Slashdot Mirror


Fighting for Your Overtime?

Papa Legba asks: "I am in a battle, with a now ex-employer, over the unpaid overtime that I incurred while working in their IT department. I refused to accept the answer 'you are a computer guy, you don't get overtime' and did some looking. My research has turned up these relevant documents: the definition of exempt Computer professional at section 13(a)(17) of the FLSA managed by the Department of Labor, the amendments in the ESA labeled C.F.R.541.3(a)(4) and C.F.R.541.303 , and a site referring to a letter, which I cannot find a copy of. The letter describes a Dept. of Labor ruling from December 4, 1998 that set out who qualifies as a computer professional. Can anyone find this letter, and is there any more documents that I am missing. I have a lawyer but this is a very specific area and I want to do this right. Has anyone else fought this battle?"

82 comments

  1. i was in the same boat by larry+bagina · · Score: 0, Offtopic
    My boss wouldn't give me overtime pay for some work where we had discussed it beforehand. I came in on the weekend and took a big old shit on his executive leather chair. This was after going to the chinese buffet and drinking a lot of budweiser the night before.

    If you live in a cold climate, you might want to wait until it warms up for the best effect.

    --
    Do you even lift?

    These aren't the 'roids you're looking for.

    1. Re:i was in the same boat by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hey, did you know that your last name rhymes with a part of the female anatomy?

  2. Calling Captain Obvious... by I+Be+Hatin' · · Score: 2, Insightful
    ...referring to a letter, which I cannot find a copy of. The letter describes a Dept. of Labor ruling...

    Have you perchance tried contacting the Dept. of Labor?

    --
    I know god exists. I read it on the internet, so it must be true.
    1. Re:Calling Captain Obvious... by Papa+Legba · · Score: 1

      Yes I did. The national department of labor refered me to my local office. The local office does not answer there phone but instead has a machine take your name and number. They still have not called me back.

      --
      Papa Legba come and open the gate
    2. Re:Calling Captain Obvious... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Did you leave your name and number?

    3. Re:Calling Captain Obvious... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Does slashdot look like your local labor office? Why are you asking slashdot?

    4. Re:Calling Captain Obvious... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      He already did and got no answer, moron.

    5. Re:Calling Captain Obvious... by pcmanjon · · Score: 1

      Hopefully the overtime your ex-employer didn't pay you will (if you win the case) be able to pay your lawyer and the court fee's...

      If your going to court over a measily 200 bucks -- going to court over the matter is practically useless.

  3. Let the lawyer handle it by rueger · · Score: 1

    If you have lawyer experienced in employment law you should do fine. It's astonishing how quickly things can change when the letter comes from him or her instead of you.

    This is a good example of why every employee should keep close records of the hours they work, and keep them off-site. It's a hassle, but in a situation like this having a written record can make all the difference.

    1. Re:Let the lawyer handle it by caseydk · · Score: 1


      Ideally, if you can have someone else keep them and/or have timestamps, it's even better.

      I interned for a guy during the summer of 2000. he paid me for the first half of the summer, but not the second half. The state I was in allowed damages to be 200% of the original wages, plus attorney's fees, plus damages.

      After 2+ years, I just didn't care anymore. I had graduated from college, had a real job, and had pretty well moved on with my life. So I went for my wages plus attorney's fees and got it.

      Another year later (2 months ago) when I was getting my background check, they contacted him. Needless to say, he torpedoed me... which caused me to lose my job. I since have a new job (in 27 days), but I know to never even mention his company's name and/or his name.

      Beware, if you go after this company, be sure to have one point of contact who can and will speak positively about your work there

  4. Right there with ya... by Yert · · Score: 5, Informative

    I've had this battle before, in both IT and physical security (ie, rent-a-cop) occupations. Security isn't exempt from OT, and therefore, gets overtime - the company I was at refused to pay OT and also went so far as to change the defined "workweek" to 7 days, period - even scattered across 1 month. IRS and DOL define a "workweek" as 7 consecutive days. A nice sit-down talk with the owner with printed documentation in hand and a few phone calls from myself and my fellow cow-orkers to the Regional Dept. of Labor Administrator, and we got our OT.

    Interestingly, the DOL website has news concerning proposed changes to the definition of a "computer professional", but unfortunately for you, the current rules are so vague as to define just about anyone in the IT industry as to be exempt from OT. A good overview comparison document is at http://www.labor.gov/_sec/media/speeches/541_Side_ By_Side.htm.

    Your state may give you more rights, but Uncle Sam isn't going to help you any.

    -Yert

    --
    Truck driver, plumber, Linux systems engineer.
  5. I know, way too late now, but... by Txiasaeia · · Score: 2, Insightful
    ... I absolutely refuse to work overtime. No matter what the job, incl. jobs in IT, after eight hours I call it quits. My boss a few years ago asked me to stay for OT and I said I couldn't, end of story. We had a project we were working on that needed to get done (waaaay overschedule, but blame the ambitious marketing dept for that), but honestly, my spare time is *precious* to me, and it can't be replaced with some chump change.

    Of course, I make it my personal mission to work as hard as I can while I'm at work so that nobody has an excuse to can me, but I've never been fired, I'm not short on money, and I've got plenty of time to spend with my family, read books, and post on /.

    If I *were* to give you some advice, I'd say forget about it until you decide to quit or move on - and just simply stop showing up for work. If they don't give you the decency to pay you OT, then why should you give them the decency of 2 weeks/1 month's notice? If they call up and ask where the hell you are, just say "Oh, mmmm, yeah, about that, I've decided to quit, mmmkay? Did you get the memo?"

    --
    Condemnant quod non intellegunt.
    1. Re:I know, way too late now, but... by wowbagger · · Score: 1

      While I to some extent agree with you about "you don't pay me for OT, you don't get OT", I vehemently disagree with you about "simply stop showing up for work."

      First of all, failure to formally quit can get you in some nasty situations, especially if you are a programmer - you could get nailed for violating NDAs, among other things. At a minimum, you should hand in a formal letter of resignation your last day there.

      HOWEVER, I really wouldn't suggest even that - it may hurt, but give them the 2 weeks notice. "Screw'em! I got another job already, fuck them!" you may say. However, this leads to what some might call an "alligator" - it may not bite you now, but when you want to leave your new job it can reach up and bite you in the ass - not only will you not be able to use the new job as a reference, but you won't be able to use the job you left as a reference ("Joe - no, I cannot recommend him - he left us in a lurch without notice.")

