali. a while back. All the spare energy from hydro power on the Columbia river was diverted south. Backups were not there because there were no economical way to supply the power needed. Keep in mind that the U.S. probobly has cheaper energy rates for industrial uses than most third world countries because of our existing infastructure and generating plants. Even if you could build a power plant next to the steel mill, will that be cheaper than getting power off the grid in the U.S.?

    11. Re:Good news, if it works by torpor · · Score: 1

      this is great news for 3rd World Countries, too, if it works.

      imagine if Toshiba or Honda or some other such industrial giant were to take these and make a portable steel-mill system the size of a porta-loo? feed it ore and whatever, get steel wire.

      even having low-grade steel for embedding into locally produced cement could make a world of difference to tribes of thirsty people.

      hell, i give it a year before someone takes this technique and puts a 'FAQ/How-To' style site together for the rec.hobby.steelwork DIY crowd...

      --
      ; -- the corruption of government starts with its secrets. a truly free people keep no secrets. --
    12. Re:Good news, if it works by ColaMan · · Score: 2, Informative

      Ok, a few basic principles of steel manufacture.

      In order to make iron, iron ore and coal (well, coke actually) are dropped in layers in an operating blast furnace. The coke burns in the furnace and as a consequence reduces the iron ore to iron, as well as supplying enough heat to keep the contents of the bottom of the furnace molten.

      So, you need coal to make coke to make iron... to make steel and such.

      Bad Things happen if the blast furnace runs out of coke, Very Bad Things in fact, so these pretty much run 24x7, meaning you've normally got a giant stockpile of coal to cover any conceivable loss of supply (normally a few weeks supply).
      So... if you've got all these ludicrous amounts of coal around (stockpiles of 100,000t are not uncommon) and a giant energy requirement, you can easily and economically build an on-site power station to power the rest of the system.

      And the fun part is you can sell your excess capacity to the grid at a profit for a good 10 or 15 years, because you built your plant larger than you needed to allow for growth in your steel mill.

      (Aluminium plants use an entirely different process, of which the only part I know about is they use an obscene amount of electricity and no coal required as in a blast furnace.)

      --

      You are in a twisty maze of processor lines, all alike.
      There is a lot of hype here.
    13. Re:Good news, if it works by larkost · · Score: 2, Informative

      Having toured an aluminum fly casting plant, I saw the gigantic magneto-constrictor melting pots that they use, and was told specifically that they relied on Wisconsin Electric for their power.

      What they do is to have a bunch of huge electromagnets and pulse them rapidly. This causes the electrons in the container to jitter producing the heat needed. It was all very interesting, and molten aluminum is one of the most beautiful thins I have aver seen.

    14. Re:Good news, if it works by dago · · Score: 1

      Well, you could have explain with you believe the US steelmakers will be the only steelmakers to benefit from that.

      Just because it was invented in Michigan doesn't limit its use to the US. Some other big steelmaking countries have also a lot of power ...

      --
      #include "coucou.h"
    15. Re:Good news, if it works by SubtleNuance · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Though to be fair "good things" in this case means fewer steelworkers will lose their jobs instead of all of them. Still, it's improvement, and who knows? If our costs really drop by 50%, demand very well could increase enough to justify keeping all the old workers around.

      Bzzt wrong. You see, in $under-industrialized-nation the workers will work for $0.50 an hour in this Microwave Steel Foundry. Just like they do in the current foundries.

      Your assertion that reducing costs "here" will keep jobs "here... not so, those technologies will just be used abroad to reduce *THERE* costs as well.

      As long as there is inequality in labour standards, pay-rates, environmental-standards, taxes, health and safety standards, etc etc etc capitalists will seek to exploit the weakest standards -- this is why 'free trade' does not work.

      On the other hand, Fair Trade is possible by realizing this reality and seeing that these things are considered in the economy, else, the lowest 'standards' will always get the job.... this is called "The Race to the Bottom." Its what is going to slap America's middle class in the face shortly.

    16. Re:Good news, if it works by merlin_jim · · Score: 1

      (as it cools it contracts, when you melt it, it expands. think frozen water)

      You are incorrect sir; water and it's frozen form ice are the exception to the rule in this case.

