The article has confused wording
by
mjrauhal
·
· Score: 5, Informative
This is not about UserLinux including KDE or supporting it. This is about Perens LLC offering support for UserLinux with KDE added on for paying customers. Perens has always maintained that this is an option for any support provider, as any support provider may offer support for, say, UserLinux with MySQL added on.
This also means that a service provider supporting UserLinux does not have to support KDE (or MySQL for that matter) to live up to their advertising.
Re:Perens LLC
by
_Pinky_
·
· Score: 5, Informative
I'm just guessing all this animosity toward Bruce is done without the recollection of how much he has given back to the opensource community...
He co-founded the Open Source Initiative with ESR..
He was a primary author of the Debian Social Contract..
He helped introduce Linux into the main stream corporate world by being a Linux proponent at HP.
He stood his ground, touting Linux over Microsoft, with disregard toward his employment with HP...
He routinely has showed up any SCO claims...
He often posts here on slashdot!
And, my favorite, he authored ElectricFence, which many of us have used...
And there are probably many, MANY other contributions he has given which I have overlooked..
So please, do give some consideration toward what he has done for all of the Linux community...
Re:Nothing new here
by
TrentC
·
· Score: 5, Informative
You seem to be confusing "Bruce Perens notes that he has a customer who wants a UserLinux system with KDE, which he will provide" with "UserLinux will offer both GNOME by default and KDE as an option".
This is not a change for the UserLinux project. GNOME is still the only officially supported desktop environment for the project, and Perens has said all along that providers using UserLinux can customize the distro however their customers want.
Jay (=
Re:QT license issues
by
tackat
·
· Score: 5, Informative
> As a software developer, you are better > with Gnome or Microsoft than with QT.
This would be correct if the cost of the Qt license would actually matter compared to the benefits you get by actually using Qt.
In reality the licensing costs for Qt are being weight out by the advantages that you get when using Qt and amortize within less than a month.
Just guess why companies like Adobe, Ati, Boeing, BP, Daimler Chrysler, Disney, Fujitsu, General Electric, Hitachi, Honda, HP, IBM, Intel, Motorola, NASA, NEC, Samsung, Sharp, Shell, Siemens, Sony, Toshiba, Toyota are actually using Qt already for their products.
> But if you want to see Adobe Photoshop on Linux,... you are wrong concerning this as well. Adobe already _does_ use Qt for their Adobe PhotoAlbum and there are rumors that they will use it for their other software as well.
This is not about UserLinux including KDE
or supporting it. This is about Perens LLC offering
support for UserLinux with KDE added on for paying
customers. Perens has always maintained
that this is an option for any support provider,
as any support provider may offer support for,
say, UserLinux with MySQL added on.
This also means that a service provider supporting UserLinux
does not have to support KDE (or MySQL for that
matter) to live up to their advertising.
And there are probably many, MANY other contributions he has given which I have overlooked..
So please, do give some consideration toward what he has done for all of the Linux community...
You seem to be confusing "Bruce Perens notes that he has a customer who wants a UserLinux system with KDE, which he will provide" with "UserLinux will offer both GNOME by default and KDE as an option".
This is not a change for the UserLinux project. GNOME is still the only officially supported desktop environment for the project, and Perens has said all along that providers using UserLinux can customize the distro however their customers want.
Jay (=
> As a software developer, you are better
... you are wrong concerning this as well.
> with Gnome or Microsoft than with QT.
This would be correct if the cost of the Qt license would actually matter compared to the benefits you get by actually using Qt.
In reality the licensing costs for Qt are being weight out by the advantages that you get when using Qt and amortize within less than a month.
Just guess why companies like Adobe, Ati, Boeing, BP, Daimler Chrysler, Disney, Fujitsu, General Electric, Hitachi, Honda, HP, IBM, Intel, Motorola, NASA, NEC, Samsung, Sharp, Shell, Siemens, Sony, Toshiba, Toyota are actually using Qt already for their products.
> But if you want to see Adobe Photoshop on Linux,
Adobe already _does_ use Qt for their Adobe PhotoAlbum and there are rumors that they will use it for their other software as well.
Tackat