      The world ia a very small place, and getting smaller every day. Do you know how many degrees seperation there are from your current job to the job you want to have 2 years down the road? Don't burn your bridges behind you - you may need to retreat in a hurry!

    2. Re:I know, way too late now, but... by pizpot · · Score: 1

      I once didn't notice the a 2nd drive in a raid array turn its yellow light on. The users lost their days work, and I spent a long weekend camping in the server room changing dlt tapes. And I made an extra $3000 OT for my experience.

    3. Re:I know, way too late now, but... by Lord+Kano · · Score: 1

      Depends on the state that you're in. In Pennsylvania, where I am, an employer can fire you for refusing to work OT. I guess this is an artifact of they days when most of the jobs here were Unionized industrial labor.

      When I got hired by my last employer, during the interview they asked me why I was leaving the employer before them. My answer included the fact that they had been forcing us to work OT. I was told that the new employer never did this. 8 months later, they did exactly that. Forced OT.

      My advice is civil disobediance. Show up for the OT and do as little work as you can get away with.

      LK

      --
      "Hi. This is my friend, Jack Shit, and you don't know him." - Lord Kano
    4. Re:I know, way too late now, but... by Txiasaeia · · Score: 1

      In principle I agree with you, but it seriously hurts to do your employer a favour and help them out w/written notice if they've been gorram bastards. Maybe just tell future employers that your NDA was so restrictive that you can't even give out the name of the company that you worked for (but detail exactly what you did, and drop enough veiled hints to help them figure it out)? Ya, I know, I like my life to be *WAY* too complicated ;)

      --
      Condemnant quod non intellegunt.
    5. Re:I know, way too late now, but... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Of course, if you're salaried, you're fucked. You don't work "overtime", you don't have a job "bye bye".

    6. Re:I know, way too late now, but... by the+Man+in+Black · · Score: 1

      I want to live in the world that you live in. You "didn't notice" a drive go into warning state and you pulled some overtime to fix it, in effect getting paid for your own mistake.

      I had an array show me all red lights (due to a quirk in the RAID card, don't get me started) and pulled a 120-hour week doing a bare metal build and data restore (from old, shitty DDS tape on an older, shittier, SCSI-2 tape drive). I got it done, the users had maybe an hour total that they couldn't access their e-mail at all (and this hour was generally at or around 4am), and saved the day.

      I received not an extra cent, and was fired two months later. That's IT for you, baby. Just to give you an idea of perspective.

      I'm gonna get my shit together and go to law school, me myself personally.

    7. Re:I know, way too late now, but... by mabhatter654 · · Score: 1
      Honestly, why should another employer care? After all, it's not like anybody give proper notice of layoffs anymore! If you've got another job, just go. Drop a note and leave...that saves you from embarassing yourself, and from any reprecussions the company may do...I have worked for at least 3 places where the bosses fired people for giving notice!

      Also, it helps to be up front with future employers that you left on bad terms with a past one. It would help to make sure you left a resignation letter, and take a copy with you if you think there'll be trouble. But seriously, if any company would reject you because of one critical [perhaps lying] past boss without your side of the story, they really aren't worth working for anyway...

      To the poster above who's former boss tore them up, they can successfuly hire a lawyer against BOTH COMPANIES!!! Many companies simply will not give out employement info anymore...heck, even McDonald's has been successfully sued for actions of their mouthy managers...that dude screwed up big time...

  6. A lead for you by Mr.+Darl+McBride · · Score: 1, Interesting

    I had a few friends who chased the overtime route. They made a bit of headway with their employer before the final answer was found. You can read more about the result here.

  7. Hmm... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Did you ever see the movie Willard? It has one look at how to deal with an arse boss, who isn't afraid to be sued...

  8. A long - probably losing - battle by mrscott · · Score: 1

    I hate to be negative, but you're probably in for a fight that you'll lose. First, take a gander at your job description. If you have management responsibilities of any kind, forget overtime. If you work fairly autonomously and make your own judgement calls in a lot of situations, you can probably hang up the overtime case. If, on the other hand, your boss gave you a schedule of exactly what was to be done at the beginning of the week or you worked under very close supervision (not meaning you were micromanaged), you might get somewhere.

    Consider also: is it worth it? If it's a couple of thousand dollars, is it worth the "I sued my former employer" chain that will hang around your beck for the rest of your career? On the other hand, if you're looking at tens of thousands of dollars, it might be worth it.

    1. Re:A long - probably losing - battle by ikeleib · · Score: 1

      bogus. The employer will probably pay up when they become aware that they may be exposed to treble damages.

    2. Re:A long - probably losing - battle by Papa+Legba · · Score: 1

      My figurring shows that the minimum they owe me, with no 1 year collection exstention and damamges, is $30K. With the above it gets a lot closer to $90K.

      --
      Papa Legba come and open the gate
    3. Re:A long - probably losing - battle by mrscott · · Score: 1

      Labor laws are tough. It all depends on where you live. In CA, where the labor laws VERY strongly favor the employee, you might have a chance. However, take a serious look at the job you were doing. Yeah - the "MIS professional" title sucks, but CAN be a problem in your case. Your best option: talk to a local lawyer well versed in your state's (and federal) employment laws.

    4. Re:A long - probably losing - battle by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If it's a couple of thousand dollars, is it worth the "I sued my former employer"

      ...which is exactly why they know they can get away with this. Nobody will stand up to them. Except the original poster, who is my new personal hero.

    5. Re:A long - probably losing - battle by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So your new personal hero is someone who was dumb enough to work OT without a contract or other indication that he would be paid OT (yet expected to be paid OT), and when it was clear that he wasn't being paid for the OT, continued to work OT anyway? Personally I like my heroes to have a little more common sense and backbone.

      Not that he doesn't have my sympathy. I think this whole "exempt" thing is a swindle. Personally I won't come in for more than ~40 hours unless the reason I'm behind schedule is something I'm personally responsible for... or I'm being paid fairly for the extra time.

  9. Battle with Ex-Employer by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You should seriously consider how important this battle is to you. Litigation between employees and employers seldom produce "winners". It is also quite possible that a future employer may look at you with a jaundice eye when evaluating you as a candidate. You can effectively blacklist yourself. No one wants a problem employee.

