Slashdot Mirror


SCO Adds Copyright Claim to IBM Suit

An anonymous reader writes "News.com.com reports that the SCO Group has significantly widened its Unix and Linux lawsuit against IBM, adding a copyright infringement claim to the already complicated case." There's also another story discussing the copyright claims.

22 of 444 comments (clear)

  1. You'd think... by grasshoppa · · Score: 4, Funny

    ...they'd have to ask Novell's permission before they go sue IBM for Novell's copyrights. ;)

    --
    Mod me down with all of your hatred and your journey towards the dark side will be complete!
  2. Another? by paranode · · Score: 5, Funny

    Adding a copyright infringement claim? They wouldn't dare!

  3. Go SCO! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Funny

    As a shareholder and a proud parent of a shareholder of SCO Group International, I welcome this step. With millions of Linux systems installed over the world, the value of the company that sells $699 licenses is within billions of dollars.

    Let's make SCO the largest company on the planet and show those boys from Redmond how Windoze is buggy and insecure! Let's sell more SCO-compliant Linux boxes! Go Linux! Go SCO!

    1. Re:Go SCO! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Funny

      True!

      It's well know that kernel of the Linux operating system was written by young consultant Darl McBride while in college. He left it on the FTP server only to see some Finnish jerks download it and rename it. This chart undoubtedly proves that SCO has a stable position in the market and that Wall Street rewards young entrepreneurs with the guts to go against big guys like IBM, even though Slashdot has a heard mentality and would support IBM on any issue.

  4. New Additions to SCO's Legal Team by ackthpt · · Score: 5, Funny
    In light of new developments, SCO has expanded their legal team to include two well known icons:

    Stimpy: "Hey, Ren, if we keep piling things onto the suit, we'll never lose because it'll go on for ever."
    Ren: "Stimpy! you're a genious!"
    Stimpy: "All we have to do is keep finding investors to underwrite the suits, because if SCO runs out of money we'll have to find someone else to represent."
    Ren: "So geet back to woork, you eediot!"

    --

    A feeling of having made the same mistake before: Deja Foobar
    1. Re:New Additions to SCO's Legal Team by Pakaran2 · · Score: 5, Funny

      They're Darl and the Brain, they're Darl and the Brain, one is a genius, the other is insane, they're Darl, Darl and the Brain, brain, brain, brain, brain, brain (fade out, and switch to SCO headquarters).

      Darl: So, what are going to do tonight, Brain?
      Brain: The same thing we do every night, Darl, try to sue IBM!
      Darl: But we did that already, and we're losing!
      Brain: Don't worry, Darl, this time we're going to make it. Using our copyrighted Lunix code, I have created an automatic evidence generator!
      ***Brain sits down at odd-looking contraption, and types in "cat /dev/urandom > /dev/lp"
      ***Contraption begins spitting paper.
      Brain: Ok, Darl, now you go take this evidence down to legal, and the judge doesn't understand technology, so he'll be impressed at all the evidence we've gathered.
      Darl: Okey dokey, Brain, here I go!
      ***Darl picks up stack of paper, which is covered with vaguely code-like control characters and things, and carries it out door.

      ***Fade to black
      Big scrolling letters appear: In next week's episode, Darl and the Brain try to cope with the discovery that their claimed Lunix code is actually a screenshot from the Ancient Unix version of Nethack - be sure to tune in!

  5. courts by Dreadlord · · Score: 5, Funny

    looks like it won't take long until we see something like this in courts.

    --
    The IT section color scheme sucks.
  6. Re:Bluff bluff bluff by Deitheres · · Score: 5, Funny

    The problem comes when the owner of the wall has coated it with teflon.

    --
    Just like driving a car:
    (D) to go forward
    (R) to go backward

  7. Darls claims IBM kicked his dog by l0ungeb0y · · Score: 5, Funny

    Immediately following the addition of the copyright infringement claims, Darl McBride announced that his dog fluffy, a 3 year old pomeranian had been kicked and severely injured. McBride citing his suspicions of IBM being the culprit planned to add his veterinarian bills as well as an unspecified monetary claim for emotional distress. "Poor Fluffy will never be the same again" Darl was quoted as saying from his Lindon Utah office

  8. News Flash by dduardo · · Score: 5, Funny

    As SCO's stock price continues to plumet amid growing speculation that their whole lawsuit lacks merit....

    Wait, this just in...SCO has just upped the lawsuit agianst IBM to 100 trillion dollars...

    ...My God, look at that stock price rise!

    (Back at SCO headquarters)

    Darl: MUAHAHAHAHAHA

    -------------

  9. Re:[OT] The court hearing today by Tackhead · · Score: 5, Funny
    > And apparently IBM's lawyers wiped the floor with SCO's counsel

    What that IBM lawyer did is an outrage.

    I urge every Slashdotter with an ounce of human decency to donate via paypal to PETCF (People for the Ethical Treatment of Courtroom Floors) today.

    No courtroom floor should ever have to be subjected to that sort of filth.

