Superbowling
An assortment of Super Bowl tidbits: Supposedly sports gambling sites are being threatened with denial of service attacks if they don't pay protection money - also a Reuters story. Infinitus writes "The NFL's legal firm has a PDF up that outlines the NFL's intellectual property rights to words like 'Super Bowl' and 'NFL'. Including a neat little chart that tells you what you can and can't say..." VeggiePossum23 writes "Panthers Upset Patriots, 29 to 21... at least in the Sony Sponsored '989 Sports Game Before the Game' played on NFL Gameday 2004 on the PS2 Console. This annual event, held Wednesday night in Houston, has a perfect 8-year track record of picking the winner of the Super Bowl. Carolina Panthers Wide Receiver Steve Smith controlled the Panthers, winning an upset victory against New England Patriots' Wide Out Troy Brown, also controlling his own team." lordbyron writes "CBS is doing a SuperBowl of commercials that will include a vote for the best commercial in history. You can watch the top 10 now and make sure that you vote at 9pm on Sunday 1/31. It includes some classics like the Apple commercial and the exploding mosquitos from Tabasco."Wing Bowl.--->
Pretty potent/A. non-sex non-beer ad with only one statement in it.
Pretty effective ad no matter what you US Political viewpoint is.
As a rock-in-roll Physicist once said, No matter where you go, there you are.
The gambling sites are in a legal grey area, in that often what they're doing would be illegal in the countries of the participants, but the organization is outside the jurisdiction of the united states/europe/whatever. So in that sense, the extorters may also be working in a legal grey area where they won't see much investigation or pressure from the western world to stop their extortion.
That had nothing to do with the ad, it has to do with the fact that TV networks don't air "issue ads," or political ads not endorsing a certain political candidate. Basically, they're too controversial and the networks don't want to show anything that might make people want to change the channel. Yup, sucks, but that's the way things work. And this has nothing to do with the first amendment, CBS is a corporation, the first amendment only applies to the government. It would only be illegal if the FCC or Congress passed a law prohibiting issue ads on TV.
Argh...I love it. I post a corrective post, and end up screwing up what I was correcting in it...
The CBS special airs tonight, Saturday, 1/31, at 9 PM EST.
"Mod, mod, mod...and another troll bites the dust."
No, tonight is not the 1st day of the 31st month.
It's 31/1. 31/1, 2004. Or 2004-01-31. Or 31-01-2004.
Use either little endian or big endian. You can't have both at the same time.
Along the same lines, to play football, you need to play with a ball, using your feet.
Any of you folks running linux may not have the best RealPlayer integration in your browsers, so here are the direct links to each of the RealMedia files, with a brief synopsis of each commercial (but no "spoilers").
Slashcode will probably embed spaces in these URLs, so you may have to manually remove them.
I quit watching television about seven or eight years ago. However, I try to catch the Super Bowl every year, if only for the commercials. In fact, I've always told folks that if there was a channel that just played commercials all day, I'd probably tune in to it.
I imagine it could be like VH-1 Classic, with an hour for commercials from the 50s, another from the 60s, etc. Maybe a "groundbreaking" commercials hour. Maybe one with ads from various countries.
I'd tune in, anyway.
Graham "Teach" Mitchell, computer science teacher, Leander HS
Perhaps you should check again. From 17 USC 110:
I've been involved with copyright issues for over 25 years and I've seen the Copyright Act go from a fairly straightforward document to one that's filled with exemptions and intentional loopholes, some that actually benefit the consumer at the expense of corporate interests. Those are the minority, to be sure, but they're in there.
k.
"In spite of everything, I still believe that people are really good at heart." - Anne Frank
http://www.ustreas.gov/education/fact-sheets/taxes /fed-debt.html
y ears shows that the total public debt increased from 5,674,178,209,886.86 on 09/29/2000 to 6,783,231,062,743.62 on 09/30/2003.
What's very telling is that from 1992 to 1996 the national debt rose 1.3 TRILLION dollars. From 1996 to 2004 is rose that same amount.
So Clinton raises the debt 1.3 trillion in 4 years and another 500 billion in his second term. From 2000 to present the debt was raised another 500 billion dollars.
So where is the 1 Trillion that Bush is responsible for?
That site shows estimates, not facts, for years after 1999. That's considerably out of date and doesn't include sweeping changes in tax lawas since then.
http://www.publicdebt.treas.gov/opd/opdpdodt.htm#
Oceana is our ally and always has been.
Go back to watching your TV, citizens.
You are in error. No-one is screaming. Thank you for your cooperation.