Slashdot Mirror


When was the Last Time You Used Gopher?

ahuber asks: "As part of a class for LIS 391 @ the University of Illinois, I'm doing a history of the gopher protocol. My intent in this is to track the rise and fall of old technologies in hope that it tells us something about technologies we use today. So, my question to you is: When was the last time you used a gopher server? What did you use it for? And finally, do you miss the gopher now that its virtually gone? While some of you may think this is a silly topic, old and useful technologies are going the way of Gopher every day. One example from my campus is the retiring of the newsgroup server and telnet. Do you have any similar experiences that made you think twice about giving up an older technology?"

36 of 127 comments (clear)

  1. The last time I used Gopher by xagon7 · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Was when I wrote the "Atomic Mp3 Finder" about 2 months before Napster came out.

    It was a piece of shit, as I was still new to development, but was fun, and I learned a TON.

    1. Re:The last time I used Gopher by SpaceLifeForm · · Score: 3, Funny
      Nice to hear that *you* learned a TON.

      According to Julie, she learned very little the last time she used Gopher,
      but she was desperate as Doc and Captain Stubing were busy.

      --
      You are being MICROattacked, from various angles, in a SOFT manner.
  2. Are there any benifits of Gopher vs the Web? by T-Ranger · · Score: 3, Interesting
    I remember using Gopher back in 1994 via Lynx on a text based dialup. Even viewing both via text, the web was infinitly better. While it may not be a requirement of the technology, all the gopher sites I went to were hierarchically based, with no cross linking. Some data hadent been webified, so gopher was still usefull, but it sucked.

    Are there any benifits of Gopher over http/html at all?

    1. Re:Are there any benifits of Gopher vs the Web? by 0x0d0a · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Are there any benifits of Gopher over http/html at all?

      It's simpler, and has lighter client interface and system requirements. It's pretty fast. It's easier to implement a gopher client properly (one of the reasons I liked gopher back in the day was because lynx was so blinking unstable).

  3. a bit of time ago by eamonman · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Jeez, I last used a gopher client nine years ago, when I was an incoming frosh in college and had no idea what http, ftp, or gopher meant. I recall that at the time, people were still using gopher for researching things, but that was quickly tapering off. We all were starting to use web search engines like infoseek or lycos or altavista (or was that more recent) to do research for school projects.

    --
    0- Eamonman Proud member of DNRC
  4. About two weeks ago by keesh · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I was testing out mozilla's gopher:// handler. It actually works :)

    1. Re:About two weeks ago by caseih · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Until recently, BYU had totally forgotten about their gopher server which was running without any changes for the last 7 years or so. gopher://gopher.byu.edu. I don't know if it is down now, or is just firewalled off.

  5. '93 - back when I was writing pages for it. by Kris_J · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I was working on Gopher pages for the University Computer Club at UWA over 10 years ago now. Can't say that I miss it. HTML/HTTP is everything Gopher was and so much more.

  6. Back when I was a Golden Gopher myself by Saganaga · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I think the only time I used Gopher was when I was a student back at the University of Minnesota (whose mascot, the Golden Gopher, provided the inspiration for the protocol's name for those at the U of M who developed it). I think that was 1992 or '93.

    It didn't really make too much of an impression on me, though. I dimly remember that is was a very rigidly hierarchical menu-based system, difficult to use if you didn't know where in the hierarchy to look. But that's about all I remember.

    Wikipedia has a good article on Gopher.

    1. Re:Back when I was a Golden Gopher myself by yelvington · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Actually, the hierarchy was NOT rigid. Any node on the tree could point to any Gopher address, so the navigational scheme could be a network and not merely a tree. However, text resources were by definition just text files, and were leaf nodes as a result. They couldn't point anywhere else.

      The big breakthroughs of the Web were the ability to embed a hypertext link at any abitrary location in text, and the ability to embed images (introduced by Mosaic).

      The Gopher model was excellent for a narrowband world. It was a tremendous breakthrough in a darkness where we all had to "just know" Telnet addresses like nyx.du.edu and FTP addresses like tsx-11.mit.edu. It worked great on a plain-text terminal. And it pioneered a lot of things that later made the Web usable, such as link-integrated search engines (Archie, which searched FTP archives, and Veronica, which searched Gopherspace).

      If the cellphone companies weren't so self-destructively larcenous, they would have used Gopher instead of creating that awful WAP/WML mess.