    Reality check:
    OT doesn't exist in IT -- it's a simple fact of life. Folks who commit their time do so for the intellectual stimulation and/or strategic financial rewards (nothing to do with OT).

    So, if you're still willing to push the issue, I suggest that you pursue alternate counsel. IANAL, but I pay them lots of money ;) Your lawyer and his/her legal staff should be doing this research.

  10. Vote by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I come from Europe, and was triggered by the topic. It's amazing that you don't get paid for overwork. In Europe it's generally settled by law. No boss there even comes up with the idea of abusing their employees in that way. My suggestion: vote for candidates who have the guts to say that raw capitalism is NOT holy. Because it is not. Without a strong - decent - government, raw GREED will rule. Look at US laws: corporate-greed=law.

  11. IT, IS, Operations, NOC by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Our company switched everyone to salary, everyone lost about %25 in OT. So everyone wanted to stop putting 60 hour weeks in, Management stated "50 hours are now the normal work week". My group is salary, but every other group I work with gets OT, so paging someone out in the middle of the night, they get paid, I'm just expected to do the work and still show up at 8am. That brings up the other point, if you worked nights, you could come in late when paid Hourly. Now we are salary, they want people to work nights and still show up at 8am.

    Also they want us to Lie on our timesheets, we cant put down if we worked on weekends, we are only allowed to put down 40 hours on our timesheets, even if we work more. So if you have 40 hours not including the 5 day business week, you have to use sick time or vacation time.

    Lots of employeers screwing over its people. My vendors are told they have to put in 12 hour days 7 days a week, if they want to keep thier jobs. So, I know it could be worse.

    OT seems to be the corporate enemy. Presidente Bush wants to make Police, Firemen, and EMT's salary. Thats just what I want, someone bitching about no OT when they have to save my ass from a fire.

    Get elected by giving tax cuts, then taking the pay away. 2 faced moron.

    1. Re:IT, IS, Operations, NOC by mjpaci · · Score: 1

      I live in a small town of 13,000 people just north of Boston. Our top two cops were paid over $110,000 each last year. More than half was for OT.

      Toll collectors on the NJTP routinely make $90,000+/year including OT. Granted, that really is shit work.

      My staff worked a boatload more hours than normal this past summer moving the large company we work for to a new building without OT. They are all salaried, exempt from OT.

      Did it suck? Yes. Is anyone still bitching about it? No. Did we abuse the employees? No.

      Do I have a point? No. I'm having a bout of insomnia now and an basically rambling on.

      Sorry.

    2. Re:IT, IS, Operations, NOC by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Get elected by giving tax cuts, then taking the pay away. 2 faced moron.

      Tax cuts? I only remember getting a $300 tax cut back in 2000... Has something more happened since then? Or does it only count if you're a married cople with kids - while people like me subsidize it?

    3. Re:IT, IS, Operations, NOC by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you're still working there, start developing a case. Go to office depot and get one of those sheets spelling out your rights. Learn it, record the times and natures of the company's violations. Play ball for a little while as you collect data. When you and your lawyer think you have enough, file a suit on your behalf, and try to get the state involved as well. You should get your lost time, and expenses, and maybe some whistle blower money too. While punishing the evil, and defending the rightious. You might want to try to line a new job up before dropping the bomb as well.

    4. Re:IT, IS, Operations, NOC by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you are salaried why are you filling out time cards?

      Quit blaming the President just because you don't have a backbone. I'm especially amused by the statements you've made that indicate that you will lie (even if it's just on your time sheet) for money.

      The more I listen to people complain about how their problems are all the Republicans' fault, the more I'm inclined to vote Republican just to piss people off. I'd go Libertarian but then I'd be in danger of taking the whole thing too seriously. In fact, I think that's just what I'll do. Then I won't have any "right" to complain about the Republicans myself (since I voted for the dumbasses), so it will force me to do something constructive with my situation.

  12. OT: wowbagger.. wanna talk to you about y/r APCO25 by yositune · · Score: 1

    You'd posted something the otherday discussing your headaches with Vx doing somekind of APCO25 waveform work. You'd joked that anyone who understood what a PSK was and how to make your DSP grok it should call you.

    I'm not looking for a job but would like to hear more about your experiences with the air interface work.

    ciao

    --
    -- This is not legal advice or solicitation. See an attorney for legal advice. My views, not anyone else's..
  13. Yes and No... by quinkin · · Score: 1
    I agree that you should determine the relative importance of your OT pay with respect to your job. I do NOT agree that "OT doesn't exist in IT".

    When you are routinely instructed(sic) to perform OT for no reward, frequently on mundane tasks, and you are neither intellectually or financially rewarded for your time and effort you are in a lose-lose situation - there is no incentive for an employee to perform under these conditions and it quickly engenders employer/employee dissatisfaction and conflict.

    As others have noted standing up for your rights may end up with your job going elsewhere. So you need to make the decision in light of this fact, and perhaps with acceptance that you may require a new job.

    I have had employers try and swindle me out of various rights (often through illegal contract clauses) and have had to confront them on these issues. I have always made a point of directly approaching the Director involved, supplying them with copies of the relevant legislation and asking them to rectify the situation. Most of them are more than willing to comply and avoid the risk of investigation and penalties.

    Finally, talk to your fellow employees regarding the problem you are facing and any resolutions achieved. I approached one employee regarding their contracted sick/holiday days being barely half of the federally mandated level. This was quickly rectified in MY case, but each of the other employees was kept in the dark and not given their entitlements until they fought for them. If I had not discussed it with them the employer would have continued to exploit them.

    Q.

    --
    Insert Signature Here
  14. Not yet by MSG · · Score: 4, Informative

    I haven't had to actually push this issue, but a coworker of mine and I looked in to it... The two items which I think applied most in our situation were:

    #1) In order to be exempt from overtime, your job just require of you independant authority and discretion. In our case, both of us go through extensive change control and approval from IT managers. That's not independant discretion.

    #2) You must not spend more than 20% of your work week involved in activities which aren't covered by the definition of "exempt". In our case, we both spend more than 20% of our time assisting users. Tech support is definitely not covered by the definition of "exempt".

    When you do talk to your lawyer, ask him about those points.

