Slashdot Mirror


Microsoft Agrees Settlement Over MikeRoweSoft.com

GillBates0 writes "CNN's reporting that Microsoft Corp has settled with Mike Rowe, persuading the teenager to give up his domain name in exchange for costs of changing the existing domain to a new Web site, Microsoft certification training, an Xbox, an invitation to a technology festival at Redmond and some other gifts. Includes a choice quote from Microsoft spokesman Jim Desler: 'We wanted to do this in a way that's going to foster his interest in technology'. Mike had received a 25-page letter from Microsoft informing him he was committing copyright infringement, and threatening legal action, as reported earlier on Slashdot."

103 of 689 comments (clear)

  1. Grammar Nazi strikes again! by Limburgher · · Score: 5, Funny

    How exactly does one agree a settlement? Isn't that a bit like setting up someone the bomb?

    --

    You are not the customer.

    1. Re:Grammar Nazi strikes again! by jxs2151 · · Score: 4, Funny
      Off topic, but your sig rocks!

      Not only does it rock on ./ but it rocks in New Hampshire. It rocks in South Carolina and Arizona and North Dakota and New Mexico, and it rocks in California and Texas and New York. And it rocks in South Dakota and Oregon and Washington and Michigan. And then it rocks in Washington, D.C. but not enough to take back the White House.

      Yeaaaaahhhhhhh!!!!

  2. aka... by jaden · · Score: 5, Funny

    "Microsoft pulls stick out of ass... finds it makes for better PR when carrot is tied to it"... I smell an innovation patent coming.

    1. Re:aka... by yintercept · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Microsoft has always been adept with the distribution of carrots...how else do you think they've been able to steer their firm through the treacherous waters of antitrust lawsuits.

      Here, Mr. Judge, is a big diamond studded gold carrot. Here, Mr. Senator, can I help you with your campaign funds...

    2. Re:aka... by firstadopter.com · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Seriously they are the best at settlements. Remember how they offered all that software to the States... Microsoft s/w! We give it away for free so we I can lock you in the future!

    3. Re:aka... by Evil+MarNuke · · Score: 5, Funny

      That's funny.

      I pictured a monster sized bully beating up a kid in an ally way. Then, a small boy seeing what's going on runs off to tell a large hurd of nerds who comes running in masses. The monster is cought red handed hurting the poor kid with about 50k anger nerds and geeks watching. Quickly the monster reaches into it's deep pockets. Opps, he left the wallet at home, but he finds some chomp change and a few other goodies. He then stand before the nerds and says "This was all a big misunstanding. I was, umm, about to give him, umm, this pocket full of change, my game console, training at my enslav, I mean, training camps, in trade for his website."

      "See," moving the boy head, "he has agreed to take my offer, so can we please forget about all of this?"

      --
      The journey is better then the end.
    4. Re:aka... by ReelOddeeo · · Score: 2, Funny

      "Microsoft pulls stick out of ass... finds it makes for better PR when carrot is tied to it"

      I'm not sure I would want that stick, even if the stick had a carrot tied to it.

      --

      Those who would give up liberty in exchange for security and DRM should switch to Microsoft Palladium!
    5. Re:aka... by devross · · Score: 5, Funny

      ...about 50k anger nerds and geeks...

      Gotta watch those anger nerds man. They're seriously dangerous. You can tell they're coming too because of the high-pitched nasal "war whine" they make when they're about to attack.

      --


      If these walls could talk they'd probly still ignore me. --MF DOOM
    6. Re:aka... by kerrbear · · Score: 4, Funny

      Microsoft pulls stick out of ass... finds it makes for better PR when carrot is tied to it

      Hey, do you think I could get an XBox too if Microsoft finds out about the web site I dedicated to my pet bird: MyCrowSoft.com?

    7. Re:aka... by Oliver+Defacszio · · Score: 2, Funny

      So, you mean it takes them 20 years to arrive?

      --

      -
      Inventor of the term 'pardon my French'.
    8. Re:aka... by srvivn21 · · Score: 2, Funny

      Along the same lines as I was thinking...

      I wouldn't want a carrot tied to that stick.

  3. XBOX?!?! by phunhippy · · Score: 5, Funny

    Cheap bastards could'nt give him a decent console like a PS2 or GC... now the poor canadian guy is stuck on Halo all day!!!!

    1. Re:XBOX?!?! by Chess_the_cat · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Who cares what the developers think? The Xbox is definitely not the favorite console of the people playing games. And to mangle a quick quote from Maddox, saying the Xbox has the best graphics and therefore is the best console is like saying that since I painted this picture with the best paints, I must be the best artist.

      --
      Support the First Amendment. Read at -1
    2. Re:XBOX?!?! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Gamespot.com also always claims

      Dude, I don't know where to start to point out what's wrong with your post and your brain...

      When you enter "biased" and "I feel lucky" at google chances are high that it will take you straight to gamespot.com and their latest XBox homage.

      You certainly never spend time in front of all these consoles but you try desperately to us that the XBox (you know it's just a inferior PC that hardly runs Linux) is superior and rules the world (except Japan, Europe, and pretty much the rest outside the US).

      Get gamespot.com out of your head and _try_ to form your own opinion.