    2. Re:Back when I was a Golden Gopher myself by 0x0d0a · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Wow...I'm pretty sure that the Mac OS TurboGopher supported bookmarks.

      I was really into getting a gopher server going a few years back. It took some work to even get one to compile on a current Red Hat system, and the setup is a pain in the ass compared to, say, Apache. There's been some resurgence of work on gopher recently, oddly enough, so it may be possible to use gopherd without trouble.

      As someone else pointed out, gopher would be *phenomenal* for cell phones. It's lightweight, it doesn't push the capabilities, it uses text, arrow keys, and number keys...it's really pretty much perfect for cells. Unfortunately, there's enough Web-based infrastructure in place that I don't think that that's going to happen.

  7. Rutgers University in 1992-94 by Unholy_Kingfish · · Score: 3, Interesting
    My first and last experience was at Rutgers University. At the time Rutgers had lots on info running over Gopher for school stuff. But even then WWW was taking over as THE source for information. Every Comp Sci major (back then it meant programming only) was learning this new language called HTML. We spent more time doing stuff with that than actual work. Not to mention some hacking of the schools network.

    Gopher seemed very antiquated since this new HTML thing allowed you to do the same stuff as Gopher, but also format it, use different text sizes and WOW... pictures. We downloaded this thing called Netscape and opened a text editor and went at it. Anyone at the school that had a "Computer" account could post these so called "web pages" to their personl storage space. It was a very generous amount of space too, 2 MB. We were amazed, we could put almost two 3 1/4 floppies worth of useless stuff there for everyone to see.

    --
    Fear Is the Only God
    1. Re:Rutgers University in 1992-94 by IMSoP · · Score: 2, Informative

      erm, do you mean either Mosaic or Netscape , by any chance? Mozilla didn't become the name of a browser until some time around 1998, by which time I'm pretty sure there were plenty of HTTP servers around...

  8. waaay back... by Balthisar · · Score: 2, Interesting

    in 1996 was the last time I used a gopher server. Also 1996 was the first time I'd used a gopher server. To me (an enlisted soldier in the US Army) the internet was a brand new thing for me and I used everything I could get my hands on. I'd just dumped AOL (yeah, yeah, I was an AOL'er for a year, and that's when they charged per minute) for this internet thing.

    I remember that the gopher program for my Mac Colour Classic had a gopher in a really nifty pair of sunglasses. But it turns out I just didn't gopher very much -- Archie and/or Veronica (am I remembering right?) found everything I needed on FTP, and this is when the web was getting popular -- my first browser was Mosaic.

    All this, and I'm a relative late starter to the internet compared to most of the /. crowd (and an really early adopter in my own crowd).

    --
    --Jim (me)
  9. quux.org by Hajoma · · Score: 5, Informative

    There's a fantastic archive at gopher.quux.org . I don't think there's anything there which isn't accessible on the Web, but it's nice to see something useful on Gopher.

    The best thing about this site is that it's still accessible when our shonky Web cache breaks. If you're incapable of doing any work without the Web, at least you can read Project Gutenberg, the Jargon File, or the Internet Oracle archives from here.

    (BTW: there are a few broken selectors on this site at the moment; unfortunately some of the most useful stuff. Hopefully it'll be fixed soon.)

  10. A useful resource by IMSoP · · Score: 5, Informative

    I've never used gopher myself (other than for seeing what it looked like), but you may all want to check out Floodgap Gopher-HTTP Proxy

    And yes, you do need a proxy, as just about all modern browsers (yes, even Mozilla) don't render gopher correctly - compare your browser with what it should look like.

    And naturally, the proxy links to lots of still-existent gopherspaces, for all you wondering if there are any still out there...

  11. Two Days Ago :) by HRbnjR · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Some people on a local board I visit were complaining about inflamatory threads being deleted, cencorship, and all that... so I was searching for good info on Canadian Defamation law, and found this:

    gopher://insight.mcmaster.ca/11/org/efc

  12. not so long ago... by Zapper · · Score: 2, Insightful

    'bout two weeks ago. One those "wonder if it's still working" momemnts. Any interesting gopher:// URLS out there?