      Water is at its densest at 4 degrees Celsius; below that, the dimagnetic structure of the molecules comes into play to form six-sided crystals that are actually less dense than the energetic but non-magnetically aligned water.

      This is why ice floats in water, instead of sinking. It's also why ponds don't freeze solid in the winter, and why we have no clue how to put someone into suspended animations and safely revive them yet.

      --
      I am disrespectful to dirt! Can you see that I am serious?!
  4. Efficieny by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Umm, last time I my microwave oven, it had an efficiency of about 50% (1500W in=>800W RF out). I'm wondering if the researcher has already counted that in?

    1. Re:Efficieny by bluGill · · Score: 4, Interesting

      If you bursh up on your thermodynamics you will notice that simple fuels (say coal) cannot reach 50% efficency). Iron melts close to the flame tempature of some fuels. Run the calculations of efficency, and 50% looks really good.

      Of course real industry uses electric a lot. However resisance (ohms law), while in theory 100% efficent has downsides. The heating elements are fragil, and that is assuming you can find one that doesn't melt at less than the tempature of liquid iron. Typically carbon arc furances are used, which means you replace carbon rods once in a while.

      Induction heating is common in industry. I'm not sure where, or for what purposes, but I know it is used. I don't know how it compares to this process.

    2. Re:Efficieny by HotNeedleOfInquiry · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Induction heating is not used in bulk steelmaking. It's very useful for heating materials in a vacuum and for heating the surface skin of steel. By only heating the surface skin, you can harden it and leave the insides tough and non-brittle. Or "crunchy on the outside, chewy in the center" as a metalurgical engineer would say.

      --
      "Eve of Destruction", it's not just for old hippies anymore...
    3. Re:Efficieny by GigsVT · · Score: 1

      Isn't this microwave technology just another form of induction heating really? Except the freuency is higher, so the skin effect is even worse.

      Something doesn't add up here.

      --
      I've had enough abrasive sigs. Kittens are cute and fuzzy.
  5. Re:not to... by danalien · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    hot diggidy, *woohhaa* competition feels great .... but coming fith doesn't :-)

    --
    I don't claim I know more than I know, and if you know you know more than I know, then by all means, let me know.
  6. My liege? by NanoGator · · Score: 4, Funny

    " The steel industry is taking a closer look at this new process which could cut steel production costs by upto 50%"

    I'm glad somebody finally hit that research button. I can't make any more villagers.

    --
    "Derp de derp."
    1. Re:My liege? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      LOL.

    2. Re:My liege? by s7726 · · Score: 1

      I'm gunna second that LOL

  7. For america lets hope not by SmallFurryCreature · · Score: 1, Interesting
    Steel is already dirt cheap with american steel plants unable to compete. Granted this partly because americans make lousy workers and the plants are hopelessly outdated but any savings would be needed to just survive.

    Oh and with lousy workers I mean that americans will keep on insisting on being paid more then a starving wage and refuse to do double shifts. The rotters.

    --

    MMO Quests are like orgasms:

    You may solo them, I prefer them in a group.

    1. Re:For america lets hope not by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Insightful

      This story is yet another example of what makes the USA great.

      The inventor, Jiann-Yang (Jim) Hwang, came from Taiwan to the U.S. to pursue his graduate studies. (Here's his resume.) He graduates from Purdue with a Ph.D., and 20 years later, he's a professor of materials science at Michigan Technological University, and is adding to the collective innovating efforts of our nation.

      Personally, I'm all for smart, hard-working people immigrating to the U.S. and staying here. All those temp workers in the technical industry who have come over here from India? All those people from Ecuador who are willing to work like dogs in the restaurant industry? All those people from Eastern Europe who are filled with the entrepreneurial sprit? Don't give them visas, make them citizens!

    2. Re:For america lets hope not by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Amen!

  8. This gives me an idea by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You could use a microwave to pop popcorn! It might sound outlandish to some, but if it can melt steel, a microwave might just be able to pop popcorn. Perhaps someone with a physics background might care to comment as to the feasibility of my concept.

    1. Re:This gives me an idea by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I haven't went so far as to try it with popcorn, but I have boiled water with a microwave, and someone else I know cooked some new fangled food called "Hot Pockets".

  9. since no one else jumped on this one by maddh · · Score: 3, Funny
    ...eliminating the need for high-cost coke.

    finished rehab?