    3. Re:XBOX?!?! by tackaberry · · Score: 3, Funny

      Ohh, I want a free XBox too.

      www.MikeRhoSoft.com is still free.

      MikeRowSoft.com, MikeRoeSoft.com, and MyCrowSoft.com are all taken.

    4. Re:XBOX?!?! by mrm677 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      It really comes down to games. However most developers are increasingly writing their games using cross-platform toolkits so that they can penetrate all three markets. And according to the people I know, Xbox performs the best. Gamespot.com corraborates this.

      So unless the few games that are console-exclusive are really what matters to you, or some tangible things like form factors, then the only difference is graphics/gameplay quality and smoothness. And XBox wins here for most cross-platform games.

      Using your paint analogy, if an artist draws the exact same picture multiple times using different paints, then the superior picture will be the one that uses the superior paints.

    5. Re:XBOX?!?! by kisrael · · Score: 4, Interesting

      I have all 3 of the current "big 3" systems.

      I started with a GC, and its still may favorite...the first party stuff can't be touched, and for multiplayer (Smash Bros, Monkey Ball 2, Mario Kart) and other exclusives (the first Rogue Squadron game on it, at least) make it the last one I'd give up.

      Then I got a PS2...ugh. I got it for WDL:Thundertanks, hoping it would be another "Battle Tanx", but it sucked. For a while its saving grace was GTA3 and GTA:VC, but now it's only the thought that the sequel to those will be on this system first that have me keep it around. There are some other good games, but overall the gem/shovelware ratio is way too small to justify the expense of the system. I really think that "first mover advantage" combined with the leverage of playing PSone games (which in turn had a huge first mover advantage) as well as being untouchable for specific genres I don't care about (sports, RPGs) are what make this system the leader.

      I got an Xbox lastly, and its made a tremendous impression on me. It follows in the Microsoft tradition of not really innovating much, but copying some of the very best parts of other systems. It's a buttugly huge console but it has the best controllers (the S-version, the original were just clones + minor enhancements and great enlargements of what the DC had) and some of the games are sweet...Halo and Crimson Skies in particular. It is very likely THE biggest horsepower console out now, and it shows.

      So while my heart is still with Nintendo, I've really been impressed with what Xbox has done. And will probably never really forgive PS2 for the dumbness of only putting 2 controller ports on without a multitap...

      --
      SO YOU'RE GOING TO DIE: The Comic for Dealing with Death
    6. Re:XBOX?!?! by falcon5768 · · Score: 4, Funny

      Slashdot... where only a joke like this will get a million geeks up in arms and starting a pissing contest of who's system is better (rolls eyes)

      --

      "Slashdot, where telling the truth is overrated but lying is insightful."

    7. Re:XBOX?!?! by kisrael · · Score: 2, Insightful

      You know, you can buy an adapter to allow you to use more controller ports for games that support it on the PS2. Just like how you can buy a remote to watch DVDs on an X-Box.

      Yes, but I have pet theories that by requiring users to buy an extra piece of middleware, roughly the cost of a controller but with no other tangible benefit, far fewer game companies put 4 player modes into their games then would if it was 4 ports in the basic hardware.

      --
      SO YOU'RE GOING TO DIE: The Comic for Dealing with Death
    8. Re:XBOX?!?! by LilMikey · · Score: 2, Insightful

      They said foster his interest in technology...

      Xbox is definitely the piece of equipment to have. Linux, MythTV, emulators, media players... screw games.

      --
      LilMikey.com... I'll stop doing it when you sto
  4. compensation? by PatrickThomson · · Score: 5, Funny

    MSCE training? Jesus, I didn't know they were going to be that hard on him

    --
    I am one of many. My idea is not unique, nor do I expect my voice alone to sway you. I speak in a chorus of opinion.
    1. Re:compensation? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      Being a Minesweeper Expert and Solitaire Consultant isn't that bad.

  5. He's got a great chance to make something of this. by djh101010 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I hope he takes the free publicity & does something good with it. If he can handle this gracefully and turn it into something positive, he can end up being seen doing so by the right people, and turn it into a good opportunity for himself.

    Or, he can stay in his room and play with the new Xbox, that's OK too I suppose.

  6. One more thing... by patricksevenlee · · Score: 5, Funny

    Don't forget the, "I got sued by Microsoft and all I got was this stupid shirt" t-shirt :)

  7. Microsoft BUYS EM out by firstadopter.com · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Sounds like Microsoft realized they were getting bad press, so bought him out with.. you guessed it, Microsoft freebie products. Now bad press turns into Microsoft product marketing. Those guys are brilliant in Redmond. Grrr...

    1. Re:Microsoft BUYS EM out by StringBlade · · Score: 2, Funny
      ...and Microsoft has never bought out the competition before, right?

      -- This post has been brought to you by the letters 'S' and 'arcasm'

      --
      ...and that's the way the cookie crumbles.
    2. Re:Microsoft BUYS EM out by MrEd · · Score: 4, Funny
      (simpsons)


      "All right boys, buy 'em out!"


      (Bill's thugs start smashing Homer's office)


      "What, you don't think I got this wealthy by writing checks, do you? Muahahahahahaha!"

      --

      Wah!

