Slashdot Mirror


Columbia's Final Minutes in Detail

grub writes "This article on Newsday has an excerpt from 'Comm Check... The Final Flight of Shuttle Columbia,' by Michael Cabbage and William Harwood describing the last minutes of Columbia's final flight in detail."

18 of 494 comments (clear)

  1. The complexity... by alexatrit · · Score: 5, Insightful

    ...of the shuttle is just fascinating. Call me naive, but it truly is amazing that aeronautical/space engineering has progressed as far as it has. Not to revel in Columbia's destruction, but I'm suprised that we haven't had more accidents since Challenger.

    --

    Nothing but the finest in meaningless drivel
    1. Re:The complexity... by jfengel · · Score: 5, Insightful

      There was only going to be one accident after Challenger. It was just a question of how long it was going to take.

      From here until the end of the lifespan, there will be only a few trips. The odds of a problem are low enough that we'll probably get through those with no more accidents.

      At this point it's like software: it's too complex to fix, so you start from scratch. I feel bad about that, just like I do throwing away mostly-functioning software, but it's got to go.

    2. Re:The complexity... by EvilTwinSkippy · · Score: 4, Insightful
      Not to mention the countless explorers who died really horrible deaths learning the hard way about things. The Curies died as a result of their exposure to radiation. One x-ray techician (name escapes me) used to calibrate flouroscopes by sticking his hand in and tweaking the picture till it looked right. His entire hand necratized eventually and the infection killed him. Then of course there are the chemists who learned about the explosive nature of nitrogen bonds the hard way.

      Those are the type of people I hope to run into in the afterlife. Those that died doing something, not of something.

      --
      "Learning is not compulsory... neither is survival."
      --Dr.W.Edwards Deming
  2. No Disrespect intended. by odyrithm · · Score: 4, Insightful

    But this is a classic lack of communication problem, people voiced there concerns but they where shooshed away because of the "nah that won't happen" syndrom.. lets hope we all learn from this lesson.

    --
    moo
  3. I didn't think it was so bad until I read this... by garcia · · Score: 5, Insightful

    One of the crew members came to rest beside a country road near Hemphill. The remains were found by a 59-year-old chemical engineer and Vietnam veteran named Roger Coday, who called the sheriff and then watched from the porch of his mobile home as a funeral director drove by to collect them.

    IIRC (if I read correctly) they were about 19 miles up when the fuselage broke apart... So this astronaut had about that far to fall before coming to rest on the ground.

    I saw it over and over again on TV and thought, well, at least it was instant and there's nothing left... I was wrong and I now have deep sorrow for these individuals.

  4. Survivability? by G4from128k · · Score: 4, Insightful

    From the article: The survivability study concluded relatively modest design changes might enable future crews to survive long enough to bail out.

    I'm not sure how the crew can survive by "bailing out" of a doomed orbiter during re-entry (take-off is another matter entirely). Once the orbiter drops below a certain speed, a return to orbit is impossible anda very hot descent is inevitable. This "bail out" logic sounds like surviving an elevator crash by stepping out at the first floor to me.

    Unless the crew module can gracefully decelerate to less than hypersonic speeds, exiting the compartment is instant death.

    --
    Two wrongs don't make a right, but three lefts do.
  5. Re:I didn't think it was so bad until I read this. by SteveAstro · · Score: 5, Insightful

    It did say that once the astronauts hit the hypersonic air flow, they would have died instantly.

    It doesn't make things any better to know that though. :-(

    Steve

  6. Re:I didn't think it was so bad until I read this. by LittleGuy · · Score: 5, Insightful

    IIRC (if I read correctly) they were about 19 miles up when the fuselage broke apart... So this astronaut had about that far to fall before coming to rest on the ground.

    Karma me down, but I'm just amazed how quickly information about Columbia's last moments is filtering to the media (and the lack of relative umbrage from family and pundits).

    In contrast, it took years for NASA to admit that, yes, the astronauts aboard Challenger were most likely aware during their final descent, but that information was quickly coupled with admonishment not to dwell on it, out of respect for the families of the astronauts.

    --
    Mod Karma -1: I sed bad wurds. If I cep my mouf shut, I wud be at riyses.
  7. bad management kills by mcmonkey · · Score: 4, Insightful
    "The most complicated machine ever built got knocked out of the sky by a pound and a half of foam. I don't know how any of us could have seen that coming. The message that sends me is, we are walking the razor's edge. This is a dangerous business and it does not take much to knock you off." -- Flight director Paul Hill

    There are none so blind as those who refuse to see. The folks at NASA could have seen this coming by listening to the engineers who wanted to get a closer look at the spots hit by the foam. The folks at NASA should have been watching for this type of situation if any attention had been paid to the follow up of the Challenger explosion.