  15. Fight, you'll probably win. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I had an employeer try to screw me. I was the Director of Network Operations. They owed me back pay, vacation pay, etc. About $65,000. They owed my brother about $20,000 (he worked for me). Basically I went on salary deferal for a few months while cash was tight and they owed most of it in vacation time (I worked so much that if I took time off it was comp-time) so in 5 years I never took any vacation time.

    This was in CA. I filed a complaint with the Labor Board. These guys suck but are on your side, they tried to get me to settle for pennies on the dollar. I told the Chairman of the Board that if the bankrupcy judge gives me pennies on the dollar or tells me there is no money for me then that is ok. But until that moment you owe me 100% of every damn dollar I earned.

    Long story short, 6 months later we are awarded $85,000. They appeal, then settle out of court 3 months later when they realized they would loose. The penalites they owed me on top of the back pay, vacation pay was $15,000. Bascially the law states that if they "PERMIT YOU TO WORK" they owe you. If you can document the overtime they owe you. It also helped that I'm a type A personality and anytime someone tries to screw me I go for broke, don't bluff and fight to the end.

    It only gets tricky if you were a manager/supervisor that directly supervised several employees. But as a manager or supervisor they owe you your salary, even if you only worked 1 minute in the pay period (it goes both ways, as a manager you are there when you need to be, but don't have to be there when YOU feel you have your job completed). I was technically a junior executive.

    When they appealed and it went to the County Supreme Court I hired an attorney. I pre-paid my legal @ 150.00 an hour. Cost me $4500 but I got to keep most of my hard earned money instead of giving the lawyer 40%. You don't need an attorney for the Labor board to help you in CA. Not sure about other states.

    If you're willing to fight you can win.

    If they do owe you it will be with penalites and interest. Best of luck.

    1. Re:Fight, you'll probably win. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And these US labor laws that favor human beings (rather than soulless corporate life-suckers), I beleive, have a whole lot more to do with offshoring trends than cost, availability, or anything else.

      I'm basically a Rush Limbaugh Republican except when it comes to this sort of thing. Nobody has the right to treat you like a serf. What we need to do is to extend the protection of US labor laws to all workers employed by US firms, including those who live in foreign countries.

    2. Re:Fight, you'll probably win. by Thu+Anon+Coward · · Score: 1

      as opposed to a King Dubya Republican handing out tax-refund/loophole largesse to his rich buddies while screwing the common working man? in other words, treating you like a serf....

      --



      I'm good with numbers - .45, 7.62, 9.....
    3. Re:Fight, you'll probably win. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      that's a load of liberal bullshit. Everyone i know got a tax refund from the govt. So saying that it was for rich people and that the common working man got screwed is a crock of shit!

    4. Re:Fight, you'll probably win. by Thu+Anon+Coward · · Score: 1

      and so an ANONYMOUS COWARD (most likely a REPUBLICAN) replies........

      they ain't got the balls to sign their own names. they remind of those women in porno films who jack off the guy and then smear it all over their faces.

      "Oh, George, you can't do no wrong! Oh..Oh..Oh! Let me have my refund big boy! That's right, give it to me! I'll be your whore and vote for you!"

      --



      I'm good with numbers - .45, 7.62, 9.....
  16. IRS by dacarr · · Score: 1

    Yes, a little irrelevant, but perhaps the IRS would be interested in this company? I mean, if they refuse to pay overtime, perhaps they're not keeping up on taxes either?....

    --
    This sig no verb.
  17. What's wrong with occasional overtime? by scott_davey · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Reading some of these posts I'm amazed at how selfish some people are.

    I mean, Slashdot is full of unemployment/job-exporting rants, yet when it comes to helping out their employer in a time of need, the advice seems to be "fuck the boss - I'm going home".

    And the same people probably wonder why their jobs are being exported.

    Personally, I feel a sense of commitment to the project I work on and the company I work for. If it needs a bit of overtime, I'm happy to provide it. Not excessively, but occasionally.

    In fact, it is written into my employment agreement - "occasional overtime may be required from time to time". I get paid in time-in-leiu.

    I also get to come in 1 hour later the next day for each hour I work past 9pm, if I need to work back. So if a server catches fire, I will stay back and fix it, and if I work until midnight I don't have to start work again until midday the next day.

    I work for a small company, and the way I see it it is in my interest to help that company succeed - if they go broke or lose a big contact because I refused to work overtime, I may lose my job.

    My overtime works out to be around 1-2 work-days every month, of which I get days off in return.

    Sure, project blowouts can be blamed on other people, but lets be realistic and say that often it is the programmer's lack of estimation ability that causes problems, too.

    Whoever is to blame for overtime requirements, the main thing to realise is that you form part of a *team*, and teamwork involves professionalism and responsibility from all members of the team (you, your boss, your project manager and your customer).

    For me this means I work occasional overtime when required, and my boss ensures it does not get excessive. I also get rewarded for it with time-in-leui, which helps me, and my boss.

    My advice to the original poster - in future, work out your conditions before you agree to work for a company to avoid these problems. And consider time-in-leiu as an alternative to overtime payments.

    1. Re:What's wrong with occasional overtime? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      What's wrong with occasional overtime?
      I don't see the word "occasional" anywhere in the original story. I tend to doubt that "occasional" OT led him to be this disgruntled.
    2. Re:What's wrong with occasional overtime? by ibbey · · Score: 4, Insightful

      At first, I thought you were just trolling, but as I read you're comment, I realized you're serious, just being naieve.

      You're right, you should be loyal to the company, as long as that loyalty is returned. But when you work overtime for months & years on end without getting paid, where does that loyalty end? The original poster said in a later follow-up that he was owed in the neighborhood of $30,000. Once the company owes you five digits of back pay, all bets are off, it's time to get a lawyer. If they're willing to give you an equivalent amount of comp time, and that is alright with you, then fine (though if you're an hourly worker, comp time is actually illegal in at least some states). But you should feel no obligation to take comp time if you don't want to. And of course, in this case, it's irrelevant: as he stated in the original article, he no longer works for the company. It's hard to take time off from a job that he no longer holds.

    3. Re:What's wrong with occasional overtime? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Man, you have been lucky. Very, very lucky.

      Picture working for a company for $30k. It's the only job you can find out of college after a year of looking...