    3. Re:Microsoft BUYS EM out by jrumney · · Score: 4, Insightful
      Exactly what should they have done to satisfy both parties?

      Leave him the fuck alone.

      They knew full well that Microsoft(TM) do not have a legal leg to stand on in trying to get Mike Rowe to stop using his own name. If Microsoft thought they were right, do you think they would have caved like this? That would just be inviting domain squatters to taunt them.

    4. Re:Microsoft BUYS EM out by NanoGator · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Only on Slashdot would Microsoft's handling of this case be mutated into evil form.

      --
      "Derp de derp."
    5. Re:Microsoft BUYS EM out by DrEldarion · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I don't know about you, but if I were Mike Rowe, I'd MUCH rather have a bunch of nice stuff than a $10 domain name.

    6. Re:Microsoft BUYS EM out by j-turkey · · Score: 5, Insightful
      They knew full well that Microsoft(TM) do not have a legal leg to stand on in trying to get Mike Rowe to stop using his own name. If Microsoft thought they were right, do you think they would have caved like this? That would just be inviting domain squatters to taunt them.

      First of all, although it's bad publicity, they have a leg to stand on, especially once you realize that this is not only about Mike Rowe using his own name (which it isn't at all...that's been done before with the Uzi Nissan/Nissan.com case). Now I don't know a damn thing about Canadian law (and very little about trademark law anyway) -- but Microsoft has enough cash and lawyers to bankrupt this kid (and his family) -- which means that after they bankrupted Mike Rowe (and his family) they'd win a summary judgement when Mike Rowe failed to show up for court.

      Secondly, Microsoft HAS to protect their trademark. This is not a simple case of a kid just using his name...I keep hearing this and I just think it's naive. Check out the Register article from the original slashdot post last week. In it, they paraphrase him as saying he wanted a cool site with a name that sounded like the software giant (my paraphrase). If this is true, Microsoft has a case -- it's NOT just someone's name, and if Mike Rowe actually said this, it proves intent. Now, as far as how trademark law applies to homophones (and this is the crux of the case) -- I don't know. AFAIK, it hasn't even been tested. However, if MSFT's trademark was dilted in any way, or it is even perceivable that their trademark is being tested, MSFT is responsible (to their shareholders) to fight tooth and nail to preserve that trademark. Otherwise, Microsoft's trademark doesn't mean squat under law. If I ran a business that had a trademark to protect, I'd consider doing the same thing.

      Instead of looking bad and spending a shitload of money, they ended up looking like nice guys and spending next-to-nothing. Sounds to me like they did the right thing. A win/win situation. This is about the easiest settlement I've ever heard of. Do you think that every time someone settles, it's because they didn't have a leg to stand on? Do you have any idea how much it takes to go to court, especially when you know you will not benefit?

      I guess what frustrates me about this (I ranted alot in earlier coverage of this topic) is that this shows where Slashdotters seem to have the hardest time being objective. If they see Microsoft, they immeadately think "those bastards". If a company tries to protect IP or trademark in any way, slashdotters will jump and yell "bastards". If a big company with deep pockets sues a little guy, slashdotters will jump and yell "bastards". If there's ever a dispute over a domain name and a large orginization is involved, Slashdotters are quick to yell "bastards". Sure, alot of these guys are bastards (I'm not Microsoft fan), but it's pretty imporatant to at least try and learn the facts before taking sides.

      BTW -- if it's not immeadately clear from the post, IANAL.

      --

      -Turkey

    7. Re:Microsoft BUYS EM out by someonehasmyname · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Disclaimer: I don't want to sound like I'm defending Microsoft here, I hate Windows and despise MS's business tactics.

      IANAL, but I have been reading copyright/trademark law extensively lately. I'm helping a friend legally secure his band name, as well as exclusive use of the name on t-shirts, posters, stickers, etc. All of that is in the realm of Trademarks, more specifically, a subset called a "Service Mark."

      "Microsoft" is a trademark. Trademarks aren't like Copyrights. If a trademark owner knows someone else is violating their trademark and doesn't do anything about it, their trademark can be REVOKED. Where with Copyright, you can ignore someone violating your copyright if you want, and it's still a valid copyright.

      I don't agree with Microsoft's tactic of waiting for a counter-offer so that they could bring out the big guns, but they had to make an effort to notify Mike Rowe that they believed he was in violation.

      Aside from the legal aspects, you and I both know he only used "soft" in the name because it'd sound exactly like "Microsoft."

      --
      Common sense is not so common.
  8. Technology? by sirReal.83. · · Score: 4, Funny

    'We wanted to do this in a way that's going to foster his interest in technology'

    Then what the hell is he going to do with a Microsoft cert?

    1. Re:Technology? by Spond!Max · · Score: 2, Funny

      Paper his birdcage with it? Use it to start a fire? Make a placemat? Line a drawer? Earn less than he would if he worked at Burger King?

      --
      oo *
    2. Re:Technology? by CheapScott · · Score: 2, Funny

      ...Microsoft cert?

      It'll give him minty fresh breath after breathing the rarified Microsoft air. Maybe he can follow it up with a Microsoft altoid just to be sure....

  9. Moving site to MikeRoweHard.com... by tbase · · Score: 5, Funny

    ...I'm sorry, that was just plain wrong.

