Slashdot Mirror


The 101 Dumbest Moments in Business

An anonymous reader writes "Business 2.0's fourth annual review of the most shameful, dishonest, and just plain stupid moments of the past year. Yes, SCO is represented..."

16 of 460 comments (clear)

  1. Number 16 - Spike Lee by curtisk · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I'm glad that idiot is listed so high, that lawsuit was just wrong. I guess he owns the market on "Spike" huh? I was hoping the network won, but it turns out there was a settlement, wonder how much it cost to have Mr. Lee grace the network with "his name" - what a tool

    --

    Sehr geehrter Toilettenbenutzer!

    1. Re:Number 16 - Spike Lee by frodo+from+middle+ea · · Score: 2, Interesting
      i thought the whole thing was just some kind of gimmic staged by spice lee and the TV channel.

      Remember any publicity is good publicity

      --
      for the last time people, I am "frodo from middle eaRTH", not "middle eaST".
    2. Re:Number 16 - Spike Lee by Ironica · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I'm glad that idiot is listed so high, that lawsuit was just wrong. I guess he owns the market on "Spike" huh? I was hoping the network won, but it turns out there was a settlement, wonder how much it cost to have Mr. Lee grace the network with "his name" - what a tool

      He could certainly make a case... until reading this article, I thought he had something to do with the network. Not just because they used the name "Spike," but because the style of their logo reminded me vaguely of something Spike-Lee related (though I'm not sure what).

      And then there's the fact that it's a stupid name for a TV network. The first several times I saw the logo, I thought it was a *show* called Spike TV, because that would make sense.

      --
      Don't you wish your girlfriend was a geek like me?
  2. Since No One Reads the Article by dave+at+hostwerks · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I liked this one. Mental note: avoid McDonald's on Chicago's famed museum campus.

    12 It could be worse. At least they're not selling wolf milk.
    In July, a McDonald's outlet in Chicago's Field Museum is closed by health inspectors who discover that the food preparation area is backed up with raw sewage and that employees have changed the expiration dates on 200 cartons of milk.

    --
    d a v e
    "Hmmm...upgrades."
  3. Re:From the article... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I'll tell you what's dumb about it. They used the word "Philly". If a cheesesteak vendor uses the word "Philly", that is a red flag that the sandwich tastes like dog poo. It is the culinary equivalent to the "As seen on TV" logo.

  4. Re:From the article... by Thud457 · · Score: 5, Interesting
    [QUOTE]
    30 On the plus side, all the applicants were buying Eclipses


    "Anyone, feasibly, given enough time and enough resources, could hack into any system."--Brad Hill, CIO of Dealerskins, a Tennessee firm that hosts websites for car dealerships, confessing in September that the company had exposed 1,000 customers' car-loan applications on an unprotected website. The Dealerskins "hack"--selecting "Source" from Internet Explorer's View menu to examine the webpage's HTML code--takes about a quarter of a second.
    [/QUOTE]

    Nice to know that my internet financial transactions are safe since they're being handled by professionals. (Professional idiots, apparently.)

    --

    the preceding comment is my own and in no way reflects the opinion of the Joint Chiefs of Staff

  5. Did they mention... by ziggy_zero · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Clear Channel's recent decision to replace O'Hare airport as a landmark for the traffic updates in Chicago with the Allstate Arena due to a marketing agreement?

    Clear Channel is worse than the devil.

    --
    I belong to the ______ generation.
  6. Re:SCO is in the 81-90 section? by adamruck · · Score: 3, Interesting

    no way... I would say sco is doing great for having no customers

    now if this was the list of the most unethical companies...... ding ding ding we have a winner

    --
    Selling software wont make you money, selling a service will.
  7. Memory by Sean80 · · Score: 4, Interesting
    What bothers me is that there's no community memory about these sorts of things. Say I have a guy who walks into my office looking to fill a job position I have. How do I know he isn't some scum who ripped off a bunch of little old ladies last year when he was a stocktrader on the floor on the New York Stock Exchange? How do I know he's not the marketing guy who named his car 'Le Masturbation'?