      Picture being required to work 80 hour weeks. Not once in a while. Every week. Not just days and evenings, but weekends too. Why? Because your boss decided one day that you should answer the main company phone while writing code. Seems everyone else is out of the office. He just released a new version of the software. Without *ANY* testing whatsoever. Forget the beta test, we're talking no in-house testing. The coders working on that software weren't really very skilled. So the clients have permanently corrupted data. All of them. And that wasn't an atypical week.

      Picture that paydays roll around, frequently, where the company can't make payroll. Why? Because the boss is siphoning off the company's assets to furnish his new home.

      Picture, after working this hell-job for over a year, the boss decides to require his employees to sign a contract. A non-compete contract. Five year time limit. Anyone producing software is considered a competitor. The little fact that it's illegal, and won't hold up in court, is irrelevant. The threat of litigation will be sufficient to keep you unemployed.

      Picture you refuse to sign. You're fired on the spot. Boss's wife goes through your bag, stealing your personal diskettes on the chance that they might contain company data. (They didn't. I never got them back.)

      You're paid your second-to-last paycheck as you're ushered out the door.

      You go back the next day, to talk to the boss, and try to come to some sort of a reasonable compromise.

      His first words are "Were sorry we had to cancel your paycheck. But we will reissue it right after your exit interview." No further reconciliation is possible. That is the second-to-last paycheck he is talking about. He is unwilling to discuss your last paycheck.

      You file for unemployment. Your [now] ex-boss challenges it, and commits blatant perjury. He claims you just got up for no apparent reason and left. The unemployment compensation judge believes him, and refuses to look at your evidence. Your claim is denied. Unemployment was paid to you for 7 weeks, and now they want it back.

      My friends, some bridges **NEED** to be burned.

      The story does have a happy ending.

      About that second-to-last paycheck: I wasn't terribly trusting of them by that point. So, immediately after receiving it, I went to their bank, to their very branch, and cashed it directly to cash. Then drove to my bank and deposited the cash. Naturally, my ex-boss was unaware of this when he told me he had canceled it.

      I challenged the unemployment ruling. Forced the judge to accept my evidence, or go on record before her superiors as refusing it. Naturally, she checked it out, and promptly lost the minutes of that meeting. In our third hearing, there was this strange mixup in her office. My ex-boss, with his highly overpriced lawyer, wound up in the wrong building, in the wrong city....

      By the conclusion of that third hearing, I had my unemployment. The only question was whether the unemployment compensation folks were going to pursue criminal legal action against my ex-boss.

      As for my last paycheck. I went down to the local law library, and read up on our laws. Followed them to the letter. Showed up 60 days later, asking for my paycheck. When they refused to pay me, I sent a lengthy letter to our state's Secretary of Labor complaining about it. Apparently the Secretary of Labor can freeze the assets of a company to pay their employees. Or ex-employees.

      I was paid in full.

      And the icing on the cake: Just after I left, my ex-employer defaulted on a bank loan. He created a new company, and moved the clients over to that new company to do so. I heard about it. Called up the bank. Asked to speak with their legal department. Explained that I was a disgruntl

    4. Re:What's wrong with occasional overtime? by scott_davey · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Just to clear things up, I wasn't trolling. I have a valid but alternate point of view.

      "Once the company owes you five digits of back pay, all bets are off, it's time to get a lawyer."
      If his employment terms were clear regarding working hours and overtime up-front, it would never have reached this point. This situation would have to have existed for a long, long time to accumulate $30,000 of overtime.

      If overtime was an agreed entitlement in his job (whether a legal entitlement or a negotiated one), it should have been reconciled much sooner than this. I'm guessing his employer didn't believe it was an entitlement, he did, and it wasn't brought up often. Again, my point on being clear upfront would have prevented the problem in this case.

      "if you're an hourly worker, comp time is actually illegal in at least some states"
      Maybe, but in my case I work in Australia. I guess the original poster may be US-based, but other slashdot readers are worldwide, and I was being general. Maybe you should be, too.

      But you should feel no obligation to take comp time if you don't want to.
      Absolutely, but again, it should be pre-negotiated to avoid confusion. It's all about ensuring you and your boss think the same on the matter.

      I acknowledge that the original poster had a dud-deal - $30k in dispute is not a good thing - but overtime per-se is not a bad thing, and I believe we should look at partnering with our employers, rather than screwing them over.

    5. Re:What's wrong with occasional overtime? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I mean, Slashdot is full of unemployment/job-exporting rants, yet when it comes to helping out their employer in a time of need, the advice seems to be "fuck the boss - I'm going home".

      There's nothingwrong with occasional overtime. But employers, particularly in the computer industry, forget that employment is a relationship. Just because they give you money, it doesn't mean that you are their slaves. When your employer treats you like utter crap when they can get away with it, you remember it when they want you to go above and beyond the call of duty.

      Sure, project blowouts can be blamed on other people, but lets be realistic and say that often it is the programmer's lack of estimation ability that causes problems, too.

      It's impossible to estimate well. If there's one thing you can be sure you can not rely on, it's programmer estimates. Any competent person would take those estimates as advisory, not set in stone. There are many incompetents around.

      Whoever is to blame for overtime requirements, the main thing to realise is that you form part of a *team*, and teamwork involves professionalism and responsibility from all members of the team (you, your boss, your project manager and your customer).

      My point exactly. Too many bosses think of the relationship as master/servant, and not team.

    6. Re:What's wrong with occasional overtime? by tigersha · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Sure, if they partner with us and stop screwing us over!

      --
      The dangers of excessive individualism are nothing compared to the oppressiveness of excessive collectivism
    7. Re:What's wrong with occasional overtime? by fruitbane · · Score: 1

      Scott,

      In the US there are laws concerning overtime. Unless your terms of employment (working responsibilities, conditions, and agreements all together) specifically exempt you from overtime you are due overtime pay by federal law.

      What this means is that your employer has to pay you for overtime unless there is a very specific and legal reason NOT to have to pay you overtime. There need not be any advance agreement with the employer for you to be eligible for overtime pay. Overtime pay is an entitlement as long as you meet certain employment conditions, or rather, unless you fail to meet certain employment condition.

      If a US employer assumes you are not due overtime pay they are obviously not up to speed on US labor law and the fact that they are assuming should be troubling to employees.

    8. Re:What's wrong with occasional overtime? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I've often wondered if my annoyance at being asked to work overtime is selfish/lazy. I really think that it depends on the employer.

      It sounds like in your case you worked in an environment of mutual respect between employee and employer.