  10. Implications for other planets? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Since this technique is a lot more efficient than using conventional methods, how feasible would it be to make a portable steelmaking machine? Say.. that was small enough to be lifted by rocket to another planet.

    The idea being, of course, that you feed rock and electricity in one end of a smallish box and get steel out the other. Would this be useful for making a base on the moon or mars? Huh?

    1. Re:Implications for other planets? by dbrutus · · Score: 1

      I never knew there were extraterrestrial sources of coal.

      You almost had me there.

    2. Re:Implications for other planets? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually, do a google search for "non-biogenic origin of coal" Some recent research casts doubt about the supposed biogenic origin of hydrocarbon based substances such as coal and oil.

    3. Re:Implications for other planets? by temojen · · Score: 1

      Most of which is based on "Creation Science".

    4. Re:Implications for other planets? by Patrik_AKA_RedX · · Score: 1

      They might be able to replace the coke in the process. The coke provides the heat and the reducing gasses (Iron ore is an oxide: Fe2O3) for the process.
      The problem with off-world steel production could be oxigen. You need oxigen to reduce the amount of carbon (from around 5% to 0.06%-2%) in the iron.

    5. Re:Implications for other planets? by kippy · · Score: 1

      Since steel is just iron and carbon (as far as I know), you've got all you need in the air and dust of Mars. First you react out the oxygen from the CO2 air, collect the graphite, breath the oxygen. That's old school chemistry. The soil contains a good amount of what amounts to rust dust. You can also react off the oxygen to get pure iron or this new magic machine may be able to do it.

      Once you've got the iron from the dirt and carbon from the air, this new do-hicky seems like it'll take care of the rest with the help of your local nuclear reactor.

      It sounds to me like a self sufficient Mars settlement just got quite a bit easier at least from a construction point of view.

  11. Sadly Companies are Greedy by Bruha · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Why would they rehire american workers if they get another way to raise their profits?

    1. Re:Sadly Companies are Greedy by ctr2sprt · · Score: 1
      Because most developing countries don't have the resources to deal with high-tech equipment like giant microwaves. Sometimes it's not just a matter of knowing how to do something, it's being capable, in terms of logistics, of getting it done. They would practically have to build the factory in the US and then ship it by boat. The skilled labor that's required simply isn't available elsewhere. And that's assuming it's possible to run and maintain the plant with unskilled native labor, or at least that you don't need to export (from the US) too many skilled jobs.

      If you do all the math, I suspect it's cheaper to bite the bullet and do it here. Of course, the unions could help that along by agreeing to take a pay cut (or hell, forego raises for a few years), but that's never in a million years going to happen.

    2. Re:Sadly Companies are Greedy by foniksonik · · Score: 1

      The bigger problem isn't that US Steel companies use offshore labor... it's that US companies buy Steel from offshore Steel companies because US Steel is so damn expensive to make as US workers demand high wages and benefits. So if US Steel can reduce the cost of manufacturing then they can keep producing steel and compete with foreign steel companies. OF course this won't last long as foreign companies will soon discover or recreate the technology and then it will once again be a wage war.

      --
      A fool throws a stone into a well and a thousand sages can not remove it.
  12. I read the article and I'm confused... by HotNeedleOfInquiry · · Score: 4, Interesting
    The article talks about replacing the blast furnace with this microwave-based device and using it to make steel. Well, a blast furnace doesn't make steel, it makes pig iron, a different and much less useful material. According to what I've read, another process such as a bessemer converter is needed to turn the pig iron into steel.

    I seem to recall that you have to blow hot air or oxygen through the melt to burn out excess carbon to convert the pig iron to steel. Maybe he hasn't gotten that far developing the process.

    If indeed he has found a way to go from ore straight to steel, this is a pretty valuable process. There just isn't enough information to tell.

    --
    "Eve of Destruction", it's not just for old hippies anymore...
    1. Re:I read the article and I'm confused... by rainwalker · · Score: 2, Informative

      He then put iron oxide and coal inside. In a matter of minutes, the microwave energy reduced the iron ore to iron, and the electric arc furnace smelted the iron and coal into steel.

      Sounds like he did, (IANAMetallurgist), although you are right, the article is really vague. Amusing how two adjacent sentences refer to adding "iron oxide" and "iron ore", which are completely different.