    --

    666-607: 6th floor apartment of the beast
  10. No name change? by BHennessy · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I would have thought the Microsoft would have wanted some change to the name of the company too? Surely the same problems will arise if he's still calling his business/site Mike Rowe Soft or whatever?

    1. Re:No name change? by nEoN+nOoDlE · · Score: 2, Funny

      As a matter of fact, they took him to the courthouse to legally change his name to Joe Rowe to avoid any possible future trademark infringements.

      --
      Don't trust a bull's horn, a doberman's tooth, a runaway horse or me.
    2. Re:No name change? by GeckoX · · Score: 4, Insightful

      No, because then that would be a Trademark case.
      MS wasn't charging him with that because they knew that they don't have a case there, they'd lose hands down. They played the prove-he's-a-domain-squatter card on him.

      Big difference.

      However, now that Mike Rowe has caved to MS, should he try to continue a company under the same name, MS will have HUGE ammunition in a trademark case because Mike Rowe has essentially admitted to attempting to profit off of a name similar to Microsoft...

      Man, that little turd's done all kinds of damage by caving to them.

      --
      No Comment.
  11. Re:Arrgggh! by DRUNK_BEAR · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Yes, but since he had fallen in the trap of offering to sell the domain for a good amount of money, he was pretty much done for. This is probably the best option he could go for, but I have to agree that it would have been interesting to see the developments of this story if Mike had chosen otherwise.

    --
    DrkBr
  12. Help him? by lxt · · Score: 4, Funny

    I doubt his nice MCSE will help him get a job :)

  13. Say what you will about MS... by Nijika · · Score: 5, Insightful

    This is a good way out for both parties, really. While I don't dig Microsoft going after anyone for a domain name, it's a known tactic to squat on "near miss" domains. Usually the speculators aren't bright eyed 17 year old kids, and that tactic would be suitable for the usual bottom feeders. In this case though, where they clearly want to quash that domain, but not cripple some poor teenager, I like this.

    --
    Luck favors the prepared, darling.
    1. Re:Say what you will about MS... by malfunct · · Score: 5, Interesting

      mikerowesoft is not a near miss. Its a very far miss at best, plus its his own damn name. I think MS was sort of out of line on this one, though he provoked them by posting (at least some at the time I saw the site) anti-MS content on the site. Shows that corporations (whether legally or though monetary means) are far more powerful than any individual which may not be a good thing.

      --

      "You can now flame me, I am full of love,"

    2. Re:Say what you will about MS... by MP3Chuck · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I would hardly call MikeRoweSoft.com a near miss. He obviously took advantage of his own name so that it SOUNDED like Microsoft... but to think that his intention was to dupe people into "accidentally" getting to his site is a bit absurd.

      Aside from that, I don't see how his domain name could be copyright infringement anyway. Unless MS somehow owns copyrights on any word or phrase that sounds like Microsoft...

  14. Re:He's got a great chance to make something of th by Cyclopedian · · Score: 5, Insightful

    He's only 17.

    Let him have his XBox fun, and some college life to go with it. If he should focus on being all business now at that age, he might grow to regret it later in his life.

    But I agree: it's a chance to build some positive ties that he can use to network his way into a job after college.

    -Cyc

  15. They'll be coming for me next by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    I have never forgiven my parents for naming me Windows Crashes Too Much Jones.

    1. Re:They'll be coming for me next by Xyde · · Score: 2, Funny
      Apologies to the Monty Python Crew, but this reminded me of...

      Bounder: Ah good morning. I'm Bounder of Adventure

      Tourist: My name is Smoke-too-much

      Bounder: Well you'd better cut down a little then

      Tourist: What?

      Bounder: You'd better cut down a little then

      Tourist: Oh I see! Cut down a little then.....

      Bounder: Yes...I expect you get people making jokes about your name all the time?

      Tourist: No, no actually it never struck me before. Smoke...to...much....(laughs)

      Bounder: Anyway you're interested in one of our adventure holidays?

  16. With any luck... by UnixRevolution · · Score: 5, Funny

    He'll mod the X-box and run linux on it.

    --
    You like your new Mac more than you like me, don't you, Dave? Dave? I asked...She said Yes.
  17. Re:compensation? (LMAO) by Grrr · · Score: 2, Funny

    'We wanted to do this in a way that's going to foster his interest in technology'.
    ...


    Naaaaaah, too easy.



    <grrr>
  18. Foster his interest in WHAT? by jrumney · · Score: 3, Insightful
    We wanted to do this in a way that's going to foster his interest in technology

    Shouldn't that be foster his interest in Microsoft?

    I mean come on, an X-box? An MCSE course? And I bet the migration to another webserver has to be to IIS and all.

  19. Extension of Copyright? by Klatoo55 · · Score: 3, Interesting

    How far does this extend? Sure, you can sue phonetic copies, but what if someone makes a macrohard.com? Is that infringement as well? Or maybe micrsoft.com, or some other creative misspelling... What are the boundaries for this type of suit?

    --
    ------- "A true friend stabs you in the front." -Eliot
  20. Microsoft finally did it right by kitzilla · · Score: 5, Interesting
    Microsoft seems to have realized there was a good way out of this. Now they've protected their (rather bizarre) trademark claim without creating the appearance that they'll pay cash to domain squatters.