    --
    So much to do, so little bandwidth.
    --
    Try Mozilla
  13. Back when I was in college by Smack · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I was home for the summer and wanted to check my mail, but we didn't have an ISP (back in 1995). So I called in to my local library's system, which they put out so you could use databases and stuff remotely. They allowed you to get into Gopher from there. I dug around until I found a telnet gateway and used that to log into my college account all summer. The tricky part was that there was no way to directly go to an address, by typing in a URL or something. So you had to follow links all the way from my little library's server in NJ to this gateway in Germany or something.

  14. 10 Minutes Ago by ev1lcanuck · · Score: 2, Informative

    For the first (and probably last) time I used it to look at gopher://sdf.lonestar.org/. I was mostly curious and found the gopher site through Vivisimo It's pretty cool and works great over dialup. I used Mozilla Firebird 0.7 to access it.

  15. how odd by Tumbleweed · · Score: 3, Insightful

    > One example from my campus is the retiring of the newsgroup server and telnet.

    Okay, see, gopher being retired is one thing - we have a superior (far superior) replacement. There _is_ no obviously-superior replacement for NNTP yet, and the only superior replacement for telnet is secure telnet.

    The interfaces of web forum software are still leagues behind that of a decent NNTP client, and what are you going to do when you need the functionality of telnet?

    Bizarre decision.

    1. Re:how odd by Brynath · · Score: 4, Insightful
      Ummm,

      SSH?

    2. Re:how odd by lambent · · Score: 2, Informative

      Telnet is an awful, awful protocl that shound never have been implemented, right from the start. Unless you're running an extremely resource-poor platform and need remote console access, there's no defendable reason to use it.

      *cough*

      As for NNTP ... where else would we get our daily giga-dose of free pr0n from?

  16. What about Archie? by Tye_Informer · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Last time I successfully used gopher was college ('96). I have tried a few times recently because gopher was a little more precise than google or the like.
    Archie is the tool I miss the most though. Need a file, know the filename, archie will find a dozen places that the file exists. Now you are tied to ad-supported search sites that make you jump through hoops to download a file from another ad-supported site that makes you jump through more hoops!

    Data is disappearing off the net, and the data that is still there is becoming impossible to find because of the search engine rankings. Give me the raw data and let me do the ranking. I am the one that knows what I'm looking for.

  17. not quite true by IMSoP · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I was testing out mozilla's gopher:// handler. It actually works :)

    Actually, no it doesn't - try comparing this gopher link with this html proxied version - not the same, I think you'll agree.

  18. Example site I found by sahrss · · Score: 2, Informative

    Doubtless someone will come up with a whole list, so please be gentle with the mods, but I managed to find one Gopher site (viewing with Moz Firebird):

    gopher://gopher.umsl.edu/

  19. gopher? by jforr · · Score: 2, Funny


    You mean that damn *mumble mumble* gopher isn't dead yet? I thaught I gawt im wiph dah bunny c-4. That does it, I'm getting mydoom's gophinator 3000 and ending this once and for all. god damn *mumble mumble* gopher ruining my gauf course.

  20. Cooler business cards by JMax · · Score: 2, Funny

    The thing I miss most about gopher is that you got to say that you were the "gophermaster" -- that's gotta be 5x cooler than "webmaster" any day.

  21. I used gopher to get access to telnet by astrashe · · Score: 2, Interesting

    My first internet account was on a unix freenet called Nyx, which was run by a guy named Andrew Burt at Denver University.

    When I first started to use my account, I could dial a local university number, and connect to a telnet prompt. There wasn't even any authentication.

    Eventually they closed that down, but kept access to the library card catalogue open to the public. You could use the card catalog to get to the gopher tree, and from there I could find a telnet link to Nyx.

    I downloaded my first linux distro using kermit through a telnet connection opened via gopher. It was the old MCC distro, which came on a series of floppy disks.

    For me, gopher was more of a means than an end in itself. I didn't spend a lot of time reading stuff on gopher. I did search for telnet links to nyx, which were always moving around (or getting shut down).

    I don't miss gopher at all, because you can think of a gopher menu as a special case of a web page. Every gopher menu can be expressed as a web page, and of course web pages can do lots of stuff that gopher menus can't.

    The first wave of consumer or hobbyist internet use was focused on shell accounts, many of which were on netcom -- you'd dial in with a terminal program, so you didn't have a tcp/ip stack on the computer you were sitting at, and nothing was graphical. Gopher worked well in that world, because it was something that a terminal program could handle.