    It is simply not true that this tragedy was unavoidable and that there was no way to see this coming. The most complicated machine ever built was not knocked out of the sky by a pound and a half of foam. This was murder by management.

    1. Re:bad management kills by goldspider · · Score: 4, Insightful
      "The most complicated machine ever built was not knocked out of the sky by a pound and a half of foam. This was murder by management."

      So every fatal car accident caused by untimely mechanical failure is "murder by manufacturer"?

      Every precaution SHOULD be taken to prevent tragedies like this, but calling it "murder by management" is far too harsh a term that unjustly impunes the motives of NASA administrators.

      Sometimes you just have to accept the fact that shit happens.

      --
      "Ask not what your country can do for you." --John F. Kennedy
    2. Re:bad management kills by Baron_Yam · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I'm not so sure. If you create an atmosphere of 'everything must be 100% safe', no engineer would ever approve anything, no astronaut would ever don a spacesuit.

      It was human error, and a regrettable one... probably rooted in the difficulty of comprehending physics so far beyond our everyday experience.

  8. Only 38% found... by feidaykin · · Score: 4, Insightful
    From the article:

    More than 25,000 searchers, who scoured a debris "footprint" that was 645 miles long, found 84,900 individual pieces, about 38 percent of the space shuttle.

    Does this not make one wonder how much of the shuttle might still be "out there" waiting to be found, or perhaps sitting on display in someone's house? Granted, much of it would have been literally vaporized, however I think that would amount to far less than the remaining 62% of Columbia.

    I heard on CNN that pages of Ilan Ramon's journal were found recently in Texas. A quick google news turned up this article on the Post.

    It has also been stated that remains from all seven astronauts were recovered, and that some of the organisms on the shuttle actually survived.

    This all points to the possibility that there is still more shuttle out there, and that perhaps we could be finding Columbia piece by precious piece for years to come...

    --

    "To confine our attention to terrestrial matters would be to limit the human spirit." -Stephen Hawking

  9. Timely: Tomorrow is Challenger's 17th anniversary by talexb · · Score: 5, Insightful

    The shuttle astronauts are true heroes -- think of the bravery it takes to fly one of those things. And let's not forget the Challenger mission which failed on January 28, 1986, seventeen years ago tomorrow.

    I'll be outside at about 1130am tomorrow, looking up at the skies as I do every year, thanking that shuttle crew for their sacrifice.

  10. Re:I didn't think it was so bad until I read this. by odyrithm · · Score: 4, Insightful

    At the end of the day they knew the risks, and they took them, hell I'm not an American, but I respect them, and know they served humanity with all they had to give, shame we all are not like that, could be a nice place otherwise, this world that is.

    --
    moo
  11. Expensive mistake = critical lessons by danwiz · · Score: 5, Insightful
    From the article ...
    Like Challenger's crew, the Columbia astronauts met their fates alone and the details will never be known.

    The initial government line is always that that people die instantly. After the Challenger crew compartment was recovered, it surfaced that some of crew's PEAPs (Personal Egress Air Packs) had been activated. This lead to the debate on whether anyone was conscious prior to impact with the ocean, and if there was any improvements that could be made to escape such a fate.

    It may seem morbid as first but spacecraft, unlike automobiles, aren't as easy to crash-test. This promotes learning as much as you can from the mistakes.

    Unfortunately, its unlikely more meaningful debris will be recovered from the Columbia.

  12. Re:A moment of silence by Ateryx · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Reading this was way more intense than seeing the footage... I was left in tears.

    --
    "The truth suffers from too much analysis"
  13. mercifully brief?!? by geekoid · · Score: 4, Insightful

    "For the astronauts, the final sequence was mercifully brief, but no doubt terrifying."

    IT was 2 minutes from the time all hell broke loos until the died! 2 freaking minutes!

    Ever hold your breath for two minutes? While somebody you don't know is forceably holding your head under water?

    Most roller coster last about 40 seconds.

    --
    The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
  14. Complexity? Try basics! by Kombat · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Keep in mind that the shuttle designs are pushing 30 years old.

    The thing that amazes me is the 1969 moon mission. Ever see the kind of equipment those guys had back then? Think about what kinds of computing power they had with them. Your car has more computing power than the Apollo mission modules.

    Ask yourself this: Would you volunteer for a moon mission using the same equipment as they did in '69? From today's perspective, it'd be suicide! And yet, back then, that was the state of the art, and people did it. Amazing.

    --
    Like woodworking? Build your own picture frames.