Slashdot Mirror


Part of Patriot Act Ruled Unconstitutional

Adam9 writes "According to Yahoo/AP, a federal judge has declared unconstitutional a portion of the USA Patriot Act that bars giving expert advice or assistance to groups designated foreign terrorist organizations. The ruling marks the first court decision to declare a part of the post-Sept. 11 anti-terrorism statute unconstitutional, said David Cole, a Georgetown University law professor who argued the case on behalf of the Humanitarian Law Project."

6 of 661 comments (clear)

  1. Re:It's unbelievable... by Mike+Hawk · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    Yes, far inferior to an attorney general who actively seeks out and kills American citizens, but that could never happen. Could it?

    Oh wait, it did. And we know how that re-election bid went.

    As soon as a candidate better than W comes forward I will consider them, but the clowns the Dems are producing this year don't leave much choice. But then, Im in California so I'll probably do what I do every election (since the state only elects Democrats or actors) and vote for the third party candidate most likely to attract 5% of the vote.

  2. Re:Just Remember by jjohnson · · Score: 1, Flamebait

    Actually, it's neither. Check your facts.

    --
    Anyone who loves or hates any language, platform, or manufacturer, doesn't know what they're talking about.
  3. Re:For the Dean Supporters. by blixel · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    For the Dean Supporters.

    Dean has supporters?

  4. Re:And??? by NearlyHeadless · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    While the treatment of Arar is appalling, it has nothing to do with the Patriot Act.

  5. you fucking liar by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    You've just described the French resistance, the founding fathers...

    Did you even read his definition of terrorism? The part about violence against civilians? This was not an m.o. of the founding fathers, you fucking idiot. Go whine to your Democrat overseers.

  6. Re:And??? by Andy+Smith · · Score: 0, Flamebait
    "Those who would give up essential freedoms for security, deserve neither freedom nor security." - Ben Franklin
    I do wish people would pay attention to the key word in that quote -- essential freedoms. Is it essential to your freedom that you are allowed to assist foreign terrorists? No? Then why do you object to a law that forbids you from doing so?