      In my last position, I worked in an environment of mutual respect and it showed in my OT. I was never hesitant to work OT. I worked at least an hour extra most days; some days I worked from 9 am to midnight. I didn't get paid very much either, so I really could have used that OT pay. At the same time, any time I needed time off, there were no questions asked. Some days, I just felt like leaving mid-afternoon, cause I was tired, and that was fine with my boss.

      However, in my current position (which is much better pay,) my boss watches if you come in ten minutes late or take an extra five minutes for lunch. However, it goes unnoticed if you skip lunch to finish an assignment, or if you stay late or come in early. So when I'm asked to work late, or come in on a weekend, I tell them to forget it. Why should I give up my valuable time to a company that obviously doesn't respect the work life balance.

      We're living in an unprecedented time where employers are constantly downsizing and there is virtually no job security. You're being foolish to give up your life to your companuy, because more often than not, it will not be rewarded.

      I'm not saying we should only think of what we can gain when we give, but I don't think we should let our non-work lives and relationships, not to mention our health, crumble to pieces to devote all our time to a job. It's just a job. It's where you go to make money. But why make money if you never have the time to spend it?

      There are rare cases of people who live their job because they love it so much, and I wish I were one of those people. If I were, I devote all my time to my job, because I'd get fulfillment in all areas of my life by doing well at my job.

      In the long run, I think you need to look at everything in context. Are you well respecte at work? Are they deserving of you giving up your free time to be there? If so, I don't think it's harmful to work an extra half hour or so (unpaid) just to help out. But if your company treats you like dirt (which includes *demanding* that you work OT without pay) and they crack the whip if you're three minutes late into the office, then it's not worth giving up your life for them.

    9. Re:What's wrong with occasional overtime? by SuiteSisterMary · · Score: 1

      Your problem, sir, is that you are a rational person working for a rational boss, who in turn works for a rational company.

      When the company is NOT rational, REQUIRES 20 hours PER WEEK of UNPAID overtime, simply as a REQUIREMENT TO WORK, that's a problem. I apologize for the caps, but for quite a few unfortunates, it truly is that bad a situation; you takes it and you likes it, or you'll be replaced with somebody else.

      --
      Vintage computer games and RPG books available. Email me if you're interested.
    10. Re:What's wrong with occasional overtime? by frAme57 · · Score: 2, Interesting
      You are right that there is nothing wrong with a little overtime now and then. And I agree that teamwork and being there for the team in a crunch is important. But that is only if the whole team's understanding of teamwork is more or less the same.

      I know for a fact that there are places where the question at an interview, "You don't mind working a little overtime now and then, do you?" is their way of asking "You don't mind grabbing your ankles and letting us have our way with you, do you?"

      My own job is a good example.(disclaimer: I was not there when it happened but enough credible people have told me the same story, and the politics I have observed here make me believe that this is true) About two years ago there was a big push on one project. The engineers (only three or four at the time) were told to do everything they could to "stay ahead of the trades". These guys put in twelve to eighteen hour days to get enough drawings out fast enough that no one would stand idle on the job. The whole time they were told to log their hours so they could take an equal number of comp hours off after the project was done.

      A few months later the production manager who told them over and over again that they would get those comp hours abruptly changed his story. Suddenly he had "no recollection" of ever promising comp time.

      The moral: get it in writing.

      This wasn't a matter of putting in the occasional forty-two to forty-eight hour week. This was some guys busting their asses for several months, with the promise of some reasonable compensation when they were done. When the comp time evaporated, it became a de facto pay cut.

      They like to tell us that we are akin to managers, and must work until the job is done. But really we are just white collar tradesmen. We are expected to generate enough drawings, based on our boss' vague, directionless, self-contradictory instructions to keep every worker here busy. But somehow - maybe because we do it sitting in front of a computer all day, and it doesn't look like 'real work' - they get us for a flat rate. And they will squeeze as many hours out of us as we will give them.

      --
      "In a hierarchy every employee will rise to his level of incompetence". The Peter Principle
    11. Re:What's wrong with occasional overtime? by mabhatter654 · · Score: 1
      For starts %0 hours a week is +1.5 extra FULL DAYS of work per week! 60 hours is +3 extra Full days per week....that is the problem. Most IT workers are still paid The point is that most people weren't hired to work 60 hours a week. And when you confront employers with a %20 to %50 pay increase to compensate they get all mean and rude...and still don't back down from the OT.

      You seem to work for a company that follows the "spirit" of the rules and not just the letter...I feel happy for you!

    12. Re:What's wrong with occasional overtime? by /dev/trash · · Score: 1

      Working for 4 weeks and not getting paid is one thing working for years is just plain stupidity.

    13. Re:What's wrong with occasional overtime? by ibbey · · Score: 1

      "if you're an hourly worker, comp time is actually illegal in at least some states"

      Maybe, but in my case I work in Australia. I guess the original poster may be US-based, but other slashdot readers are worldwide, and I was being general. Maybe you should be, too.


      Umm, pointing out that your solution may be illegal in some jurisdictions is quite general. Had I said "Comp time is illegal.", your reply would be valid. Since I didn't say that, it's you who is not being general (I suppose that I could have been more general had I said "in some US states", but that seems a little pedantic.). Considering that the poster is asking a legal question, on a US based discussion site, I think it's reasonable to assume that he is probably based in the US. If he were somewhere else, he probably would have mentioned it in the post, wouldn't he?

      You're right, the situation should have been negotiated up front, but I can think of many cases where these issues may crop up. For example if the employee was promised comp time at a future date, then leaves the job before he is able to take that time, the employer is still liable for the pay. Or perhaps, he didn't want to rock the boat to much because he was loyal to the company, only to be unceremoniously laid off without notice (as happens all the time here), so he now feels he should be able to collect on the back pay he is legally owed.

      Where you're being naieve is in your assumption that it's the employee in this case that is doing the screwing over. Perhaps things are different in Australia, or maybe you've just been lucky, but in corporate America, it's the companies that usually do the screwing. Certainly there are exceptions, but in this case, it sounds like he has a perfectly reasonable case.

    14. Re:What's wrong with occasional overtime? by scott_davey · · Score: 1

      "Where you're being naieve is in your assumption that it's the employee in this case that is doing the screwing over. Perhaps things are different in Australia, or maybe you've just been lucky, but in corporate America, it's the companies that usually do the screwing. Certainly there are exceptions, but in this case, it sounds like he has a perfectly reasonable case."

