Slashdot Mirror


California Man Sues Penis-Enlargment Firms

Ronin writes "The DenverPost reports that 'A California man on Thursday sued a slew of international companies, including a Greeley distributor, alleging the penis-enlargement products they market and distribute do not work.' One of the highlights of the article is when the man says "I was wondering for a long time why no one has gotten around to suing these penis-enlargement guys, because it seems like a pretty blatant ... fraud." Probably cause people are too embarrased to say they've tried it."

10 of 733 comments (clear)

  1. Doesn't work by ChaoticLimbs · · Score: 5, Insightful

    These things prey on people's desperation and feelings of inadequacy. I mean really, even a tiny dude can score if his head game is good.

    1. Re:Doesn't work by the_ed_dawg · · Score: 5, Insightful

      I think that the most obvious reason to believe that they don't work is the fact that you don't see them in every store in the USA. Let's face it... if they worked, they'd probably be selling better than crack.

      --
      There are two types of people: those prepared for the zombie apocalypse and those who will be eaten.
    2. Re:Doesn't work by JPriest · · Score: 5, Insightful

      It is about time someone went after spammers for false advertisement. If the spammers want to claim that spam is a legit method of marketing than thay can be subject to the same rules and regulations as any other advratisement media.

      --
      Saying Java is nice because it works on all OS's is like saying that anal sex is nice because it works on all genders.
    3. Re:Doesn't work by TRACK-YOUR-POSITION · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Really, isn't that what all human progress is based on?

  2. Re:A new front against Spam by Uber+Banker · · Score: 5, Insightful

    It may be hard to track down the spammers advertising it (and prove a link between them and the retailer) but it is hell-of-easy tracking down the retailer when they accept payments on Visa/Mastercard.

  3. Re:Denver or California? by ikewillis · · Score: 4, Insightful

    It's fairly clear from the article he's a California man suing a Greely, CO firm in Denver, CO, most likely because it's an interstate matter. Greeley is in Weld county... one would assume the suit would take place in the county seat (which I believe is Greeley)... but I don't really know too much in matters of interstate law. Perhaps one of the sides requested a change of venue...

  4. Why Englargment Pills Sell Despite Not Working by $criptah · · Score: 4, Insightful

    From a social engineering point of view, selling penis enlargement pills can bring a very limited amount of loss. Just imagine, you are a guy who is concerned about his manhood. You buy tons of expensive pills to find out that none of them work. Would you advertise it to the rest of the world? Would you have enough balls to tell a sweet young lady on the other side of the phone that your penis is still small despite that four hundred dollars that you have spent in the past six months? Probably not.

    Additionally, you cannot argue when it comes to shady products such as penis enlargement and dieting pills. Usually when you get those items, you get many disclosures that state "Not approved by FDA" and "results may vary." How are you going to argue against that? If you do not believe me, go to any GNC store and get a bottle of any *magic* pills that promise to turn you into a pro-bodybuilder with an eleven-inch manhood. Then read what it says on the bottle... then, if you dare, go and use it. Then go and complain about your results if you find them to be unsatisfactory. At best, everybody is going to laugh at you.

  5. Re:Damn !! by 0x0d0a · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Rich white criminals don't land in pound-me-in-the-ass prisons.

    America's judicial system may be better than a lot of systems around the world, but neither is it free of corruptino.

  6. Here's what I don't understand by Moraelin · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Even the ones hawking these things tell you that the average size for a human is something like 6.1 inches. And that the vast majority of humans have "only" that size.

    So basically guess what? Anyone who "only" has 6 inches -- or is within, say, +/- 10% of that -- is just a perfectly normal member of the human species.

    Why, in Odin's name, would anyone feel desperate and inadequate for being perfectly normal? WTH? Since when it's inadequate to _not_ be a mutant?

    I mean, what next? Spam for pills to grow a 6'th finger on your hands? Or to grow an elephant trunk instead of a nose? Or to grow a giraffe neck?

    The whole thing seems stupid beyond belief to me.

    --
    A polar bear is a cartesian bear after a coordinate transform.
    1. Re:Here's what I don't understand by Civil_Disobedient · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I believe the appropriate reponse might contain the comment, "Karma is a bitch." When Jane Mansfield and Marilyn Monroe were popular in the 50's, women were faced with unrealistic expectations -- and have had cope with lower self-esteem and in some cases increased health risks (implants). Nowadays crap like Sex in the City and Coupling tell guys they will simply not be memorable lovers if they're aren't donkies. Never mind technique. Never mind that most normal women do have an upper bound on "comfortable" size that likely isn't that much larger then the guy in question. No, if you're going to satisfy your woman, you've got to split her in half.

      Ask yourself how many guys would want to date a woman based on her breast size? That's probably a similar number to how many women would go for a larger guy. Now, think about that first number, and subtract how many guys could still have a happy relationship with a woman regardless of her chest?

      In other words, Yes, women care, a few more than others, but not so many that it's causing you to lose potential dates. There are probably other factors that rank far higher (spending all your time on /., for instance).