    Master Rowe gets a nice toy or two, and has a career track ahead of him.

    In the end, everyone smiles but the lawyers. Good.

    --
    This is my post. There are many others like it. If you don't like what you read here, go try one of the others.
  21. He should have... by suman28 · · Score: 2, Funny

    He should have taken the first offer of $10. Atleast, that would have been worth something rather than the crap he got.

  22. Trademark, not Copyright by Ezubaric · · Score: 2, Informative


    If you make someone think that you are someone else by using their logo/name, that's trademark violation. If you copy the site itself, that's copyright violation.

    --

    ----------
    I am an expert in electricity. My father held the chair of applied electricity at the state prision.
    1. Re:Trademark, not Copyright by 10101001+10101001 · · Score: 2, Informative

      You and others keep bugging with the idea that it was a trademark violation. Guess what? It was neither. Trademark corresponds to a very limited set of things, almost always a company name associated with a product if a field. That's why there can be two companies named Apple, one who makes pies and the other computers.

      Now, MikeRoweSoft is a company name, but not even a copy of the Microsoft name. Nor is it associated with any products. The fact is, at best MikeRoweSoft could be claimed to be a derivative work of the name Microsoft (same pronunciation, different spelling). Of course, it's ludicrous to believe one can copyright a single word. Why do you and others think it's any less ludicrious to trademark a single word? Or do we never see knock-off G-ello on the store shelves?

      --
      Eurohacker European paranoia, gun rights, and h
  23. Why not from the beginning? by Rufus211 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    What I don't understand is why Microsoft didn't do this from the beginning. They send a legal threat and find out they're dealing with some kid. Instead of turning around to sue the hell out of the kid if they had just offered this from the beginning there would never have been any story and this would be a complete non-issue.

  24. Re:New precendent? by Random+BedHead+Ed · · Score: 4, Interesting
    You'd be less successful than Mike. Remember, his actual name is Mike Rowe, so mikerowesoft.com is somthing he might have gotten away with since it doesn't even contain the word Microsoft. Also, he wasn't in the business of registering domain names and then squatting. They crack down on squatters, but in this case Mike only had one domain and didn't solicit its sale (except under stress in a reply to a Microsoft offer).

    One odd thing: I keep reading about copyright violations in these stories, but shouldn't Microsoft's claims be trademark-related? Copyright doesn't apply to a business name as far as I know.

    Regarding the settlement: it mentions the MCSE, the XBox and so forth, but I'm guessing there's money in there somewhere, too. This was a very bad PR situation for Microsoft. Since Mike had the PR on his side, yet is giving up the domain, I'm guessing he got more than just some courses, plane tickets and a game console in return.

  25. That It! by sherpajohn · · Score: 5, Funny

    I am changing my name to Winifred Dowes (the fact I am male is not relevant!). All my friends will now call me Win, please.

    My new Domain is gonna be WinDowesHome.com

    Will I get any games with my x-box?

    --

    Going on means going far
    Going far means returning
    1. Re:That It! by sik0fewl · · Score: 2, Funny

      Or you could join up with Mike Rowe and create MikeRoweSoftWinDowes.com

      This way you can violate two trademarks with just one domain name!

      --
      I remember when legal used to mean lawful, now it means some kind of loophole. - Leo Kessler
    2. Re:That It! by Dukael_Mikakis · · Score: 3, Funny

      Or keep a blog and call it WinDowesUpdate.com, but the only problem is that Microsoft gave up that domain after the DDoS, right?

  26. Re:Did MS *really* do the right thing here? by gfxguy · · Score: 2

    The kids name is Mike Rowe, he didn't make it up. He was trying to start his own little software company. Now, I'm sure he knew what he was doing when he registered the name, but frankly, I'm not seeing the problem.

    Now if it was me (granted, I'm not a 17 YO anymore), I'd have held out and told MS to bite my shiny metal ass.

    --
    Stupid sexy Flanders.
  27. Re:Arrgggh! by LordK3nn3th · · Score: 5, Interesting

    That doesn't mean it was in bad faith, like MS claimed. The kid had an actual business running. He simply decided to make a counteroffer when they came up to him. Had they not, he would've run the site all the same. He wasn't cybersquatting

    --

    ---
    Never criticize religion on Slashdot. You will be modded down for "Troll" no matter how factual it is.
  28. Re:He's got a great chance to make something of th by AgentAce · · Score: 3, Funny

    If he should focus on being all business now at that age, he might grow to regret it later in his life.

    Yeah, look at Michael Jackson

  29. Mike Rowe = sellout by kobotronic · · Score: 2, Troll

    Way to go, dude. You had your five minutes of net.fame, people on the net heard about your phlight, backed you up and sent thousands of dollars your way in order to help you fight the litigious Beast's gorilla attorneys wanting to steal your rightful property. You should have held on! Instead, you just roll over on your back like a sheep and let them bribe you with trinkets. An X-box and a couple of coupons. Ya big loser! You're nothing but a sellout, and Microsoft's henchmen will now ramp up their efforts instead of backing off from such lawsuits and legal threats. No respect. Dipshit.