      I don't like being called naieve, but still, there is a fair point in there. Companies are usually better at screwing than people are. And certainly we need to be watchful and aware of being screwed, to avoid having the problems of the original poster. But I didn't think I really needed to state that in my post, because everyone else had already said it.

      Remember that I was commenting not on the original poster's situation, but on all the negative replies at the time I posted.

      The original poster was being screwed, and there's probably lots more people in his position. Unfortunately there's lots of techs that are great at programming but lousy at watching their own backs. I feel for them, actually. But there are also lots of people that make back-watching a sport, and forget to play fair.

      I only hope that people take heed from this thread and ensure their expectations are the same as their employer's. People need to ask themselves : Do you have an agreement with your employer for overtime? Is it written down?

      "Considering that the poster is asking a legal question, on a US based discussion site, I think it's reasonable to assume that he is probably based in the US"

      I don't really know where slashdot is hosted - is it a US-based discussion site? I thought it was an internet-based discussion site. With all due respect, only Americans think that the .com/.org/.net domain belongs to them. The rest of us recognise that those domains are international.

      After saying that, I did realise the original poster was US-based - it was obvious from his language - but I was not responding to his post, I was responding to everyone else's posts. And I was trying to be general in my response (maybe I failed - you can decide).

    15. Re:What's wrong with occasional overtime? by claud9999 · · Score: 1

      Simple, if you weren't working overtime, the underemployed of /. would have more job opportunities.

      Working overtime is ok *on occasion* but I've actually asked employers in interviews what their workweek is like and they said "we prettymuch expect you'll be working overtime." Why not hire more people then? ('course, it costs them more to hire enough people to fill the work, so the force overtime.)

      A simple rule I follow on overtime: if I set a schedule and I might not make it, I'll work extra. If I screw up, I work extra. If my boss sets my schedule, I work 40-hour weeks and let the schedule slip. In fact, I think the only time I even asked to be paid for overtime (once in my life?) was when my boss said "can you be here late today"? Otherwise I just eat it as comp time.

      Regarding comp time, it's not the same as overtime...Comp time is 1x, overtime is usually 1.5x (or more if it's over a holiday.)

  18. Maybe it also explains... by HotNeedleOfInquiry · · Score: 1

    Why all the top semiconductor manufacturers are either US or Asian.

    --
    "Eve of Destruction", it's not just for old hippies anymore...
    1. Re:Maybe it also explains... by odyrithm · · Score: 1

      And why what you say gives the US a bad rep in the rest of the world...

      Fucktard.

      --
      moo
    2. Re:Maybe it also explains... by HotNeedleOfInquiry · · Score: 1

      What an insightful comment. And by the way, what's a "bad rep"? Nice spelling poser.

      --
      "Eve of Destruction", it's not just for old hippies anymore...
    3. Re:Maybe it also explains... by odyrithm · · Score: 1

      And your comment was? rep/reputation, but don't tell me, you where being sarcastic correct? or it was suppose to be funny? dumbass.

      --
      moo
  19. Whoa nelly! by jgardn · · Score: 0, Redundant

    The last thing you want to do is tarnish your reputation with a lawsuit against your employer.

    Your next potential employer is going to call your last employer. Your last employer is not going to say nice things about you. Your chances of getting hired are going to be much lower, particularly in an industry with such a high rate of unemployment.

    I'd sit down and resolve this out of court, amicably, and leave on terms where they wouldn't mind hiring you back. This doesn't mean "bend over", it means work it out like adults and figure out a solution that suits you both and makes you both happy. You'll find your employers are just as human as you are, and would rather make a friend than an enemy. (They don't need an engineer running around telling people what a sweatshop their hole is, either! See, it goes both ways!)

    And next job you get, get overtime conditions in the contract if you really want it. Don't rely on federal or state law to back you up, work it out like adults. Treat the employer not as a "proletariat", but as a business partner. They are giving you cash and you're giving them your time, talents, and sweat. It really is a business negotiation and not slavery.

    I'm surprised your lawyer hasn't clued you in on this. Maybe he smells blood in the water and is willing to sacrifice you for it. The best lawyers I've met have always resolved things out of court farily and without hard feelings between the parties. Heck, they actually would encourage me to make the call because (1) they charge big $$$ for it and (2) things work out better when the parties talk to each other directly.

    The other lawyers are out for the cash and don't give a damn about their clients. Is he representing your long-term interests or does he only see the payola?

    --
    The radical sect of Islam would either see you dead or "reverted" to Islam.
    1. Re:Whoa nelly! by BiAthlon · · Score: 2, Informative

      What you're talking about is totaly illegal. The only thing a previous employer can legaly say about you when called for a reference is that you did or did not work there for a date range given to them. They can not comment on your work history or their opinion of you.

    2. Re:Whoa nelly! by the+Man+in+Black · · Score: 1

      They can not comment on your work history or their opinion of you.

      Of course they can, and they do. "What is your opinion of him as a worker" and "Would you hire him again" are the top two questions on any reference worksheet.

      Show me where it says that this is illegal, because if it is, I need to have a sit-down with my last boss.

    3. Re:Whoa nelly! by deacon · · Score: 1
      Well, ok, but the employer can get sued, and the manager making the comments can get sued personally for defamation of character..

      There are law firms and investigative firms which specialize in this area..

      Some employers might think that they can get away with anything. They are wrong.

    4. Re:Whoa nelly! by Suppafly · · Score: 1

      Show me where it says that this is illegal, because if it is, I need to have a sit-down with my last boss.

      It's illegal in most states, contact someone that knows something about the labor laws in your area.

  20. Overtime? by rayamor · · Score: 0, Redundant

    Shut up and get back to work! :)

  21. See the previous article... by SkewlD00d · · Score: 1, Interesting

    ... if you really want overtime, your job is going to India. Let's see... $60/hr Union job, 15 min smoke breaks every 30 min, "I just work here, Bub."-attitude, and older "untrainable" workers (vs.) $10/hr illegals paid under the table (physical services like cleaning) and Indian contract workers in Mumbai for $6/hr. If you can't do 5-6x their work, you better look for alternate employment, im sorry, but we're in a period economists call "transitory frictional adjustment." Any attempts to prevent it legislatively (min wages, etc) will only make it worse, last longer, and prevent the markets from reaching equilibrium. It's sad, but it's a fact of live, and we're all going to have to adjust to a world market and quit thinking isolationism will solve everything. It will just leave us behind, since India and China are growing at around 8%/yr on avg and are destined to be even bigger economies that the US. The US is not the be-all-end-all of world economies, we can't rest on our laurels. The only constant is change.