    2. Re:I read the article and I'm confused... by Drishmung · · Score: 3, Interesting
      Even so, steel is very cheap to manufacture. By the ton, it is one of the cheapest structural materials. And I mean mild steel here, not pig iron. By contrast, Al and it's alloys are far more expensive, and plastics even more so.

      However, most people are not very interested in mild steel by the ton. They want manufactured goods, and there things change. The hardness, toughness and high melting point of steel make it relatively expensive to manufacture. So much so that it's not really worth re-cycling iron scrap in small quantities---the raw material is so cheap that the processing and transportation costs make it uneconomic. It's easy to re-cycle beer cans though---just melt them at (relatively) low temperature and you have your raw material back for much less than it costs to process bauxite.

      Plastics, despite the high raw material cost are typically extremely cheap to manufacture (though often expensive to recycle for various reasons).

      So, if you can halve the cost of making mild steel, or even the cost of making pig iron, that's not going to add up to a lot of saving on the cost of your new car. It won't even halve the cost of the product leaving the steel factory's gates, since that product is , AFAIK, not 'raw' steel, but some form of at least partially manufactured product such as steel plate at the very least.

      --
      Protoplasm. Quiet Protoplasm. I like quiet protoplasm.
    3. Re:I read the article and I'm confused... by pipingguy · · Score: 1

      I seem to recall that you have to blow hot air or oxygen through the melt to burn out excess carbon to convert the pig iron to steel. Maybe he hasn't gotten that far developing the process.

      Yeah, that's sort-of right (within my limited understanding of the process). One of the problems with blowing air or O2 through the tuyeres is accretion. Do you know what a pneumatic puncher is and how it works?

  13. Hehe! by Discoflamingo13 · · Score: 1

    Well, nobody has mentioned that you're not supposed to put steel things in the microwave yet, either.

    1. Re:Hehe! by Patrik_AKA_RedX · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Why not? As long as there aren't sharp points to it, you can put spoons and such in a wave. I usualy put a spoon in a cup when I heat it in a wave. (Supposingly this prevents that parts in the liquid superheat and splash hot liquid around when disturbed.)

  14. Did they see sparks when the microware was on by GrassyKnowl · · Score: 1

    Did the professor see sparks when he turned on the microware with the iron inside?

    Mine produces sparks when I put aluminum foil in the appliance and turn it on.

    Disclaimer:
    Kids, don't try this at home!!!

  15. Oh Yeah Great by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Funny

    This may be a big timesaver, but, unfortunately, this process gives the steel a rubbery texture, and the middle always comes out frozen.

  16. Not Exactly New by core+plexus · · Score: 3, Interesting
    I remember reading about using microwaves for certain refractory ores, I'm pretty sure one of them was "Microwave Heating of Chemicals and Minerals", 1995. They have also used microwaves in the treatment of gold ore, and microwaves for the embrittlement of coal. I haven't heard of it being used on any but a lab scale yet, though.

    Alaska Bugs Sweat Gold Nuggets

    1. Re:Not Exactly New by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There are commercial operations using microwaves and gold ore. As well, reduction of iron oxide with microwave is not new, as that has been done before. The outrageously cheap price of steel is what killed it.

  17. That's funny. by Inoshiro · · Score: 1

    "(as it cools it contracts, when you melt it, it expands. think frozen water)"

    Because, with water, the density of it as a solid is less than the density of it as a liquid. That's why freezing water in something will cause the little peak hill in the middle, or shatter the container from the extra pressure. It's also why ice floats.

    So, frozen water contracts when it melts and expands when it freezes -- the opposite of what you're trying to get to ;)

    --
    --
    Internet Explorer (n): Another bug -- that is, a feature that can't be turned off -- in Windows.
  18. Productivity by Detritus · · Score: 1

    How much of the price of a ton of steel is attributable to labor costs? Some industrialists like to blame organized labor for all of their problems when they themselves have refused to invest in improved production techniques for decades.

    --
    Mea navis aericumbens anguillis abundat
  19. Bah! by deacon · · Score: 2, Informative
    Unskilled Labor my Ass.

    Do you have any idea on the multiple steps needed to make any particular alloy of steel?

    No?

    Do you know how to check the ore for sulfur?