  10. Re:In related news.com by Waffle+Iron · · Score: 4, Funny

    The new figure is due to the effects of "Darl's Law", which states that on average the damage claims of a lawsuit doubles every 5 months.

  11. They HAD to, you know by Doug+Merritt · · Score: 5, Funny
    They HAD to find some reason to bring the suit up to $5 billion, you know...

    They calculated the projected future losses caused by ill will generated in potential customers, losses from counter-lawsuits, contempt of court fees for frivolous lawsuits and fraud, etc, and the previous $3 billion they were asking for wasn't enough to cover it.

    --
    Professional Wild-Eyed Visionary
  12. Best part of the hearing... by TrentC · · Score: 4, Funny

    ...is when Mark Heise, counsel for SCO at this hearing, was asked why SCO needed IBM's source code to AIX to determine if there is any infringement occuring, when SCO has certified that Sun and HP are not infringing without having shown any source code.

    Heise replied (not sure of the exact quote, transcript isn't available yet) "As for HP, there is a fundamental difference in that they haven't said they are contributing to Linux". Dave Marriott, counsel for IBM at the hearing, replied that HP has, in fact, contributed to Linux.

    Talk about not having done your homework...

    Jay (=

  13. Re:[OT] The court hearing today by Hentai · · Score: 5, Funny

    Where did they find 300 million lines of Linux code to begin with, much less 300 million infringing lines?

    REUTERS, 3/1/04:

    In a stunning reversal today, SCO (NASDAQ SCOX) has announced that due to a 'minor technical error', it has been looking at the wrong source tree all along.

    "Funny enough, we came across the actual copyrights in the code headers, and discovered it wasn't Linux at all! We were kinda confused ourself when we saw 300 million lines of violating code in a piece of software that only has 30 million lines of code or so, but it all started making since once we realized we were actually looking at a copy of the Windows NT kernel!", Darl McBride told reporters on Tuesday.

    "This represents a complete shift in strategy for us. We have bigger fish to fry, this time. Incidentally, Linus might want to take a look at this too - one of the main reasons we were confused for so long was the amount of Linux code mixed in with ours."

    A representative from IBM told the press, "We completely understand the confusion, and look forward to working together with SCO to remedy the situation."

    Steve Balmer was unavailable for comment, but sources close to the Microsoft (NYSE MSFT) chairman report him as having said, "Oh, FUCK".

    God, please grant me just this one wish before I die... just let this come true.

    --
    -Hentai [in vita non pacem est]
  14. SCO.com copyright page does not exist! by VisorGuy · · Score: 4, Funny

    <defense style=chewbaca>
    Hey! Look over here!

    Browse to sco.com and mouse over the Company nav menu at the top and select the bottom entry for "Open Letter on Copyrights" and note that it doesn't exist.

    Therefore you must acquit!!
    </defense>

    ;-P
    --
    This user account is inactive account replaced by the PDA
  15. My favourite article headline.. by wo1verin3 · · Score: 4, Funny
    My favourite article headline so far has to be from SiliconValley.com

    SCO files for temporary restraining order against reality

  16. Re:Bluff bluff bluff by Pakaran2 · · Score: 5, Funny

    Basically SCO ends up looking stupid again.

    Can the judge moderate them -1 redundant?

  17. Re:Bluff bluff bluff by jcuervo · · Score: 4, Funny
    Can the judge moderate them -1 redundant?
    Their karma already sucks. :-)
    --
    Assume I was drunk when I posted this.
  18. Re:Bluff bluff bluff by Lonath · · Score: 5, Funny

    Nope, the problem is when the "wall" is really one part of one blade of a giant fan and the owner finally decides to turn it on.

  19. What happened to Darl??? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Funny

    Looking at Darl's picture on the SLTrib article, he looks absolutely terrible. Worse than Brando showing up to shoot Apacolypse Now. It's almost as if... (horrors!) he's got Philipkahnosis!

    Yes, this dreaded sickness attacks increasingly useless technology executives. It manifests itself by eating their soul, and as the infection spreads, it releases large amounts of noxious gas, resulting in a foul odor and a "puffy" or "bloated" appearance. Medical scientists believe that frequent contact with attorneys, tape worms, or other parasites may increase the risk of contracting Philipkahnosis.

  20. It's our birthday, we'll *gollum* if we wants to by Zenmonkeycat · · Score: 4, Funny
    April 11, 2005: SCO and IBM go to trial
    April 12, 2005: I get a birthday present when the judge tells SCO to go f*** itself with a rusty shovel.

    "We rule in favor of the Defendant, and order SCO to pay an assload of money to everyone affiliated with Linux development in any way, shape or form. Furthermore, SCO sucks, and should, in the Court's opinion, find a suitable location to perform sexual acts upon itself with poorly-maintained garden equipment. And on part 2, subsection B, I find SCO in contempt of court, and therefore must pay damages to the court in the form of either a fully-trained attack monkey, or two nice dress shirts."

    --

    *****
    Dear Mary,
    I yearn for you tragically,
    A.T. Tappman, Chaplain, U.S. Army.