    --
    The biggest trick the devil pulled was letting lawyers become politicians so they can write the laws.
  22. ha! by spudwiser · · Score: 2, Insightful

    you and your fancy shmancy degree got you a big ol SALARIED job! work hourly for a company that doesn't straight screw it's employees, never fight for overtime again. hell you might even start to fight overtime!

    ok, I think I'm running low on karma so I'll stop being a jerk-shit.

    --
    .cig - what you do after winning a good flame war
  23. pleasant experience by Zugok · · Score: 1

    I was once salaried in a job and there really didn't get overtime unless I was on call and for scheduled weekend work which my salary didn't cover. Any other overtime I did beyond the standard 37.5 hour working week wasn't paid and sometimes I worked 50-60 hours a week. Sure I didn't enjoy it, and even human resoucre told my peers and myself that we are not obligated to work overtime. Anyhow, I asked for two weeks leave on time and my boss said "look, you've done a lot of overtime, I'll let you take the leave and it won't be taken off you annual leave."

    --
    "I just can't sit while people are saying nonsense in a meeting without saying it's nonsense" J Watson, Sci Am 288:(4)51
  24. Collapse before Equilibrium by MacFury · · Score: 2, Insightful
    We have the capacity to make laws to do whatever we want. We could enact a law that completely shuts our borders to imports/exports if we so chose.

    Currently, the market favors the employer. They are running a race to the bottom in prices which in the long run, hurts everyone in the US.

    If we allow them to screw us out of overtime, it puts more money into their hands and less in ours. This in turn, gives them more money to buy in cheaper labor outside of our country while giving you less to spend locally.

    While I agree that America needs a wake up call and that we, in general, have gotten lazy...if this short sighted, ateoo attitude of employers is allowed to continue, we face disasturous economic collapse.

    1. Re:Collapse before Equilibrium by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      We have the capacity to make laws to do whatever we want. We could enact a law that completely shuts our borders to imports/exports if we so chose.

      And it's physically impossible to smuggle jobs, and you just might get caught if you try.

    2. Re:Collapse before Equilibrium by SkewlD00d · · Score: 1

      Agreed, businesses only care about maximizing profit at any human cost. We have the capacity to change laws, but not the motivation nor the attention to so affect change. We allow ourselves to be screwed, so we are complicit in this (silence gives consent, read "A Man for All Seasons"). If we really cared, we would ask for a raise or overtime benefits or unionize or whatever.

      The problem is that America will eventually become a play-ground for the well-to-do, and a service economy for the pleasure and maintenance of the upper-crust. We will all be teants in their apartment blocks and sharecroppers to their land.

      More troubling is the National Debt (currently 70% of anual GDP), and more specifically, the Total Public Debt is a ticking time-bomb. It's a loan on future taxes that must be paid (or we default, and become another USSR). If I was operating almost a nine months behind in payments, I think my creditors would be camping on my door-step.

      --
      The biggest trick the devil pulled was letting lawyers become politicians so they can write the laws.
  25. Re:OT: wowbagger.. wanna talk to you about y/r APC by wowbagger · · Score: 1

    OK, in what forum do you wish to conduct this - my journal, email, or what?

    My email (in obfucated form) is listed in my info.

  26. Lol by BoomerSooner · · Score: 1

    Why in Christ's name did you put his name on your resume?

    This is why we all need a connected italian friend.

    1. Re:Lol by SuiteSisterMary · · Score: 1

      He didn't say he put the name on his resume; he said they contacted the guy during a background check. Big difference.

      --
      Vintage computer games and RPG books available. Email me if you're interested.
  27. How naive. by jotaeleemeese · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Former boss of mine, he was working for the same company for the last 10 years and goes into this charade (not disimilar to yours) about overtime and loyality and all the rest.

    When after that I explained in no uncertain terms I will not do unpaid overtime, he threatened with, get this, no bonus. Since I don't work for a meagre bonus, I said that was fine with me.

    A few weeks later company panics because profits are lower than expected (mind you, they did not loose money, they just made less than what they had expected) and goes in a wild downsizing exercise.

    Guess who got the axe? Yea, the loyal employee that would spend any amount of weekends and unsocial hours working and always sung the prises about the company. He was kicked out of the building with a cardboard for his personal belongings escorted by two guards. A vulgar thief would get more deferential treatment. That after 11 years of loyal services.

    That is loyalty for you. I will be damned, I am professional and will work to deliver a good service for my employer, but I feel no emotional attachment whatsoever to the company I work for, because the only relationship between my company and my is a business transaction: they pay, I work, we are happy. Fortunately I enjoy what I do thus it is much better than it sounds.

    --
    IANAL but write like a drunk one.
  28. My company made me go hourly by kiley · · Score: 1

    My company made all of the Systems people go hourly based on a previous lawsuit that they lost regarding some assistant managers. Anyway, After we were made hourly, we all had to fill out a weeks worth of "job diaries" that explained everything we did during the day. This was to determine if we made enough decisions to be declared management/exempt. During this whole thing did some reserch and included some links below. Hope this helps. Oh, and this is in California.

    http://www.dol.gov/dol/allcfr/ESA/Title_29/Part_54 1/29CFR541.3.htm
    http://www.dir.ca.gov/DLSE/dlse.html
    3 slashdot links on this subject:
    http://ask.slashdot.org/askslashdot/03/06/15/19522 40.shtml?tid=187&tid=98&tid=99
    http://ask.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=03/02/11/02 23211&tid=124
    http://ask.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=03/03/24/23 42259&tid=123
    And a couple of labor lawyers:
    http://www.overtimelawyer.com/
    http://www.wmlaborlaw.com/

    PS. I stayed hourly and it ended up being a $17000/yr raise with the OT.

  29. oops by wowbagger · · Score: 1

    I had removed the obfuscated version of my email - it's back now.

  30. Hopefully.. by pcmanjon · · Score: 1

    Hopefully the overtime your ex-employer didn't pay you will (if you win the case) be able to pay your lawyer and the court fee's...