  22. Re:What, exactly did gopher do? by dougmc · · Score: 3, Informative
    gopher was basically like the WWW, but all text -- no pictures.

    Archie searched ftp sites for a given file. There was a central server that polled all the known sites occasionally, and it handled your requests.

    Veronica indexed gopher sites, much like google does web sites.

    Of course, you could have learned all this much faster by just using google.

  23. Usenet and telnet by dougmc · · Score: 2, Interesting
    One example from my campus is the retiring of the newsgroup server and telnet.
    This is a pretty poor example. Usenet has hardly died out -- in fact, I'd guess that more people are using it now than at any other time. The percentage of people online using it is probably lower than it has ever been since it's inception, but with so many people out there, there's still a lot of people using it.

    (Granted, many (most?) are using it for porn and warez, but that was probably true 10 years ago too.)

    As for telnet, ssh is much more like telnet than WWW is like gopher. I doubt many people lament the loss of telnet access (it having been replaced with ssh) ... but going from gopher to the WWW is a very different transition. WWW is everything that gopher wasn't, but gopher had a certain charm that escapes most of the WWW.

    As for when I last used gopher? A few weeks ago, actually. Somebody mentioned it, and I wondered if browsers still supported it (I remember how Mosaic would support it) ... and Mozilla does!

  24. I remember clearly when I last used gopher by nomadic · · Score: 4, Funny

    It was the time I caught the ferry over to Shelbyville. I needee a heel for my shoe, so I decided to go to Morganville, which is what they called Shelbyville in those days. So I tied an onion to my belt, which was the style at the time. Now to take the ferry cost a nickel, and in those days, nickels had pictures of bumblebees on them. 'Give me five bees for a quarter' you'd say. Now where were we?

  25. Gopher left a bad taste in my mouth.... by JGski · · Score: 4, Interesting
    The last time was about when gopher+ came out (not sure of the date). The changes to the license pushed me from being a gopher enthusiast into becoming a web enthusiast and gopher-hater. By accident of employment I was on the wrong side of the new UMinn license, despite working on an open-source derivative that was going to be open-source itself.

    I had been working on a C++ version of gopherd and gopher back then. UMinn legal pulled a nasty one on loyal users and contributors: if you were a commerical user or coming from a .com domain, you have to pay us. They claimed to own the protocol so even separate development would cost. It wasn't based on what you did with it or what you added to it like most of today's open source licenses, just the "color" of your domain. Definitely an open license moving to a closed license.

    The commerical-academic-government balkanization was quite strong on the internet back then. No advertising allowed. You had to be careful about regular discussion sometimes (Will this post be seen as an innocent "product support" answer or would it perceived as disallowed commercial speech?). A lot of the nostalgic "gentility" of the old Internet was due to this kind of self-censorship.

    At the time the web seemed more (and unnecessarily) complicated as a technology (remember we had just ftp, telnet, usenet and e-mail to compare it against). However, more importantly, there were no 2nd class citizen clauses on the license unlike gopher+.

    The UMinn license changes pushed me to research web and html further, which I might not have done otherwise - which was financially rewarding a few short years later. I know other folks had a similar reaction and experience. I shutdown all my gopher servers and converted the content to html.

  26. MozillaFirebird 0.7 by SanityInAnarchy · · Score: 2, Informative

    Mozilla Firebird 0.7 works just fine. The only difference is that it puts a giant honking message at the top to tell you it's a Gopher page, whereas the proxy puts links at the bottom to link back to the proxy.

    If anyone cares, I can put up a screenshot, but I really suggest you just go actually download Mozilla before you run your mouth. (Or is this firebird only?)

    --
    Don't thank God, thank a doctor!
    1. Re:MozillaFirebird 0.7 by SanityInAnarchy · · Score: 2, Interesting

      "just about all modern browsers"

      So I suppose Firebird is out of date? I never suggested it was Mozilla...

      Just because I insult you doesn't mean I'm not thinking, or that you shouldn't.

      --
      Don't thank God, thank a doctor!
    2. Re:MozillaFirebird 0.7 by SanityInAnarchy · · Score: 2, Informative

      Fair enough.

      btw, the only problems I've had with Firebird in a long time is its incompatibility with some Mozilla plugins (plugger, mplayer), but that seems fixed now.

      Back to starcraft :P

      --
      Don't thank God, thank a doctor!