  30. Had a similar experience... by philipkd · · Score: 4, Interesting

    This was in 1996, I was 14, and I registered gamespotlight.com. I then e-mailed gamespot.com and asked them if they had a problem with it, and they said in fact they did (I was surprised for some reason). They offered to pay me to transfer the domain name, and rather than taking the money, I just did it for free: back then internic let you transfer domains because of trademark disputes for free.

    The good deed was graciously recieved. After meeting up with some of the guys at E3, GameSpot then offered me a paid summer internship in San Francisco when I was 16.

    Bam! Those were the good ol' days.

    - Philosopistry

  31. Re:Mike Rowe cowed down by flewp · · Score: 2, Funny

    Speeking for all teh illiterate monkeys out thair, yew sir our rong.

    --
    WWJD.... for a Klondike bar?
  32. "invitation to a technology festival at Redmond" by flacco · · Score: 2, Funny

    i hope his mom checks him for a freshly-shaved spot behind his ear when he gets back.

    --
    pr0n - keeping monitor glass spotless since 1981.
  33. Re:Arrgggh! by md65536 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Yeah.

    "Ha! He took the bait! He said his site was worth $10000 to him! Now his ass is ours! Let's eat his soul!"

    "Oh wait! The public is actually sympathizing with this monster? Let's give him an xbox! Make sure to get some nice press photos of us and our new best friend."

  34. Confusingly similar by BreadMan · · Score: 4, Informative

    Here are the rules for trademarking names and infringement. This is written for a non-laywer, so the english is fairly free of jargon.

    The commonly quoted case is that of LEXUS the law archival and search company and Toyota who wanted to use the same name of thier luxury division. LEXUS sued and lost.

  35. So when are they going after THIS guy? by samdu · · Score: 2, Informative

    BetterWhoIs Domain Search

    At least this Mike Rowe dude could make an argument that it was his fricking name.

  36. No McBride sandwich from McDonalds by FerretFrottage · · Score: 2, Funny

    McDonald's reports that its new "Honeymooner" happy meal will be cancelled due to legal threats from SCO.

    --
    "Look Lois, the two symbols of the Republican Party: an elephant, and a fat white guy who is threatened by change."
  37. One more destined for our camp? by miffo.swe · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I myself being a highly trained at Microsoft products was what made me realixe just how plain stupid they are sometimes. Having knowledge in linux before i started training Windows 2000 server made me understand that linux does many things easier for an admin. Account management is a breeze in linux as opposed to the nightmare of managing domains, AD and security principles (barf!).

    The more he reads about MS stuff the more the kid is going to understand that there are much better and faster ways of doing things.

    Pople who tend to stay at the MS camp is often people who dont quite understand what happens behind the bells and whistles.

    Typing this away at my 25th reboot installing a frigging client machine Running W2k after having installed a fully fledged Linux Terminal Server with 1 (one) reboot.

    Aww, these moments make me appriciate the awkwardness of VI.

    --
    HTTP/1.1 400
  38. Re:Say what you will about MS...2 dumb 2 use Inet by Nom+du+Keyboard · · Score: 3, Funny
    it's a known tactic to squat on "near miss" domains

    Anyone who types MikeRoweSoft when they mean Microsoft is too dumb to be using a computer and the Internet anyway.

    --
    "It's the height of ridiculousness to say for those 9 lines you get hundreds of millions."
  39. What about MyCrowSoft by serutan · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Probably already been posted, but I wonder how these guys are managing to survive.

  40. The Real Reason Microsoft Sued... by Nom+du+Keyboard · · Score: 2, Funny

    The real reason Microsoft sued is because when you say "Microsoft" into their speech-to-text converter you get...

    --
    "It's the height of ridiculousness to say for those 9 lines you get hundreds of millions."
  41. Biased Against M$ by bhima · · Score: 5, Insightful
    Come on guys! I use Linux at home, hell I even use NetBSD on my QUBE 2, I'm Pro Open Source and Pro Free Software as much as most of the folks here.

    But be honest! if this had been Gentoo, SUSE or any other Linux oriented company, giving this kid crap lying around in the marketing department would have been applauded.

    What the hell did you expect MS to give him?

    Redhat certified engineering courses? A free G5 Powermac with Steve Jobs' Autograph?

    Get real! Finally MS is doing the right thing (TM) and you STILLwhine!

    Now lets talk about XML patents!

    --
    Nothing in the world is more dangerous than sincere ignorance and conscientious stupidity.
  42. But what about Hotmale.com? by zakezuke · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Mike Roe Soft is indeed a soundalike to mic-ro-soft, on this point you can not debate. It took me a second after reading it to make the sound connection, what the hell does Mike Roe have to do with Microsoft, who is this Mike Roe person, what the hell does Micro.. oh yea....

    Hotmale.com is a much closer soundalike, and a hell of alot more likely to be a miss then mikeroesoft.com. Haven't you been in an office and had people yell "I was just checking my mail and I'm getting gay porn popups from hell".

    Why doesn't Microsoft go after sites that offer gay porn rather then products for the microcomputer? After all... some people might be offended by gay porn popups from hell, and might learn to associate Microsoft's mail service with gay nakid men.