    Maybe that's a role played by HR consulting firms that I'm simply not aware of, but my understanding is that those guys typically search criminal records and so forth.

    Who's up for a web site that catalogs this sort of behaviour, easy to search, for use during recruitment? Otherwise these guys just prey on our lack of communal memory.

  8. Re:SCO is in the 81-90 section? by Tablizer · · Score: 2, Interesting

    no way... I would say sco is doing great for having no customers...now if this was the list of the most unethical companies......

    Agreed. It is not a list of Evil Companies, but companies that make bad business decisions. SCO is shrewed because they went from having a 90% chance of death and 10% chance of mere piddly survivle, to an 80% chance of death and a 20% chance of getting royalties on the second biggest OS in history and being huge. Evilness aside, the second is the smarter choice it appears. At least their future is no worse off for it. Look how many articles and covers SCO has made lately. They were a noboby before.

  9. Re:Here's one... by Politburo · · Score: 2, Interesting

    When you put an (already pressurized) can of Diet Coke into a freezer for more than a few minutes, it typically explodes!

    That's a hell of a freezer for it to happen in 5 minutes or so.

  10. Re:I've got one ... by DAldredge · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Sigh. I miss the old /.

  11. Re:SCO is in the 81-90 section? by zurab · · Score: 2, Interesting
    now if this was the list of the most unethical companies.....


    But people don't know. Just this morning Darl was interviewed on CNN where he painted the picture that those "Linux hackers" are attacking his business. Then he was asked a question about SCO's reward for leads ($250K) - could it be that the "bad guy" could turn someone in just to get the reward?

    Darl's answer was - yeah, potentially... that's what it has come down to, they can't sell Linux, it's free, so they attack us to get the money.

    Not exactly in those words, but same idea. First of all, I don't understand how CNN allowed this kind of interview in the first place; but more importantly, Linux needs more mainstream press (not just tech mainstream) so that all the facts are out there, everyone knows what's going on, and Linux gains even more popularity after the show is over.

    I bet that's not what MS would have been counting on when they donated cash to SCO for their lawsuits.
  12. Re:From the article... by Desert+Raven · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Man, I thought that was the greatest commercial they've done! That line about the milkshakes alone had me laughing.

    Fact: Higher butterfat content makes better ice cream.

    I'll take one Jack in the Box milkshake over a lifetime supply of McD's artificial sludge any day.

    Besides, I like the fact that they don't try to push their stuff off as being health-food. Anyone who eats there with an expectation of it being good for their diet certainly didn't get that impression from JB, and deserves what they get. I like their food, but I'd have to be insane to eat there every day.

  13. Points here by phorm · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Indeed, of all the commercial in the last while this is probably the one most mentioned by my friends. Maybe I just hang around with a bunch of sickos (well, probably), but still it obviously proves that the commercial is getting high visibility.

    You might want to remember, if 10% of people ignore a commercial, 45% of people remember it because they like it, and 45% of people remember it but it bothered them... 90% still remember the commercial and have a company name quite possibly stuck in their head. How many of those will say "I'd never eat there after that aweful commercial?"

    Mindshare works, just look at the SCO fud... even negetive publicity is publicity, though personally I found it somewhat amusing as well.

  14. Re:Taking the Fun out of Life by moosemoose · · Score: 2, Interesting
    i've been in business for over 30 years, the first 10 of which was practicing law in (conservative) orange county california and in los angeles. maybe its just california but in all my years of business i never observed anyone making what i thought were business decisions based on race or gender. i did have one client in the mid 70's who made a derogatory comment about 'jews' and that's been about it. now thats not to say that it doesn't happen. i'm certain that it does. its just that i've seen more examples of reverse racism in the business world.

    on the other hand, i have heard plenty of racist and sexist comments made by (1) the elderly (most of whom have now passed) and (2) the poor. in fact it seems to me that the last great reservoirs of racism in this country are the trailer park and the truck stop. given the fact that most racists and sexists are fairly nasty and above all STUPID people, why do people find it so easy to believe that racists or sexists can rise to a level of power where they can fire or hire within business organizations?

    --
    the real evil is not what people think - its how people think