    How about too much Phophorus?

    No again?

    Do you know when and why to add lime?

    Hmmmm????

    Lets try an easy one: What are the alloying elements in 4140 Steel? No looking it up online, after all, this is unskilled knowledge!!!!!

    How about the time and temperature schedule for heat treating 6061 alloy Aluminium to the T5 State???

    So, you have no knowledge about metals at all, other than that they are (sometimes) shiny?

    So where do you get off denigrating the skills of people who can do something which you have no idea how to even start?

    Of all the things I loath, the arrogance of people who call a task they could not do if I held a blowtorch to their genitalia and their life depended on it "Unskilled" is near the top of the list.

    1. Re:Bah! by inode_buddha · · Score: 1

      You just made my friend list. I'm a (US) steelworker and fabricator. Double-duty sometimes as plant mechanic. Not to mention Linux-using slashdotter.

      --
      C|N>K
  20. Power plants by nuggz · · Score: 1

    Actually many of those power plants shut down because they could make more money supplying California then making their actual products.

    I remember because there were some labour unions upset that they were doing this.
    I don't know what the problem is, getting sent home full pay because the company could make an even more profit due to the NIMBY attitude of California.

  21. Oil in Mars by DigiShaman · · Score: 1

    If Mars once had life...and for long periods of time. Then there might be oil to be found as well. But even if so, the quality of and quantity of such hydrocarbons may not be worth the effort for energy use.

    --
    Life is not for the lazy.
  22. Why do we recycle tin cans? by Latent+Heat · · Score: 1
    Some 14 years ago we had this huge recycling initiative called PRIDE (People Recycling in Defense of the Earth -- yeah, right). Every morning we have two garbage trucks come by -- the green recycling truck and the brown garbage truck.

    We are supposed to recycle -- under penalty of law, but the most serious penalty I have seen is that the city workers are "empowered" to slap a bright orange stickers on piles of cardboard left by students at the U during moving day if they didn't bundle such piles to the satisfaction of the city workers. We have to recycle aluminum, glass, newspapers, cardboard, and number 1 and number 2 plastic, although there is a list as long as your arm of non-acceptable number 1 and number 2 containers. Oh, and we have to recycle tin cans.

    Mr. Recycleman (not his real name, but ironically close to it), the city dude in charge of garbage, got on the TV to mention the benefits of recycling, including that all those tin cans are made into new cars.

    Is this the real deal or one of those enviro-fibs? I thought that steelmaking for cars, or at least what the Japanese were doing, was almost as fussy in its control over trace impurities and alloy levels as semiconductors, because they were making a very low carbon steel that they could bond with zinc rustproofing and then stamp or otherwise form into very thin and curved sections that make up modern lightweight, fuel efficient, crash resistant, rust resistant cars. I thought the only thing tin can scrap was good for was rebar -- you could make the road the cars ride on but certainly not the cars themselves.

    So why do we have to recycle tin cans? They are a PITA to get clean enough to stockpile enough to set out for recycling (the stuff that comes in them turns into very rank garbage if not cleaned up -- spaghetti sauce, canned soup, and so on). If they were really so valuable, couldn't they be picked out of the garbage stream with a magnet?

    I heard that the only thing that makes money recycling is the aluminum can, and we wouldn't need the second green garage truck, it would pay to take them to a drop off center for cash. It was also suggested that the reason for recycling this other stuff was to get homeowners in the habit in case some kind of other markets developed. I think the other than aluminum recycling is a big scam, but I suppose I could be educated if someone has some other insights on this.

    1. Re:Why do we recycle tin cans? by Drishmung · · Score: 1

      Well, according to this, it is worthwhile, although considering the source there may be some bias there. Analysis of the article seems to indicate that most steel from tin cans is recycled back into...tin cans! Note also that it is a UK site. The economics vary quite a lot according to region I believe. Here is an article from Spokane, which claims 28% of the tinplate is from scrap, but only 10% of this scrap is recycled cans.

      --
      Protoplasm. Quiet Protoplasm. I like quiet protoplasm.
  23. ok... we found another way to do this... by -Maurice66- · · Score: 1

    another machine that goes "ping"

    I would not really call this progress; if they would run this contraption on solar power or a penlite battery, it would be worth mentioning...

    Morc