    --
    There is no sanctuary. There is no sanctuary. SHUT UP! There is no shut up. There is no shut up.
    1. Re:But what about Hotmale.com? by FrostedWheat · · Score: 4, Funny

      might learn to associate Microsoft's mail service with gay nakid men

      I made that association and I don't even use hotmail!

      (or hotmale)

  43. Bah... Big Company Mechanics by Dr.+Evil · · Score: 5, Funny

    Shmuck: "Hey look, this guy's got a clever domain"

    Schmuck's manager: "This guy's ripping us off"

    Schmuck's manager's manager: "This could ruin us, rake him over the coals, call legal"

    Legal: "Hmmm... let's ask him to stop and see if he demands money"

    Mike Rowe: "$10? Are you nuts? That's not worth the hassle, not for something like $10k would I do it"

    Legal: "Congratulations, you're a cybersquatter, cease and desist or die."

    Mike Rowe: "Wow, these guys suck, I'm going to the press."

    Press: "Clippy slices 17-year old's jugular"

    Microsoft PR: "Holy shit!, get Bill's lackey, get Legal!"

    Bill's Lackey: "Geeze man, Legal, back off. PR, give the kid what any reasonable 17 year old would want for the hard work he's put into his domain. And throw in some extra stuff... not so much to make it profitable though."

    Marketing: "and get some brands into the press"

    1. Re:Bah... Big Company Mechanics by Pentagram · · Score: 4, Funny

      And throw in some extra stuff... not so much to make it profitable though.

      An Xbox for the price of registering a domain sounds like a profit to me.

      I'm just off to register My Crow Soft .com. It's going to be the next big thing in avian bedding!

  44. Re:Arrgggh! by firstadopter.com · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I think he would of gotten his $10K if he held out. But he probably got a few thousand worth of Microsoft goodies + a visit to Redmond isn't 1/2 bad.

  45. I think this is big....here's why by andy_geek · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Micro$oft never changes their mind, never yields to public outcry, no matter how outrageously far they might have overstepped any particular line. In fact, as a company they've always sort of delighted in the fact that they didn't have to make decisions based on practicality and expediency: they've always wanted to world (read, competitors) to understand that they will do what they want, when they want and to whom they wish to do it.

    So, I think it's a pretty big thing when the Redmonster backs down, even over something this silly (and arguably, that they had no claim to in the first place). No, this is not like them apologizing to Apple for stealing-and-ruining their OS (or, to be fair, like Apple doing the same to Xerox-PARC) or changing their mind on just how hard it actually would be to de-couple the browser from the OS, but I think it's an indication of a subtle cultural shift. Maybe it was Ballmer's off-day?

    In addition, I commend young Mr. Rowe for taking as much out of them as they'd give, even if their motives were PR-driven rather than a sincere wish to right a wrong. Besides, the more experience he gains with ASP/.NET, the more he'll realize he was smart to be heading in the direction of PHP to begin with. *snicker*

    --
    "Don't matter how New Age you get, old age is gonna kick your ass." - Utah Phillips
  46. damn my TV is busted... by sTalking_Goat · · Score: 4, Funny

    time to register www.SewKnee.com

    --

    My days of not taking you seriously are certainly coming to a middle...

  47. Uh Oh by Durin00 · · Score: 2, Funny

    ...an invitation to a technology festival at Redmond...

    sounds like an ambush to me...

  48. Re:Foster his interest in technology? BAHAHA by Paleomacus · · Score: 5, Funny

    We all know what a software festival at Redmond means. He'll spend 6 days and 7 nights in a re-education and brainwashing resort.

  49. Looks like Mike did the persuading by greygent · · Score: 4, Insightful

    The CNN article doesn't say that Microsoft wooed him over with this set of cash and prizes. and judging by what the prizes are, I'd wager that Mike set these terms, and Microsoft said "okay".

    A win-win situation for both parties involved.

  50. Re:Arrgggh! by the+MaD+HuNGaRIaN · · Score: 4, Funny

    At least they are going to give him and MCSE so he'll know how to re-image/re-boot his XBox when it BSODs on him.

  51. Umm. Still Not resolved! by AwesomeJT · · Score: 2, Insightful
    C'mon! They just swept the issue under the rug. The bought out a poor kid -- probably scared to death over the thought of being sued by the Almighty Bill. But the real issue still has not been resolved! Did he really do anything bad or is just M$ trying to take over the world again?

    How is this no different than Lindows? Very similiar names, and they probably chose the name because of the closeness to a popular product of M$. Sure, you can argue that point, but can M$ patent/copywrite words that sound similar to their name or products?

    Darn. I was hoping the kid would counter sue. Although, I can't blame him. I would probably sell out too -- but since I already have an XBox -- I would hold out for the $1M instead.

    --
    SPAM solution made easy: 1 spammer, 5 cords of rope, 5 hourses, and fireworks. Be creative.
  52. Re:Arrgggh! by Trejkaz · · Score: 3, Funny

    The visit to Redmond is probably so Bill can kick his butt in person.

    --
    Karma: It's all a bunch of tree-huggin' hippy crap!
  53. Re:He's got a great chance to make something of th by AndroidCat · · Score: 2, Informative
    If that's what he wanted, then good. Now he'll get the question "Are you that Mike Rowe?" for years to come. That's got to be worth something!

    Best of all, if he acts fast he might be able to swipe a better domain in a week or so:

    whois -h whois.godaddy.com mikerowe.com
    Registrant:
    Mike Rowe
    P.O. Box 1196
    Pasco, Washington 99301
    United States

    Registered through: GoDaddy.com
    Domain Name: MIKEROWE.COM
    Created on: 07-Feb-02
    Expires on: 07-Feb-04
    Last Updated on: 07-Feb-03
    --
    One line blog. I hear that they're called Twitters now.
  54. What really happened by bonch · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Schmuck: Some kid named their group "Mike Rowe Soft."

    Schmuck's Manager: He's riding the coattails of our trademark. Legally, we have to get him to stop.

    Legal: Please stop using this or we will be forced to puruse this legally.

    Mike Rowe: $10? This is worth $10k.

    Legal: You're setting a price? We owe it to our shareholders to pursue this.

    Mike Rowe: Oh, crap! I didn't realize trademark law existed! Could we settle?

    Legal: Sure. Here's some cool stuff if you change your domain name like we requested in the beginning.

    Mike Rowe: Cool, thanks!

    Slashdot: M$ IS RAKING A 17-YEAR OLD OVER THE COALS!!!11

  55. This is a NON-STORY--here's why by bonch · · Score: 5, Informative

    Once established, a trademark must be "policed" to maintain rights. If you allow your mark to become synonymous with others' goods or services, you run the risk that your trademark rights will be lost because the name may be deemed to have become "generic" and, thereby no longer identifies a source, but a good or service available from several sources.

    From http://www.mit.edu:8001/activities/e-club/8.html

    1. Re:This is a NON-STORY--here's why by bonch · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Even though it's good business policy to protect your trademark, that does not give your business some exclusive right to other words that are pronounced in the same way.

      Yes, it does. Mike Rowe calling it "Mike Rowe Soft" was an obvious and intended play on Microsoft.

    2. Re:This is a NON-STORY--here's why by lowe0 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Actually, he said it was an intentional play on it. Hence, there went a large portion of his defense.

      The kid may be getting some technology training from MS, but the real lesson here is to keep your mouth shut and let a lawyer do the talking.

  56. I smell a rat by dickiedoodles · · Score: 2, Informative

    Call me cynical if you must but this smells of a rat to me. I doubt that anyone who registered a domain so similar to a huge corporations trademark could claim utter surprise when Microsoft got involved in this however right or wrong that involvement was.

    I think there is a strong possibility that Mike Rowe planned this all along, what did he have to lose? If it came down to it he could surrender the domain and he's lost $10, once they have the domain Microsoft have no reason to push for anything else.

    On the other hand he could enrage Microsoft run to the media and make it look like the big bad guy is squashing the little tiny guy and seeing if Microsoft caved and gave him free stuff, he seems to of got lots of traffic to his site(along with a nice little money making banner advert) and according to the article Microsoft are going to pay to redirect his traffic so whatever he renames it to is likely to is likely to be more successful then it would have been had none of this ever happened. Also when you think about it mikerowesoft is a really lame name.

    --
    In Soviet Russia Slashdot cliches use you
  57. www.mikeroesoft.org by dfj225 · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Ok, so the domains mikeroesoft.org, .info, .biz, and .us are open. If I have been reading things correctly and I register these, then I get a free Xbox and certification?

    --
    SIGFAULT
  58. Re:Arrgggh! by Joe+U · · Score: 3, Funny

    The XBOX was a good idea.

    Until he decides to throw a mod chip in it and open up Mike's house of XBOX hacking.

    It all goes downhill from there...

  59. Re: Put your ear to the ground for early warning by old7 · · Score: 3, Insightful

    See, it is only funny to those with asthma. Everyone else assumes that it is offensive. What a world we live in.

  60. Re:Arrgggh! by HogynCymraeg · · Score: 3, Funny
    The visit to Redmond is probably so Bill can kick his butt in person.

    No, it's just another way of saying "Go to hell".

  61. What I don't understand by jesser · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Why does Microsoft want to own MikeRoweSoft.com? Why didn't they just ask Mike to change MikeRoweSoft.com to a page saying "MikeRoweSoft.com has been renamed/moved to _MikeRoweForums.com_ to avoid confusion with the _Microsoft Corporation_."?

    --
    The shareholder is always right.
  62. Good business by TachyonAT · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Actually in our country that is just a good way to make money. You either copyright an idea or reserve a domain and then you sell the rights for a ton of money to someone who can actually do something with it. It's not bad faith its simply good business. Acquire something that you think will be sellable someday, then hold out till you get an offer you like.

  63. Copyright? by aonaran · · Score: 2, Informative

    Um, unless I missed something what the kid did was trademark infringement, not copyright infringement.
    He wasn't putting pirated MS software on his site, and I just missed that part, was he?

    "MicroSoft" is a trademark, not a piece of literature or other artistic work.

  64. the only reason by CAIMLAS · · Score: 2, Insightful

    the only reason they gave him an xbox at all is because it cost them less to give it away than to sell it, after the tax write off.

    --
    ~/ssh slashdot.org ssh: connect to host slashdot.org port 22: too many beers